Searched refs:local_to_remote_time_gradient (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
84 if (conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient >= 1.0) { in local_to_remote_time_difference_now()86 (uint64_t)((conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient - 1.0) * in local_to_remote_time_difference_now()90 (uint64_t)((1.0 - conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient) * in local_to_remote_time_difference_now()536 gradients->value = conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient; in rtp_timing_receiver_cleanup_handler()543 new_entry->value = conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient; in rtp_timing_receiver_cleanup_handler()577 conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient = 1.0; // initial value. in rtp_timing_receiver()585 conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient = gradients->value; in rtp_timing_receiver()794 conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient = mtl / mbl; in rtp_timing_receiver()798 (conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient - 1.0) * 1000000); in rtp_timing_receiver()811 (conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient - 1.0) * 1000000); in rtp_timing_receiver()
242 double local_to_remote_time_gradient; // if no drift, this would be exactly 1.0; likely it's member
2770 (conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient - 1.0) * 1000000, 6,2775 conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient) *2798 (conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient - 1.0) * 1000000, 6,2817 (conn->local_to_remote_time_gradient - 1.0) * 1000000, 6,