xref: /netbsd/sbin/mount_null/mount_null.8 (revision bf9ec67e)
1.\"	$NetBSD: mount_null.8,v 1.16 2002/03/30 15:28:35 groo Exp $
2.\"
3.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994
4.\"	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
5.\"
6.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by
7.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project.
8.\"
9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
11.\" are met:
12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
13.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
15.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
16.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
17.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
18.\"    must display the following acknowledgement:
19.\"	This product includes software developed by the University of
20.\"	California, Berkeley and its contributors.
21.\" 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
22.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
23.\"    without specific prior written permission.
24.\"
25.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
26.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
27.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
28.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
29.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
30.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
31.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
32.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
33.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
34.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
35.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
36.\"
37.\"     @(#)mount_null.8	8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95
38.\"
39.\"
40.Dd May 1, 1995
41.Dt MOUNT_NULL 8
42.Os
43.Sh NAME
44.Nm mount_null
45.Nd mount a loopback filesystem sub-tree;
46demonstrate the use of a null file system layer
47.Sh SYNOPSIS
48.Nm
49.Op Fl o Ar options
50.Ar target
51.Ar mount-point
52.Sh DESCRIPTION
53The
54.Nm
55command creates a
56null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system
57name space under another part of the global file system namespace.
58This allows existing files and directories to be accessed
59using a different pathname.
60.Pp
61The primary differences between a virtual copy of the filesystem
62and a symbolic link are that
63.Xr getcwd 3
64functions correctly in the virtual copy, and that other filesystems
65may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original.
66A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by
67.Xr stat 2 ,
68but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original.
69.Pp
70The
71.Nm
72filesystem differs from a traditional
73loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using
74a stackable layers technique, and its
75.Do
76null-nodes
77.Dc
78stack above
79all lower-layer vnodes (not just above directory vnodes).
80.Pp
81The options are as follows:
82.Bl -tag -width indent
83.It Fl o
84Options are specified with a
85.Fl o
86flag followed by a comma separated string of options.
87See the
88.Xr mount 8
89man page for possible options and their meanings.
90.El
91.Pp
92The null layer has two purposes.
93First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer
94which does nothing.
95Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer.
96Since it provides all necessary layer framework,
97new file system layers can be created very easily by starting
98with a null layer.
99.Pp
100The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis
101for constructing new layers.
102.\"
103.\"
104.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS
105New null layers are created with
106.Nm "" .
107.Nm
108takes two arguments, the pathname
109of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null
110layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn).  After
111the null layer is put into place, the contents
112of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn.
113.\"
114.\"
115.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER
116The null layer is the minimum file system layer,
117simply passing all possible operations to the lower layer
118for processing there.  The majority of its activity centers
119on the bypass routine, through which nearly all vnode operations
120pass.
121.Pp
122The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for
123handling by the lower layer.  It begins by examining vnode
124operation arguments and replacing any null-nodes by their
125lower-layer equivalents.  It then invokes the operation
126on the lower layer.  Finally, it replaces the null-nodes
127in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation,
128stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode.
129.Pp
130Although bypass handles most operations,
131.Em vop_getattr ,
132.Em vop_inactive ,
133.Em vop_reclaim ,
134and
135.Em vop_print
136are not bypassed.
137.Em vop_getattr
138must change the fsid being returned.
139.Em vop_inactive
140and vop_reclaim are not bypassed so that
141they can handle freeing null-layer specific data.
142.Em vop_print
143is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging
144information.
145.\"
146.\"
147.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS
148Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer,
149in effect stacking two VFSes.  Vnode stacks are instead
150created on demand as files are accessed.
151.Pp
152The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the
153root of the new null layer.  All other vnode stacks
154are created as a result of vnode operations on
155this or other null vnode stacks.
156.Pp
157New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of
158an operation which returns a vnode.
159The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new
160vnode before returning it to the caller.
161.Pp
162For example, imagine mounting a null layer with
163.Bd -literal -offset indent
164mount_null /usr/include /dev/layer/null
165.Ed
166Changing directory to
167.Pa /dev/layer/null
168will assign
169the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted).
170Now consider opening
171.Pa sys .
172A vop_lookup would be
173done on the root null-node.  This operation would bypass through
174to the lower layer which would return a vnode representing
175the UFS
176.Pa sys .
177null_bypass then builds a null-node
178aliasing the UFS
179.Pa sys
180and returns this to the caller.
181Later operations on the null-node
182.Pa sys
183will repeat this
184process when constructing other vnode stacks.
185.\"
186.\"
187.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS
188One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make
189a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and
190then begin modifying the copy.
191.Xr sed 1
192can be used to easily rename all variables.
193.Pp
194The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the
195null layer.
196.\"
197.\"
198.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS
199There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer
200when the operation cannot be completely bypassed.  Each method
201is appropriate in different situations.  In both cases,
202it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make
203the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer
204by mapping any vnode arguments to the lower layer.
205.Pp
206The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine.
207This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation
208currently being handled on the lower layer.  It has the advantage
209that the bypass routine already must do argument mapping.
210An example of this is
211.Em null_getattrs
212in the null layer.
213.Pp
214A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on
215the lower layer with the
216.Em VOP_OPERATIONNAME
217interface.
218The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke
219arbitrary operations on the lower layer.  The disadvantage
220is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped.
221.\"
222.\"
223.Sh SEE ALSO
224.Xr mount 8
225.sp
226UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056,
227.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" .
228.Sh HISTORY
229The
230.Nm
231utility first appeared in
232.Bx 4.4 .
233