1======================
2Control Flow Integrity
3======================
4
5.. toctree::
6   :hidden:
7
8   ControlFlowIntegrityDesign
9
10.. contents::
11   :local:
12
13Introduction
14============
15
16Clang includes an implementation of a number of control flow integrity (CFI)
17schemes, which are designed to abort the program upon detecting certain forms
18of undefined behavior that can potentially allow attackers to subvert the
19program's control flow. These schemes have been optimized for performance,
20allowing developers to enable them in release builds.
21
22To enable Clang's available CFI schemes, use the flag ``-fsanitize=cfi``.
23You can also enable a subset of available :ref:`schemes <cfi-schemes>`.
24As currently implemented, all schemes rely on link-time optimization (LTO);
25so it is required to specify ``-flto``, and the linker used must support LTO,
26for example via the `gold plugin`_.
27
28To allow the checks to be implemented efficiently, the program must
29be structured such that certain object files are compiled with CFI
30enabled, and are statically linked into the program. This may preclude
31the use of shared libraries in some cases.
32
33The compiler will only produce CFI checks for a class if it can infer hidden
34LTO visibility for that class. LTO visibility is a property of a class that
35is inferred from flags and attributes. For more details, see the documentation
36for :doc:`LTO visibility <LTOVisibility>`.
37
38The ``-fsanitize=cfi-{vcall,nvcall,derived-cast,unrelated-cast}`` flags
39require that a ``-fvisibility=`` flag also be specified. This is because the
40default visibility setting is ``-fvisibility=default``, which would disable
41CFI checks for classes without visibility attributes. Most users will want
42to specify ``-fvisibility=hidden``, which enables CFI checks for such classes.
43
44Experimental support for :ref:`cross-DSO control flow integrity
45<cfi-cross-dso>` exists that does not require classes to have hidden LTO
46visibility. This cross-DSO support has unstable ABI at this time.
47
48.. _gold plugin: https://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html
49
50.. _cfi-schemes:
51
52Available schemes
53=================
54
55Available schemes are:
56
57  -  ``-fsanitize=cfi-cast-strict``: Enables :ref:`strict cast checks
58     <cfi-strictness>`.
59  -  ``-fsanitize=cfi-derived-cast``: Base-to-derived cast to the wrong
60     dynamic type.
61  -  ``-fsanitize=cfi-unrelated-cast``: Cast from ``void*`` or another
62     unrelated type to the wrong dynamic type.
63  -  ``-fsanitize=cfi-nvcall``: Non-virtual call via an object whose vptr is of
64     the wrong dynamic type.
65  -  ``-fsanitize=cfi-vcall``: Virtual call via an object whose vptr is of the
66     wrong dynamic type.
67  -  ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``: Indirect call of a function with wrong dynamic
68     type.
69  -  ``-fsanitize=cfi-mfcall``: Indirect call via a member function pointer with
70     wrong dynamic type.
71
72You can use ``-fsanitize=cfi`` to enable all the schemes and use
73``-fno-sanitize`` flag to narrow down the set of schemes as desired.
74For example, you can build your program with
75``-fsanitize=cfi -fno-sanitize=cfi-nvcall,cfi-icall``
76to use all schemes except for non-virtual member function call and indirect call
77checking.
78
79Remember that you have to provide ``-flto`` if at least one CFI scheme is
80enabled.
81
82Trapping and Diagnostics
83========================
84
85By default, CFI will abort the program immediately upon detecting a control
86flow integrity violation. You can use the :ref:`-fno-sanitize-trap=
87<controlling-code-generation>` flag to cause CFI to print a diagnostic
88similar to the one below before the program aborts.
89
90.. code-block:: console
91
92    bad-cast.cpp:109:7: runtime error: control flow integrity check for type 'B' failed during base-to-derived cast (vtable address 0x000000425a50)
93    0x000000425a50: note: vtable is of type 'A'
94     00 00 00 00  f0 f1 41 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  20 5a 42 00
95                  ^
96
97If diagnostics are enabled, you can also configure CFI to continue program
98execution instead of aborting by using the :ref:`-fsanitize-recover=
99<controlling-code-generation>` flag.
100
101Forward-Edge CFI for Virtual Calls
102==================================
103
104This scheme checks that virtual calls take place using a vptr of the correct
105dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the called object must be a
106derived class of the static type of the object used to make the call.
107This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own using ``-fsanitize=cfi-vcall``.
108
109For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition
110of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members
111of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types or types with public :doc:`LTO
112visibility <LTOVisibility>`, must be compiled with ``-flto`` or ``-flto=thin``
113enabled and be statically linked into the program.
114
115Performance
116-----------
117
118A performance overhead of less than 1% has been measured by running the
119Dromaeo benchmark suite against an instrumented version of the Chromium
120web browser. Another good performance benchmark for this mechanism is the
121virtual-call-heavy SPEC 2006 xalancbmk.
122
123Note that this scheme has not yet been optimized for binary size; an increase
124of up to 15% has been observed for Chromium.
125
126Bad Cast Checking
127=================
128
129This scheme checks that pointer casts are made to an object of the correct
130dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the object must be a derived class
131of the pointee type of the cast. The checks are currently only introduced
132where the class being casted to is a polymorphic class.
133
134Bad casts are not in themselves control flow integrity violations, but they
135can also create security vulnerabilities, and the implementation uses many
136of the same mechanisms.
137
138There are two types of bad cast that may be forbidden: bad casts
139from a base class to a derived class (which can be checked with
140``-fsanitize=cfi-derived-cast``), and bad casts from a pointer of
141type ``void*`` or another unrelated type (which can be checked with
142``-fsanitize=cfi-unrelated-cast``).
143
144The difference between these two types of casts is that the first is defined
145by the C++ standard to produce an undefined value, while the second is not
146in itself undefined behavior (it is well defined to cast the pointer back
147to its original type) unless the object is uninitialized and the cast is a
148``static_cast`` (see C++14 [basic.life]p5).
149
150If a program as a matter of policy forbids the second type of cast, that
151restriction can normally be enforced. However it may in some cases be necessary
152for a function to perform a forbidden cast to conform with an external API
153(e.g. the ``allocate`` member function of a standard library allocator). Such
154functions may be :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>`.
155
156For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition
157of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members
158of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types or types with public :doc:`LTO
159visibility <LTOVisibility>`, must be compiled with ``-flto`` or ``-flto=thin``
160enabled and be statically linked into the program.
161
162Non-Virtual Member Function Call Checking
163=========================================
164
165This scheme checks that non-virtual calls take place using an object of
166the correct dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the called object
167must be a derived class of the static type of the object used to make the
168call. The checks are currently only introduced where the object is of a
169polymorphic class type.  This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own using
170``-fsanitize=cfi-nvcall``.
171
172For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition
173of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members
174of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types or types with public :doc:`LTO
175visibility <LTOVisibility>`, must be compiled with ``-flto`` or ``-flto=thin``
176enabled and be statically linked into the program.
177
178.. _cfi-strictness:
179
180Strictness
181----------
182
183If a class has a single non-virtual base and does not introduce or override
184virtual member functions or fields other than an implicitly defined virtual
185destructor, it will have the same layout and virtual function semantics as
186its base. By default, casts to such classes are checked as if they were made
187to the least derived such class.
188
189Casting an instance of a base class to such a derived class is technically
190undefined behavior, but it is a relatively common hack for introducing
191member functions on class instances with specific properties that works under
192most compilers and should not have security implications, so we allow it by
193default. It can be disabled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-cast-strict``.
194
195Indirect Function Call Checking
196===============================
197
198This scheme checks that function calls take place using a function of the
199correct dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the function must match
200the static type used at the call. This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own
201using ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``.
202
203For this scheme to work, each indirect function call in the program, other
204than calls in :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` functions, must call a
205function which was either compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` enabled,
206or whose address was taken by a function in a translation unit compiled with
207``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``.
208
209If a function in a translation unit compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``
210takes the address of a function not compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``,
211that address may differ from the address taken by a function in a translation
212unit not compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``. This is technically a
213violation of the C and C++ standards, but it should not affect most programs.
214
215Each translation unit compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` must be
216statically linked into the program or shared library, and calls across
217shared library boundaries are handled as if the callee was not compiled with
218``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``.
219
220This scheme is currently only supported on the x86 and x86_64 architectures.
221
222``-fsanitize-cfi-icall-generalize-pointers``
223--------------------------------------------
224
225Mismatched pointer types are a common cause of cfi-icall check failures.
226Translation units compiled with the ``-fsanitize-cfi-icall-generalize-pointers``
227flag relax pointer type checking for call sites in that translation unit,
228applied across all functions compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``.
229
230Specifically, pointers in return and argument types are treated as equivalent as
231long as the qualifiers for the type they point to match. For example, ``char*``,
232``char**``, and ``int*`` are considered equivalent types. However, ``char*`` and
233``const char*`` are considered separate types.
234
235``-fsanitize-cfi-icall-generalize-pointers`` is not compatible with
236``-fsanitize-cfi-cross-dso``.
237
238
239``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` and ``-fsanitize=function``
240----------------------------------------------------
241
242This tool is similar to ``-fsanitize=function`` in that both tools check
243the types of function calls. However, the two tools occupy different points
244on the design space; ``-fsanitize=function`` is a developer tool designed
245to find bugs in local development builds, whereas ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall``
246is a security hardening mechanism designed to be deployed in release builds.
247
248``-fsanitize=function`` has a higher space and time overhead due to a more
249complex type check at indirect call sites, as well as a need for run-time
250type information (RTTI), which may make it unsuitable for deployment. Because
251of the need for RTTI, ``-fsanitize=function`` can only be used with C++
252programs, whereas ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` can protect both C and C++ programs.
253
254On the other hand, ``-fsanitize=function`` conforms more closely with the C++
255standard and user expectations around interaction with shared libraries;
256the identity of function pointers is maintained, and calls across shared
257library boundaries are no different from calls within a single program or
258shared library.
259
260Member Function Pointer Call Checking
261=====================================
262
263This scheme checks that indirect calls via a member function pointer
264take place using an object of the correct dynamic type. Specifically, we
265check that the dynamic type of the member function referenced by the member
266function pointer matches the "function pointer" part of the member function
267pointer, and that the member function's class type is related to the base
268type of the member function. This CFI scheme can be enabled on its own using
269``-fsanitize=cfi-mfcall``.
270
271The compiler will only emit a full CFI check if the member function pointer's
272base type is complete. This is because the complete definition of the base
273type contains information that is necessary to correctly compile the CFI
274check. To ensure that the compiler always emits a full CFI check, it is
275recommended to also pass the flag ``-fcomplete-member-pointers``, which
276enables a non-conforming language extension that requires member pointer
277base types to be complete if they may be used for a call.
278
279For this scheme to work, all translation units containing the definition
280of a virtual member function (whether inline or not), other than members
281of :ref:`blacklisted <cfi-blacklist>` types or types with public :doc:`LTO
282visibility <LTOVisibility>`, must be compiled with ``-flto`` or ``-flto=thin``
283enabled and be statically linked into the program.
284
285This scheme is currently not compatible with cross-DSO CFI or the
286Microsoft ABI.
287
288.. _cfi-blacklist:
289
290Blacklist
291=========
292
293A :doc:`SanitizerSpecialCaseList` can be used to relax CFI checks for certain
294source files, functions and types using the ``src``, ``fun`` and ``type``
295entity types. Specific CFI modes can be be specified using ``[section]``
296headers.
297
298.. code-block:: bash
299
300    # Suppress all CFI checking for code in a file.
301    src:bad_file.cpp
302    src:bad_header.h
303    # Ignore all functions with names containing MyFooBar.
304    fun:*MyFooBar*
305    # Ignore all types in the standard library.
306    type:std::*
307    # Disable only unrelated cast checks for this function
308    [cfi-unrelated-cast]
309    fun:*UnrelatedCast*
310    # Disable CFI call checks for this function without affecting cast checks
311    [cfi-vcall|cfi-nvcall|cfi-icall]
312    fun:*BadCall*
313
314
315.. _cfi-cross-dso:
316
317Shared library support
318======================
319
320Use **-f[no-]sanitize-cfi-cross-dso** to enable the cross-DSO control
321flow integrity mode, which allows all CFI schemes listed above to
322apply across DSO boundaries. As in the regular CFI, each DSO must be
323built with ``-flto``.
324
325Normally, CFI checks will only be performed for classes that have hidden LTO
326visibility. With this flag enabled, the compiler will emit cross-DSO CFI
327checks for all classes, except for those which appear in the CFI blacklist
328or which use a ``no_sanitize`` attribute.
329
330Design
331======
332
333Please refer to the :doc:`design document<ControlFlowIntegrityDesign>`.
334
335Publications
336============
337
338`Control-Flow Integrity: Principles, Implementations, and Applications <https://research.microsoft.com/pubs/64250/ccs05.pdf>`_.
339Martin Abadi, Mihai Budiu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jay Ligatti.
340
341`Enforcing Forward-Edge Control-Flow Integrity in GCC & LLVM <http://www.pcc.me.uk/~peter/acad/usenix14.pdf>`_.
342Caroline Tice, Tom Roeder, Peter Collingbourne, Stephen Checkoway,
343Úlfar Erlingsson, Luis Lozano, Geoff Pike.
344