| H A D | name6.c | be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
|
| H A D | getaddrinfo.c | be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
be26adb5 Thu Feb 10 02:59:50 GMT 2000 Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@FreeBSD.org> Let getaddrinfo() and related functions supports traditional IPv4 format
(shortend format, etc)
Current KAME getaddrinfo() supports only d.d.d.d format IPv4
addr. But traditionally inet_aton() and etc support other formats.
(shortend format and octal/deciaml/hex format)
Aboud this,
-As far as the discussion on freebsd-current, many people
think traditional format should also be supported by getaddrinfo().
-X/Open spec requires getaddrinfo() also support those
traditional IPv4 format.
-RFC2553 say nothing about it.
-As the result of confirmation in ietf/ipng list, there is
no clear concensus yet, and the reply was, "RFC2553 update
and X/Open spec will be in sync"
So takeing these conditions into account, I think
getaddrinfo() should also support traditional IPv4 format.
Specified by: Marc Schneiders <marc@oldserver.demon.nl>
Approved by: jkh
|