xref: /netbsd/sys/miscfs/nullfs/null_vnops.c (revision bf9ec67e)
1 /*	$NetBSD: null_vnops.c,v 1.25 2002/01/04 07:19:33 chs Exp $	*/
2 
3 /*
4  * Copyright (c) 1999 National Aeronautics & Space Administration
5  * All rights reserved.
6  *
7  * This software was written by William Studenmund of the
8  * Numerical Aerospace Simulation Facility, NASA Ames Research Center.
9  *
10  * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
11  * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
12  * are met:
13  * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
14  *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
15  * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
16  *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
17  *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
18  * 3. Neither the name of the National Aeronautics & Space Administration
19  *    nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote
20  *    products derived from this software without specific prior written
21  *    permission.
22  *
23  * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION
24  * ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
25  * TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
26  * PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE ADMINISTRATION OR CONTRIB-
27  * UTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY,
28  * OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
29  * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
30  * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
31  * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
32  * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
33  * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
34  */
35 /*
36  * Copyright (c) 1992, 1993
37  *	The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
38  *
39  * This code is derived from software contributed to Berkeley by
40  * John Heidemann of the UCLA Ficus project.
41  *
42  * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
43  * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
44  * are met:
45  * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
46  *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
47  * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
48  *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
49  *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
50  * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
51  *    must display the following acknowledgement:
52  *	This product includes software developed by the University of
53  *	California, Berkeley and its contributors.
54  * 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
55  *    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
56  *    without specific prior written permission.
57  *
58  * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
59  * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
60  * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
61  * ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
62  * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
63  * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
64  * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
65  * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
66  * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
67  * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
68  * SUCH DAMAGE.
69  *
70  *	@(#)null_vnops.c	8.6 (Berkeley) 5/27/95
71  *
72  * Ancestors:
73  *	@(#)lofs_vnops.c	1.2 (Berkeley) 6/18/92
74  *	$Id: null_vnops.c,v 1.25 2002/01/04 07:19:33 chs Exp $
75  *	...and...
76  *	@(#)null_vnodeops.c 1.20 92/07/07 UCLA Ficus project
77  */
78 
79 /*
80  * Null Layer
81  *
82  * (See mount_null(8) for more information.)
83  *
84  * The null layer duplicates a portion of the file system
85  * name space under a new name.  In this respect, it is
86  * similar to the loopback file system.  It differs from
87  * the loopback fs in two respects:  it is implemented using
88  * a stackable layers technique, and its "null-nodes" stack above
89  * all lower-layer vnodes, not just over directory vnodes.
90  *
91  * The null layer has two purposes.  First, it serves as a demonstration
92  * of layering by providing a layer which does nothing (it actually
93  * does everything the loopback file system does, which is slightly
94  * more than nothing).  Second, the null layer can serve as a prototype
95  * layer.  Since it provides all necessary layer framework,
96  * new file system layers can be created very easily by starting
97  * with a null layer.
98  *
99  * The remainder of this comment examines the null layer as a basis
100  * for constructing new layers.
101  *
102  *
103  * INSTANTIATING NEW NULL LAYERS
104  *
105  * New null layers are created with mount_null(8).
106  * mount_null(8) takes two arguments, the pathname
107  * of the lower vfs (target-pn) and the pathname where the null
108  * layer will appear in the namespace (alias-pn).  After
109  * the null layer is put into place, the contents
110  * of target-pn subtree will be aliased under alias-pn.
111  *
112  *
113  * OPERATION OF A NULL LAYER
114  *
115  * The null layer is the minimum file system layer,
116  * simply bypassing all possible operations to the lower layer
117  * for processing there.  The majority of its activity centers
118  * on the bypass routine, through which nearly all vnode operations
119  * pass.
120  *
121  * The bypass routine accepts arbitrary vnode operations for
122  * handling by the lower layer.  It begins by examining vnode
123  * operation arguments and replacing any null-nodes by their
124  * lower-layer equivalents.  It then invokes the operation
125  * on the lower layer.  Finally, it replaces the null-nodes
126  * in the arguments and, if a vnode is returned by the operation,
127  * stacks a null-node on top of the returned vnode.
128  *
129  * Although bypass handles most operations, vop_getattr, vop_lock,
130  * vop_unlock, vop_inactive, vop_reclaim, and vop_print are not
131  * bypassed. vop_getattr must change the fsid being returned.
132  * vop_lock and vop_unlock must handle any locking for the
133  * current vnode as well as pass the lock request down.
134  * vop_inactive and vop_reclaim are not bypassed so that
135  * they can handle freeing null-layer specific data. vop_print
136  * is not bypassed to avoid excessive debugging information.
137  * Also, certain vnode operations change the locking state within
138  * the operation (create, mknod, remove, link, rename, mkdir, rmdir,
139  * and symlink). Ideally these operations should not change the
140  * lock state, but should be changed to let the caller of the
141  * function unlock them. Otherwise all intermediate vnode layers
142  * (such as union, umapfs, etc) must catch these functions to do
143  * the necessary locking at their layer.
144  *
145  *
146  * INSTANTIATING VNODE STACKS
147  *
148  * Mounting associates the null layer with a lower layer,
149  * in effect stacking two VFSes.  Vnode stacks are instead
150  * created on demand as files are accessed.
151  *
152  * The initial mount creates a single vnode stack for the
153  * root of the new null layer.  All other vnode stacks
154  * are created as a result of vnode operations on
155  * this or other null vnode stacks.
156  *
157  * New vnode stacks come into existence as a result of
158  * an operation which returns a vnode.
159  * The bypass routine stacks a null-node above the new
160  * vnode before returning it to the caller.
161  *
162  * For example, imagine mounting a null layer with
163  * "mount_null /usr/include /dev/layer/null".
164  * Changing directory to /dev/layer/null will assign
165  * the root null-node (which was created when the null layer was mounted).
166  * Now consider opening "sys".  A vop_lookup would be
167  * done on the root null-node.  This operation would bypass through
168  * to the lower layer which would return a vnode representing
169  * the UFS "sys".  null_bypass then builds a null-node
170  * aliasing the UFS "sys" and returns this to the caller.
171  * Later operations on the null-node "sys" will repeat this
172  * process when constructing other vnode stacks.
173  *
174  *
175  * CREATING OTHER FILE SYSTEM LAYERS
176  *
177  * One of the easiest ways to construct new file system layers is to make
178  * a copy of the null layer, rename all files and variables, and
179  * then begin modifying the copy.  sed(1) can be used to easily rename
180  * all variables.
181  *
182  * The umap layer is an example of a layer descended from the
183  * null layer.
184  *
185  *
186  * INVOKING OPERATIONS ON LOWER LAYERS
187  *
188  * There are two techniques to invoke operations on a lower layer
189  * when the operation cannot be completely bypassed.  Each method
190  * is appropriate in different situations.  In both cases,
191  * it is the responsibility of the aliasing layer to make
192  * the operation arguments "correct" for the lower layer
193  * by mapping any vnode arguments to the lower layer.
194  *
195  * The first approach is to call the aliasing layer's bypass routine.
196  * This method is most suitable when you wish to invoke the operation
197  * currently being handled on the lower layer.  It has the advantage
198  * that the bypass routine already must do argument mapping.
199  * An example of this is null_getattrs in the null layer.
200  *
201  * A second approach is to directly invoke vnode operations on
202  * the lower layer with the VOP_OPERATIONNAME interface.
203  * The advantage of this method is that it is easy to invoke
204  * arbitrary operations on the lower layer.  The disadvantage
205  * is that vnode arguments must be manually mapped.
206  *
207  */
208 
209 #include <sys/cdefs.h>
210 __KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: null_vnops.c,v 1.25 2002/01/04 07:19:33 chs Exp $");
211 
212 #include <sys/param.h>
213 #include <sys/systm.h>
214 #include <sys/proc.h>
215 #include <sys/time.h>
216 #include <sys/vnode.h>
217 #include <sys/mount.h>
218 #include <sys/namei.h>
219 #include <sys/malloc.h>
220 #include <sys/buf.h>
221 #include <miscfs/genfs/genfs.h>
222 #include <miscfs/nullfs/null.h>
223 #include <miscfs/genfs/layer_extern.h>
224 
225 /*
226  * Global vfs data structures
227  */
228 int (**null_vnodeop_p) __P((void *));
229 const struct vnodeopv_entry_desc null_vnodeop_entries[] = {
230 	{ &vop_default_desc,  layer_bypass },
231 
232 	{ &vop_lookup_desc,   layer_lookup },
233 	{ &vop_setattr_desc,  layer_setattr },
234 	{ &vop_getattr_desc,  layer_getattr },
235 	{ &vop_access_desc,   layer_access },
236 	{ &vop_lock_desc,     layer_lock },
237 	{ &vop_unlock_desc,   layer_unlock },
238 	{ &vop_islocked_desc, layer_islocked },
239 	{ &vop_fsync_desc,    layer_fsync },
240 	{ &vop_inactive_desc, layer_inactive },
241 	{ &vop_reclaim_desc,  layer_reclaim },
242 	{ &vop_print_desc,    layer_print },
243 
244 	{ &vop_open_desc,     layer_open },	/* mount option handling */
245 
246 	{ &vop_strategy_desc, layer_strategy },
247 	{ &vop_bwrite_desc,   layer_bwrite },
248 	{ &vop_bmap_desc,     layer_bmap },
249 	{ &vop_getpages_desc, layer_getpages },
250 	{ &vop_putpages_desc, layer_putpages },
251 
252 	{ NULL, NULL }
253 };
254 const struct vnodeopv_desc null_vnodeop_opv_desc =
255 	{ &null_vnodeop_p, null_vnodeop_entries };
256