xref: /openbsd/gnu/usr.bin/perl/t/op/inc.t (revision cecf84d4)
1#!./perl -w
2
3require './test.pl';
4use strict;
5
6# Tests of post/pre - increment/decrement operators.
7
8# Verify that addition/subtraction properly upgrade to doubles.
9# These tests are only significant on machines with 32 bit longs,
10# and two's complement negation, but shouldn't fail anywhere.
11
12my $a = 2147483647;
13my $c=$a++;
14cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483648, "postincrement properly upgrades to double");
15
16$a = 2147483647;
17$c=++$a;
18cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483648, "preincrement properly upgrades to double");
19
20$a = 2147483647;
21$a=$a+1;
22cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483648, "addition properly upgrades to double");
23
24$a = -2147483648;
25$c=$a--;
26cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649, "postdecrement properly upgrades to double");
27
28$a = -2147483648;
29$c=--$a;
30cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649, "predecrement properly upgrades to double");
31
32$a = -2147483648;
33$a=$a-1;
34cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649, "subtraction properly upgrades to double");
35
36$a = 2147483648;
37$a = -$a;
38$c=$a--;
39cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649,
40    "negation and postdecrement properly upgrade to double");
41
42$a = 2147483648;
43$a = -$a;
44$c=--$a;
45cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649,
46    "negation and predecrement properly upgrade to double");
47
48$a = 2147483648;
49$a = -$a;
50$a=$a-1;
51cmp_ok($a, '==', -2147483649,
52    "negation and subtraction properly upgrade to double");
53
54$a = 2147483648;
55$b = -$a;
56$c=$b--;
57cmp_ok($b, '==', -$a-1, "negation, postdecrement and additional negation");
58
59$a = 2147483648;
60$b = -$a;
61$c=--$b;
62cmp_ok($b, '==', -$a-1, "negation, predecrement and additional negation");
63
64$a = 2147483648;
65$b = -$a;
66$b=$b-1;
67cmp_ok($b, '==', -(++$a),
68    "negation, subtraction, preincrement and additional negation");
69
70$a = undef;
71is($a++, '0', "postinc undef returns '0'");
72
73$a = undef;
74is($a--, undef, "postdec undef returns undef");
75
76# Verify that shared hash keys become unshared.
77
78sub check_same {
79  my ($orig, $suspect) = @_;
80  my $fail;
81  while (my ($key, $value) = each %$suspect) {
82    if (exists $orig->{$key}) {
83      if ($orig->{$key} ne $value) {
84        print "# key '$key' was '$orig->{$key}' now '$value'\n";
85        $fail = 1;
86      }
87    } else {
88      print "# key '$key' is '$orig->{$key}', unexpect.\n";
89      $fail = 1;
90    }
91  }
92  foreach (keys %$orig) {
93    next if (exists $suspect->{$_});
94    print "# key '$_' was '$orig->{$_}' now missing\n";
95    $fail = 1;
96  }
97  ok (!$fail, "original hashes unchanged");
98}
99
100my (%orig) = my (%inc) = my (%dec) = my (%postinc) = my (%postdec)
101  = (1 => 1, ab => "ab");
102my %up = (1=>2, ab => 'ac');
103my %down = (1=>0, ab => -1);
104
105foreach (keys %inc) {
106  my $ans = $up{$_};
107  my $up;
108  eval {$up = ++$_};
109  is($up, $ans, "key '$_' incremented correctly");
110  is($@, '', "no error condition");
111}
112
113check_same (\%orig, \%inc);
114
115foreach (keys %dec) {
116  my $ans = $down{$_};
117  my $down;
118  eval {$down = --$_};
119  is($down, $ans, "key '$_' decremented correctly");
120  is($@, '', "no error condition");
121}
122
123check_same (\%orig, \%dec);
124
125foreach (keys %postinc) {
126  my $ans = $postinc{$_};
127  my $up;
128  eval {$up = $_++};
129  is($up, $ans, "assignment preceded postincrement");
130  is($@, '', "no error condition");
131}
132
133check_same (\%orig, \%postinc);
134
135foreach (keys %postdec) {
136  my $ans = $postdec{$_};
137  my $down;
138  eval {$down = $_--};
139  is($down, $ans, "assignment preceded postdecrement");
140  is($@, '', "no error condition");
141}
142
143check_same (\%orig, \%postdec);
144
145{
146    no warnings 'uninitialized';
147    my ($x, $y);
148    eval {
149	$y ="$x\n";
150	++$x;
151    };
152    cmp_ok($x, '==', 1, "preincrement of previously uninitialized variable");
153    is($@, '', "no error condition");
154
155    my ($p, $q);
156    eval {
157	$q ="$p\n";
158	--$p;
159    };
160    cmp_ok($p, '==', -1, "predecrement of previously uninitialized variable");
161    is($@, '', "no error condition");
162}
163
164$a = 2147483648;
165$c=--$a;
166cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483647, "predecrement properly downgrades from double");
167
168
169$a = 2147483648;
170$c=$a--;
171cmp_ok($a, '==', 2147483647, "postdecrement properly downgrades from double");
172
173{
174    use integer;
175    my $x = 0;
176    $x++;
177    cmp_ok($x, '==', 1, "(void) i_postinc");
178    $x--;
179    cmp_ok($x, '==', 0, "(void) i_postdec");
180}
181
182# I'm sure that there's an IBM format with a 48 bit mantissa
183# IEEE doubles have a 53 bit mantissa
184# 80 bit long doubles have a 64 bit mantissa
185# sparcs have a 112 bit mantissa for their long doubles. Just to be awkward :-)
186
187my $h_uv_max = 1 + (~0 >> 1);
188my $found;
189for my $n (47..113) {
190    my $power_of_2 = 2**$n;
191    my $plus_1 = $power_of_2 + 1;
192    next if $plus_1 != $power_of_2;
193    my ($start_p, $start_n);
194    if ($h_uv_max > $power_of_2 / 2) {
195	my $uv_max = 1 + 2 * (~0 >> 1);
196	# UV_MAX is 2**$something - 1, so subtract 1 to get the start value
197	$start_p = $uv_max - 1;
198	# whereas IV_MIN is -(2**$something), so subtract 2
199	$start_n = -$h_uv_max + 2;
200	print "# Mantissa overflows at 2**$n ($power_of_2)\n";
201	print "# But max UV ($uv_max) is greater so testing that\n";
202    } else {
203	print "# Testing 2**$n ($power_of_2) which overflows the mantissa\n";
204	$start_p = int($power_of_2 - 2);
205	$start_n = -$start_p;
206	my $check = $power_of_2 - 2;
207	die "Something wrong with our rounding assumptions: $check vs $start_p"
208	    unless $start_p == $check;
209    }
210
211    foreach ([$start_p, '++$i', 'pre-inc', 'inc'],
212	     [$start_p, '$i++', 'post-inc', 'inc'],
213	     [$start_n, '--$i', 'pre-dec', 'dec'],
214	     [$start_n, '$i--', 'post-dec', 'dec']) {
215	my ($start, $action, $description, $act) = @$_;
216	my $code = eval << "EOC" or die $@;
217sub {
218    no warnings 'imprecision';
219    my \$i = \$start;
220    for(0 .. 3) {
221        my \$a = $action;
222    }
223}
224EOC
225
226	warning_is($code, undef, "$description under no warnings 'imprecision'");
227
228	$code = eval << "EOC" or die $@;
229sub {
230    use warnings 'imprecision';
231    my \$i = \$start;
232    for(0 .. 3) {
233        my \$a = $action;
234    }
235}
236EOC
237
238	warnings_like($code, [(qr/Lost precision when ${act}rementing -?\d+/) x 2],
239		      "$description under use warnings 'imprecision'");
240    }
241
242    $found = 1;
243    last;
244}
245die "Could not find a value which overflows the mantissa" unless $found;
246
247# these will segfault if they fail
248
249sub PVBM () { 'foo' }
250{ my $dummy = index 'foo', PVBM }
251
252isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; $pvbm++ }, undef, "postincrement defined");
253isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; $pvbm-- }, undef, "postdecrement defined");
254isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; ++$pvbm }, undef, "preincrement defined");
255isnt(scalar eval { my $pvbm = PVBM; --$pvbm }, undef, "predecrement defined");
256
257# #9466
258
259# don't use pad TARG when the thing you're copying is a ref, or the referent
260# won't get freed.
261{
262    package P9466;
263    my $x;
264    sub DESTROY { $x = 1 }
265    for (0..1) {
266	$x = 0;
267	my $a = bless {};
268	my $b = $_ ? $a++ : $a--;
269	undef $a; undef $b;
270	::is($x, 1, "9466 case $_");
271    }
272}
273
274$_ = ${qr //};
275$_--;
276is($_, -1, 'regexp--');
277$_ = ${qr //};
278$_++;
279is($_, 1, 'regexp++');
280
281$_ = v97;
282$_++;
283isnt(ref\$_, 'VSTRING', '++ flattens vstrings');
284
285done_testing();
286