xref: /freebsd/share/man/man4/geom.4 (revision d6b92ffa)
1.\"
2.\" Copyright (c) 2002 Poul-Henning Kamp
3.\" Copyright (c) 2002 Networks Associates Technology, Inc.
4.\" All rights reserved.
5.\"
6.\" This software was developed for the FreeBSD Project by Poul-Henning Kamp
7.\" and NAI Labs, the Security Research Division of Network Associates, Inc.
8.\" under DARPA/SPAWAR contract N66001-01-C-8035 ("CBOSS"), as part of the
9.\" DARPA CHATS research program.
10.\"
11.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
12.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
13.\" are met:
14.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
15.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
16.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
17.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
18.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
19.\" 3. The names of the authors may not be used to endorse or promote
20.\"    products derived from this software without specific prior written
21.\"    permission.
22.\"
23.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
24.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
25.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
26.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
27.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
28.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
29.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
30.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
31.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
32.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
33.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
34.\"
35.\" $FreeBSD$
36.\"
37.Dd April 20, 2017
38.Dt GEOM 4
39.Os
40.Sh NAME
41.Nm GEOM
42.Nd "modular disk I/O request transformation framework"
43.Sh SYNOPSIS
44.Cd options GEOM_AES
45.Cd options GEOM_BDE
46.Cd options GEOM_BSD
47.Cd options GEOM_CACHE
48.Cd options GEOM_CONCAT
49.Cd options GEOM_ELI
50.Cd options GEOM_FOX
51.Cd options GEOM_GATE
52.Cd options GEOM_JOURNAL
53.Cd options GEOM_LABEL
54.Cd options GEOM_LINUX_LVM
55.Cd options GEOM_MAP
56.Cd options GEOM_MBR
57.Cd options GEOM_MIRROR
58.Cd options GEOM_MOUNTVER
59.Cd options GEOM_MULTIPATH
60.Cd options GEOM_NOP
61.Cd options GEOM_PART_APM
62.Cd options GEOM_PART_BSD
63.Cd options GEOM_PART_BSD64
64.Cd options GEOM_PART_EBR
65.Cd options GEOM_PART_EBR_COMPAT
66.Cd options GEOM_PART_GPT
67.Cd options GEOM_PART_LDM
68.Cd options GEOM_PART_MBR
69.Cd options GEOM_PART_VTOC8
70.Cd options GEOM_RAID
71.Cd options GEOM_RAID3
72.Cd options GEOM_SHSEC
73.Cd options GEOM_STRIPE
74.Cd options GEOM_SUNLABEL
75.Cd options GEOM_UZIP
76.Cd options GEOM_VIRSTOR
77.Cd options GEOM_VOL
78.Cd options GEOM_ZERO
79.Sh DESCRIPTION
80The
81.Nm
82framework provides an infrastructure in which
83.Dq classes
84can perform transformations on disk I/O requests on their path from
85the upper kernel to the device drivers and back.
86.Pp
87Transformations in a
88.Nm
89context range from the simple geometric
90displacement performed in typical disk partitioning modules over RAID
91algorithms and device multipath resolution to full blown cryptographic
92protection of the stored data.
93.Pp
94Compared to traditional
95.Dq "volume management" ,
96.Nm
97differs from most
98and in some cases all previous implementations in the following ways:
99.Bl -bullet
100.It
101.Nm
102is extensible.
103It is trivially simple to write a new class
104of transformation and it will not be given stepchild treatment.
105If
106someone for some reason wanted to mount IBM MVS diskpacks, a class
107recognizing and configuring their VTOC information would be a trivial
108matter.
109.It
110.Nm
111is topologically agnostic.
112Most volume management implementations
113have very strict notions of how classes can fit together, very often
114one fixed hierarchy is provided, for instance, subdisk - plex -
115volume.
116.El
117.Pp
118Being extensible means that new transformations are treated no differently
119than existing transformations.
120.Pp
121Fixed hierarchies are bad because they make it impossible to express
122the intent efficiently.
123In the fixed hierarchy above, it is not possible to mirror two
124physical disks and then partition the mirror into subdisks, instead
125one is forced to make subdisks on the physical volumes and to mirror
126these two and two, resulting in a much more complex configuration.
127.Nm
128on the other hand does not care in which order things are done,
129the only restriction is that cycles in the graph will not be allowed.
130.Sh "TERMINOLOGY AND TOPOLOGY"
131.Nm
132is quite object oriented and consequently the terminology
133borrows a lot of context and semantics from the OO vocabulary:
134.Pp
135A
136.Dq class ,
137represented by the data structure
138.Vt g_class
139implements one
140particular kind of transformation.
141Typical examples are MBR disk
142partition, BSD disklabel, and RAID5 classes.
143.Pp
144An instance of a class is called a
145.Dq geom
146and represented by the data structure
147.Vt g_geom .
148In a typical i386
149.Fx
150system, there
151will be one geom of class MBR for each disk.
152.Pp
153A
154.Dq provider ,
155represented by the data structure
156.Vt g_provider ,
157is the front gate at which a geom offers service.
158A provider is
159.Do
160a disk-like thing which appears in
161.Pa /dev
162.Dc - a logical
163disk in other words.
164All providers have three main properties:
165.Dq name ,
166.Dq sectorsize
167and
168.Dq size .
169.Pp
170A
171.Dq consumer
172is the backdoor through which a geom connects to another
173geom provider and through which I/O requests are sent.
174.Pp
175The topological relationship between these entities are as follows:
176.Bl -bullet
177.It
178A class has zero or more geom instances.
179.It
180A geom has exactly one class it is derived from.
181.It
182A geom has zero or more consumers.
183.It
184A geom has zero or more providers.
185.It
186A consumer can be attached to zero or one providers.
187.It
188A provider can have zero or more consumers attached.
189.El
190.Pp
191All geoms have a rank-number assigned, which is used to detect and
192prevent loops in the acyclic directed graph.
193This rank number is
194assigned as follows:
195.Bl -enum
196.It
197A geom with no attached consumers has rank=1.
198.It
199A geom with attached consumers has a rank one higher than the
200highest rank of the geoms of the providers its consumers are
201attached to.
202.El
203.Sh "SPECIAL TOPOLOGICAL MANEUVERS"
204In addition to the straightforward attach, which attaches a consumer
205to a provider, and detach, which breaks the bond, a number of special
206topological maneuvers exists to facilitate configuration and to
207improve the overall flexibility.
208.Bl -inset
209.It Em TASTING
210is a process that happens whenever a new class or new provider
211is created, and it provides the class a chance to automatically configure an
212instance on providers which it recognizes as its own.
213A typical example is the MBR disk-partition class which will look for
214the MBR table in the first sector and, if found and validated, will
215instantiate a geom to multiplex according to the contents of the MBR.
216.Pp
217A new class will be offered to all existing providers in turn and a new
218provider will be offered to all classes in turn.
219.Pp
220Exactly what a class does to recognize if it should accept the offered
221provider is not defined by
222.Nm ,
223but the sensible set of options are:
224.Bl -bullet
225.It
226Examine specific data structures on the disk.
227.It
228Examine properties like
229.Dq sectorsize
230or
231.Dq mediasize
232for the provider.
233.It
234Examine the rank number of the provider's geom.
235.It
236Examine the method name of the provider's geom.
237.El
238.It Em ORPHANIZATION
239is the process by which a provider is removed while
240it potentially is still being used.
241.Pp
242When a geom orphans a provider, all future I/O requests will
243.Dq bounce
244on the provider with an error code set by the geom.
245Any
246consumers attached to the provider will receive notification about
247the orphanization when the event loop gets around to it, and they
248can take appropriate action at that time.
249.Pp
250A geom which came into being as a result of a normal taste operation
251should self-destruct unless it has a way to keep functioning whilst
252lacking the orphaned provider.
253Geoms like disk slicers should therefore self-destruct whereas
254RAID5 or mirror geoms will be able to continue as long as they do
255not lose quorum.
256.Pp
257When a provider is orphaned, this does not necessarily result in any
258immediate change in the topology: any attached consumers are still
259attached, any opened paths are still open, any outstanding I/O
260requests are still outstanding.
261.Pp
262The typical scenario is:
263.Pp
264.Bl -bullet -offset indent -compact
265.It
266A device driver detects a disk has departed and orphans the provider for it.
267.It
268The geoms on top of the disk receive the orphanization event and
269orphan all their providers in turn.
270Providers which are not attached to will typically self-destruct
271right away.
272This process continues in a quasi-recursive fashion until all
273relevant pieces of the tree have heard the bad news.
274.It
275Eventually the buck stops when it reaches geom_dev at the top
276of the stack.
277.It
278Geom_dev will call
279.Xr destroy_dev 9
280to stop any more requests from
281coming in.
282It will sleep until any and all outstanding I/O requests have
283been returned.
284It will explicitly close (i.e.: zero the access counts), a change
285which will propagate all the way down through the mesh.
286It will then detach and destroy its geom.
287.It
288The geom whose provider is now detached will destroy the provider,
289detach and destroy its consumer and destroy its geom.
290.It
291This process percolates all the way down through the mesh, until
292the cleanup is complete.
293.El
294.Pp
295While this approach seems byzantine, it does provide the maximum
296flexibility and robustness in handling disappearing devices.
297.Pp
298The one absolutely crucial detail to be aware of is that if the
299device driver does not return all I/O requests, the tree will
300not unravel.
301.It Em SPOILING
302is a special case of orphanization used to protect
303against stale metadata.
304It is probably easiest to understand spoiling by going through
305an example.
306.Pp
307Imagine a disk,
308.Pa da0 ,
309on top of which an MBR geom provides
310.Pa da0s1
311and
312.Pa da0s2 ,
313and on top of
314.Pa da0s1
315a BSD geom provides
316.Pa da0s1a
317through
318.Pa da0s1e ,
319and that both the MBR and BSD geoms have
320autoconfigured based on data structures on the disk media.
321Now imagine the case where
322.Pa da0
323is opened for writing and those
324data structures are modified or overwritten: now the geoms would
325be operating on stale metadata unless some notification system
326can inform them otherwise.
327.Pp
328To avoid this situation, when the open of
329.Pa da0
330for write happens,
331all attached consumers are told about this and geoms like
332MBR and BSD will self-destruct as a result.
333When
334.Pa da0
335is closed, it will be offered for tasting again
336and, if the data structures for MBR and BSD are still there, new
337geoms will instantiate themselves anew.
338.Pp
339Now for the fine print:
340.Pp
341If any of the paths through the MBR or BSD module were open, they
342would have opened downwards with an exclusive bit thus rendering it
343impossible to open
344.Pa da0
345for writing in that case.
346Conversely,
347the requested exclusive bit would render it impossible to open a
348path through the MBR geom while
349.Pa da0
350is open for writing.
351.Pp
352From this it also follows that changing the size of open geoms can
353only be done with their cooperation.
354.Pp
355Finally: the spoiling only happens when the write count goes from
356zero to non-zero and the retasting happens only when the write count goes
357from non-zero to zero.
358.It Em CONFIGURE
359is the process where the administrator issues instructions
360for a particular class to instantiate itself.
361There are multiple
362ways to express intent in this case - a particular provider may be
363specified with a level of override forcing, for instance, a BSD
364disklabel module to attach to a provider which was not found palatable
365during the TASTE operation.
366.Pp
367Finally, I/O is the reason we even do this: it concerns itself with
368sending I/O requests through the graph.
369.It Em "I/O REQUESTS" ,
370represented by
371.Vt "struct bio" ,
372originate at a consumer,
373are scheduled on its attached provider and, when processed, are returned
374to the consumer.
375It is important to realize that the
376.Vt "struct bio"
377which enters through the provider of a particular geom does not
378.Do
379come out on the other side
380.Dc .
381Even simple transformations like MBR and BSD will clone the
382.Vt "struct bio" ,
383modify the clone, and schedule the clone on their
384own consumer.
385Note that cloning the
386.Vt "struct bio"
387does not involve cloning the
388actual data area specified in the I/O request.
389.Pp
390In total, four different I/O requests exist in
391.Nm :
392read, write, delete, and
393.Dq "get attribute".
394.Pp
395Read and write are self explanatory.
396.Pp
397Delete indicates that a certain range of data is no longer used
398and that it can be erased or freed as the underlying technology
399supports.
400Technologies like flash adaptation layers can arrange to erase
401the relevant blocks before they will become reassigned and
402cryptographic devices may want to fill random bits into the
403range to reduce the amount of data available for attack.
404.Pp
405It is important to recognize that a delete indication is not a
406request and consequently there is no guarantee that the data actually
407will be erased or made unavailable unless guaranteed by specific
408geoms in the graph.
409If
410.Dq "secure delete"
411semantics are required, a
412geom should be pushed which converts delete indications into (a
413sequence of) write requests.
414.Pp
415.Dq "Get attribute"
416supports inspection and manipulation
417of out-of-band attributes on a particular provider or path.
418Attributes are named by
419.Tn ASCII
420strings and they will be discussed in
421a separate section below.
422.El
423.Pp
424(Stay tuned while the author rests his brain and fingers: more to come.)
425.Sh DIAGNOSTICS
426Several flags are provided for tracing
427.Nm
428operations and unlocking
429protection mechanisms via the
430.Va kern.geom.debugflags
431sysctl.
432All of these flags are off by default, and great care should be taken in
433turning them on.
434.Bl -tag -width indent
435.It 0x01 Pq Dv G_T_TOPOLOGY
436Provide tracing of topology change events.
437.It 0x02 Pq Dv G_T_BIO
438Provide tracing of buffer I/O requests.
439.It 0x04 Pq Dv G_T_ACCESS
440Provide tracing of access check controls.
441.It 0x08 (unused)
442.It 0x10 (allow foot shooting)
443Allow writing to Rank 1 providers.
444This would, for example, allow the super-user to overwrite the MBR on the root
445disk or write random sectors elsewhere to a mounted disk.
446The implications are obvious.
447.It 0x40 Pq Dv G_F_DISKIOCTL
448This is unused at this time.
449.It 0x80 Pq Dv G_F_CTLDUMP
450Dump contents of gctl requests.
451.El
452.Sh SEE ALSO
453.Xr libgeom 3 ,
454.Xr DECLARE_GEOM_CLASS 9 ,
455.Xr disk 9 ,
456.Xr g_access 9 ,
457.Xr g_attach 9 ,
458.Xr g_bio 9 ,
459.Xr g_consumer 9 ,
460.Xr g_data 9 ,
461.Xr g_event 9 ,
462.Xr g_geom 9 ,
463.Xr g_provider 9 ,
464.Xr g_provider_by_name 9
465.Sh HISTORY
466This software was developed for the
467.Fx
468Project by
469.An Poul-Henning Kamp
470and NAI Labs, the Security Research Division of Network Associates, Inc.\&
471under DARPA/SPAWAR contract N66001-01-C-8035
472.Pq Dq CBOSS ,
473as part of the
474DARPA CHATS research program.
475.Pp
476The first precursor for
477.Nm
478was a gruesome hack to Minix 1.2 and was
479never distributed.
480An earlier attempt to implement a less general scheme
481in
482.Fx
483never succeeded.
484.Sh AUTHORS
485.An Poul-Henning Kamp Aq Mt phk@FreeBSD.org
486