1\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*- 2@setfilename gprof.info 3@c Copyright (C) 1988-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 4@settitle GNU gprof 5@setchapternewpage odd 6 7@c man begin INCLUDE 8@include bfdver.texi 9@c man end 10 11@ifnottex 12@c This is a dir.info fragment to support semi-automated addition of 13@c manuals to an info tree. zoo@cygnus.com is developing this facility. 14@dircategory Software development 15@direntry 16* gprof: (gprof). Profiling your program's execution 17@end direntry 18@end ifnottex 19 20@copying 21This file documents the gprof profiler of the GNU system. 22 23@c man begin COPYRIGHT 24Copyright @copyright{} 1988-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 25 26Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document 27under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 28or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; 29with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no 30Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the 31section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''. 32 33@c man end 34@end copying 35 36@finalout 37@smallbook 38 39@titlepage 40@title GNU gprof 41@subtitle The @sc{gnu} Profiler 42@ifset VERSION_PACKAGE 43@subtitle @value{VERSION_PACKAGE} 44@end ifset 45@subtitle Version @value{VERSION} 46@author Jay Fenlason and Richard Stallman 47 48@page 49 50This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you 51can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the 52execution time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and 53execute programs. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason. 54Eric S. Raymond made some minor corrections and additions in 2003. 55 56@vskip 0pt plus 1filll 57Copyright @copyright{} 1988-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 58 59 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document 60 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 61 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; 62 with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no 63 Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the 64 section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''. 65 66@end titlepage 67@contents 68 69@ifnottex 70@node Top 71@top Profiling a Program: Where Does It Spend Its Time? 72 73This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you 74can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the 75execution time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and 76execute programs. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason. 77 78This manual is for @code{gprof} 79@ifset VERSION_PACKAGE 80@value{VERSION_PACKAGE} 81@end ifset 82version @value{VERSION}. 83 84This document is distributed under the terms of the GNU Free 85Documentation License version 1.3. A copy of the license is included 86in the section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''. 87 88@menu 89* Introduction:: What profiling means, and why it is useful. 90 91* Compiling:: How to compile your program for profiling. 92* Executing:: Executing your program to generate profile data 93* Invoking:: How to run @code{gprof}, and its options 94 95* Output:: Interpreting @code{gprof}'s output 96 97* Inaccuracy:: Potential problems you should be aware of 98* How do I?:: Answers to common questions 99* Incompatibilities:: (between @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Unix @code{gprof}.) 100* Details:: Details of how profiling is done 101* GNU Free Documentation License:: GNU Free Documentation License 102@end menu 103@end ifnottex 104 105@node Introduction 106@chapter Introduction to Profiling 107 108@ifset man 109@c man title gprof display call graph profile data 110 111@smallexample 112@c man begin SYNOPSIS 113gprof [ -[abcDhilLrsTvwxyz] ] [ -[ACeEfFJnNOpPqQZ][@var{name}] ] 114 [ -I @var{dirs} ] [ -d[@var{num}] ] [ -k @var{from/to} ] 115 [ -m @var{min-count} ] [ -R @var{map_file} ] [ -t @var{table-length} ] 116 [ --[no-]annotated-source[=@var{name}] ] 117 [ --[no-]exec-counts[=@var{name}] ] 118 [ --[no-]flat-profile[=@var{name}] ] [ --[no-]graph[=@var{name}] ] 119 [ --[no-]time=@var{name}] [ --all-lines ] [ --brief ] 120 [ --debug[=@var{level}] ] [ --function-ordering ] 121 [ --file-ordering @var{map_file} ] [ --directory-path=@var{dirs} ] 122 [ --display-unused-functions ] [ --file-format=@var{name} ] 123 [ --file-info ] [ --help ] [ --line ] [ --inline-file-names ] 124 [ --min-count=@var{n} ] [ --no-static ] [ --print-path ] 125 [ --separate-files ] [ --static-call-graph ] [ --sum ] 126 [ --table-length=@var{len} ] [ --traditional ] [ --version ] 127 [ --width=@var{n} ] [ --ignore-non-functions ] 128 [ --demangle[=@var{STYLE}] ] [ --no-demangle ] 129 [--external-symbol-table=name] 130 [ @var{image-file} ] [ @var{profile-file} @dots{} ] 131@c man end 132@end smallexample 133 134@c man begin DESCRIPTION 135@code{gprof} produces an execution profile of C, Pascal, or Fortran77 136programs. The effect of called routines is incorporated in the profile 137of each caller. The profile data is taken from the call graph profile file 138(@file{gmon.out} default) which is created by programs 139that are compiled with the @samp{-pg} option of 140@code{cc}, @code{pc}, and @code{f77}. 141The @samp{-pg} option also links in versions of the library routines 142that are compiled for profiling. @code{Gprof} reads the given object 143file (the default is @code{a.out}) and establishes the relation between 144its symbol table and the call graph profile from @file{gmon.out}. 145If more than one profile file is specified, the @code{gprof} 146output shows the sum of the profile information in the given profile files. 147 148@code{Gprof} calculates the amount of time spent in each routine. 149Next, these times are propagated along the edges of the call graph. 150Cycles are discovered, and calls into a cycle are made to share the time 151of the cycle. 152 153@c man end 154 155@c man begin BUGS 156The granularity of the sampling is shown, but remains 157statistical at best. 158We assume that the time for each execution of a function 159can be expressed by the total time for the function divided 160by the number of times the function is called. 161Thus the time propagated along the call graph arcs to the function's 162parents is directly proportional to the number of times that 163arc is traversed. 164 165Parents that are not themselves profiled will have the time of 166their profiled children propagated to them, but they will appear 167to be spontaneously invoked in the call graph listing, and will 168not have their time propagated further. 169Similarly, signal catchers, even though profiled, will appear 170to be spontaneous (although for more obscure reasons). 171Any profiled children of signal catchers should have their times 172propagated properly, unless the signal catcher was invoked during 173the execution of the profiling routine, in which case all is lost. 174 175The profiled program must call @code{exit}(2) 176or return normally for the profiling information to be saved 177in the @file{gmon.out} file. 178@c man end 179 180@c man begin FILES 181@table @code 182@item @file{a.out} 183the namelist and text space. 184@item @file{gmon.out} 185dynamic call graph and profile. 186@item @file{gmon.sum} 187summarized dynamic call graph and profile. 188@end table 189@c man end 190 191@c man begin SEEALSO 192monitor(3), profil(2), cc(1), prof(1), and the Info entry for @file{gprof}. 193 194``An Execution Profiler for Modular Programs'', 195by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick; 196Software - Practice and Experience, 197Vol. 13, pp. 671-685, 1983. 198 199``gprof: A Call Graph Execution Profiler'', 200by S. Graham, P. Kessler, M. McKusick; 201Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '82 Symposium on Compiler Construction, 202SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 17, No 6, pp. 120-126, June 1982. 203@c man end 204@end ifset 205 206Profiling allows you to learn where your program spent its time and which 207functions called which other functions while it was executing. This 208information can show you which pieces of your program are slower than you 209expected, and might be candidates for rewriting to make your program 210execute faster. It can also tell you which functions are being called more 211or less often than you expected. This may help you spot bugs that had 212otherwise been unnoticed. 213 214Since the profiler uses information collected during the actual execution 215of your program, it can be used on programs that are too large or too 216complex to analyze by reading the source. However, how your program is run 217will affect the information that shows up in the profile data. If you 218don't use some feature of your program while it is being profiled, no 219profile information will be generated for that feature. 220 221Profiling has several steps: 222 223@itemize @bullet 224@item 225You must compile and link your program with profiling enabled. 226@xref{Compiling, ,Compiling a Program for Profiling}. 227 228@item 229You must execute your program to generate a profile data file. 230@xref{Executing, ,Executing the Program}. 231 232@item 233You must run @code{gprof} to analyze the profile data. 234@xref{Invoking, ,@code{gprof} Command Summary}. 235@end itemize 236 237The next three chapters explain these steps in greater detail. 238 239@c man begin DESCRIPTION 240 241Several forms of output are available from the analysis. 242 243The @dfn{flat profile} shows how much time your program spent in each function, 244and how many times that function was called. If you simply want to know 245which functions burn most of the cycles, it is stated concisely here. 246@xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}. 247 248The @dfn{call graph} shows, for each function, which functions called it, which 249other functions it called, and how many times. There is also an estimate 250of how much time was spent in the subroutines of each function. This can 251suggest places where you might try to eliminate function calls that use a 252lot of time. @xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}. 253 254The @dfn{annotated source} listing is a copy of the program's 255source code, labeled with the number of times each line of the 256program was executed. @xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source 257Listing}. 258@c man end 259 260To better understand how profiling works, you may wish to read 261a description of its implementation. 262@xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}. 263 264@node Compiling 265@chapter Compiling a Program for Profiling 266 267The first step in generating profile information for your program is 268to compile and link it with profiling enabled. 269 270To compile a source file for profiling, specify the @samp{-pg} option when 271you run the compiler. (This is in addition to the options you normally 272use.) 273 274To link the program for profiling, if you use a compiler such as @code{cc} 275to do the linking, simply specify @samp{-pg} in addition to your usual 276options. The same option, @samp{-pg}, alters either compilation or linking 277to do what is necessary for profiling. Here are examples: 278 279@example 280cc -g -c myprog.c utils.c -pg 281cc -o myprog myprog.o utils.o -pg 282@end example 283 284The @samp{-pg} option also works with a command that both compiles and links: 285 286@example 287cc -o myprog myprog.c utils.c -g -pg 288@end example 289 290Note: The @samp{-pg} option must be part of your compilation options 291as well as your link options. If it is not then no call-graph data 292will be gathered and when you run @code{gprof} you will get an error 293message like this: 294 295@example 296gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data 297@end example 298 299If you add the @samp{-Q} switch to suppress the printing of the call 300graph data you will still be able to see the time samples: 301 302@example 303Flat profile: 304 305Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. 306 % cumulative self self total 307 time seconds seconds calls Ts/call Ts/call name 308 44.12 0.07 0.07 zazLoop 309 35.29 0.14 0.06 main 310 20.59 0.17 0.04 bazMillion 311@end example 312 313If you run the linker @code{ld} directly instead of through a compiler 314such as @code{cc}, you may have to specify a profiling startup file 315@file{gcrt0.o} as the first input file instead of the usual startup 316file @file{crt0.o}. In addition, you would probably want to 317specify the profiling C library, @file{libc_p.a}, by writing 318@samp{-lc_p} instead of the usual @samp{-lc}. This is not absolutely 319necessary, but doing this gives you number-of-calls information for 320standard library functions such as @code{read} and @code{open}. For 321example: 322 323@example 324ld -o myprog /lib/gcrt0.o myprog.o utils.o -lc_p 325@end example 326 327If you are running the program on a system which supports shared 328libraries you may run into problems with the profiling support code in 329a shared library being called before that library has been fully 330initialised. This is usually detected by the program encountering a 331segmentation fault as soon as it is run. The solution is to link 332against a static version of the library containing the profiling 333support code, which for @code{gcc} users can be done via the 334@samp{-static} or @samp{-static-libgcc} command line option. For 335example: 336 337@example 338gcc -g -pg -static-libgcc myprog.c utils.c -o myprog 339@end example 340 341If you compile only some of the modules of the program with @samp{-pg}, you 342can still profile the program, but you won't get complete information about 343the modules that were compiled without @samp{-pg}. The only information 344you get for the functions in those modules is the total time spent in them; 345there is no record of how many times they were called, or from where. This 346will not affect the flat profile (except that the @code{calls} field for 347the functions will be blank), but will greatly reduce the usefulness of the 348call graph. 349 350If you wish to perform line-by-line profiling you should use the 351@code{gcov} tool instead of @code{gprof}. See that tool's manual or 352info pages for more details of how to do this. 353 354Note, older versions of @code{gcc} produce line-by-line profiling 355information that works with @code{gprof} rather than @code{gcov} so 356there is still support for displaying this kind of information in 357@code{gprof}. @xref{Line-by-line, ,Line-by-line Profiling}. 358 359It also worth noting that @code{gcc} implements a 360@samp{-finstrument-functions} command line option which will insert 361calls to special user supplied instrumentation routines at the entry 362and exit of every function in their program. This can be used to 363implement an alternative profiling scheme. 364 365@node Executing 366@chapter Executing the Program 367 368Once the program is compiled for profiling, you must run it in order to 369generate the information that @code{gprof} needs. Simply run the program 370as usual, using the normal arguments, file names, etc. The program should 371run normally, producing the same output as usual. It will, however, run 372somewhat slower than normal because of the time spent collecting and 373writing the profile data. 374 375The way you run the program---the arguments and input that you give 376it---may have a dramatic effect on what the profile information shows. The 377profile data will describe the parts of the program that were activated for 378the particular input you use. For example, if the first command you give 379to your program is to quit, the profile data will show the time used in 380initialization and in cleanup, but not much else. 381 382Your program will write the profile data into a file called @file{gmon.out} 383just before exiting. If there is already a file called @file{gmon.out}, 384its contents are overwritten. There is currently no way to tell the 385program to write the profile data under a different name, but you can rename 386the file afterwards if you are concerned that it may be overwritten. 387 388In order to write the @file{gmon.out} file properly, your program must exit 389normally: by returning from @code{main} or by calling @code{exit}. Calling 390the low-level function @code{_exit} does not write the profile data, and 391neither does abnormal termination due to an unhandled signal. 392 393The @file{gmon.out} file is written in the program's @emph{current working 394directory} at the time it exits. This means that if your program calls 395@code{chdir}, the @file{gmon.out} file will be left in the last directory 396your program @code{chdir}'d to. If you don't have permission to write in 397this directory, the file is not written, and you will get an error message. 398 399Older versions of the @sc{gnu} profiling library may also write a file 400called @file{bb.out}. This file, if present, contains an human-readable 401listing of the basic-block execution counts. Unfortunately, the 402appearance of a human-readable @file{bb.out} means the basic-block 403counts didn't get written into @file{gmon.out}. 404The Perl script @code{bbconv.pl}, included with the @code{gprof} 405source distribution, will convert a @file{bb.out} file into 406a format readable by @code{gprof}. Invoke it like this: 407 408@smallexample 409bbconv.pl < bb.out > @var{bh-data} 410@end smallexample 411 412This translates the information in @file{bb.out} into a form that 413@code{gprof} can understand. But you still need to tell @code{gprof} 414about the existence of this translated information. To do that, include 415@var{bb-data} on the @code{gprof} command line, @emph{along with 416@file{gmon.out}}, like this: 417 418@smallexample 419gprof @var{options} @var{executable-file} gmon.out @var{bb-data} [@var{yet-more-profile-data-files}@dots{}] [> @var{outfile}] 420@end smallexample 421 422@node Invoking 423@chapter @code{gprof} Command Summary 424 425After you have a profile data file @file{gmon.out}, you can run @code{gprof} 426to interpret the information in it. The @code{gprof} program prints a 427flat profile and a call graph on standard output. Typically you would 428redirect the output of @code{gprof} into a file with @samp{>}. 429 430You run @code{gprof} like this: 431 432@smallexample 433gprof @var{options} [@var{executable-file} [@var{profile-data-files}@dots{}]] [> @var{outfile}] 434@end smallexample 435 436@noindent 437Here square-brackets indicate optional arguments. 438 439If you omit the executable file name, the file @file{a.out} is used. If 440you give no profile data file name, the file @file{gmon.out} is used. If 441any file is not in the proper format, or if the profile data file does not 442appear to belong to the executable file, an error message is printed. 443 444You can give more than one profile data file by entering all their names 445after the executable file name; then the statistics in all the data files 446are summed together. 447 448The order of these options does not matter. 449 450@menu 451* Output Options:: Controlling @code{gprof}'s output style 452* Analysis Options:: Controlling how @code{gprof} analyzes its data 453* Miscellaneous Options:: 454* Deprecated Options:: Options you no longer need to use, but which 455 have been retained for compatibility 456* Symspecs:: Specifying functions to include or exclude 457@end menu 458 459@node Output Options 460@section Output Options 461 462@c man begin OPTIONS 463These options specify which of several output formats 464@code{gprof} should produce. 465 466Many of these options take an optional @dfn{symspec} to specify 467functions to be included or excluded. These options can be 468specified multiple times, with different symspecs, to include 469or exclude sets of symbols. @xref{Symspecs, ,Symspecs}. 470 471Specifying any of these options overrides the default (@samp{-p -q}), 472which prints a flat profile and call graph analysis 473for all functions. 474 475@table @code 476 477@item -A[@var{symspec}] 478@itemx --annotated-source[=@var{symspec}] 479The @samp{-A} option causes @code{gprof} to print annotated source code. 480If @var{symspec} is specified, print output only for matching symbols. 481@xref{Annotated Source, ,The Annotated Source Listing}. 482 483@item -b 484@itemx --brief 485If the @samp{-b} option is given, @code{gprof} doesn't print the 486verbose blurbs that try to explain the meaning of all of the fields in 487the tables. This is useful if you intend to print out the output, or 488are tired of seeing the blurbs. 489 490@item -C[@var{symspec}] 491@itemx --exec-counts[=@var{symspec}] 492The @samp{-C} option causes @code{gprof} to 493print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called. 494If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally only for matching symbols. 495 496If the profile data file contains basic-block count records, specifying 497the @samp{-l} option, along with @samp{-C}, will cause basic-block 498execution counts to be tallied and displayed. 499 500@item -i 501@itemx --file-info 502The @samp{-i} option causes @code{gprof} to display summary information 503about the profile data file(s) and then exit. The number of histogram, 504call graph, and basic-block count records is displayed. 505 506@item -I @var{dirs} 507@itemx --directory-path=@var{dirs} 508The @samp{-I} option specifies a list of search directories in 509which to find source files. Environment variable @var{GPROF_PATH} 510can also be used to convey this information. 511Used mostly for annotated source output. 512 513@item -J[@var{symspec}] 514@itemx --no-annotated-source[=@var{symspec}] 515The @samp{-J} option causes @code{gprof} not to 516print annotated source code. 517If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints annotated source, 518but excludes matching symbols. 519 520@item -L 521@itemx --print-path 522Normally, source filenames are printed with the path 523component suppressed. The @samp{-L} option causes @code{gprof} 524to print the full pathname of 525source filenames, which is determined 526from symbolic debugging information in the image file 527and is relative to the directory in which the compiler 528was invoked. 529 530@item -p[@var{symspec}] 531@itemx --flat-profile[=@var{symspec}] 532The @samp{-p} option causes @code{gprof} to print a flat profile. 533If @var{symspec} is specified, print flat profile only for matching symbols. 534@xref{Flat Profile, ,The Flat Profile}. 535 536@item -P[@var{symspec}] 537@itemx --no-flat-profile[=@var{symspec}] 538The @samp{-P} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing a flat profile. 539If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a flat profile, 540but excludes matching symbols. 541 542@item -q[@var{symspec}] 543@itemx --graph[=@var{symspec}] 544The @samp{-q} option causes @code{gprof} to print the call graph analysis. 545If @var{symspec} is specified, print call graph only for matching symbols 546and their children. 547@xref{Call Graph, ,The Call Graph}. 548 549@item -Q[@var{symspec}] 550@itemx --no-graph[=@var{symspec}] 551The @samp{-Q} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing the 552call graph. 553If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a call graph, 554but excludes matching symbols. 555 556@item -t 557@itemx --table-length=@var{num} 558The @samp{-t} option causes the @var{num} most active source lines in 559each source file to be listed when source annotation is enabled. The 560default is 10. 561 562@item -y 563@itemx --separate-files 564This option affects annotated source output only. 565Normally, @code{gprof} prints annotated source files 566to standard-output. If this option is specified, 567annotated source for a file named @file{path/@var{filename}} 568is generated in the file @file{@var{filename}-ann}. If the underlying 569file system would truncate @file{@var{filename}-ann} so that it 570overwrites the original @file{@var{filename}}, @code{gprof} generates 571annotated source in the file @file{@var{filename}.ann} instead (if the 572original file name has an extension, that extension is @emph{replaced} 573with @file{.ann}). 574 575@item -Z[@var{symspec}] 576@itemx --no-exec-counts[=@var{symspec}] 577The @samp{-Z} option causes @code{gprof} not to 578print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called. 579If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally, but exclude matching symbols. 580 581@item -r 582@itemx --function-ordering 583The @samp{--function-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a 584suggested function ordering for the program based on profiling data. 585This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and 586cache behavior for the program on systems which support arbitrary 587ordering of functions in an executable. 588 589The exact details of how to force the linker to place functions 590in a particular order is system dependent and out of the scope of this 591manual. 592 593@item -R @var{map_file} 594@itemx --file-ordering @var{map_file} 595The @samp{--file-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a 596suggested .o link line ordering for the program based on profiling data. 597This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and 598cache behavior for the program on systems which do not support arbitrary 599ordering of functions in an executable. 600 601Use of the @samp{-a} argument is highly recommended with this option. 602 603The @var{map_file} argument is a pathname to a file which provides 604function name to object file mappings. The format of the file is similar to 605the output of the program @code{nm}. 606 607@smallexample 608@group 609c-parse.o:00000000 T yyparse 610c-parse.o:00000004 C yyerrflag 611c-lang.o:00000000 T maybe_objc_method_name 612c-lang.o:00000000 T print_lang_statistics 613c-lang.o:00000000 T recognize_objc_keyword 614c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_identifier 615c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_type 616@dots{} 617 618@end group 619@end smallexample 620 621To create a @var{map_file} with @sc{gnu} @code{nm}, type a command like 622@kbd{nm --extern-only --defined-only -v --print-file-name program-name}. 623 624@item -T 625@itemx --traditional 626The @samp{-T} option causes @code{gprof} to print its output in 627``traditional'' BSD style. 628 629@item -w @var{width} 630@itemx --width=@var{width} 631Sets width of output lines to @var{width}. 632Currently only used when printing the function index at the bottom 633of the call graph. 634 635@item -x 636@itemx --all-lines 637This option affects annotated source output only. 638By default, only the lines at the beginning of a basic-block 639are annotated. If this option is specified, every line in 640a basic-block is annotated by repeating the annotation for the 641first line. This behavior is similar to @code{tcov}'s @samp{-a}. 642 643@item --demangle[=@var{style}] 644@itemx --no-demangle 645These options control whether C++ symbol names should be demangled when 646printing output. The default is to demangle symbols. The 647@code{--no-demangle} option may be used to turn off demangling. Different 648compilers have different mangling styles. The optional demangling style 649argument can be used to choose an appropriate demangling style for your 650compiler. 651@end table 652 653@node Analysis Options 654@section Analysis Options 655 656@table @code 657 658@item -a 659@itemx --no-static 660The @samp{-a} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress the printing of 661statically declared (private) functions. (These are functions whose 662names are not listed as global, and which are not visible outside the 663file/function/block where they were defined.) Time spent in these 664functions, calls to/from them, etc., will all be attributed to the 665function that was loaded directly before it in the executable file. 666@c This is compatible with Unix @code{gprof}, but a bad idea. 667This option affects both the flat profile and the call graph. 668 669@item -c 670@itemx --static-call-graph 671The @samp{-c} option causes the call graph of the program to be 672augmented by a heuristic which examines the text space of the object 673file and identifies function calls in the binary machine code. 674Since normal call graph records are only generated when functions are 675entered, this option identifies children that could have been called, 676but never were. Calls to functions that were not compiled with 677profiling enabled are also identified, but only if symbol table 678entries are present for them. 679Calls to dynamic library routines are typically @emph{not} found 680by this option. 681Parents or children identified via this heuristic 682are indicated in the call graph with call counts of @samp{0}. 683 684@item -D 685@itemx --ignore-non-functions 686The @samp{-D} option causes @code{gprof} to ignore symbols which 687are not known to be functions. This option will give more accurate 688profile data on systems where it is supported (Solaris and HPUX for 689example). 690 691@item -k @var{from}/@var{to} 692The @samp{-k} option allows you to delete from the call graph any arcs from 693symbols matching symspec @var{from} to those matching symspec @var{to}. 694 695@item -l 696@itemx --line 697The @samp{-l} option enables line-by-line profiling, which causes 698histogram hits to be charged to individual source code lines, 699instead of functions. This feature only works with programs compiled 700by older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler. Newer versions of 701@code{gcc} are designed to work with the @code{gcov} tool instead. 702 703If the program was compiled with basic-block counting enabled, 704this option will also identify how many times each line of 705code was executed. 706While line-by-line profiling can help isolate where in a large function 707a program is spending its time, it also significantly increases 708the running time of @code{gprof}, and magnifies statistical 709inaccuracies. 710@xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error}. 711 712@item --inline-file-names 713This option causes @code{gprof} to print the source file after each 714symbol in both the flat profile and the call graph. The full path to the 715file is printed if used with the @samp{-L} option. 716 717@item -m @var{num} 718@itemx --min-count=@var{num} 719This option affects execution count output only. 720Symbols that are executed less than @var{num} times are suppressed. 721 722@item -n@var{symspec} 723@itemx --time=@var{symspec} 724The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis, 725to only propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}. 726 727@item -N@var{symspec} 728@itemx --no-time=@var{symspec} 729The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis, 730not to propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}. 731 732@item -S@var{filename} 733@itemx --external-symbol-table=@var{filename} 734The @samp{-S} option causes @code{gprof} to read an external symbol table 735file, such as @file{/proc/kallsyms}, rather than read the symbol table 736from the given object file (the default is @code{a.out}). This is useful 737for profiling kernel modules. 738 739@item -z 740@itemx --display-unused-functions 741If you give the @samp{-z} option, @code{gprof} will mention all 742functions in the flat profile, even those that were never called, and 743that had no time spent in them. This is useful in conjunction with the 744@samp{-c} option for discovering which routines were never called. 745 746@end table 747 748@node Miscellaneous Options 749@section Miscellaneous Options 750 751@table @code 752 753@item -d[@var{num}] 754@itemx --debug[=@var{num}] 755The @samp{-d @var{num}} option specifies debugging options. 756If @var{num} is not specified, enable all debugging. 757@xref{Debugging, ,Debugging @code{gprof}}. 758 759@item -h 760@itemx --help 761The @samp{-h} option prints command line usage. 762 763@item -O@var{name} 764@itemx --file-format=@var{name} 765Selects the format of the profile data files. Recognized formats are 766@samp{auto} (the default), @samp{bsd}, @samp{4.4bsd}, @samp{magic}, and 767@samp{prof} (not yet supported). 768 769@item -s 770@itemx --sum 771The @samp{-s} option causes @code{gprof} to summarize the information 772in the profile data files it read in, and write out a profile data 773file called @file{gmon.sum}, which contains all the information from 774the profile data files that @code{gprof} read in. The file @file{gmon.sum} 775may be one of the specified input files; the effect of this is to 776merge the data in the other input files into @file{gmon.sum}. 777 778Eventually you can run @code{gprof} again without @samp{-s} to analyze the 779cumulative data in the file @file{gmon.sum}. 780 781@item -v 782@itemx --version 783The @samp{-v} flag causes @code{gprof} to print the current version 784number, and then exit. 785 786@end table 787 788@node Deprecated Options 789@section Deprecated Options 790 791These options have been replaced with newer versions that use symspecs. 792 793@table @code 794 795@item -e @var{function_name} 796The @samp{-e @var{function}} option tells @code{gprof} to not print 797information about the function @var{function_name} (and its 798children@dots{}) in the call graph. The function will still be listed 799as a child of any functions that call it, but its index number will be 800shown as @samp{[not printed]}. More than one @samp{-e} option may be 801given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-e} 802option. 803 804@item -E @var{function_name} 805The @code{-E @var{function}} option works like the @code{-e} option, but 806time spent in the function (and children who were not called from 807anywhere else), will not be used to compute the percentages-of-time for 808the call graph. More than one @samp{-E} option may be given; only one 809@var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-E} option. 810 811@item -f @var{function_name} 812The @samp{-f @var{function}} option causes @code{gprof} to limit the 813call graph to the function @var{function_name} and its children (and 814their children@dots{}). More than one @samp{-f} option may be given; 815only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-f} 816option. 817 818@item -F @var{function_name} 819The @samp{-F @var{function}} option works like the @code{-f} option, but 820only time spent in the function and its children (and their 821children@dots{}) will be used to determine total-time and 822percentages-of-time for the call graph. More than one @samp{-F} option 823may be given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each 824@samp{-F} option. The @samp{-F} option overrides the @samp{-E} option. 825 826@end table 827 828@c man end 829 830Note that only one function can be specified with each @code{-e}, 831@code{-E}, @code{-f} or @code{-F} option. To specify more than one 832function, use multiple options. For example, this command: 833 834@example 835gprof -e boring -f foo -f bar myprogram > gprof.output 836@end example 837 838@noindent 839lists in the call graph all functions that were reached from either 840@code{foo} or @code{bar} and were not reachable from @code{boring}. 841 842@node Symspecs 843@section Symspecs 844 845Many of the output options allow functions to be included or excluded 846using @dfn{symspecs} (symbol specifications), which observe the 847following syntax: 848 849@example 850 filename_containing_a_dot 851| funcname_not_containing_a_dot 852| linenumber 853| ( [ any_filename ] `:' ( any_funcname | linenumber ) ) 854@end example 855 856Here are some sample symspecs: 857 858@table @samp 859@item main.c 860Selects everything in file @file{main.c}---the 861dot in the string tells @code{gprof} to interpret 862the string as a filename, rather than as 863a function name. To select a file whose 864name does not contain a dot, a trailing colon 865should be specified. For example, @samp{odd:} is 866interpreted as the file named @file{odd}. 867 868@item main 869Selects all functions named @samp{main}. 870 871Note that there may be multiple instances of the same function name 872because some of the definitions may be local (i.e., static). Unless a 873function name is unique in a program, you must use the colon notation 874explained below to specify a function from a specific source file. 875 876Sometimes, function names contain dots. In such cases, it is necessary 877to add a leading colon to the name. For example, @samp{:.mul} selects 878function @samp{.mul}. 879 880In some object file formats, symbols have a leading underscore. 881@code{gprof} will normally not print these underscores. When you name a 882symbol in a symspec, you should type it exactly as @code{gprof} prints 883it in its output. For example, if the compiler produces a symbol 884@samp{_main} from your @code{main} function, @code{gprof} still prints 885it as @samp{main} in its output, so you should use @samp{main} in 886symspecs. 887 888@item main.c:main 889Selects function @samp{main} in file @file{main.c}. 890 891@item main.c:134 892Selects line 134 in file @file{main.c}. 893@end table 894 895@node Output 896@chapter Interpreting @code{gprof}'s Output 897 898@code{gprof} can produce several different output styles, the 899most important of which are described below. The simplest output 900styles (file information, execution count, and function and file ordering) 901are not described here, but are documented with the respective options 902that trigger them. 903@xref{Output Options, ,Output Options}. 904 905@menu 906* Flat Profile:: The flat profile shows how much time was spent 907 executing directly in each function. 908* Call Graph:: The call graph shows which functions called which 909 others, and how much time each function used 910 when its subroutine calls are included. 911* Line-by-line:: @code{gprof} can analyze individual source code lines 912* Annotated Source:: The annotated source listing displays source code 913 labeled with execution counts 914@end menu 915 916 917@node Flat Profile 918@section The Flat Profile 919@cindex flat profile 920 921The @dfn{flat profile} shows the total amount of time your program 922spent executing each function. Unless the @samp{-z} option is given, 923functions with no apparent time spent in them, and no apparent calls 924to them, are not mentioned. Note that if a function was not compiled 925for profiling, and didn't run long enough to show up on the program 926counter histogram, it will be indistinguishable from a function that 927was never called. 928 929This is part of a flat profile for a small program: 930 931@smallexample 932@group 933Flat profile: 934 935Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. 936 % cumulative self self total 937 time seconds seconds calls ms/call ms/call name 938 33.34 0.02 0.02 7208 0.00 0.00 open 939 16.67 0.03 0.01 244 0.04 0.12 offtime 940 16.67 0.04 0.01 8 1.25 1.25 memccpy 941 16.67 0.05 0.01 7 1.43 1.43 write 942 16.67 0.06 0.01 mcount 943 0.00 0.06 0.00 236 0.00 0.00 tzset 944 0.00 0.06 0.00 192 0.00 0.00 tolower 945 0.00 0.06 0.00 47 0.00 0.00 strlen 946 0.00 0.06 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 strchr 947 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 main 948 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 memcpy 949 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 10.11 print 950 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 profil 951 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 report 952@dots{} 953@end group 954@end smallexample 955 956@noindent 957The functions are sorted first by decreasing run-time spent in them, 958then by decreasing number of calls, then alphabetically by name. The 959functions @samp{mcount} and @samp{profil} are part of the profiling 960apparatus and appear in every flat profile; their time gives a measure of 961the amount of overhead due to profiling. 962 963Just before the column headers, a statement appears indicating 964how much time each sample counted as. 965This @dfn{sampling period} estimates the margin of error in each of the time 966figures. A time figure that is not much larger than this is not 967reliable. In this example, each sample counted as 0.01 seconds, 968suggesting a 100 Hz sampling rate. 969The program's total execution time was 0.06 970seconds, as indicated by the @samp{cumulative seconds} field. Since 971each sample counted for 0.01 seconds, this means only six samples 972were taken during the run. Two of the samples occurred while the 973program was in the @samp{open} function, as indicated by the 974@samp{self seconds} field. Each of the other four samples 975occurred one each in @samp{offtime}, @samp{memccpy}, @samp{write}, 976and @samp{mcount}. 977Since only six samples were taken, none of these values can 978be regarded as particularly reliable. 979In another run, 980the @samp{self seconds} field for 981@samp{mcount} might well be @samp{0.00} or @samp{0.02}. 982@xref{Sampling Error, ,Statistical Sampling Error}, 983for a complete discussion. 984 985The remaining functions in the listing (those whose 986@samp{self seconds} field is @samp{0.00}) didn't appear 987in the histogram samples at all. However, the call graph 988indicated that they were called, so therefore they are listed, 989sorted in decreasing order by the @samp{calls} field. 990Clearly some time was spent executing these functions, 991but the paucity of histogram samples prevents any 992determination of how much time each took. 993 994Here is what the fields in each line mean: 995 996@table @code 997@item % time 998This is the percentage of the total execution time your program spent 999in this function. These should all add up to 100%. 1000 1001@item cumulative seconds 1002This is the cumulative total number of seconds the computer spent 1003executing this functions, plus the time spent in all the functions 1004above this one in this table. 1005 1006@item self seconds 1007This is the number of seconds accounted for by this function alone. 1008The flat profile listing is sorted first by this number. 1009 1010@item calls 1011This is the total number of times the function was called. If the 1012function was never called, or the number of times it was called cannot 1013be determined (probably because the function was not compiled with 1014profiling enabled), the @dfn{calls} field is blank. 1015 1016@item self ms/call 1017This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this 1018function per call, if this function is profiled. Otherwise, this field 1019is blank for this function. 1020 1021@item total ms/call 1022This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this 1023function and its descendants per call, if this function is profiled. 1024Otherwise, this field is blank for this function. 1025This is the only field in the flat profile that uses call graph analysis. 1026 1027@item name 1028This is the name of the function. The flat profile is sorted by this 1029field alphabetically after the @dfn{self seconds} and @dfn{calls} 1030fields are sorted. 1031@end table 1032 1033@node Call Graph 1034@section The Call Graph 1035@cindex call graph 1036 1037The @dfn{call graph} shows how much time was spent in each function 1038and its children. From this information, you can find functions that, 1039while they themselves may not have used much time, called other 1040functions that did use unusual amounts of time. 1041 1042Here is a sample call from a small program. This call came from the 1043same @code{gprof} run as the flat profile example in the previous 1044section. 1045 1046@smallexample 1047@group 1048granularity: each sample hit covers 2 byte(s) for 20.00% of 0.05 seconds 1049 1050index % time self children called name 1051 <spontaneous> 1052[1] 100.0 0.00 0.05 start [1] 1053 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2] 1054 0.00 0.00 1/2 on_exit [28] 1055 0.00 0.00 1/1 exit [59] 1056----------------------------------------------- 1057 0.00 0.05 1/1 start [1] 1058[2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2] 1059 0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3] 1060----------------------------------------------- 1061 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2] 1062[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3] 1063 0.00 0.03 8/8 timelocal [6] 1064 0.00 0.01 1/1 print [9] 1065 0.00 0.01 9/9 fgets [12] 1066 0.00 0.00 12/34 strncmp <cycle 1> [40] 1067 0.00 0.00 8/8 lookup [20] 1068 0.00 0.00 1/1 fopen [21] 1069 0.00 0.00 8/8 chewtime [24] 1070 0.00 0.00 8/16 skipspace [44] 1071----------------------------------------------- 1072[4] 59.8 0.01 0.02 8+472 <cycle 2 as a whole> [4] 1073 0.01 0.02 244+260 offtime <cycle 2> [7] 1074 0.00 0.00 236+1 tzset <cycle 2> [26] 1075----------------------------------------------- 1076@end group 1077@end smallexample 1078 1079The lines full of dashes divide this table into @dfn{entries}, one for each 1080function. Each entry has one or more lines. 1081 1082In each entry, the primary line is the one that starts with an index number 1083in square brackets. The end of this line says which function the entry is 1084for. The preceding lines in the entry describe the callers of this 1085function and the following lines describe its subroutines (also called 1086@dfn{children} when we speak of the call graph). 1087 1088The entries are sorted by time spent in the function and its subroutines. 1089 1090The internal profiling function @code{mcount} (@pxref{Flat Profile, ,The 1091Flat Profile}) is never mentioned in the call graph. 1092 1093@menu 1094* Primary:: Details of the primary line's contents. 1095* Callers:: Details of caller-lines' contents. 1096* Subroutines:: Details of subroutine-lines' contents. 1097* Cycles:: When there are cycles of recursion, 1098 such as @code{a} calls @code{b} calls @code{a}@dots{} 1099@end menu 1100 1101@node Primary 1102@subsection The Primary Line 1103 1104The @dfn{primary line} in a call graph entry is the line that 1105describes the function which the entry is about and gives the overall 1106statistics for this function. 1107 1108For reference, we repeat the primary line from the entry for function 1109@code{report} in our main example, together with the heading line that 1110shows the names of the fields: 1111 1112@smallexample 1113@group 1114index % time self children called name 1115@dots{} 1116[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3] 1117@end group 1118@end smallexample 1119 1120Here is what the fields in the primary line mean: 1121 1122@table @code 1123@item index 1124Entries are numbered with consecutive integers. Each function 1125therefore has an index number, which appears at the beginning of its 1126primary line. 1127 1128Each cross-reference to a function, as a caller or subroutine of 1129another, gives its index number as well as its name. The index number 1130guides you if you wish to look for the entry for that function. 1131 1132@item % time 1133This is the percentage of the total time that was spent in this 1134function, including time spent in subroutines called from this 1135function. 1136 1137The time spent in this function is counted again for the callers of 1138this function. Therefore, adding up these percentages is meaningless. 1139 1140@item self 1141This is the total amount of time spent in this function. This 1142should be identical to the number printed in the @code{seconds} field 1143for this function in the flat profile. 1144 1145@item children 1146This is the total amount of time spent in the subroutine calls made by 1147this function. This should be equal to the sum of all the @code{self} 1148and @code{children} entries of the children listed directly below this 1149function. 1150 1151@item called 1152This is the number of times the function was called. 1153 1154If the function called itself recursively, there are two numbers, 1155separated by a @samp{+}. The first number counts non-recursive calls, 1156and the second counts recursive calls. 1157 1158In the example above, the function @code{report} was called once from 1159@code{main}. 1160 1161@item name 1162This is the name of the current function. The index number is 1163repeated after it. 1164 1165If the function is part of a cycle of recursion, the cycle number is 1166printed between the function's name and the index number 1167(@pxref{Cycles, ,How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described}). 1168For example, if function @code{gnurr} is part of 1169cycle number one, and has index number twelve, its primary line would 1170be end like this: 1171 1172@example 1173gnurr <cycle 1> [12] 1174@end example 1175@end table 1176 1177@node Callers 1178@subsection Lines for a Function's Callers 1179 1180A function's entry has a line for each function it was called by. 1181These lines' fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but 1182their meanings are different because of the difference in context. 1183 1184For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function 1185@code{report}, the primary line and one caller-line preceding it, together 1186with the heading line that shows the names of the fields: 1187 1188@smallexample 1189index % time self children called name 1190@dots{} 1191 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2] 1192[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3] 1193@end smallexample 1194 1195Here are the meanings of the fields in the caller-line for @code{report} 1196called from @code{main}: 1197 1198@table @code 1199@item self 1200An estimate of the amount of time spent in @code{report} itself when it was 1201called from @code{main}. 1202 1203@item children 1204An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report} 1205when @code{report} was called from @code{main}. 1206 1207The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate 1208of the amount of time spent within calls to @code{report} from @code{main}. 1209 1210@item called 1211Two numbers: the number of times @code{report} was called from @code{main}, 1212followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report} from 1213all its callers. 1214 1215@item name and index number 1216The name of the caller of @code{report} to which this line applies, 1217followed by the caller's index number. 1218 1219Not all functions have entries in the call graph; some 1220options to @code{gprof} request the omission of certain functions. 1221When a caller has no entry of its own, it still has caller-lines 1222in the entries of the functions it calls. 1223 1224If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is 1225printed between the name and the index number. 1226@end table 1227 1228If the identity of the callers of a function cannot be determined, a 1229dummy caller-line is printed which has @samp{<spontaneous>} as the 1230``caller's name'' and all other fields blank. This can happen for 1231signal handlers. 1232@c What if some calls have determinable callers' names but not all? 1233@c FIXME - still relevant? 1234 1235@node Subroutines 1236@subsection Lines for a Function's Subroutines 1237 1238A function's entry has a line for each of its subroutines---in other 1239words, a line for each other function that it called. These lines' 1240fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their meanings 1241are different because of the difference in context. 1242 1243For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function 1244@code{main}, the primary line and a line for a subroutine, together 1245with the heading line that shows the names of the fields: 1246 1247@smallexample 1248index % time self children called name 1249@dots{} 1250[2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2] 1251 0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3] 1252@end smallexample 1253 1254Here are the meanings of the fields in the subroutine-line for @code{main} 1255calling @code{report}: 1256 1257@table @code 1258@item self 1259An estimate of the amount of time spent directly within @code{report} 1260when @code{report} was called from @code{main}. 1261 1262@item children 1263An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report} 1264when @code{report} was called from @code{main}. 1265 1266The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate 1267of the total time spent in calls to @code{report} from @code{main}. 1268 1269@item called 1270Two numbers, the number of calls to @code{report} from @code{main} 1271followed by the total number of non-recursive calls to @code{report}. 1272This ratio is used to determine how much of @code{report}'s @code{self} 1273and @code{children} time gets credited to @code{main}. 1274@xref{Assumptions, ,Estimating @code{children} Times}. 1275 1276@item name 1277The name of the subroutine of @code{main} to which this line applies, 1278followed by the subroutine's index number. 1279 1280If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is 1281printed between the name and the index number. 1282@end table 1283 1284@node Cycles 1285@subsection How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described 1286@cindex cycle 1287@cindex recursion cycle 1288 1289The graph may be complicated by the presence of @dfn{cycles of 1290recursion} in the call graph. A cycle exists if a function calls 1291another function that (directly or indirectly) calls (or appears to 1292call) the original function. For example: if @code{a} calls @code{b}, 1293and @code{b} calls @code{a}, then @code{a} and @code{b} form a cycle. 1294 1295Whenever there are call paths both ways between a pair of functions, they 1296belong to the same cycle. If @code{a} and @code{b} call each other and 1297@code{b} and @code{c} call each other, all three make one cycle. Note that 1298even if @code{b} only calls @code{a} if it was not called from @code{a}, 1299@code{gprof} cannot determine this, so @code{a} and @code{b} are still 1300considered a cycle. 1301 1302The cycles are numbered with consecutive integers. When a function 1303belongs to a cycle, each time the function name appears in the call graph 1304it is followed by @samp{<cycle @var{number}>}. 1305 1306The reason cycles matter is that they make the time values in the call 1307graph paradoxical. The ``time spent in children'' of @code{a} should 1308include the time spent in its subroutine @code{b} and in @code{b}'s 1309subroutines---but one of @code{b}'s subroutines is @code{a}! How much of 1310@code{a}'s time should be included in the children of @code{a}, when 1311@code{a} is indirectly recursive? 1312 1313The way @code{gprof} resolves this paradox is by creating a single entry 1314for the cycle as a whole. The primary line of this entry describes the 1315total time spent directly in the functions of the cycle. The 1316``subroutines'' of the cycle are the individual functions of the cycle, and 1317all other functions that were called directly by them. The ``callers'' of 1318the cycle are the functions, outside the cycle, that called functions in 1319the cycle. 1320 1321Here is an example portion of a call graph which shows a cycle containing 1322functions @code{a} and @code{b}. The cycle was entered by a call to 1323@code{a} from @code{main}; both @code{a} and @code{b} called @code{c}. 1324 1325@smallexample 1326index % time self children called name 1327---------------------------------------- 1328 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] 1329[3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3] 1330 1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4] 1331 0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5] 1332---------------------------------------- 1333 3 a <cycle 1> [5] 1334[4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4] 1335 2 a <cycle 1> [5] 1336 0 0 3/6 c [6] 1337---------------------------------------- 1338 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] 1339 2 b <cycle 1> [4] 1340[5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5] 1341 3 b <cycle 1> [4] 1342 0 0 3/6 c [6] 1343---------------------------------------- 1344@end smallexample 1345 1346@noindent 1347(The entire call graph for this program contains in addition an entry for 1348@code{main}, which calls @code{a}, and an entry for @code{c}, with callers 1349@code{a} and @code{b}.) 1350 1351@smallexample 1352index % time self children called name 1353 <spontaneous> 1354[1] 100.00 0 1.93 0 start [1] 1355 0.16 1.77 1/1 main [2] 1356---------------------------------------- 1357 0.16 1.77 1/1 start [1] 1358[2] 100.00 0.16 1.77 1 main [2] 1359 1.77 0 1/1 a <cycle 1> [5] 1360---------------------------------------- 1361 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] 1362[3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3] 1363 1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4] 1364 0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5] 1365 0 0 6/6 c [6] 1366---------------------------------------- 1367 3 a <cycle 1> [5] 1368[4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4] 1369 2 a <cycle 1> [5] 1370 0 0 3/6 c [6] 1371---------------------------------------- 1372 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] 1373 2 b <cycle 1> [4] 1374[5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5] 1375 3 b <cycle 1> [4] 1376 0 0 3/6 c [6] 1377---------------------------------------- 1378 0 0 3/6 b <cycle 1> [4] 1379 0 0 3/6 a <cycle 1> [5] 1380[6] 0.00 0 0 6 c [6] 1381---------------------------------------- 1382@end smallexample 1383 1384The @code{self} field of the cycle's primary line is the total time 1385spent in all the functions of the cycle. It equals the sum of the 1386@code{self} fields for the individual functions in the cycle, found 1387in the entry in the subroutine lines for these functions. 1388 1389The @code{children} fields of the cycle's primary line and subroutine lines 1390count only subroutines outside the cycle. Even though @code{a} calls 1391@code{b}, the time spent in those calls to @code{b} is not counted in 1392@code{a}'s @code{children} time. Thus, we do not encounter the problem of 1393what to do when the time in those calls to @code{b} includes indirect 1394recursive calls back to @code{a}. 1395 1396The @code{children} field of a caller-line in the cycle's entry estimates 1397the amount of time spent @emph{in the whole cycle}, and its other 1398subroutines, on the times when that caller called a function in the cycle. 1399 1400The @code{called} field in the primary line for the cycle has two numbers: 1401first, the number of times functions in the cycle were called by functions 1402outside the cycle; second, the number of times they were called by 1403functions in the cycle (including times when a function in the cycle calls 1404itself). This is a generalization of the usual split into non-recursive and 1405recursive calls. 1406 1407The @code{called} field of a subroutine-line for a cycle member in the 1408cycle's entry says how many time that function was called from functions in 1409the cycle. The total of all these is the second number in the primary line's 1410@code{called} field. 1411 1412In the individual entry for a function in a cycle, the other functions in 1413the same cycle can appear as subroutines and as callers. These lines show 1414how many times each function in the cycle called or was called from each other 1415function in the cycle. The @code{self} and @code{children} fields in these 1416lines are blank because of the difficulty of defining meanings for them 1417when recursion is going on. 1418 1419@node Line-by-line 1420@section Line-by-line Profiling 1421 1422@code{gprof}'s @samp{-l} option causes the program to perform 1423@dfn{line-by-line} profiling. In this mode, histogram 1424samples are assigned not to functions, but to individual 1425lines of source code. This only works with programs compiled with 1426older versions of the @code{gcc} compiler. Newer versions of @code{gcc} 1427use a different program - @code{gcov} - to display line-by-line 1428profiling information. 1429 1430With the older versions of @code{gcc} the program usually has to be 1431compiled with a @samp{-g} option, in addition to @samp{-pg}, in order 1432to generate debugging symbols for tracking source code lines. 1433Note, in much older versions of @code{gcc} the program had to be 1434compiled with the @samp{-a} command line option as well. 1435 1436The flat profile is the most useful output table 1437in line-by-line mode. 1438The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since 1439the current version of @code{gprof} does not propagate 1440call graph arcs from source code lines to the enclosing function. 1441The call graph does, however, show each line of code 1442that called each function, along with a count. 1443 1444Here is a section of @code{gprof}'s output, without line-by-line profiling. 1445Note that @code{ct_init} accounted for four histogram hits, and 144613327 calls to @code{init_block}. 1447 1448@smallexample 1449Flat profile: 1450 1451Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. 1452 % cumulative self self total 1453 time seconds seconds calls us/call us/call name 1454 30.77 0.13 0.04 6335 6.31 6.31 ct_init 1455 1456 1457 Call graph (explanation follows) 1458 1459 1460granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds 1461 1462index % time self children called name 1463 1464 0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long 1465 0.00 0.00 40/13496 deflate 1466 0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast 1467 0.00 0.00 13327/13496 ct_init 1468[7] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block 1469 1470@end smallexample 1471 1472Now let's look at some of @code{gprof}'s output from the same program run, 1473this time with line-by-line profiling enabled. Note that @code{ct_init}'s 1474four histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code---one hit 1475occurred on each of lines 349, 351, 382 and 385. In the call graph, 1476note how 1477@code{ct_init}'s 13327 calls to @code{init_block} are broken down 1478into one call from line 396, 3071 calls from line 384, 3730 calls 1479from line 385, and 6525 calls from 387. 1480 1481@smallexample 1482Flat profile: 1483 1484Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. 1485 % cumulative self 1486 time seconds seconds calls name 1487 7.69 0.10 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:349) 1488 7.69 0.11 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:351) 1489 7.69 0.12 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:382) 1490 7.69 0.13 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:385) 1491 1492 1493 Call graph (explanation follows) 1494 1495 1496granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds 1497 1498 % time self children called name 1499 1500 0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long (gzip.c:1440) 1501 0.00 0.00 1/13496 deflate (deflate.c:763) 1502 0.00 0.00 1/13496 ct_init (trees.c:396) 1503 0.00 0.00 2/13496 deflate (deflate.c:727) 1504 0.00 0.00 4/13496 deflate (deflate.c:686) 1505 0.00 0.00 5/13496 deflate (deflate.c:675) 1506 0.00 0.00 12/13496 deflate (deflate.c:679) 1507 0.00 0.00 16/13496 deflate (deflate.c:730) 1508 0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast (deflate.c:654) 1509 0.00 0.00 3071/13496 ct_init (trees.c:384) 1510 0.00 0.00 3730/13496 ct_init (trees.c:385) 1511 0.00 0.00 6525/13496 ct_init (trees.c:387) 1512[6] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block (trees.c:408) 1513 1514@end smallexample 1515 1516 1517@node Annotated Source 1518@section The Annotated Source Listing 1519 1520@code{gprof}'s @samp{-A} option triggers an annotated source listing, 1521which lists the program's source code, each function labeled with the 1522number of times it was called. You may also need to specify the 1523@samp{-I} option, if @code{gprof} can't find the source code files. 1524 1525With older versions of @code{gcc} compiling with @samp{gcc @dots{} -g 1526-pg -a} augments your program with basic-block counting code, in 1527addition to function counting code. This enables @code{gprof} to 1528determine how many times each line of code was executed. With newer 1529versions of @code{gcc} support for displaying basic-block counts is 1530provided by the @code{gcov} program. 1531 1532For example, consider the following function, taken from gzip, 1533with line numbers added: 1534 1535@smallexample 1536 1 ulg updcrc(s, n) 1537 2 uch *s; 1538 3 unsigned n; 1539 4 @{ 1540 5 register ulg c; 1541 6 1542 7 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL; 1543 8 1544 9 if (s == NULL) @{ 154510 c = 0xffffffffL; 154611 @} else @{ 154712 c = crc; 154813 if (n) do @{ 154914 c = crc_32_tab[...]; 155015 @} while (--n); 155116 @} 155217 crc = c; 155318 return c ^ 0xffffffffL; 155419 @} 1555 1556@end smallexample 1557 1558@code{updcrc} has at least five basic-blocks. 1559One is the function itself. The 1560@code{if} statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks, one 1561for each branch of the @code{if}. A fourth basic-block results from 1562the @code{if} on line 13, and the contents of the @code{do} loop form 1563the fifth basic-block. The compiler may also generate additional 1564basic-blocks to handle various special cases. 1565 1566A program augmented for basic-block counting can be analyzed with 1567@samp{gprof -l -A}. 1568The @samp{-x} option is also helpful, 1569to ensure that each line of code is labeled at least once. 1570Here is @code{updcrc}'s 1571annotated source listing for a sample @code{gzip} run: 1572 1573@smallexample 1574 ulg updcrc(s, n) 1575 uch *s; 1576 unsigned n; 1577 2 ->@{ 1578 register ulg c; 1579 1580 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL; 1581 1582 2 -> if (s == NULL) @{ 1583 1 -> c = 0xffffffffL; 1584 1 -> @} else @{ 1585 1 -> c = crc; 1586 1 -> if (n) do @{ 1587 26312 -> c = crc_32_tab[...]; 158826312,1,26311 -> @} while (--n); 1589 @} 1590 2 -> crc = c; 1591 2 -> return c ^ 0xffffffffL; 1592 2 ->@} 1593@end smallexample 1594 1595In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through 1596each branch of the @code{if} statement. The body of the @code{do} 1597loop was executed a total of 26312 times. Note how the @code{while} 1598statement is annotated. It began execution 26312 times, once for 1599each iteration through the loop. One of those times (the last time) 1600it exited, while it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times. 1601 1602@node Inaccuracy 1603@chapter Inaccuracy of @code{gprof} Output 1604 1605@menu 1606* Sampling Error:: Statistical margins of error 1607* Assumptions:: Estimating children times 1608@end menu 1609 1610@node Sampling Error 1611@section Statistical Sampling Error 1612 1613The run-time figures that @code{gprof} gives you are based on a sampling 1614process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy. If a function runs 1615only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling process 1616ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a pretty good 1617chance it will actually find that function zero times, or twice. 1618 1619By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures are derived 1620by counting, not sampling. They are completely accurate and will not 1621vary from run to run if your program is deterministic and single 1622threaded. In multi-threaded applications, or single threaded 1623applications that link with multi-threaded libraries, the counts are 1624only deterministic if the counting function is thread-safe. (Note: 1625beware that the mcount counting function in glibc is @emph{not} 1626thread-safe). @xref{Implementation, ,Implementation of Profiling}. 1627 1628The @dfn{sampling period} that is printed at the beginning of the flat 1629profile says how often samples are taken. The rule of thumb is that a 1630run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the sampling 1631period. 1632 1633The actual amount of error can be predicted. 1634For @var{n} samples, the @emph{expected} error 1635is the square-root of @var{n}. For example, 1636if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{foo}'s run-time is 1 second, 1637@var{n} is 100 samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(@var{n}) is 10 samples, so 1638the expected error in @code{foo}'s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds), 1639or ten percent of the observed value. 1640Again, if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{bar}'s run-time is 1641100 seconds, @var{n} is 10000 samples, sqrt(@var{n}) is 100 samples, so 1642the expected error in @code{bar}'s run-time is 1 second, 1643or one percent of the observed value. 1644It is likely to 1645vary this much @emph{on the average} from one profiling run to the next. 1646(@emph{Sometimes} it will vary more.) 1647 1648This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of information. 1649If the program's @emph{total} run-time is large, a small run-time for one 1650function does tell you that that function used an insignificant fraction of 1651the whole program's time. Usually this means it is not worth optimizing. 1652 1653One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but similar) 1654input data so it will take longer. Another way is to combine the data from 1655several runs, using the @samp{-s} option of @code{gprof}. Here is how: 1656 1657@enumerate 1658@item 1659Run your program once. 1660 1661@item 1662Issue the command @samp{mv gmon.out gmon.sum}. 1663 1664@item 1665Run your program again, the same as before. 1666 1667@item 1668Merge the new data in @file{gmon.out} into @file{gmon.sum} with this command: 1669 1670@example 1671gprof -s @var{executable-file} gmon.out gmon.sum 1672@end example 1673 1674@item 1675Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish. 1676 1677@item 1678Analyze the cumulative data using this command: 1679 1680@example 1681gprof @var{executable-file} gmon.sum > @var{output-file} 1682@end example 1683@end enumerate 1684 1685@node Assumptions 1686@section Estimating @code{children} Times 1687 1688Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates---for example, the 1689@code{children} time values and all the time figures in caller and 1690subroutine lines. 1691 1692There is no direct information about these measurements in the profile 1693data itself. Instead, @code{gprof} estimates them by making an assumption 1694about your program that might or might not be true. 1695 1696The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to any 1697function @code{foo} is not correlated with who called @code{foo}. If 1698@code{foo} used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to @code{foo} came 1699from @code{a}, then @code{foo} contributes 2 seconds to @code{a}'s 1700@code{children} time, by assumption. 1701 1702This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is far 1703from true. Suppose that @code{foo} returns very quickly when its argument 1704is zero; suppose that @code{a} always passes zero as an argument, while 1705other callers of @code{foo} pass other arguments. In this program, all the 1706time spent in @code{foo} is in the calls from callers other than @code{a}. 1707But @code{gprof} has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and 1708incorrectly charge 2 seconds of time in @code{foo} to the children of 1709@code{a}. 1710 1711@c FIXME - has this been fixed? 1712We hope some day to put more complete data into @file{gmon.out}, so that 1713this assumption is no longer needed, if we can figure out how. For the 1714novice, the estimated figures are usually more useful than misleading. 1715 1716@node How do I? 1717@chapter Answers to Common Questions 1718 1719@table @asis 1720@item How can I get more exact information about hot spots in my program? 1721 1722Looking at the per-line call counts only tells part of the story. 1723Because @code{gprof} can only report call times and counts by function, 1724the best way to get finer-grained information on where the program 1725is spending its time is to re-factor large functions into sequences 1726of calls to smaller ones. Beware however that this can introduce 1727artificial hot spots since compiling with @samp{-pg} adds a significant 1728overhead to function calls. An alternative solution is to use a 1729non-intrusive profiler, e.g.@: oprofile. 1730 1731@item How do I find which lines in my program were executed the most times? 1732 1733Use the @code{gcov} program. 1734 1735@item How do I find which lines in my program called a particular function? 1736 1737Use @samp{gprof -l} and lookup the function in the call graph. 1738The callers will be broken down by function and line number. 1739 1740@item How do I analyze a program that runs for less than a second? 1741 1742Try using a shell script like this one: 1743 1744@example 1745for i in `seq 1 100`; do 1746 fastprog 1747 mv gmon.out gmon.out.$i 1748done 1749 1750gprof -s fastprog gmon.out.* 1751 1752gprof fastprog gmon.sum 1753@end example 1754 1755If your program is completely deterministic, all the call counts 1756will be simple multiples of 100 (i.e., a function called once in 1757each run will appear with a call count of 100). 1758 1759@end table 1760 1761@node Incompatibilities 1762@chapter Incompatibilities with Unix @code{gprof} 1763 1764@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Berkeley Unix @code{gprof} use the same data 1765file @file{gmon.out}, and provide essentially the same information. But 1766there are a few differences. 1767 1768@itemize @bullet 1769@item 1770@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} uses a new, generalized file format with support 1771for basic-block execution counts and non-realtime histograms. A magic 1772cookie and version number allows @code{gprof} to easily identify 1773new style files. Old BSD-style files can still be read. 1774@xref{File Format, ,Profiling Data File Format}. 1775 1776@item 1777For a recursive function, Unix @code{gprof} lists the function as a 1778parent and as a child, with a @code{calls} field that lists the number 1779of recursive calls. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} omits these lines and puts 1780the number of recursive calls in the primary line. 1781 1782@item 1783When a function is suppressed from the call graph with @samp{-e}, @sc{gnu} 1784@code{gprof} still lists it as a subroutine of functions that call it. 1785 1786@item 1787@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} accepts the @samp{-k} with its argument 1788in the form @samp{from/to}, instead of @samp{from to}. 1789 1790@item 1791In the annotated source listing, 1792if there are multiple basic blocks on the same line, 1793@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} prints all of their counts, separated by commas. 1794 1795@ignore - it does this now 1796@item 1797The function names printed in @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} output do not include 1798the leading underscores that are added internally to the front of all 1799C identifiers on many operating systems. 1800@end ignore 1801 1802@item 1803The blurbs, field widths, and output formats are different. @sc{gnu} 1804@code{gprof} prints blurbs after the tables, so that you can see the 1805tables without skipping the blurbs. 1806@end itemize 1807 1808@node Details 1809@chapter Details of Profiling 1810 1811@menu 1812* Implementation:: How a program collects profiling information 1813* File Format:: Format of @samp{gmon.out} files 1814* Internals:: @code{gprof}'s internal operation 1815* Debugging:: Using @code{gprof}'s @samp{-d} option 1816@end menu 1817 1818@node Implementation 1819@section Implementation of Profiling 1820 1821Profiling works by changing how every function in your program is compiled 1822so that when it is called, it will stash away some information about where 1823it was called from. From this, the profiler can figure out what function 1824called it, and can count how many times it was called. This change is made 1825by the compiler when your program is compiled with the @samp{-pg} option, 1826which causes every function to call @code{mcount} 1827(or @code{_mcount}, or @code{__mcount}, depending on the OS and compiler) 1828as one of its first operations. 1829 1830The @code{mcount} routine, included in the profiling library, 1831is responsible for recording in an in-memory call graph table 1832both its parent routine (the child) and its parent's parent. This is 1833typically done by examining the stack frame to find both 1834the address of the child, and the return address in the original parent. 1835Since this is a very machine-dependent operation, @code{mcount} 1836itself is typically a short assembly-language stub routine 1837that extracts the required 1838information, and then calls @code{__mcount_internal} 1839(a normal C function) with two arguments---@code{frompc} and @code{selfpc}. 1840@code{__mcount_internal} is responsible for maintaining 1841the in-memory call graph, which records @code{frompc}, @code{selfpc}, 1842and the number of times each of these call arcs was traversed. 1843 1844GCC Version 2 provides a magical function (@code{__builtin_return_address}), 1845which allows a generic @code{mcount} function to extract the 1846required information from the stack frame. However, on some 1847architectures, most notably the SPARC, using this builtin can be 1848very computationally expensive, and an assembly language version 1849of @code{mcount} is used for performance reasons. 1850 1851Number-of-calls information for library routines is collected by using a 1852special version of the C library. The programs in it are the same as in 1853the usual C library, but they were compiled with @samp{-pg}. If you 1854link your program with @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg}, it automatically uses the 1855profiling version of the library. 1856 1857Profiling also involves watching your program as it runs, and keeping a 1858histogram of where the program counter happens to be every now and then. 1859Typically the program counter is looked at around 100 times per second of 1860run time, but the exact frequency may vary from system to system. 1861 1862This is done is one of two ways. Most UNIX-like operating systems 1863provide a @code{profil()} system call, which registers a memory 1864array with the kernel, along with a scale 1865factor that determines how the program's address space maps 1866into the array. 1867Typical scaling values cause every 2 to 8 bytes of address space 1868to map into a single array slot. 1869On every tick of the system clock 1870(assuming the profiled program is running), the value of the 1871program counter is examined and the corresponding slot in 1872the memory array is incremented. Since this is done in the kernel, 1873which had to interrupt the process anyway to handle the clock 1874interrupt, very little additional system overhead is required. 1875 1876However, some operating systems, most notably Linux 2.0 (and earlier), 1877do not provide a @code{profil()} system call. On such a system, 1878arrangements are made for the kernel to periodically deliver 1879a signal to the process (typically via @code{setitimer()}), 1880which then performs the same operation of examining the 1881program counter and incrementing a slot in the memory array. 1882Since this method requires a signal to be delivered to 1883user space every time a sample is taken, it uses considerably 1884more overhead than kernel-based profiling. Also, due to the 1885added delay required to deliver the signal, this method is 1886less accurate as well. 1887 1888A special startup routine allocates memory for the histogram and 1889either calls @code{profil()} or sets up 1890a clock signal handler. 1891This routine (@code{monstartup}) can be invoked in several ways. 1892On Linux systems, a special profiling startup file @code{gcrt0.o}, 1893which invokes @code{monstartup} before @code{main}, 1894is used instead of the default @code{crt0.o}. 1895Use of this special startup file is one of the effects 1896of using @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg} to link. 1897On SPARC systems, no special startup files are used. 1898Rather, the @code{mcount} routine, when it is invoked for 1899the first time (typically when @code{main} is called), 1900calls @code{monstartup}. 1901 1902If the compiler's @samp{-a} option was used, basic-block counting 1903is also enabled. Each object file is then compiled with a static array 1904of counts, initially zero. 1905In the executable code, every time a new basic-block begins 1906(i.e., when an @code{if} statement appears), an extra instruction 1907is inserted to increment the corresponding count in the array. 1908At compile time, a paired array was constructed that recorded 1909the starting address of each basic-block. Taken together, 1910the two arrays record the starting address of every basic-block, 1911along with the number of times it was executed. 1912 1913The profiling library also includes a function (@code{mcleanup}) which is 1914typically registered using @code{atexit()} to be called as the 1915program exits, and is responsible for writing the file @file{gmon.out}. 1916Profiling is turned off, various headers are output, and the histogram 1917is written, followed by the call-graph arcs and the basic-block counts. 1918 1919The output from @code{gprof} gives no indication of parts of your program that 1920are limited by I/O or swapping bandwidth. This is because samples of the 1921program counter are taken at fixed intervals of the program's run time. 1922Therefore, the 1923time measurements in @code{gprof} output say nothing about time that your 1924program was not running. For example, a part of the program that creates 1925so much data that it cannot all fit in physical memory at once may run very 1926slowly due to thrashing, but @code{gprof} will say it uses little time. On 1927the other hand, sampling by run time has the advantage that the amount of 1928load due to other users won't directly affect the output you get. 1929 1930@node File Format 1931@section Profiling Data File Format 1932 1933The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not contain a 1934magic cookie that allows to check whether a data file really is a 1935@code{gprof} file. Furthermore, it does not provide a version number, thus 1936rendering changes to the file format almost impossible. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} 1937uses a new file format that provides these features. For backward 1938compatibility, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} continues to support the old BSD-derived 1939format, but not all features are supported with it. For example, 1940basic-block execution counts cannot be accommodated by the old file 1941format. 1942 1943The new file format is defined in header file @file{gmon_out.h}. It 1944consists of a header containing the magic cookie and a version number, 1945as well as some spare bytes available for future extensions. All data 1946in a profile data file is in the native format of the target for which 1947the profile was collected. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} adapts automatically 1948to the byte-order in use. 1949 1950In the new file format, the header is followed by a sequence of 1951records. Currently, there are three different record types: histogram 1952records, call-graph arc records, and basic-block execution count 1953records. Each file can contain any number of each record type. When 1954reading a file, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} will ensure records of the same type are 1955compatible with each other and compute the union of all records. For 1956example, for basic-block execution counts, the union is simply the sum 1957of all execution counts for each basic-block. 1958 1959@subsection Histogram Records 1960 1961Histogram records consist of a header that is followed by an array of 1962bins. The header contains the text-segment range that the histogram 1963spans, the size of the histogram in bytes (unlike in the old BSD 1964format, this does not include the size of the header), the rate of the 1965profiling clock, and the physical dimension that the bin counts 1966represent after being scaled by the profiling clock rate. The 1967physical dimension is specified in two parts: a long name of up to 15 1968characters and a single character abbreviation. For example, a 1969histogram representing real-time would specify the long name as 1970``seconds'' and the abbreviation as ``s''. This feature is useful for 1971architectures that support performance monitor hardware (which, 1972fortunately, is becoming increasingly common). For example, under DEC 1973OSF/1, the ``uprofile'' command can be used to produce a histogram of, 1974say, instruction cache misses. In this case, the dimension in the 1975histogram header could be set to ``i-cache misses'' and the abbreviation 1976could be set to ``1'' (because it is simply a count, not a physical 1977dimension). Also, the profiling rate would have to be set to 1 in 1978this case. 1979 1980Histogram bins are 16-bit numbers and each bin represent an equal 1981amount of text-space. For example, if the text-segment is one 1982thousand bytes long and if there are ten bins in the histogram, each 1983bin represents one hundred bytes. 1984 1985 1986@subsection Call-Graph Records 1987 1988Call-graph records have a format that is identical to the one used in 1989the BSD-derived file format. It consists of an arc in the call graph 1990and a count indicating the number of times the arc was traversed 1991during program execution. Arcs are specified by a pair of addresses: 1992the first must be within caller's function and the second must be 1993within the callee's function. When performing profiling at the 1994function level, these addresses can point anywhere within the 1995respective function. However, when profiling at the line-level, it is 1996better if the addresses are as close to the call-site/entry-point as 1997possible. This will ensure that the line-level call-graph is able to 1998identify exactly which line of source code performed calls to a 1999function. 2000 2001@subsection Basic-Block Execution Count Records 2002 2003Basic-block execution count records consist of a header followed by a 2004sequence of address/count pairs. The header simply specifies the 2005length of the sequence. In an address/count pair, the address 2006identifies a basic-block and the count specifies the number of times 2007that basic-block was executed. Any address within the basic-address can 2008be used. 2009 2010@node Internals 2011@section @code{gprof}'s Internal Operation 2012 2013Like most programs, @code{gprof} begins by processing its options. 2014During this stage, it may building its symspec list 2015(@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_add}), if 2016options are specified which use symspecs. 2017@code{gprof} maintains a single linked list of symspecs, 2018which will eventually get turned into 12 symbol tables, 2019organized into six include/exclude pairs---one 2020pair each for the flat profile (INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT), 2021the call graph arcs (INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS), 2022printing in the call graph (INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH), 2023timing propagation in the call graph (INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME), 2024the annotated source listing (INCL_ANNO/EXCL_ANNO), 2025and the execution count listing (INCL_EXEC/EXCL_EXEC). 2026 2027After option processing, @code{gprof} finishes 2028building the symspec list by adding all the symspecs in 2029@code{default_excluded_list} to the exclude lists 2030EXCL_TIME and EXCL_GRAPH, and if line-by-line profiling is specified, 2031EXCL_FLAT as well. 2032These default excludes are not added to EXCL_ANNO, EXCL_ARCS, and EXCL_EXEC. 2033 2034Next, the BFD library is called to open the object file, 2035verify that it is an object file, 2036and read its symbol table (@code{core.c:@-core_init}), 2037using @code{bfd_canonicalize_symtab} after mallocing 2038an appropriately sized array of symbols. At this point, 2039function mappings are read (if the @samp{--file-ordering} option 2040has been specified), and the core text space is read into 2041memory (if the @samp{-c} option was given). 2042 2043@code{gprof}'s own symbol table, an array of Sym structures, 2044is now built. 2045This is done in one of two ways, by one of two routines, depending 2046on whether line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option) has been 2047enabled. 2048For normal profiling, the BFD canonical symbol table is scanned. 2049For line-by-line profiling, every 2050text space address is examined, and a new symbol table entry 2051gets created every time the line number changes. 2052In either case, two passes are made through the symbol 2053table---one to count the size of the symbol table required, 2054and the other to actually read the symbols. In between the 2055two passes, a single array of type @code{Sym} is created of 2056the appropriate length. 2057Finally, @code{symtab.c:@-symtab_finalize} 2058is called to sort the symbol table and remove duplicate entries 2059(entries with the same memory address). 2060 2061The symbol table must be a contiguous array for two reasons. 2062First, the @code{qsort} library function (which sorts an array) 2063will be used to sort the symbol table. 2064Also, the symbol lookup routine (@code{symtab.c:@-sym_lookup}), 2065which finds symbols 2066based on memory address, uses a binary search algorithm 2067which requires the symbol table to be a sorted array. 2068Function symbols are indicated with an @code{is_func} flag. 2069Line number symbols have no special flags set. 2070Additionally, a symbol can have an @code{is_static} flag 2071to indicate that it is a local symbol. 2072 2073With the symbol table read, the symspecs can now be translated 2074into Syms (@code{sym_ids.c:@-sym_id_parse}). Remember that a single 2075symspec can match multiple symbols. 2076An array of symbol tables 2077(@code{syms}) is created, each entry of which is a symbol table 2078of Syms to be included or excluded from a particular listing. 2079The master symbol table and the symspecs are examined by nested 2080loops, and every symbol that matches a symspec is inserted 2081into the appropriate syms table. This is done twice, once to 2082count the size of each required symbol table, and again to build 2083the tables, which have been malloced between passes. 2084From now on, to determine whether a symbol is on an include 2085or exclude symspec list, @code{gprof} simply uses its 2086standard symbol lookup routine on the appropriate table 2087in the @code{syms} array. 2088 2089Now the profile data file(s) themselves are read 2090(@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_read}), 2091first by checking for a new-style @samp{gmon.out} header, 2092then assuming this is an old-style BSD @samp{gmon.out} 2093if the magic number test failed. 2094 2095New-style histogram records are read by @code{hist.c:@-hist_read_rec}. 2096For the first histogram record, allocate a memory array to hold 2097all the bins, and read them in. 2098When multiple profile data files (or files with multiple histogram 2099records) are read, the memory ranges of each pair of histogram records 2100must be either equal, or non-overlapping. For each pair of histogram 2101records, the resolution (memory region size divided by the number of 2102bins) must be the same. The time unit must be the same for all 2103histogram records. If the above containts are met, all histograms 2104for the same memory range are merged. 2105 2106As each call graph record is read (@code{call_graph.c:@-cg_read_rec}), 2107the parent and child addresses 2108are matched to symbol table entries, and a call graph arc is 2109created by @code{cg_arcs.c:@-arc_add}, unless the arc fails a symspec 2110check against INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS. As each arc is added, 2111a linked list is maintained of the parent's child arcs, and of the child's 2112parent arcs. 2113Both the child's call count and the arc's call count are 2114incremented by the record's call count. 2115 2116Basic-block records are read (@code{basic_blocks.c:@-bb_read_rec}), 2117but only if line-by-line profiling has been selected. 2118Each basic-block address is matched to a corresponding line 2119symbol in the symbol table, and an entry made in the symbol's 2120bb_addr and bb_calls arrays. Again, if multiple basic-block 2121records are present for the same address, the call counts 2122are cumulative. 2123 2124A gmon.sum file is dumped, if requested (@code{gmon_io.c:@-gmon_out_write}). 2125 2126If histograms were present in the data files, assign them to symbols 2127(@code{hist.c:@-hist_assign_samples}) by iterating over all the sample 2128bins and assigning them to symbols. Since the symbol table 2129is sorted in order of ascending memory addresses, we can 2130simple follow along in the symbol table as we make our pass 2131over the sample bins. 2132This step includes a symspec check against INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT. 2133Depending on the histogram 2134scale factor, a sample bin may span multiple symbols, 2135in which case a fraction of the sample count is allocated 2136to each symbol, proportional to the degree of overlap. 2137This effect is rare for normal profiling, but overlaps 2138are more common during line-by-line profiling, and can 2139cause each of two adjacent lines to be credited with half 2140a hit, for example. 2141 2142If call graph data is present, @code{cg_arcs.c:@-cg_assemble} is called. 2143First, if @samp{-c} was specified, a machine-dependent 2144routine (@code{find_call}) scans through each symbol's machine code, 2145looking for subroutine call instructions, and adding them 2146to the call graph with a zero call count. 2147A topological sort is performed by depth-first numbering 2148all the symbols (@code{cg_dfn.c:@-cg_dfn}), so that 2149children are always numbered less than their parents, 2150then making a array of pointers into the symbol table and sorting it into 2151numerical order, which is reverse topological 2152order (children appear before parents). 2153Cycles are also detected at this point, all members 2154of which are assigned the same topological number. 2155Two passes are now made through this sorted array of symbol pointers. 2156The first pass, from end to beginning (parents to children), 2157computes the fraction of child time to propagate to each parent 2158and a print flag. 2159The print flag reflects symspec handling of INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH, 2160with a parent's include or exclude (print or no print) property 2161being propagated to its children, unless they themselves explicitly appear 2162in INCL_GRAPH or EXCL_GRAPH. 2163A second pass, from beginning to end (children to parents) actually 2164propagates the timings along the call graph, subject 2165to a check against INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME. 2166With the print flag, fractions, and timings now stored in the symbol 2167structures, the topological sort array is now discarded, and a 2168new array of pointers is assembled, this time sorted by propagated time. 2169 2170Finally, print the various outputs the user requested, which is now fairly 2171straightforward. The call graph (@code{cg_print.c:@-cg_print}) and 2172flat profile (@code{hist.c:@-hist_print}) are regurgitations of values 2173already computed. The annotated source listing 2174(@code{basic_blocks.c:@-print_annotated_source}) uses basic-block 2175information, if present, to label each line of code with call counts, 2176otherwise only the function call counts are presented. 2177 2178The function ordering code is marginally well documented 2179in the source code itself (@code{cg_print.c}). Basically, 2180the functions with the most use and the most parents are 2181placed first, followed by other functions with the most use, 2182followed by lower use functions, followed by unused functions 2183at the end. 2184 2185@node Debugging 2186@section Debugging @code{gprof} 2187 2188If @code{gprof} was compiled with debugging enabled, 2189the @samp{-d} option triggers debugging output 2190(to stdout) which can be helpful in understanding its operation. 2191The debugging number specified is interpreted as a sum of the following 2192options: 2193 2194@table @asis 2195@item 2 - Topological sort 2196Monitor depth-first numbering of symbols during call graph analysis 2197@item 4 - Cycles 2198Shows symbols as they are identified as cycle heads 2199@item 16 - Tallying 2200As the call graph arcs are read, show each arc and how 2201the total calls to each function are tallied 2202@item 32 - Call graph arc sorting 2203Details sorting individual parents/children within each call graph entry 2204@item 64 - Reading histogram and call graph records 2205Shows address ranges of histograms as they are read, and each 2206call graph arc 2207@item 128 - Symbol table 2208Reading, classifying, and sorting the symbol table from the object file. 2209For line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option), also shows line numbers 2210being assigned to memory addresses. 2211@item 256 - Static call graph 2212Trace operation of @samp{-c} option 2213@item 512 - Symbol table and arc table lookups 2214Detail operation of lookup routines 2215@item 1024 - Call graph propagation 2216Shows how function times are propagated along the call graph 2217@item 2048 - Basic-blocks 2218Shows basic-block records as they are read from profile data 2219(only meaningful with @samp{-l} option) 2220@item 4096 - Symspecs 2221Shows symspec-to-symbol pattern matching operation 2222@item 8192 - Annotate source 2223Tracks operation of @samp{-A} option 2224@end table 2225 2226@node GNU Free Documentation License 2227@appendix GNU Free Documentation License 2228@include fdl.texi 2229 2230@bye 2231 2232NEEDS AN INDEX 2233 2234-T - "traditional BSD style": How is it different? Should the 2235differences be documented? 2236 2237example flat file adds up to 100.01%... 2238 2239note: time estimates now only go out to one decimal place (0.0), where 2240they used to extend two (78.67). 2241