1// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
2// Copyright 2008 Google Inc.  All rights reserved.
3// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
4//
5// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
6// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
7// met:
8//
9//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
10// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
11//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
12// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
13// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
14// distribution.
15//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
16// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
17// this software without specific prior written permission.
18//
19// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
20// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
21// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
22// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
23// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
24// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
25// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
26// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
27// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
28// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
29// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
30
31// Author: benjy@google.com (Benjy Weinberger)
32//  Based on original Protocol Buffers design by
33//  Sanjay Ghemawat, Jeff Dean, and others.
34//
35// A proto file used to test the "custom options" feature of google.protobuf.
36
37// This file is based on unittest_custom_options.proto in
38// src/google/protobuf, but is modified for proto3. It could
39// potentially be moved into src/google/protobuf, but currently C#
40// is the only language that really needs it, as we don't support
41// proto2 syntax. It's cut down significantly as proto3 only supports
42// extensions for options.
43
44
45syntax = "proto3";
46
47// A custom file option (defined below).
48option (file_opt1) = 9876543210;
49
50import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto";
51
52// We don't put this in a package within proto2 because we need to make sure
53// that the generated code doesn't depend on being in the proto2 namespace.
54package protobuf_unittest;
55option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
56
57// Some simple test custom options of various types.
58
59extend google.protobuf.FileOptions {
60  uint64 file_opt1 = 7736974;
61}
62
63extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
64  int32 message_opt1 = 7739036;
65}
66
67extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions {
68  fixed64 field_opt1 = 7740936;
69}
70
71extend google.protobuf.OneofOptions {
72  int32 oneof_opt1 = 7740111;
73}
74
75extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions {
76  sfixed32 enum_opt1 = 7753576;
77}
78
79extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions {
80  int32 enum_value_opt1 = 1560678;
81}
82
83extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions {
84  sint64 service_opt1 = 7887650;
85}
86
87enum MethodOpt1 {
88  METHODOPT1_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
89  METHODOPT1_VAL1 = 1;
90  METHODOPT1_VAL2 = 2;
91}
92
93extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions {
94  MethodOpt1 method_opt1 = 7890860;
95}
96
97// A test message with custom options at all possible locations (and also some
98// regular options, to make sure they interact nicely).
99message TestMessageWithCustomOptions {
100  option message_set_wire_format = false;
101
102  option (message_opt1) = -56;
103
104  string field1 = 1 [ctype=CORD,
105                              (field_opt1)=8765432109];
106
107  oneof AnOneof {
108    option (oneof_opt1) = -99;
109    int32 oneof_field = 2;
110  }
111
112  enum AnEnum {
113    option (enum_opt1) = -789;
114    ANENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
115    ANENUM_VAL1 = 1;
116    ANENUM_VAL2 = 2 [(enum_value_opt1) = 123];
117  }
118}
119
120
121// A test RPC service with custom options at all possible locations (and also
122// some regular options, to make sure they interact nicely).
123message CustomOptionFooRequest {
124}
125
126message CustomOptionFooResponse {
127}
128
129message CustomOptionFooClientMessage {
130}
131
132message CustomOptionFooServerMessage {
133}
134
135service TestServiceWithCustomOptions {
136  option (service_opt1) = -9876543210;
137
138  rpc Foo(CustomOptionFooRequest) returns (CustomOptionFooResponse) {
139    option (method_opt1) = METHODOPT1_VAL2;
140  }
141}
142
143
144
145// Options of every possible field type, so we can test them all exhaustively.
146
147message DummyMessageContainingEnum {
148  enum TestEnumType {
149    TEST_OPTION_ENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
150    TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE1 = 22;
151    TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2 = -23;
152  }
153}
154
155message DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType {
156}
157
158extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
159          bool     bool_opt = 7706090;
160         int32    int32_opt = 7705709;
161         int64    int64_opt = 7705542;
162        uint32   uint32_opt = 7704880;
163        uint64   uint64_opt = 7702367;
164        sint32   sint32_opt = 7701568;
165        sint64   sint64_opt = 7700863;
166       fixed32  fixed32_opt = 7700307;
167       fixed64  fixed64_opt = 7700194;
168      sfixed32 sfixed32_opt = 7698645;
169      sfixed64 sfixed64_opt = 7685475;
170         float    float_opt = 7675390;
171        double   double_opt = 7673293;
172        string   string_opt = 7673285;
173         bytes    bytes_opt = 7673238;
174  DummyMessageContainingEnum.TestEnumType enum_opt = 7673233;
175  DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType message_type_opt = 7665967;
176}
177
178message CustomOptionMinIntegerValues {
179  option     (bool_opt) = false;
180  option    (int32_opt) = -0x80000000;
181  option    (int64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
182  option   (uint32_opt) = 0;
183  option   (uint64_opt) = 0;
184  option   (sint32_opt) = -0x80000000;
185  option   (sint64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
186  option  (fixed32_opt) = 0;
187  option  (fixed64_opt) = 0;
188  option (sfixed32_opt) = -0x80000000;
189  option (sfixed64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
190}
191
192message CustomOptionMaxIntegerValues {
193  option     (bool_opt) = true;
194  option    (int32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
195  option    (int64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
196  option   (uint32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF;
197  option   (uint64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
198  option   (sint32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
199  option   (sint64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
200  option  (fixed32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF;
201  option  (fixed64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
202  option (sfixed32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
203  option (sfixed64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
204}
205
206message CustomOptionOtherValues {
207  option  (int32_opt) = -100;  // To test sign-extension.
208  option  (float_opt) = 12.3456789;
209  option (double_opt) = 1.234567890123456789;
210  option (string_opt) = "Hello, \"World\"";
211  option  (bytes_opt) = "Hello\0World";
212  option   (enum_opt) = TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2;
213}
214
215message SettingRealsFromPositiveInts {
216  option  (float_opt) = 12;
217  option (double_opt) = 154;
218}
219
220message SettingRealsFromNegativeInts {
221  option  (float_opt) = -12;
222  option  (double_opt) = -154;
223}
224
225// Options of complex message types, themselves combined and extended in
226// various ways.
227
228message ComplexOptionType1 {
229  int32 foo = 1;
230  int32 foo2 = 2;
231  int32 foo3 = 3;
232  repeated int32 foo4 = 4;
233}
234
235message ComplexOptionType2 {
236  ComplexOptionType1 bar = 1;
237  int32 baz = 2;
238
239  message ComplexOptionType4 {
240    int32 waldo = 1;
241
242    extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
243      ComplexOptionType4 complex_opt4 = 7633546;
244    }
245  }
246
247  ComplexOptionType4 fred = 3;
248  repeated ComplexOptionType4 barney = 4;
249}
250
251message ComplexOptionType3 {
252  int32 qux = 1;
253}
254
255extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
256  protobuf_unittest.ComplexOptionType1 complex_opt1 = 7646756;
257  ComplexOptionType2 complex_opt2 = 7636949;
258  ComplexOptionType3 complex_opt3 = 7636463;
259}
260
261// Note that we try various different ways of naming the same extension.
262message VariousComplexOptions {
263  option (.protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo = 42;
264  option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 99;
265  option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 88;
266  option (complex_opt2).baz = 987;
267  option (complex_opt2).bar.foo = 743;
268  option (ComplexOptionType2.ComplexOptionType4.complex_opt4).waldo = 1971;
269  option (complex_opt2).fred.waldo = 321;
270  option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 101 };
271  option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 212 };
272  option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt3).qux = 9;
273}
274
275// ------------------------------------------------------
276// Definitions for testing aggregate option parsing.
277// See descriptor_unittest.cc.
278
279// A helper type used to test aggregate option parsing
280message Aggregate {
281  int32 i = 1;
282  string s = 2;
283
284  // A nested object
285  Aggregate sub = 3;
286}
287
288// Allow Aggregate to be used as an option at all possible locations
289// in the .proto grammer.
290extend google.protobuf.FileOptions      { Aggregate fileopt    = 15478479; }
291extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions   { Aggregate msgopt     = 15480088; }
292extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions     { Aggregate fieldopt   = 15481374; }
293extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions      { Aggregate enumopt    = 15483218; }
294extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions { Aggregate enumvalopt = 15486921; }
295extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions   { Aggregate serviceopt = 15497145; }
296extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions    { Aggregate methodopt  = 15512713; }
297
298// Try using AggregateOption at different points in the proto grammar
299option (fileopt) = {
300  s: 'FileAnnotation'
301  // Also test the handling of comments
302  /* of both types */ i: 100
303
304  sub { s: 'NestedFileAnnotation' }
305};
306
307message AggregateMessage {
308  option (msgopt) = { i:101 s:'MessageAnnotation' };
309  int32 fieldname = 1 [(fieldopt) = { s:'FieldAnnotation' }];
310}
311
312service AggregateService {
313  option (serviceopt) = { s:'ServiceAnnotation' };
314  rpc Method (AggregateMessage) returns (AggregateMessage) {
315    option (methodopt) = { s:'MethodAnnotation' };
316  }
317}
318
319enum AggregateEnum {
320  option (enumopt) = { s:'EnumAnnotation' };
321  UNSPECIFIED = 0;
322  VALUE = 1 [(enumvalopt) = { s:'EnumValueAnnotation' }];
323}
324
325// Test custom options for nested type.
326message NestedOptionType {
327  message NestedMessage {
328    option (message_opt1) = 1001;
329    int32 nested_field = 1 [(field_opt1) = 1002];
330  }
331  enum NestedEnum {
332    UNSPECIFIED = 0;
333    option (enum_opt1) = 1003;
334    NESTED_ENUM_VALUE = 1 [(enum_value_opt1) = 1004];
335  }
336}
337