Searched hist:d944293d (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /qemu/tests/tcg/s390x/ |
| H A D | exrl-trtr.c | d944293d Mon Jan 11 16:38:44 GMT 2021 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> tests/tcg/s390x: Fix EXRL tests
The current EXRL tests crash on real machines: we must not use r0 as a base
register for trt/trtr, otherwise the content gets ignored. Also, we must
not use r0 for exrl, otherwise it gets ignored.
Let's use the "a" constraint so we get a general purpose register != r0.
For op2, we can simply specify a memory operand directly via "Q" (Memory
reference without index register and with short displacement).
Fixes: ad8c851d2e77 ("target/s390x: add EX support for TRT and TRTR")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210111163845.18148-5-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | exrl-trt.c | d944293d Mon Jan 11 16:38:44 GMT 2021 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> tests/tcg/s390x: Fix EXRL tests
The current EXRL tests crash on real machines: we must not use r0 as a base
register for trt/trtr, otherwise the content gets ignored. Also, we must
not use r0 for exrl, otherwise it gets ignored.
Let's use the "a" constraint so we get a general purpose register != r0.
For op2, we can simply specify a memory operand directly via "Q" (Memory
reference without index register and with short displacement).
Fixes: ad8c851d2e77 ("target/s390x: add EX support for TRT and TRTR")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210111163845.18148-5-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
|