Searched hist:d66ba370 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /freebsd/sys/ufs/ufs/ |
| H A D | ufs_inode.c | d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
|
| /freebsd/sys/ufs/ffs/ |
| H A D | ffs_softdep.c | d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
d66ba370 Fri Jun 22 13:22:37 GMT 2007 Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Fix livelock that could occur when snapshoting UFS with quotas, where
some quota limit was exceeded. Sequence of UFS_VALLOC()/UFS_VFREE()
call there could cause inodeblock to have both freefile and inodedep
dependencies without any inode in the block being marked for write.
Then, softdep_check_suspend() would return EAGAIN forewer.
Force write of inodeblock with allocated freefile softdependency by
setting IN_MODIFIED flag in softdep_freefile and unconditionally calling
UFS_UPDATE() in ufs_reclaim.
Reported by: kris
Debug help and tested by: Peter Holm
Approved by: re (kensmith)
MFC after: 3 weeks
|