1<!--===- docs/Parsing.md
2
3   Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
4   See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
5   SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
6
7-->
8
9# The F18 Parser
10
11```eval_rst
12.. contents::
13   :local:
14```
15
16This program source code implements a parser for the Fortran programming
17language.
18
19The draft ISO standard for Fortran 2018 dated July 2017 was used as the
20primary definition of the language.  The parser also accepts many features
21from previous versions of the standard that are no longer part of the Fortran
222018 language.
23
24It also accepts many features that have never been part of any version
25of the standard Fortran language but have been supported by previous
26implementations and are known or suspected to remain in use.  As a
27general principle, we want to recognize and implement any such feature
28so long as it does not conflict with requirements of the current standard
29for Fortran.
30
31The parser is implemented in standard ISO C++ and requires the 2017
32edition of the language and library.  The parser constitutes a reentrant
33library with no mutable or constructed static data.  Best modern C++
34programming practices are observed to ensure that the ownership of
35dynamic memory is clear, that value rather than object semantics are
36defined for the data structures, that most functions are free from
37invisible side effects, and that the strictest available type checking
38is enforced by the C++ compiler when the Fortran parser is built.
39Class inheritance is rare and dynamic polymorphism is avoided in favor
40of modern discriminated unions.  To the furthest reasonable extent, the
41parser has been implemented in a declarative fashion that corresponds
42closely to the text of the Fortran language standard.
43
44The several major modules of the Fortran parser are composed into a
45top-level Parsing class, by means of which one may drive the parsing of a
46source file and receive its parse tree and error messages.  The interfaces
47of the Parsing class correspond to the two major passes of the parser,
48which are described below.
49
50## Prescanning and Preprocessing
51
52The first pass is performed by an instance of the Prescanner class,
53with help from an instance of Preprocessor.
54
55The prescanner generates the "cooked character stream", implemented
56by a CookedSource class instance, in which:
57* line ends have been normalized to single ASCII LF characters (UNIX newlines)
58* all `INCLUDE` files have been expanded
59* all continued Fortran source lines have been unified
60* all comments and insignificant spaces have been removed
61* fixed form right margins have been clipped
62* extra blank card columns have been inserted into character literals
63  and Hollerith constants
64* preprocessing directives have been implemented
65* preprocessing macro invocations have been expanded
66* legacy `D` lines in fixed form source have been omitted or included
67* except for the payload in character literals, Hollerith constants,
68  and character and Hollerith edit descriptors, all letters have been
69  normalized to lower case
70* all original non-ASCII characters in Hollerith constants have been
71  decoded and re-encoded into UTF-8
72
73Lines in the cooked character stream can be of arbitrary length.
74
75The purpose of the cooked character stream is to enable the implementation
76of a parser whose sole concern is the recognition of the Fortran language
77from productions that closely correspond to the grammar that is presented
78in the Fortran standard, without having to deal with the complexity of
79all of the source-level concerns in the preceding list.
80
81The implementation of the preprocessor interacts with the prescanner by
82means of _token sequences_.  These are partitionings of input lines into
83contiguous virtual blocks of characters, and are the only place in this
84Fortran compiler in which we have reified a tokenization of the program
85source; the parser proper does not have a tokenizer.  The prescanner
86builds these token sequences out of source lines and supplies them
87to the preprocessor, which interprets directives and expands macro
88invocations.  The token sequences returned by the preprocessor are then
89marshaled to constitute the cooked character stream that is the output of
90the prescanner.
91
92The preprocessor and prescanner can both instantiate new temporary
93instances of the Prescanner class to locate, open, and process any
94include files.
95
96The tight interaction and mutual design of the prescanner and preprocessor
97enable a principled implementation of preprocessing for the Fortran
98language that implements a reasonable facsimile of the C language
99preprocessor that is fully aware of Fortran's source forms, line
100continuation mechanisms, case insensitivity, token syntax, &c.
101
102The preprocessor always runs.  There's no good reason for it not to.
103
104The content of the cooked character stream is available and useful
105for debugging, being as it is a simple value forwarded from the first major
106pass of the compiler to the second.
107
108## Source Provenance
109
110The prescanner constructs a chronicle of every file that is read by the
111parser, viz. the original source file and all others that it directly
112or indirectly includes.  One copy of the content of each of these files
113is mapped or read into the address space of the parser.  Memory mapping
114is used initially, but files with DOS line breaks or a missing terminal
115newline are immediately normalized in a buffer when necessary.
116
117The virtual input stream, which marshals every appearance of every file
118and every expansion of every macro invocation, is not materialized as
119an actual stream of bytes.  There is, however, a mapping from each byte
120position in this virtual input stream back to whence it came (maintained
121by an instance of the AllSources class).  Offsets into this virtual input
122stream constitute values of the Provenance class.  Provenance values,
123and contiguous ranges thereof, are used to describe and delimit source
124positions for messaging.
125
126Further, every byte in the cooked character stream supplied by the
127prescanner to the parser can be inexpensively mapped to its provenance.
128Simple `const char *` pointers to characters in the cooked character
129stream, or to contiguous ranges thereof, are used as source position
130indicators within the parser and in the parse tree.
131
132## Messages
133
134Message texts, and snprintf-like formatting strings for constructing
135messages, are instantiated in the various components of the parser with
136C++ user defined character literals tagged with `_err_en_US` and `_en_US`
137(signifying fatality and language, with the default being the dialect of
138English used in the United States) so that they may be easily identified
139for localization.  As described above, messages are associated with
140source code positions by means of provenance values.
141
142## The Parse Tree
143
144Each of the ca. 450 numbered requirement productions in the standard
145Fortran language grammar, as well as the productions implied by legacy
146extensions and preserved obsolescent features, maps to a distinct class
147in the parse tree so as to maximize the efficacy of static type checking
148by the C++ compiler.
149
150A transcription of the Fortran grammar appears with production requirement
151numbers in the commentary before these class definitions, so that one
152may easily refer to the standard (or to the parse tree definitions while
153reading that document).
154
155Three paradigms collectively implement most of the parse tree classes:
156* *wrappers*, in which a single data member `v` has been encapsulated
157  in a new type
158* *tuples* (or product types), in which several values of arbitrary
159  types have been encapsulated in a single data member `t` whose type
160  is an instance of `std::tuple<>`
161* *discriminated unions* (or sum types), in which one value whose type is
162  a dynamic selection from a set of distinct types is saved in a data
163  member `u` whose type is an instance of `std::variant<>`
164
165The use of these patterns is a design convenience, and exceptions to them
166are not uncommon wherever it made better sense to write custom definitions.
167
168Parse tree entities should be viewed as values, not objects; their
169addresses should not be abused for purposes of identification.  They are
170assembled with C++ move semantics during parse tree construction.
171Their default and copy constructors are deliberately deleted in their
172declarations.
173
174The std::list<> data type is used in the parse tree to reliably store pointers
175to other relevant entries in the tree. Since the tree lists are moved and
176spliced at certain points std::list<> provides the necessary guarantee of the
177stability of pointers into these lists.
178
179There is a general purpose library by means of which parse trees may
180be traversed.
181
182## Parsing
183
184This compiler attempts to recognize the entire cooked character stream
185(see above) as a Fortran program.  It records the reductions made during
186a successful recognition as a parse tree value.  The recognized grammar
187is that of a whole source file, not just of its possible statements,
188so the parser has no global state that tracks the subprogram hierarchy
189or the structure of their nested block constructs.  The parser performs
190no semantic analysis along the way, deferring all of that work to the
191next pass of the compiler.
192
193The resulting parse tree therefore necessarily contains ambiguous parses
194that cannot be resolved without recourse to a symbol table.  Most notably,
195leading assignments to array elements can be misrecognized as statement
196function definitions, and array element references can be misrecognized
197as function calls.  The semantic analysis phase of the compiler performs
198local rewrites of the parse tree once it can be disambiguated by symbols
199and types.
200
201Formally speaking, this parser is based on recursive descent with
202localized backtracking (specifically, it will not backtrack into a
203successful reduction to try its other alternatives).  It is not generated
204as a table or code from a specification of the Fortran grammar; rather, it
205_is_ the grammar, as declaratively respecified in C++ constant expressions
206using a small collection of basic token recognition objects and a library
207of "parser combinator" template functions that compose them to form more
208complicated recognizers and their correspondences to the construction
209of parse tree values.
210
211## Unparsing
212
213Parse trees can be converted back into free form Fortran source code.
214This formatter is not really a classical "pretty printer", but is
215more of a data structure dump whose output is suitable for compilation
216by another compiler.  It is also used for testing the parser, since a
217reparse of an unparsed parse tree should be an identity function apart from
218source provenance.
219