1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3====================
4Kernel Testing Guide
5====================
6
7
8There are a number of different tools for testing the Linux kernel, so knowing
9when to use each of them can be a challenge. This document provides a rough
10overview of their differences, and how they fit together.
11
12
13Writing and Running Tests
14=========================
15
16The bulk of kernel tests are written using either the kselftest or KUnit
17frameworks. These both provide infrastructure to help make running tests and
18groups of tests easier, as well as providing helpers to aid in writing new
19tests.
20
21If you're looking to verify the behaviour of the Kernel — particularly specific
22parts of the kernel — then you'll want to use KUnit or kselftest.
23
24
25The Difference Between KUnit and kselftest
26------------------------------------------
27
28KUnit (Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst) is an entirely in-kernel system
29for "white box" testing: because test code is part of the kernel, it can access
30internal structures and functions which aren't exposed to userspace.
31
32KUnit tests therefore are best written against small, self-contained parts
33of the kernel, which can be tested in isolation. This aligns well with the
34concept of 'unit' testing.
35
36For example, a KUnit test might test an individual kernel function (or even a
37single codepath through a function, such as an error handling case), rather
38than a feature as a whole.
39
40This also makes KUnit tests very fast to build and run, allowing them to be
41run frequently as part of the development process.
42
43There is a KUnit test style guide which may give further pointers in
44Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst
45
46
47kselftest (Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst), on the other hand, is
48largely implemented in userspace, and tests are normal userspace scripts or
49programs.
50
51This makes it easier to write more complicated tests, or tests which need to
52manipulate the overall system state more (e.g., spawning processes, etc.).
53However, it's not possible to call kernel functions directly from kselftest.
54This means that only kernel functionality which is exposed to userspace somehow
55(e.g. by a syscall, device, filesystem, etc.) can be tested with kselftest.  To
56work around this, some tests include a companion kernel module which exposes
57more information or functionality. If a test runs mostly or entirely within the
58kernel, however,  KUnit may be the more appropriate tool.
59
60kselftest is therefore suited well to tests of whole features, as these will
61expose an interface to userspace, which can be tested, but not implementation
62details. This aligns well with 'system' or 'end-to-end' testing.
63
64For example, all new system calls should be accompanied by kselftest tests.
65
66Code Coverage Tools
67===================
68
69The Linux Kernel supports two different code coverage measurement tools. These
70can be used to verify that a test is executing particular functions or lines
71of code. This is useful for determining how much of the kernel is being tested,
72and for finding corner-cases which are not covered by the appropriate test.
73
74Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be
75used with the kernel to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it
76does not record per-task coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs,
77and interpreted using the usual gcov tooling.
78
79Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst is a feature which can be built in to the
80kernel to allow capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful
81for fuzzing and other situations where information about code executed during,
82for example, a single syscall is useful.
83
84
85Dynamic Analysis Tools
86======================
87
88The kernel also supports a number of dynamic analysis tools, which attempt to
89detect classes of issues when they occur in a running kernel. These typically
90each look for a different class of bugs, such as invalid memory accesses,
91concurrency issues such as data races, or other undefined behaviour like
92integer overflows.
93
94Some of these tools are listed below:
95
96* kmemleak detects possible memory leaks. See
97  Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
98* KASAN detects invalid memory accesses such as out-of-bounds and
99  use-after-free errors. See Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
100* UBSAN detects behaviour that is undefined by the C standard, like integer
101  overflows. See Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst
102* KCSAN detects data races. See Documentation/dev-tools/kcsan.rst
103* KFENCE is a low-overhead detector of memory issues, which is much faster than
104  KASAN and can be used in production. See Documentation/dev-tools/kfence.rst
105* lockdep is a locking correctness validator. See
106  Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst
107* There are several other pieces of debug instrumentation in the kernel, many
108  of which can be found in lib/Kconfig.debug
109
110These tools tend to test the kernel as a whole, and do not "pass" like
111kselftest or KUnit tests. They can be combined with KUnit or kselftest by
112running tests on a kernel with these tools enabled: you can then be sure
113that none of these errors are occurring during the test.
114
115Some of these tools integrate with KUnit or kselftest and will
116automatically fail tests if an issue is detected.
117
118