xref: /dragonfly/crypto/libressl/crypto/bio/b_print.c (revision cca6fc52)
1 /* $OpenBSD: b_print.c,v 1.26 2019/06/28 05:47:57 deraadt Exp $ */
2 
3 /* Theo de Raadt places this file in the public domain. */
4 
5 #include <openssl/bio.h>
6 
7 int
BIO_printf(BIO * bio,const char * format,...)8 BIO_printf(BIO *bio, const char *format, ...)
9 {
10 	va_list args;
11 	int ret;
12 
13 	va_start(args, format);
14 	ret = BIO_vprintf(bio, format, args);
15 	va_end(args);
16 	return (ret);
17 }
18 
19 #ifdef HAVE_FUNOPEN
20 static int
_BIO_write(void * cookie,const char * buf,int nbytes)21 _BIO_write(void *cookie, const char *buf, int nbytes)
22 {
23 	return BIO_write(cookie, buf, nbytes);
24 }
25 
26 int
BIO_vprintf(BIO * bio,const char * format,va_list args)27 BIO_vprintf(BIO *bio, const char *format, va_list args)
28 {
29 	int ret;
30 	FILE *fp;
31 
32 	fp = funopen(bio, NULL, &_BIO_write, NULL, NULL);
33 	if (fp == NULL) {
34 		ret = -1;
35 		goto fail;
36 	}
37 	ret = vfprintf(fp, format, args);
38 	fclose(fp);
39 fail:
40 	return (ret);
41 }
42 
43 #else /* !HAVE_FUNOPEN */
44 
45 int
BIO_vprintf(BIO * bio,const char * format,va_list args)46 BIO_vprintf(BIO *bio, const char *format, va_list args)
47 {
48 	int ret;
49 	char *buf = NULL;
50 
51 	ret = vasprintf(&buf, format, args);
52 	if (ret == -1)
53 		return (ret);
54 	BIO_write(bio, buf, ret);
55 	free(buf);
56 	return (ret);
57 }
58 
59 #endif /* HAVE_FUNOPEN */
60 
61 /*
62  * BIO_snprintf and BIO_vsnprintf return -1 for overflow,
63  * due to the history of this API.  Justification:
64  *
65  * Traditional snprintf surfaced in 4.4BSD, and returned
66  * "number of bytes wanted". Solaris and Windows opted to
67  * return -1.  A draft standard was written which returned -1.
68  * Due to the large volume of code already using the first
69  * semantics, the draft was repaired before standardization to
70  * specify "number of bytes wanted" plus "-1 for character conversion
71  * style errors".  Solaris adapted to this rule, but Windows stuck
72  * with -1.
73  *
74  * Original OpenSSL comment which is full of lies:
75  *
76  * "In case of truncation, return -1 like traditional snprintf.
77  * (Current drafts for ISO/IEC 9899 say snprintf should return
78  * the number of characters that would have been written,
79  * had the buffer been large enough.)"
80  */
81 int
BIO_snprintf(char * buf,size_t n,const char * format,...)82 BIO_snprintf(char *buf, size_t n, const char *format, ...)
83 {
84 	va_list args;
85 	int ret;
86 
87 	va_start(args, format);
88 	ret = vsnprintf(buf, n, format, args);
89 	va_end(args);
90 
91 	if (ret >= n || ret == -1)
92 		return (-1);
93 	return (ret);
94 }
95 
96 int
BIO_vsnprintf(char * buf,size_t n,const char * format,va_list args)97 BIO_vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t n, const char *format, va_list args)
98 {
99 	int ret;
100 
101 	ret = vsnprintf(buf, n, format, args);
102 
103 	if (ret >= n || ret == -1)
104 		return (-1);
105 	return (ret);
106 }
107