/qemu/ui/ |
H A D | input-keymap.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
H A D | input-legacy.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
H A D | input.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
H A D | console.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
/qemu/hw/input/ |
H A D | virtio-input-hid.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
H A D | hid.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
H A D | ps2.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|
/qemu/hw/char/ |
H A D | escc.c | 568c73a4 Mon Oct 26 22:34:58 GMT 2015 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> input: Convert to new qapi union layout
We have two issues with our qapi union layout: 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator. 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This leads to spurious collisions if a tag value matches a non-variant member's name.
Make the conversion to the new layout for input-related code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
|