| /openbsd/sys/net/ |
| H A D | route.h | 8c023157 Thu Jan 08 14:29:18 GMT 2015 mpi <mpi@openbsd.org> Factorize various duplicated chunks of (old and horrible) code, checking
for the validity of a given outgoing route entry into a single function.
This change is inspired from FreeBSD r111767. The function introduced
here, rt_checkgate(), should hopefully die in a near future. Why should
it die? Well, it is way too late to do such validity checks: if your
kernel can ends up in ether_output() with an invalid route, please do
not let it try to find a new one that might do the job.
Go read this function if you're wondering why you're getting messages
like:
"arpresolve: X.X.X.X: route without link local address"
Since this horrible logic has survived 20 years of copy & past and small
modifications for workarounds without a single clear commit message, let's
assume it is full of dragons and try to play safe. This factorization is
not intended to change any behavior.
With much inputs from bluhm@, tested by weerd@ and florian@ on setups
with p2p IPv6 interfaces.
ok bluhm@, benno@, florian@
|
| H A D | if_ethersubr.c | 8c023157 Thu Jan 08 14:29:18 GMT 2015 mpi <mpi@openbsd.org> Factorize various duplicated chunks of (old and horrible) code, checking
for the validity of a given outgoing route entry into a single function.
This change is inspired from FreeBSD r111767. The function introduced
here, rt_checkgate(), should hopefully die in a near future. Why should
it die? Well, it is way too late to do such validity checks: if your
kernel can ends up in ether_output() with an invalid route, please do
not let it try to find a new one that might do the job.
Go read this function if you're wondering why you're getting messages
like:
"arpresolve: X.X.X.X: route without link local address"
Since this horrible logic has survived 20 years of copy & past and small
modifications for workarounds without a single clear commit message, let's
assume it is full of dragons and try to play safe. This factorization is
not intended to change any behavior.
With much inputs from bluhm@, tested by weerd@ and florian@ on setups
with p2p IPv6 interfaces.
ok bluhm@, benno@, florian@
|
| H A D | route.c | 8c023157 Thu Jan 08 14:29:18 GMT 2015 mpi <mpi@openbsd.org> Factorize various duplicated chunks of (old and horrible) code, checking
for the validity of a given outgoing route entry into a single function.
This change is inspired from FreeBSD r111767. The function introduced
here, rt_checkgate(), should hopefully die in a near future. Why should
it die? Well, it is way too late to do such validity checks: if your
kernel can ends up in ether_output() with an invalid route, please do
not let it try to find a new one that might do the job.
Go read this function if you're wondering why you're getting messages
like:
"arpresolve: X.X.X.X: route without link local address"
Since this horrible logic has survived 20 years of copy & past and small
modifications for workarounds without a single clear commit message, let's
assume it is full of dragons and try to play safe. This factorization is
not intended to change any behavior.
With much inputs from bluhm@, tested by weerd@ and florian@ on setups
with p2p IPv6 interfaces.
ok bluhm@, benno@, florian@
|
| /openbsd/sys/netinet/ |
| H A D | if_ether.c | 8c023157 Thu Jan 08 14:29:18 GMT 2015 mpi <mpi@openbsd.org> Factorize various duplicated chunks of (old and horrible) code, checking
for the validity of a given outgoing route entry into a single function.
This change is inspired from FreeBSD r111767. The function introduced
here, rt_checkgate(), should hopefully die in a near future. Why should
it die? Well, it is way too late to do such validity checks: if your
kernel can ends up in ether_output() with an invalid route, please do
not let it try to find a new one that might do the job.
Go read this function if you're wondering why you're getting messages
like:
"arpresolve: X.X.X.X: route without link local address"
Since this horrible logic has survived 20 years of copy & past and small
modifications for workarounds without a single clear commit message, let's
assume it is full of dragons and try to play safe. This factorization is
not intended to change any behavior.
With much inputs from bluhm@, tested by weerd@ and florian@ on setups
with p2p IPv6 interfaces.
ok bluhm@, benno@, florian@
|
| /openbsd/sys/netinet6/ |
| H A D | nd6.c | 8c023157 Thu Jan 08 14:29:18 GMT 2015 mpi <mpi@openbsd.org> Factorize various duplicated chunks of (old and horrible) code, checking
for the validity of a given outgoing route entry into a single function.
This change is inspired from FreeBSD r111767. The function introduced
here, rt_checkgate(), should hopefully die in a near future. Why should
it die? Well, it is way too late to do such validity checks: if your
kernel can ends up in ether_output() with an invalid route, please do
not let it try to find a new one that might do the job.
Go read this function if you're wondering why you're getting messages
like:
"arpresolve: X.X.X.X: route without link local address"
Since this horrible logic has survived 20 years of copy & past and small
modifications for workarounds without a single clear commit message, let's
assume it is full of dragons and try to play safe. This factorization is
not intended to change any behavior.
With much inputs from bluhm@, tested by weerd@ and florian@ on setups
with p2p IPv6 interfaces.
ok bluhm@, benno@, florian@
|