/* * Copyright (c) 1989 Regents of the University of California. * All rights reserved. * * This code is derived from software contributed to Berkeley by * Edward Wang at The University of California, Berkeley. * * %sccs.include.redist.c% */ #ifndef lint static char sccsid[] = "@(#)xxflush.c 3.6 (Berkeley) 06/06/90"; #endif /* not lint */ #include "ww.h" #include "xx.h" #include "tt.h" xxflush(intr) register intr; { register struct xx *xp, *xq; for (xp = xx_head; xp != 0 && !(intr && wwinterrupt()); xp = xq) { switch (xp->cmd) { case xc_move: if (xp->link == 0) (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg0, xp->arg1); break; case xc_scroll: xxflush_scroll(xp); break; case xc_inschar: (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg0, xp->arg1); tt.tt_nmodes = xp->arg3; (*tt.tt_inschar)(xp->arg2); break; case xc_insspace: (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg0, xp->arg1); (*tt.tt_insspace)(xp->arg2); break; case xc_delchar: (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg0, xp->arg1); (*tt.tt_delchar)(xp->arg2); break; case xc_clear: (*tt.tt_clear)(); break; case xc_clreos: (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg0, xp->arg1); (*tt.tt_clreos)(); break; case xc_clreol: (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg0, xp->arg1); (*tt.tt_clreol)(); break; case xc_write: (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg0, xp->arg1); tt.tt_nmodes = xp->arg3; (*tt.tt_write)(xp->buf, xp->arg2); break; } xq = xp->link; xxfree(xp); } if ((xx_head = xp) == 0) { xx_tail = 0; xxbufp = xxbuf; } (*tt.tt_flush)(); } xxflush_scroll(xp) register struct xx *xp; { register struct xx *xq; top: if (xp->arg0 == 0) return; /* * We handle retain (da and db) by putting the burden on scrolling up, * which is the less common operation. It must ensure that * text is not pushed below the screen, so scrolling down doesn't * have to worry about it. * * Try scrolling region (or scrolling the whole screen) first. * Can we assume "sr" doesn't push text below the screen * so we don't have to worry about retain below? * What about scrolling down with a newline? It probably does * push text above (with da). Scrolling up would then have * to take care of that. * It's easy to be fool proof, but that slows things down. * The current solution is to disallow tt_scroll_up if da or db is true * but cs (scrolling region) is not. Again, we sacrifice scrolling * up in favor of scrolling down. The idea is having scrolling regions * probably means we can scroll (even the whole screen) with impunity. * This lets us work efficiently on simple terminals (use newline * on the bottom to scroll), on any terminal without retain, and * on vt100 style scrolling regions (I think). */ if (xp->arg0 > 0) { if ((xq = xp->link) != 0 && xq->cmd == xc_scroll && xp->arg2 == xq->arg2 && xq->arg0 < 0) { if (xp->arg1 < xq->arg1) { if (xp->arg2 - xp->arg0 <= xq->arg1) { xq->arg0 = xp->arg0; xq->arg1 = xp->arg1; xq->arg2 = xp->arg2; return; } xp->arg2 = xq->arg1 + xp->arg0; xq->arg0 += xp->arg0; xq->arg1 = xp->arg2; if (xq->arg0 > 0) xq->arg1 -= xq->arg0; goto top; } else { if (xp->arg1 - xq->arg0 >= xp->arg2) return; xq->arg2 = xp->arg1 - xq->arg0; xp->arg0 += xq->arg0; xp->arg1 = xq->arg2; if (xp->arg0 < 0) xp->arg1 += xp->arg0; goto top; } } if (xp->arg0 > xp->arg2 - xp->arg1) xp->arg0 = xp->arg2 - xp->arg1; if (tt.tt_scroll_down) { if (tt.tt_scroll_top != xp->arg1 || tt.tt_scroll_bot != xp->arg2 - 1) { if (tt.tt_setscroll == 0) goto down; (*tt.tt_setscroll)(xp->arg1, xp->arg2 - 1); } tt.tt_scroll_down(xp->arg0); } else { down: (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg1, 0); (*tt.tt_delline)(xp->arg0); if (xp->arg2 < tt.tt_nrow) { (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg2 - xp->arg0, 0); (*tt.tt_insline)(xp->arg0); } } } else { xp->arg0 = - xp->arg0; if (xp->arg0 > xp->arg2 - xp->arg1) xp->arg0 = xp->arg2 - xp->arg1; if (tt.tt_scroll_up) { if (tt.tt_scroll_top != xp->arg1 || tt.tt_scroll_bot != xp->arg2 - 1) { if (tt.tt_setscroll == 0) goto up; (*tt.tt_setscroll)(xp->arg1, xp->arg2 - 1); } tt.tt_scroll_up(xp->arg0); } else { up: if (tt.tt_retain || xp->arg2 != tt.tt_nrow) { (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg2 - xp->arg0, 0); (*tt.tt_delline)(xp->arg0); } (*tt.tt_move)(xp->arg1, 0); (*tt.tt_insline)(xp->arg0); } } }