Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:d406b0bb (Results 1 – 11 of 11) sorted by relevance

/openbsd/usr.bin/true/
H A Dtrue.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/usr.bin/false/
H A Dfalse.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/usr.bin/nohup/
H A Dnohup.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/usr.bin/nice/
H A Dnice.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/bin/pwd/
H A Dpwd.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/sbin/mknod/
H A Dmknod.8d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/bin/echo/
H A Decho.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/usr.bin/time/
H A Dtime.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/usr.bin/which/
H A Dwhich.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/bin/kill/
H A Dkill.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.
/openbsd/bin/test/
H A Dtest.1d406b0bb Tue Jan 06 23:56:18 GMT 2009 jmc <jmc@openbsd.org> i saw the previous was wrong as soon as i committed it: put the
built-in blurb in STANDARDS; we did once have a COMPATIBILITY section
which we merged with STANDARDS, so i think this is appropriate. it
certainly feels better than adding single sentences randomly to the
end of text bodies.