| /freebsd/lib/libc/stdlib/ |
| H A D | qsort_r_compat.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | qsort_r.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | qsort.3 | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | qsort.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | Symbol.map | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | Makefile.inc | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/lib/libc/tests/stdlib/ |
| H A D | qsort_r_compat_test.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | qsort_r_test.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | Makefile | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/sys/dev/bhnd/nvram/ |
| H A D | bhnd_nvram_store_subr.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/lib/libc/gen/ |
| H A D | scandir-compat11.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| H A D | scandir.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/sys/dev/drm2/ |
| H A D | drm_linux_list_sort.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/sys/libkern/ |
| H A D | qsort.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/lib/libproc/ |
| H A D | proc_sym.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/sys/netgraph/ |
| H A D | ng_ppp.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/sys/sys/ |
| H A D | libkern.h | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/include/ |
| H A D | stdlib.h | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|
| /freebsd/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/ |
| H A D | linux_compat.c | af3c7888 Fri Sep 30 22:26:30 GMT 2022 Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the
glibc-based interface.
Unfortunately, the glibc maintainers, despite knowing the existence
of the FreeBSD qsort_r(3) interface in 2004 and refused to add the
same interface to glibc based on grounds of the lack of standardization
and portability concerns, has decided it was a good idea to introduce
their own qsort_r(3) interface in 2007 as a GNU extension with a
slightly different and incompatible interface.
With the adoption of their interface as POSIX standard, let's switch
to the same prototype, there is no need to remain incompatible.
C++ and C applications written for the historical FreeBSD interface
get source level compatibility when building in C++ mode, or when
building with a C compiler with C11 generics support, provided that
the caller passes a fifth parameter of qsort_r() that exactly matches
the historical FreeBSD comparator function pointer type and does not
redefine the historical qsort_r(3) prototype in their source code.
Symbol versioning is used to keep old binaries working.
MFC: never
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem, imp, hps, pauamma
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17083
|