Searched hist:"91301 e6e" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd/sys/compat/freebsd32/ |
| H A D | freebsd32_systrace_args.c | 91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
|
| H A D | freebsd32_syscalls.c | 91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
|
| H A D | freebsd32_syscall.h | 91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
|
| H A D | freebsd32_sysent.c | 91301e6e Wed Nov 17 20:12:25 GMT 2021 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> freebsd32: don't implement kldsym
Previously we fell back to sys_kldsym, but because we'd always
mismatch on the version field we'd return EINVAL. A freebsd32
implementation is impossible with the current ABI as there simply
isn't space to store a kernel virtual address in a uint32_t.
Reviewed by: kevans
|