1=================================
2How To Release LLVM To The Public
3=================================
4
5.. contents::
6   :local:
7   :depth: 1
8
9Introduction
10============
11
12This document contains information about successfully releasing LLVM ---
13including subprojects: e.g., ``clang`` and ``dragonegg`` --- to the public.  It
14is the Release Manager's responsibility to ensure that a high quality build of
15LLVM is released.
16
17If you're looking for the document on how to test the release candidates and
18create the binary packages, please refer to the :doc:`ReleaseProcess` instead.
19
20.. _timeline:
21
22Release Timeline
23================
24
25LLVM is released on a time based schedule --- with major releases roughly
26every 6 months.  In between major releases there may be dot releases.
27The release manager will determine if and when to make a dot release based
28on feedback from the community.  Typically, dot releases should be made if
29there are large number of bug-fixes in the stable branch or a critical bug
30has been discovered that affects a large number of users.
31
32Unless otherwise stated, dot releases will follow the same procedure as
33major releases.
34
35The release process is roughly as follows:
36
37* Set code freeze and branch creation date for 6 months after last code freeze
38  date.  Announce release schedule to the LLVM community and update the website.
39
40* Create release branch and begin release process.
41
42* Send out release candidate sources for first round of testing.  Testing lasts
43  7-10 days.  During the first round of testing, any regressions found should be
44  fixed.  Patches are merged from mainline into the release branch.  Also, all
45  features need to be completed during this time.  Any features not completed at
46  the end of the first round of testing will be removed or disabled for the
47  release.
48
49* Generate and send out the second release candidate sources.  Only *critial*
50  bugs found during this testing phase will be fixed.  Any bugs introduced by
51  merged patches will be fixed.  If so a third round of testing is needed.
52
53* The release notes are updated.
54
55* Finally, release!
56
57The release process will be accelerated for dot releases.  If the first round
58of testing finds no critical bugs and no regressions since the last major release,
59then additional rounds of testing will not be required.
60
61Release Process
62===============
63
64.. contents::
65   :local:
66
67Release Administrative Tasks
68----------------------------
69
70This section describes a few administrative tasks that need to be done for the
71release process to begin.  Specifically, it involves:
72
73* Creating the release branch,
74
75* Setting version numbers, and
76
77* Tagging release candidates for the release team to begin testing.
78
79Create Release Branch
80^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
81
82Branch the Subversion trunk using the following procedure:
83
84#. Remind developers that the release branching is imminent and to refrain from
85   committing patches that might break the build.  E.g., new features, large
86   patches for works in progress, an overhaul of the type system, an exciting
87   new TableGen feature, etc.
88
89#. Verify that the current Subversion trunk is in decent shape by
90   examining nightly tester and buildbot results.
91
92#. Create the release branch for ``llvm``, ``clang``, the ``test-suite``, and
93   ``dragonegg`` from the last known good revision.  The branch's name is
94   ``release_XY``, where ``X`` is the major and ``Y`` the minor release
95   numbers.  The branches should be created using the following commands:
96
97   ::
98
99     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk \
100                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY
101
102     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk \
103                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY
104
105     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk \
106                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY
107
108     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk \
109                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY
110
111#. Advise developers that they may now check their patches into the Subversion
112   tree again.
113
114#. The Release Manager should switch to the release branch, because all changes
115   to the release will now be done in the branch.  The easiest way to do this is
116   to grab a working copy using the following commands:
117
118   ::
119
120     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY llvm-X.Y
121
122     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY clang-X.Y
123
124     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY dragonegg-X.Y
125
126     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY test-suite-X.Y
127
128Update LLVM Version
129^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
130
131After creating the LLVM release branch, update the release branches'
132``autoconf`` and ``configure.ac`` versions from '``X.Ysvn``' to '``X.Y``'.
133Update it on mainline as well to be the next version ('``X.Y+1svn``').
134Regenerate the configure scripts for both ``llvm`` and the ``test-suite``.
135
136In addition, the version numbers of all the Bugzilla components must be updated
137for the next release.
138
139Build the LLVM Release Candidates
140^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
141
142Create release candidates for ``llvm``, ``clang``, ``dragonegg``, and the LLVM
143``test-suite`` by tagging the branch with the respective release candidate
144number.  For instance, to create **Release Candidate 1** you would issue the
145following commands:
146
147::
148
149  $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XYZ
150  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY \
151             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1
152
153  $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XYZ
154  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY \
155             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1
156
157  $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XYZ
158  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY \
159             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1
160
161  $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XYZ
162  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY \
163             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1
164
165Similarly, **Release Candidate 2** would be named ``RC2`` and so on.  This keeps
166a permanent copy of the release candidate around for people to export and build
167as they wish.  The final released sources will be tagged in the ``RELEASE_XYZ``
168directory as ``Final`` (c.f. :ref:`tag`).
169
170The Release Manager may supply pre-packaged source tarballs for users.  This can
171be done with the following commands:
172
173::
174
175  $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1 llvm-X.Yrc1
176  $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1 clang-X.Yrc1
177  $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1 dragonegg-X.Yrc1
178  $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/rc1 llvm-test-X.Yrc1
179
180  $ tar -cvf - llvm-X.Yrc1        | gzip > llvm-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
181  $ tar -cvf - clang-X.Yrc1       | gzip > clang-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
182  $ tar -cvf - dragonegg-X.Yrc1   | gzip > dragonegg-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
183  $ tar -cvf - llvm-test-X.Yrc1   | gzip > llvm-test-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
184
185Building the Release
186--------------------
187
188The builds of ``llvm``, ``clang``, and ``dragonegg`` *must* be free of
189errors and warnings in Debug, Release+Asserts, and Release builds.  If all
190builds are clean, then the release passes Build Qualification.
191
192The ``make`` options for building the different modes:
193
194+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
195| Mode            | Options                                     |
196+=================+=============================================+
197| Debug           | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0``                      |
198+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
199| Release+Asserts | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1``                      |
200+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
201| Release         | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1`` |
202+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
203
204Build LLVM
205^^^^^^^^^^
206
207Build ``Debug``, ``Release+Asserts``, and ``Release`` versions
208of ``llvm`` on all supported platforms.  Directions to build ``llvm``
209are :doc:`here <GettingStarted>`.
210
211Build Clang Binary Distribution
212^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
213
214Creating the ``clang`` binary distribution (Debug/Release+Asserts/Release)
215requires performing the following steps for each supported platform:
216
217#. Build clang according to the directions `here
218   <http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html>`__.
219
220#. Build both a Debug and Release version of clang.  The binary will be the
221   Release build.
222
223#. Package ``clang`` (details to follow).
224
225Target Specific Build Details
226^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
227
228The table below specifies which compilers are used for each Arch/OS combination
229when qualifying the build of ``llvm``, ``clang``, and ``dragonegg``.
230
231+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
232| Architecture | OS            | compiler             |
233+==============+===============+======================+
234| x86-32       | Mac OS 10.5   | gcc 4.0.1            |
235+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
236| x86-32       | Linux         | gcc 4.2.X, gcc 4.3.X |
237+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
238| x86-32       | FreeBSD       | gcc 4.2.X            |
239+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
240| x86-32       | mingw         | gcc 3.4.5            |
241+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
242| x86-64       | Mac OS 10.5   | gcc 4.0.1            |
243+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
244| x86-64       | Linux         | gcc 4.2.X, gcc 4.3.X |
245+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
246| x86-64       | FreeBSD       | gcc 4.2.X            |
247+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
248| ARMv7        | Linux         | gcc 4.6.X, gcc 4.7.X |
249+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
250
251Release Qualification Criteria
252------------------------------
253
254A release is qualified when it has no regressions from the previous release (or
255baseline).  Regressions are related to correctness first and performance second.
256(We may tolerate some minor performance regressions if they are deemed
257necessary for the general quality of the compiler.)
258
259**Regressions are new failures in the set of tests that are used to qualify
260each product and only include things on the list.  Every release will have
261some bugs in it.  It is the reality of developing a complex piece of
262software.  We need a very concrete and definitive release criteria that
263ensures we have monotonically improving quality on some metric.  The metric we
264use is described below.  This doesn't mean that we don't care about other
265criteria, but these are the criteria which we found to be most important and
266which must be satisfied before a release can go out.**
267
268Qualify LLVM
269^^^^^^^^^^^^
270
271LLVM is qualified when it has a clean test run without a front-end.  And it has
272no regressions when using either ``clang`` or ``dragonegg`` with the
273``test-suite`` from the previous release.
274
275Qualify Clang
276^^^^^^^^^^^^^
277
278``Clang`` is qualified when front-end specific tests in the ``llvm`` regression
279test suite all pass, clang's own test suite passes cleanly, and there are no
280regressions in the ``test-suite``.
281
282Specific Target Qualification Details
283^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
284
285+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
286| Architecture | OS          | clang baseline | tests                       |
287+==============+=============+================+=============================+
288| x86-32       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
289|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
290|              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
291+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
292| x86-32       | FreeBSD     | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
293|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
294|              |             |                | test-suite                  |
295+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
296| x86-32       | mingw       | none           | QT                          |
297+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
298| x86-64       | Mac OS 10.X | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
299|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
300|              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
301+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
302| x86-64       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
303|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
304|              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
305+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
306| x86-64       | FreeBSD     | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
307|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
308|              |             |                | test-suite                  |
309+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
310| ARMv7A       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
311|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
312|              |             |                | test-suite                  |
313+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
314
315Community Testing
316-----------------
317
318Once all testing has been completed and appropriate bugs filed, the release
319candidate tarballs are put on the website and the LLVM community is notified.
320Ask that all LLVM developers test the release in 2 ways:
321
322#. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
323   binary.  Build LLVM.  Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
324   TEST=nightly report``).
325
326#. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the ``clang`` sources.  Compile
327   everything.  Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
328   TEST=nightly report``).
329
330Ask LLVM developers to submit the test suite report and ``make check`` results
331to the list.  Verify that there are no regressions from the previous release.
332The results are not used to qualify a release, but to spot other potential
333problems.  For unsupported targets, verify that ``make check`` is at least
334clean.
335
336During the first round of testing, all regressions must be fixed before the
337second release candidate is tagged.
338
339If this is the second round of testing, the testing is only to ensure that bug
340fixes previously merged in have not created new major problems. *This is not
341the time to solve additional and unrelated bugs!* If no patches are merged in,
342the release is determined to be ready and the release manager may move onto the
343next stage.
344
345Release Patch Rules
346-------------------
347
348Below are the rules regarding patching the release branch:
349
350#. Patches applied to the release branch may only be applied by the release
351   manager.
352
353#. During the first round of testing, patches that fix regressions or that are
354   small and relatively risk free (verified by the appropriate code owner) are
355   applied to the branch.  Code owners are asked to be very conservative in
356   approving patches for the branch.  We reserve the right to reject any patch
357   that does not fix a regression as previously defined.
358
359#. During the remaining rounds of testing, only patches that fix critical
360   regressions may be applied.
361
362#. For dot releases all patches must mantain both API and ABI compatibility with
363   the previous major release.  Only bugfixes will be accepted.
364
365Release Final Tasks
366-------------------
367
368The final stages of the release process involves tagging the "final" release
369branch, updating documentation that refers to the release, and updating the
370demo page.
371
372Update Documentation
373^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
374
375Review the documentation and ensure that it is up to date.  The "Release Notes"
376must be updated to reflect new features, bug fixes, new known issues, and
377changes in the list of supported platforms.  The "Getting Started Guide" should
378be updated to reflect the new release version number tag available from
379Subversion and changes in basic system requirements.  Merge both changes from
380mainline into the release branch.
381
382.. _tag:
383
384Tag the LLVM Final Release
385^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
386
387Tag the final release sources using the following procedure:
388
389::
390
391  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY \
392             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/Final
393
394  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY \
395             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/Final
396
397  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY \
398             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/Final
399
400  $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY \
401             https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XYZ/Final
402
403Update the LLVM Demo Page
404-------------------------
405
406The LLVM demo page must be updated to use the new release.  This consists of
407using the new ``clang`` binary and building LLVM.
408
409Update the LLVM Website
410^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
411
412The website must be updated before the release announcement is sent out.  Here
413is what to do:
414
415#. Check out the ``www`` module from Subversion.
416
417#. Create a new subdirectory ``X.Y`` in the releases directory.
418
419#. Commit the ``llvm``, ``test-suite``, ``clang`` source, ``clang binaries``,
420   ``dragonegg`` source, and ``dragonegg`` binaries in this new directory.
421
422#. Copy and commit the ``llvm/docs`` and ``LICENSE.txt`` files into this new
423   directory.  The docs should be built with ``BUILD_FOR_WEBSITE=1``.
424
425#. Commit the ``index.html`` to the ``release/X.Y`` directory to redirect (use
426   from previous release).
427
428#. Update the ``releases/download.html`` file with the new release.
429
430#. Update the ``releases/index.html`` with the new release and link to release
431   documentation.
432
433#. Finally, update the main page (``index.html`` and sidebar) to point to the
434   new release and release announcement.  Make sure this all gets committed back
435   into Subversion.
436
437Announce the Release
438^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
439
440Have Chris send out the release announcement when everything is finished.
441
442