Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:bitfields (Results 1 – 23 of 23) sorted by relevance

/dragonfly/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/generate/lint/
H A Dstd64.lnt7 -e46 // Compiler supports bitfields other than int
/dragonfly/sys/dev/drm/radeon/
H A Dcik_reg.h237 } bitfields, bits; member
/dragonfly/tools/tools/bus_autoconf/
H A Dbus_autoconf_format_example.txt76 /* NOTE: On big endian machines bitfields are bitreversed. */
/dragonfly/contrib/binutils-2.27/gas/doc/
H A Dc-vax.texi355 @cindex VAX bitfields not supported
356 @cindex bitfields, not supported on VAX
H A Dc-i960.texi23 @c FIXME! Add Syntax sec with discussion of bitfields here, at least so
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/doc/
H A Dimplement-c.texi445 @opindex funsigned-bitfields
447 by the @option{-funsigned-bitfields} option.
H A Dtrouble.texi995 @opindex fsigned-bitfields
996 @opindex funsigned-bitfields
998 dialect with @option{-fsigned-bitfields} and the unsigned dialect with
999 @option{-funsigned-bitfields}. However, this leaves open the question of
H A Dinvoke.texi708 -mno-relax-immediates -mwide-bitfields -mno-wide-bitfields @gol
1859 @item -fsigned-bitfields
1860 @itemx -funsigned-bitfields
1861 @itemx -fno-signed-bitfields
1863 @opindex fsigned-bitfields
1864 @opindex funsigned-bitfields
1865 @opindex fno-signed-bitfields
14951 @item -mwide-bitfields
14952 @itemx -mno-wide-bitfields
14953 @opindex mwide-bitfields
[all …]
H A Dextend.texi4996 Handling of zero-length bitfields:
4998 MSVC interprets zero-length bitfields in the following ways:
5001 @item If a zero-length bitfield is inserted between two bitfields that would
5002 normally be coalesced, the bitfields will not be coalesced.
5067 @item Zero-length bitfields following non-bitfield members are ignored:
5231 definition, specifies that each member (other than zero-width bitfields)
5746 As bitfields are not individually addressable, volatile bitfields may
5747 be implicitly read when written to, or when adjacent bitfields are
5749 bitfields are only partially accessed, if they straddle a storage unit
5750 boundary. For these reasons it is unwise to use volatile bitfields to
[all …]
H A Dobjc.texi519 bitfields. It encodes them as @code{b} followed by the size, without
H A Dtm.texi1258 whether unnamed bitfields affect the alignment of the containing
1264 This target hook should return @code{true} if accesses to volatile bitfields
H A Dtm.texi.in1236 whether unnamed bitfields affect the alignment of the containing
1242 This target hook should return @code{true} if accesses to volatile bitfields
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/config/i386/
H A Di386.opt226 mms-bitfields
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/c-family/
H A Dc.opt1012 fsigned-bitfields
1052 funsigned-bitfields
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-4.7/gcc/
H A Dtarget.def1158 /* Return true if bitfields in RECORD_TYPE should follow the
1196 /* Return true if anonymous bitfields affect structure alignment. */
1203 /* Return true if volatile bitfields should use the narrowest type possible.
H A Dcommon.opt1207 fstrict-volatile-bitfields
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-8.0/gcc/config/i386/
H A Di386.opt382 mms-bitfields
/dragonfly/contrib/tcsh-6/
H A Dcomplete.tcsh133 no-strict-prototype signed-bitfields signed-char this-is-variable \
134 unsigned-bitfields unsigned-char writable-strings call-saved-reg \
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-8.0/gcc/c-family/
H A Dc.opt1691 fsigned-bitfields
1777 funsigned-bitfields
/dragonfly/contrib/gcc-8.0/gcc/
H A Dtarget.def2212 /* Return true if bitfields in RECORD_TYPE should follow the
2286 /* Return true if anonymous bitfields affect structure alignment. */
2290 whether unnamed bitfields affect the alignment of the containing\n\
2296 /* Return true if volatile bitfields should use the narrowest type possible.
2300 "This target hook should return @code{true} if accesses to volatile bitfields\n\
H A Dcommon.opt1542 fstrict-volatile-bitfields
/dragonfly/contrib/bmake/
H A DChangeLog391 o replace enums with bitfields, this simplifies a lot of code.
/dragonfly/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/
H A Dchanges.txt6243 structure since the memory layout of individual bitfields is not defined
11528 For example, bitfields have been completely removed because of their lack
13285 eliminate bitfields entirely because of a lack of portability.