Searched hist:"40380 a6a" (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd/sys/amd64/amd64/ |
| H A D | cpu_switch.S | 40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
40380a6a Tue Jul 17 22:36:56 GMT 2007 Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> - Optimize the amd64 cpu_switch() TD_LOCK blocking and releasing to
require fewer blocking loops.
- Don't use atomic ops with 4BSD or on UP.
- Only use the blocking loop if ULE is compiled in.
- Use the correct memory barrier.
Discussed with: attilio, jhb, ssouhlal
Tested by: current@
Approved by: re
|