| /freebsd/sys/dev/mlx/ |
| H A D | mlx_pci.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | mlx_disk.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | mlx.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/dev/ida/ |
| H A D | ida.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | ida_pci.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | ida_disk.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/fs/cd9660/ |
| H A D | cd9660_rrip.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | cd9660_lookup.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | cd9660_node.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | cd9660_vnops.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/cam/scsi/ |
| H A D | scsi_targ_bh.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | scsi_pt.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | scsi_target.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/fs/msdosfs/ |
| H A D | msdosfs_lookup.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | msdosfs_fat.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/kern/ |
| H A D | kern_physio.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | subr_disk.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | subr_devstat.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/powerpc/powerpc/ |
| H A D | genassym.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | vm_machdep.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/ufs/ufs/ |
| H A D | ufs_bmap.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/ufs/ffs/ |
| H A D | ffs_subr.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| H A D | ffs_balloc.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/geom/ |
| H A D | geom_ccd.c | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|
| /freebsd/sys/dev/sound/pcm/ |
| H A D | sound.h | 9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
9626b608 Fri May 05 09:59:14 GMT 2000 Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Separate the struct bio related stuff out of <sys/buf.h> into
<sys/bio.h>.
<sys/bio.h> is now a prerequisite for <sys/buf.h> but it shall
not be made a nested include according to bdes teachings on the
subject of nested includes.
Diskdrivers and similar stuff below specfs::strategy() should no
longer need to include <sys/buf.> unless they need caching of data.
Still a few bogus uses of struct buf to track down.
Repocopy by: peter
|