/dragonfly/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/generate/lint/ |
H A D | std64.lnt | 7 -e46 // Compiler supports bitfields other than int
|
/dragonfly/sys/dev/drm/radeon/ |
H A D | cik_reg.h | 237 } bitfields, bits; member
|
/dragonfly/tools/tools/bus_autoconf/ |
H A D | bus_autoconf_format_example.txt | 76 /* NOTE: On big endian machines bitfields are bitreversed. */
|
/dragonfly/contrib/binutils-2.27/gas/doc/ |
H A D | c-vax.texi | 355 @cindex VAX bitfields not supported 356 @cindex bitfields, not supported on VAX
|
H A D | c-i960.texi | 23 @c FIXME! Add Syntax sec with discussion of bitfields here, at least so
|
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/doc/ |
H A D | implement-c.texi | 445 @opindex funsigned-bitfields 447 by the @option{-funsigned-bitfields} option.
|
H A D | trouble.texi | 995 @opindex fsigned-bitfields 996 @opindex funsigned-bitfields 998 dialect with @option{-fsigned-bitfields} and the unsigned dialect with 999 @option{-funsigned-bitfields}. However, this leaves open the question of
|
H A D | invoke.texi | 708 -mno-relax-immediates -mwide-bitfields -mno-wide-bitfields @gol 1859 @item -fsigned-bitfields 1860 @itemx -funsigned-bitfields 1861 @itemx -fno-signed-bitfields 1863 @opindex fsigned-bitfields 1864 @opindex funsigned-bitfields 1865 @opindex fno-signed-bitfields 14951 @item -mwide-bitfields 14952 @itemx -mno-wide-bitfields 14953 @opindex mwide-bitfields [all …]
|
H A D | extend.texi | 4996 Handling of zero-length bitfields: 4998 MSVC interprets zero-length bitfields in the following ways: 5001 @item If a zero-length bitfield is inserted between two bitfields that would 5002 normally be coalesced, the bitfields will not be coalesced. 5067 @item Zero-length bitfields following non-bitfield members are ignored: 5231 definition, specifies that each member (other than zero-width bitfields) 5746 As bitfields are not individually addressable, volatile bitfields may 5747 be implicitly read when written to, or when adjacent bitfields are 5749 bitfields are only partially accessed, if they straddle a storage unit 5750 boundary. For these reasons it is unwise to use volatile bitfields to [all …]
|
H A D | objc.texi | 519 bitfields. It encodes them as @code{b} followed by the size, without
|
H A D | tm.texi | 1258 whether unnamed bitfields affect the alignment of the containing 1264 This target hook should return @code{true} if accesses to volatile bitfields
|
H A D | tm.texi.in | 1236 whether unnamed bitfields affect the alignment of the containing 1242 This target hook should return @code{true} if accesses to volatile bitfields
|
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/config/i386/ |
H A D | i386.opt | 226 mms-bitfields
|
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/c-family/ |
H A D | c.opt | 1012 fsigned-bitfields 1052 funsigned-bitfields
|
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/ |
H A D | target.def | 1158 /* Return true if bitfields in RECORD_TYPE should follow the 1196 /* Return true if anonymous bitfields affect structure alignment. */ 1203 /* Return true if volatile bitfields should use the narrowest type possible.
|
H A D | common.opt | 1207 fstrict-volatile-bitfields
|
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-8.0/gcc/config/i386/ |
H A D | i386.opt | 382 mms-bitfields
|
/dragonfly/contrib/tcsh-6/ |
H A D | complete.tcsh | 133 no-strict-prototype signed-bitfields signed-char this-is-variable \ 134 unsigned-bitfields unsigned-char writable-strings call-saved-reg \
|
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-8.0/gcc/c-family/ |
H A D | c.opt | 1691 fsigned-bitfields 1777 funsigned-bitfields
|
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-8.0/gcc/ |
H A D | target.def | 2212 /* Return true if bitfields in RECORD_TYPE should follow the 2286 /* Return true if anonymous bitfields affect structure alignment. */ 2290 whether unnamed bitfields affect the alignment of the containing\n\ 2296 /* Return true if volatile bitfields should use the narrowest type possible. 2300 "This target hook should return @code{true} if accesses to volatile bitfields\n\
|
H A D | common.opt | 1542 fstrict-volatile-bitfields
|
/dragonfly/contrib/bmake/ |
H A D | ChangeLog | 391 o replace enums with bitfields, this simplifies a lot of code.
|
/dragonfly/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/ |
H A D | changes.txt | 6243 structure since the memory layout of individual bitfields is not defined 11528 For example, bitfields have been completely removed because of their lack 13285 eliminate bitfields entirely because of a lack of portability.
|