xref: /netbsd/sbin/mount_null/mount_null.8 (revision c4a72b64)
1.\"	$NetBSD: mount_null.8,v 1.17 2002/10/01 13:40:42 wiz Exp $
2.\"
3.\" Copyright (c) 1992, 1993, 1994
4.\"	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
5.\"
6.\" This code is derived from software donated to Berkeley by
7.\" John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project.
8.\"
9.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
10.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
11.\" are met:
12.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
13.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
14.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
15.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
16.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
17.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
18.\"    must display the following acknowledgement:
19.\"	This product includes software developed by the University of
20.\"	California, Berkeley and its contributors.
21.\" 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
22.\"    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
23.\"    without specific prior written permission.
24.\"
25.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
26.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
27.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
28.\" ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
29.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
30.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
31.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
32.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
33.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
34.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
35.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
36.\"
37.\"     @(#)mount_null.8	8.6 (Berkeley) 5/1/95
38.\"
39.\"
40.Dd May 1, 1995
41.Dt MOUNT_NULL 8
42.Os
43.Sh NAME
44.Nm mount_null
45.Nd mount a loopback filesystem sub-tree;
46demonstrate the use of a null file system layer
47.Sh SYNOPSIS
48.Nm
49.Op Fl o Ar options
50.Ar target
51.Ar mount-point
52.Sh DESCRIPTION
53The
54.Nm
55command creates a
56null layer, duplicating a sub-tree of the file system
57name space under another part of the global file system namespace.
58This allows existing files and directories to be accessed
59using a different pathname.
60.Pp
61The primary differences between a virtual copy of the filesystem
62and a symbolic link are that
63.Xr getcwd 3
64functions correctly in the virtual copy, and that other filesystems
65may be mounted on the virtual copy without affecting the original.
66A different device number for the virtual copy is returned by
67.Xr stat 2 ,
68but in other respects it is indistinguishable from the original.
69.Pp
70The
71.Nm
72filesystem differs from a traditional
73loopback file system in two respects: it is implemented using
74a stackable layers technique, and its
75.Do
76null-nodes
77.Dc
78stack above
79all lower-layer vnodes (not just above directory vnodes).
80.Pp
81The options are as follows:
82.Bl -tag -width indent
83.It Fl o
84Options are specified with a
85.Fl o
86flag followed by a comma separated string of options.
87See the
88.Xr mount 8
89man page for possible options and their meanings.
90.El
91.Pp
92The null layer has two purposes.
93First, it serves as a demonstration of layering by providing a layer
94which does nothing.
95Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype layer.
96Since it provides all necessary layer framework,
97new file system layers can be created very easily by starting
98with a null layer.
99.Pp
100The remainder of this man page examines the null layer as a basis
101for constructing new layers.
102.\"
103.\"
104.Sh INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS
105New null layers are created with
106.Nm "" .
107.Nm
108takes two arguments, the pathname
109of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null
110layer will appear in the namespace (mount-point-pn).
111After the null layer is put into place, the contents
112of target-pn subtree will be aliased under mount-point-pn.
113.\"
114.\"
115.Sh OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER
116The null layer is the minimum file system layer,
117simply passing all possible operations to the lower layer
118for processing there.
119The majority of its activity centers on the bypass routine,
120through which nearly all vnode operations pass.
121.Pp
122The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for
123handling by the lower layer.
124It begins by examining vnode operation arguments and replacing
125any null-nodes by their lower-layer equivalents.
126It then invokes the operation on the lower layer.
127Finally, it replaces the null-nodes
128in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation,
129stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode.
130.Pp
131Although bypass handles most operations,
132.Em vop_getattr ,
133.Em vop_inactive ,
134.Em vop_reclaim ,
135and
136.Em vop_print
137are not bypassed.
138.Em vop_getattr
139must change the fsid being returned.
140.Em vop_inactive
141and vop_reclaim are not bypassed so that
142they can handle freeing null-layer specific data.
143.Em vop_print
144is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging
145information.
146.\"
147.\"
148.Sh INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS
149Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer,
150in effect stacking two VFSes.
151Vnode stacks are instead
152created on demand as files are accessed.
153.Pp
154The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the
155root of the new null layer.
156All other vnode stacks
157are created as a result of vnode operations on
158this or other null vnode stacks.
159.Pp
160New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of
161an operation which returns a vnode.
162The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new
163vnode before returning it to the caller.
164.Pp
165For example, imagine mounting a null layer with
166.Bd -literal -offset indent
167mount_null /usr/include /dev/layer/null
168.Ed
169Changing directory to
170.Pa /dev/layer/null
171will assign
172the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted).
173Now consider opening
174.Pa sys .
175A vop_lookup would be done on the root null-node.
176This operation would bypass through to the lower layer
177which would return a vnode representing the UFS
178.Pa sys .
179null_bypass then builds a null-node aliasing the UFS
180.Pa sys
181and returns this to the caller.
182Later operations on the null-node
183.Pa sys
184will repeat this process when constructing other vnode stacks.
185.\"
186.\"
187.Sh CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS
188One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make
189a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and
190then begin modifying the copy.
191.Xr sed 1
192can be used to easily rename all variables.
193.Pp
194The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the
195null layer.
196.\"
197.\"
198.Sh INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS
199There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer
200when the operation cannot be completely bypassed.
201Each method is appropriate in different situations.
202In both cases, it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make
203the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer
204by mapping any vnode arguments to the lower layer.
205.Pp
206The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine.
207This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation
208currently being handled on the lower layer.
209It has the advantage that the bypass routine already must do argument mapping.
210An example of this is
211.Em null_getattrs
212in the null layer.
213.Pp
214A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on
215the lower layer with the
216.Em VOP_OPERATIONNAME
217interface.
218The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke
219arbitrary operations on the lower layer.
220The disadvantage is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped.
221.\"
222.\"
223.Sh SEE ALSO
224.Xr mount 8
225.sp
226UCLA Technical Report CSD-910056,
227.Em "Stackable Layers: an Architecture for File System Development" .
228.Sh HISTORY
229The
230.Nm
231utility first appeared in
232.Bx 4.4 .
233