xref: /freebsd/share/man/man4/geom.4 (revision 4b9d6057)
1.\"
2.\" Copyright (c) 2002 Poul-Henning Kamp
3.\" Copyright (c) 2002 Networks Associates Technology, Inc.
4.\" All rights reserved.
5.\"
6.\" This software was developed for the FreeBSD Project by Poul-Henning Kamp
7.\" and NAI Labs, the Security Research Division of Network Associates, Inc.
8.\" under DARPA/SPAWAR contract N66001-01-C-8035 ("CBOSS"), as part of the
9.\" DARPA CHATS research program.
10.\"
11.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
12.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
13.\" are met:
14.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
15.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
16.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
17.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
18.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
19.\" 3. The names of the authors may not be used to endorse or promote
20.\"    products derived from this software without specific prior written
21.\"    permission.
22.\"
23.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
24.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
25.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
26.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
27.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
28.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
29.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
30.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
31.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
32.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
33.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
34.\"
35.Dd October 6, 2023
36.Dt GEOM 4
37.Os
38.Sh NAME
39.Nm GEOM
40.Nd "modular disk I/O request transformation framework"
41.Sh SYNOPSIS
42.Cd options GEOM_BDE
43.Cd options GEOM_CACHE
44.Cd options GEOM_CONCAT
45.Cd options GEOM_ELI
46.Cd options GEOM_GATE
47.Cd options GEOM_JOURNAL
48.Cd options GEOM_LABEL
49.Cd options GEOM_LINUX_LVM
50.Cd options GEOM_MAP
51.Cd options GEOM_MIRROR
52.Cd options GEOM_MOUNTVER
53.Cd options GEOM_MULTIPATH
54.Cd options GEOM_NOP
55.Cd options GEOM_PART_APM
56.Cd options GEOM_PART_BSD
57.Cd options GEOM_PART_BSD64
58.Cd options GEOM_PART_EBR
59.Cd options GEOM_PART_EBR_COMPAT
60.Cd options GEOM_PART_GPT
61.Cd options GEOM_PART_LDM
62.Cd options GEOM_PART_MBR
63.Cd options GEOM_RAID
64.Cd options GEOM_RAID3
65.Cd options GEOM_SHSEC
66.Cd options GEOM_STRIPE
67.Cd options GEOM_UZIP
68.Cd options GEOM_VIRSTOR
69.Cd options GEOM_ZERO
70.Sh DESCRIPTION
71The
72.Nm
73framework provides an infrastructure in which
74.Dq classes
75can perform transformations on disk I/O requests on their path from
76the upper kernel to the device drivers and back.
77.Pp
78Transformations in a
79.Nm
80context range from the simple geometric
81displacement performed in typical disk partitioning modules over RAID
82algorithms and device multipath resolution to full blown cryptographic
83protection of the stored data.
84.Pp
85Compared to traditional
86.Dq "volume management" ,
87.Nm
88differs from most
89and in some cases all previous implementations in the following ways:
90.Bl -bullet
91.It
92.Nm
93is extensible.
94It is trivially simple to write a new class
95of transformation and it will not be given stepchild treatment.
96If
97someone for some reason wanted to mount IBM MVS diskpacks, a class
98recognizing and configuring their VTOC information would be a trivial
99matter.
100.It
101.Nm
102is topologically agnostic.
103Most volume management implementations
104have very strict notions of how classes can fit together, very often
105one fixed hierarchy is provided, for instance, subdisk - plex -
106volume.
107.El
108.Pp
109Being extensible means that new transformations are treated no differently
110than existing transformations.
111.Pp
112Fixed hierarchies are bad because they make it impossible to express
113the intent efficiently.
114In the fixed hierarchy above, it is not possible to mirror two
115physical disks and then partition the mirror into subdisks, instead
116one is forced to make subdisks on the physical volumes and to mirror
117these two and two, resulting in a much more complex configuration.
118.Nm
119on the other hand does not care in which order things are done,
120the only restriction is that cycles in the graph will not be allowed.
121.Sh "TERMINOLOGY AND TOPOLOGY"
122.Nm
123is quite object oriented and consequently the terminology
124borrows a lot of context and semantics from the OO vocabulary:
125.Pp
126A
127.Dq class ,
128represented by the data structure
129.Vt g_class
130implements one
131particular kind of transformation.
132Typical examples are MBR disk
133partition, BSD disklabel, and RAID5 classes.
134.Pp
135An instance of a class is called a
136.Dq geom
137and represented by the data structure
138.Vt g_geom .
139In a typical i386
140.Fx
141system, there
142will be one geom of class MBR for each disk.
143.Pp
144A
145.Dq provider ,
146represented by the data structure
147.Vt g_provider ,
148is the front gate at which a geom offers service.
149A provider is
150.Do
151a disk-like thing which appears in
152.Pa /dev
153.Dc - a logical
154disk in other words.
155All providers have three main properties:
156.Dq name ,
157.Dq sectorsize
158and
159.Dq size .
160.Pp
161A
162.Dq consumer
163is the backdoor through which a geom connects to another
164geom provider and through which I/O requests are sent.
165.Pp
166The topological relationship between these entities are as follows:
167.Bl -bullet
168.It
169A class has zero or more geom instances.
170.It
171A geom has exactly one class it is derived from.
172.It
173A geom has zero or more consumers.
174.It
175A geom has zero or more providers.
176.It
177A consumer can be attached to zero or one providers.
178.It
179A provider can have zero or more consumers attached.
180.El
181.Pp
182All geoms have a rank-number assigned, which is used to detect and
183prevent loops in the acyclic directed graph.
184This rank number is
185assigned as follows:
186.Bl -enum
187.It
188A geom with no attached consumers has rank=1.
189.It
190A geom with attached consumers has a rank one higher than the
191highest rank of the geoms of the providers its consumers are
192attached to.
193.El
194.Sh "SPECIAL TOPOLOGICAL MANEUVERS"
195In addition to the straightforward attach, which attaches a consumer
196to a provider, and detach, which breaks the bond, a number of special
197topological maneuvers exists to facilitate configuration and to
198improve the overall flexibility.
199.Bl -inset
200.It Em TASTING
201is a process that happens whenever a new class or new provider
202is created, and it provides the class a chance to automatically configure an
203instance on providers which it recognizes as its own.
204A typical example is the MBR disk-partition class which will look for
205the MBR table in the first sector and, if found and validated, will
206instantiate a geom to multiplex according to the contents of the MBR.
207.Pp
208A new class will be offered to all existing providers in turn and a new
209provider will be offered to all classes in turn.
210.Pp
211Exactly what a class does to recognize if it should accept the offered
212provider is not defined by
213.Nm ,
214but the sensible set of options are:
215.Bl -bullet
216.It
217Examine specific data structures on the disk.
218.It
219Examine properties like
220.Dq sectorsize
221or
222.Dq mediasize
223for the provider.
224.It
225Examine the rank number of the provider's geom.
226.It
227Examine the method name of the provider's geom.
228.El
229.Pp
230Tasting is controlled by the
231.Va kern.geom.notaste
232sysctl.
233To disable tasting, set the sysctl to 1, to
234re-enable tasting, set the sysctl to 0.
235.It Em ORPHANIZATION
236is the process by which a provider is removed while
237it potentially is still being used.
238.Pp
239When a geom orphans a provider, all future I/O requests will
240.Dq bounce
241on the provider with an error code set by the geom.
242Any
243consumers attached to the provider will receive notification about
244the orphanization when the event loop gets around to it, and they
245can take appropriate action at that time.
246.Pp
247A geom which came into being as a result of a normal taste operation
248should self-destruct unless it has a way to keep functioning whilst
249lacking the orphaned provider.
250Geoms like disk slicers should therefore self-destruct whereas
251RAID5 or mirror geoms will be able to continue as long as they do
252not lose quorum.
253.Pp
254When a provider is orphaned, this does not necessarily result in any
255immediate change in the topology: any attached consumers are still
256attached, any opened paths are still open, any outstanding I/O
257requests are still outstanding.
258.Pp
259The typical scenario is:
260.Pp
261.Bl -bullet -offset indent -compact
262.It
263A device driver detects a disk has departed and orphans the provider for it.
264.It
265The geoms on top of the disk receive the orphanization event and
266orphan all their providers in turn.
267Providers which are not attached to will typically self-destruct
268right away.
269This process continues in a quasi-recursive fashion until all
270relevant pieces of the tree have heard the bad news.
271.It
272Eventually the buck stops when it reaches geom_dev at the top
273of the stack.
274.It
275Geom_dev will call
276.Xr destroy_dev 9
277to stop any more requests from
278coming in.
279It will sleep until any and all outstanding I/O requests have
280been returned.
281It will explicitly close (i.e.: zero the access counts), a change
282which will propagate all the way down through the mesh.
283It will then detach and destroy its geom.
284.It
285The geom whose provider is now detached will destroy the provider,
286detach and destroy its consumer and destroy its geom.
287.It
288This process percolates all the way down through the mesh, until
289the cleanup is complete.
290.El
291.Pp
292While this approach seems byzantine, it does provide the maximum
293flexibility and robustness in handling disappearing devices.
294.Pp
295The one absolutely crucial detail to be aware of is that if the
296device driver does not return all I/O requests, the tree will
297not unravel.
298.It Em SPOILING
299is a special case of orphanization used to protect
300against stale metadata.
301It is probably easiest to understand spoiling by going through
302an example.
303.Pp
304Imagine a disk,
305.Pa da0 ,
306on top of which an MBR geom provides
307.Pa da0s1
308and
309.Pa da0s2 ,
310and on top of
311.Pa da0s1
312a BSD geom provides
313.Pa da0s1a
314through
315.Pa da0s1e ,
316and that both the MBR and BSD geoms have
317autoconfigured based on data structures on the disk media.
318Now imagine the case where
319.Pa da0
320is opened for writing and those
321data structures are modified or overwritten: now the geoms would
322be operating on stale metadata unless some notification system
323can inform them otherwise.
324.Pp
325To avoid this situation, when the open of
326.Pa da0
327for write happens,
328all attached consumers are told about this and geoms like
329MBR and BSD will self-destruct as a result.
330When
331.Pa da0
332is closed, it will be offered for tasting again
333and, if the data structures for MBR and BSD are still there, new
334geoms will instantiate themselves anew.
335.Pp
336Now for the fine print:
337.Pp
338If any of the paths through the MBR or BSD module were open, they
339would have opened downwards with an exclusive bit thus rendering it
340impossible to open
341.Pa da0
342for writing in that case.
343Conversely,
344the requested exclusive bit would render it impossible to open a
345path through the MBR geom while
346.Pa da0
347is open for writing.
348.Pp
349From this it also follows that changing the size of open geoms can
350only be done with their cooperation.
351.Pp
352Finally: the spoiling only happens when the write count goes from
353zero to non-zero and the retasting happens only when the write count goes
354from non-zero to zero.
355.It Em CONFIGURE
356is the process where the administrator issues instructions
357for a particular class to instantiate itself.
358There are multiple
359ways to express intent in this case - a particular provider may be
360specified with a level of override forcing, for instance, a BSD
361disklabel module to attach to a provider which was not found palatable
362during the TASTE operation.
363.Pp
364Finally, I/O is the reason we even do this: it concerns itself with
365sending I/O requests through the graph.
366.It Em "I/O REQUESTS" ,
367represented by
368.Vt "struct bio" ,
369originate at a consumer,
370are scheduled on its attached provider and, when processed, are returned
371to the consumer.
372It is important to realize that the
373.Vt "struct bio"
374which enters through the provider of a particular geom does not
375.Do
376come out on the other side
377.Dc .
378Even simple transformations like MBR and BSD will clone the
379.Vt "struct bio" ,
380modify the clone, and schedule the clone on their
381own consumer.
382Note that cloning the
383.Vt "struct bio"
384does not involve cloning the
385actual data area specified in the I/O request.
386.Pp
387In total, four different I/O requests exist in
388.Nm :
389read, write, delete, and
390.Dq "get attribute".
391.Pp
392Read and write are self explanatory.
393.Pp
394Delete indicates that a certain range of data is no longer used
395and that it can be erased or freed as the underlying technology
396supports.
397Technologies like flash adaptation layers can arrange to erase
398the relevant blocks before they will become reassigned and
399cryptographic devices may want to fill random bits into the
400range to reduce the amount of data available for attack.
401.Pp
402It is important to recognize that a delete indication is not a
403request and consequently there is no guarantee that the data actually
404will be erased or made unavailable unless guaranteed by specific
405geoms in the graph.
406If
407.Dq "secure delete"
408semantics are required, a
409geom should be pushed which converts delete indications into (a
410sequence of) write requests.
411.Pp
412.Dq "Get attribute"
413supports inspection and manipulation
414of out-of-band attributes on a particular provider or path.
415Attributes are named by
416.Tn ASCII
417strings and they will be discussed in
418a separate section below.
419.El
420.Pp
421(Stay tuned while the author rests his brain and fingers: more to come.)
422.Sh DIAGNOSTICS
423Several flags are provided for tracing
424.Nm
425operations and unlocking
426protection mechanisms via the
427.Va kern.geom.debugflags
428sysctl.
429All of these flags are off by default, and great care should be taken in
430turning them on.
431.Bl -tag -width indent
432.It 0x01 Pq Dv G_T_TOPOLOGY
433Provide tracing of topology change events.
434.It 0x02 Pq Dv G_T_BIO
435Provide tracing of buffer I/O requests.
436.It 0x04 Pq Dv G_T_ACCESS
437Provide tracing of access check controls.
438.It 0x08 (unused)
439.It 0x10 (allow foot shooting)
440Allow writing to Rank 1 providers.
441This would, for example, allow the super-user to overwrite the MBR on the root
442disk or write random sectors elsewhere to a mounted disk.
443The implications are obvious.
444.It 0x40 Pq Dv G_F_DISKIOCTL
445This is unused at this time.
446.It 0x80 Pq Dv G_F_CTLDUMP
447Dump contents of gctl requests.
448.El
449.Sh SEE ALSO
450.Xr libgeom 3 ,
451.Xr geom 8 ,
452.Xr DECLARE_GEOM_CLASS 9 ,
453.Xr disk 9 ,
454.Xr g_access 9 ,
455.Xr g_attach 9 ,
456.Xr g_bio 9 ,
457.Xr g_consumer 9 ,
458.Xr g_data 9 ,
459.Xr g_event 9 ,
460.Xr g_geom 9 ,
461.Xr g_provider 9 ,
462.Xr g_provider_by_name 9
463.Sh HISTORY
464This software was initially developed for the
465.Fx
466Project by
467.An Poul-Henning Kamp
468and NAI Labs, the Security Research Division of Network Associates, Inc.\&
469under DARPA/SPAWAR contract N66001-01-C-8035
470.Pq Dq CBOSS ,
471as part of the
472DARPA CHATS research program.
473.Pp
474The following obsolete
475.Nm
476components were removed in
477.Fx 13.0 :
478.Bl -bullet -offset indent -compact
479.It
480.Cd GEOM_BSD ,
481.It
482.Cd GEOM_FOX ,
483.It
484.Cd GEOM_MBR ,
485.It
486.Cd GEOM_SUNLABEL ,
487and
488.It
489.Cd GEOM_VOL .
490.El
491.Pp
492Use
493.Bl -bullet -offset indent -compact
494.It
495.Cd GEOM_PART_BSD ,
496.It
497.Cd GEOM_MULTIPATH ,
498.It
499.Cd GEOM_PART_MBR ,
500and
501.It
502.Cd GEOM_LABEL
503.El
504options, respectively, instead.
505.Sh AUTHORS
506.An Poul-Henning Kamp Aq Mt phk@FreeBSD.org
507