Searched hist:b5a7a057 (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /qemu/include/qemu/ |
| H A D | job.h | diff b5a7a057 Fri Sep 07 13:31:22 GMT 2018 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> blockjob: Lie better in child_job_drained_poll()
Block jobs claim in .drained_poll() that they are in a quiescent state
as soon as job->deferred_to_main_loop is true. This is obviously wrong,
they still have a completion BH to run. We only get away with this
because commit 91af091f923 added an unconditional aio_poll(false) to the
drain functions, but this is bypassing the regular drain mechanisms.
However, just removing this and telling that the job is still active
doesn't work either: The completion callbacks themselves call drain
functions (directly, or indirectly with bdrv_reopen), so they would
deadlock then.
As a better lie, tell that the job is active as long as the BH is
pending, but falsely call it quiescent from the point in the BH when the
completion callback is called. At this point, nested drain calls won't
deadlock because they ignore the job, and outer drains will wait for the
job to really reach a quiescent state because the callback is already
running.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
|
| /qemu/ |
| H A D | job.c | diff b5a7a057 Fri Sep 07 13:31:22 GMT 2018 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> blockjob: Lie better in child_job_drained_poll()
Block jobs claim in .drained_poll() that they are in a quiescent state
as soon as job->deferred_to_main_loop is true. This is obviously wrong,
they still have a completion BH to run. We only get away with this
because commit 91af091f923 added an unconditional aio_poll(false) to the
drain functions, but this is bypassing the regular drain mechanisms.
However, just removing this and telling that the job is still active
doesn't work either: The completion callbacks themselves call drain
functions (directly, or indirectly with bdrv_reopen), so they would
deadlock then.
As a better lie, tell that the job is active as long as the BH is
pending, but falsely call it quiescent from the point in the BH when the
completion callback is called. At this point, nested drain calls won't
deadlock because they ignore the job, and outer drains will wait for the
job to really reach a quiescent state because the callback is already
running.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
|
| H A D | blockjob.c | diff b5a7a057 Fri Sep 07 13:31:22 GMT 2018 Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> blockjob: Lie better in child_job_drained_poll()
Block jobs claim in .drained_poll() that they are in a quiescent state
as soon as job->deferred_to_main_loop is true. This is obviously wrong,
they still have a completion BH to run. We only get away with this
because commit 91af091f923 added an unconditional aio_poll(false) to the
drain functions, but this is bypassing the regular drain mechanisms.
However, just removing this and telling that the job is still active
doesn't work either: The completion callbacks themselves call drain
functions (directly, or indirectly with bdrv_reopen), so they would
deadlock then.
As a better lie, tell that the job is active as long as the BH is
pending, but falsely call it quiescent from the point in the BH when the
completion callback is called. At this point, nested drain calls won't
deadlock because they ignore the job, and outer drains will wait for the
job to really reach a quiescent state because the callback is already
running.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
|