1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
2 
3 struct A { };
4 A::A() { } // expected-error {{definition of implicitly declared default constructor}}
5 
6 struct B { };
7 B::B(const B&) { } // expected-error {{definition of implicitly declared copy constructor}}
8 
9 struct C { };
10 C& C::operator=(const C&) { return *this; } // expected-error {{definition of implicitly declared copy assignment operator}}
11 
12 struct D { };
13 D::~D() { } // expected-error {{definition of implicitly declared destructor}}
14 
15 // Make sure that the special member functions are introduced for
16 // name-lookup purposes and overload with user-declared
17 // constructors and assignment operators.
18 namespace PR6570 {
19   class A { };
20 
21   class B {
22   public:
23     B() {}
24 
25     B(const A& a) {
26       operator = (CONST);
27       operator = (a);
28     }
29 
30     B& operator = (const A& a) {
31       return *this;
32     }
33 
34     void f(const A &a) {
35       B b(a);
36     };
37 
38     static const B CONST;
39   };
40 
41 }
42 
43 namespace PR7594 {
44   // If the lazy declaration of special member functions is triggered
45   // in an out-of-line initializer, make sure the functions aren't in
46   // the initializer scope. This used to crash Clang:
47   struct C {
48     C();
49     static C *c;
50   };
51   C *C::c = new C();
52 }
53 
54 namespace Recursion {
55   template<typename T> struct InvokeCopyConstructor {
56     static const T &get();
57     typedef decltype(T(get())) type; // expected-error {{no matching conver}}
58   };
59   struct B;
60   struct A {
61     typedef B type;
62     template<typename T,
63              typename = typename InvokeCopyConstructor<typename T::type>::type>
64     // expected-note@-1 {{in instantiation of template class}}
65     A(const T &);
66     // expected-note@-1 {{in instantiation of default argument}}
67     // expected-note@-2 {{while substituting deduced template arguments}}
68   };
69   struct B { // expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit move }}
70     B(); // expected-note {{candidate constructor not viable}}
71     A a;
72   };
73   // Triggering the declaration of B's copy constructor causes overload
74   // resolution to occur for A's copying constructor, which instantiates
75   // InvokeCopyConstructor<B>, which triggers the declaration of B's copy
76   // constructor. Notionally, this happens when we get to the end of the
77   // definition of 'struct B', so there is no declared copy constructor yet.
78   //
79   // This behavior is g++-compatible, but isn't exactly right; the class is
80   // supposed to be incomplete when we implicitly declare its special members.
81   B b = B();
82 
83 
84   // Another case, which isn't ill-formed under our rules. This is inspired by
85   // a problem which occurs when combining CGAL with libstdc++-4.7.
86 
87   template<typename T> T &&declval();
88   template<typename T, typename U> struct pair {
89     pair();
90     template<typename V, typename W,
91              typename = decltype(T(declval<const V&>())),
92              typename = decltype(U(declval<const W&>()))>
93     pair(const pair<V,W> &);
94   };
95 
96   template<typename K> struct Line;
97 
98   template<typename K> struct Vector {
99     Vector(const Line<K> &l);
100   };
101 
102   template<typename K> struct Point {
103     Vector<K> v;
104   };
105 
106   template<typename K> struct Line {
107     pair<Point<K>, Vector<K>> x;
108   };
109 
110   // Trigger declaration of Line copy ctor, which causes substitution into
111   // pair's templated constructor, which triggers instantiation of the
112   // definition of Point's copy constructor, which performs overload resolution
113   // on Vector's constructors, which requires declaring all of Line's
114   // constructors. That should not find a copy constructor (because we've not
115   // declared it yet), but by the time we get all the way back here, we should
116   // find the copy constructor.
117   Line<void> L1;
118   Line<void> L2(L1);
119 }
120