| /qemu/block/ |
| H A D | create.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | raw-format.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | vhdx.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | crypto.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | vdi.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | vpc.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | parallels.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | qcow.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | qed.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | vmdk.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | qcow2.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| /qemu/include/block/ |
| H A D | block-global-state.h | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | block_int-common.h | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
| /qemu/ |
| H A D | block.c | 4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
4db7ba3b Wed May 10 20:35:54 GMT 2023 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked
These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.
Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!
This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|