1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
2<!DOCTYPE html
3          PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
4          "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
5
6<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
7<head>
8   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
9   <meta name="AUTHOR" content="pme@gcc.gnu.org (Phil Edwards)" />
10   <meta name="KEYWORDS" content="HOWTO, libstdc++, GCC, g++, libg++, STL" />
11   <meta name="DESCRIPTION" content="HOWTO for the libstdc++ chapter 21." />
12   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="vi and eight fingers" />
13   <title>libstdc++-v3 HOWTO:  Chapter 21: Strings</title>
14<link rel="StyleSheet" href="../lib3styles.css" type="text/css" />
15<link rel="Start" href="../documentation.html" type="text/html"
16  title="GNU C++ Standard Library" />
17<link rel="Prev" href="../20_util/howto.html" type="text/html"
18  title="General Utilities" />
19<link rel="Next" href="../22_locale/howto.html" type="text/html"
20  title="Localization" />
21<link rel="Copyright" href="../17_intro/license.html" type="text/html" />
22<link rel="Help" href="../faq/index.html" type="text/html" title="F.A.Q." />
23</head>
24<body>
25
26<h1 class="centered"><a name="top">Chapter 21:  Strings</a></h1>
27
28<p>Chapter 21 deals with the C++ strings library (a welcome relief).
29</p>
30
31
32<!-- ####################################################### -->
33<hr />
34<h1>Contents</h1>
35<ul>
36   <li><a href="#1">MFC's CString</a></li>
37   <li><a href="#2">A case-insensitive string class</a></li>
38   <li><a href="#3">Breaking a C++ string into tokens</a></li>
39   <li><a href="#4">Simple transformations</a></li>
40   <li><a href="#5">Making strings of arbitrary character types</a></li>
41   <li><a href="#6">Shrink-to-fit strings</a></li>
42</ul>
43
44<hr />
45
46<!-- ####################################################### -->
47
48<h2><a name="1">MFC's CString</a></h2>
49   <p>A common lament seen in various newsgroups deals with the Standard
50      string class as opposed to the Microsoft Foundation Class called
51      CString.  Often programmers realize that a standard portable
52      answer is better than a proprietary nonportable one, but in porting
53      their application from a Win32 platform, they discover that they
54      are relying on special functions offered by the CString class.
55   </p>
56   <p>Things are not as bad as they seem.  In
57      <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1999-04n/msg00236.html">this
58      message</a>, Joe Buck points out a few very important things:
59   </p>
60      <ul>
61         <li>The Standard <code>string</code> supports all the operations
62             that CString does, with three exceptions.
63         </li>
64         <li>Two of those exceptions (whitespace trimming and case
65             conversion) are trivial to implement.  In fact, we do so
66             on this page.
67         </li>
68         <li>The third is <code>CString::Format</code>, which allows formatting
69             in the style of <code>sprintf</code>.  This deserves some mention:
70         </li>
71      </ul>
72   <p><a name="1.1internal"> <!-- Coming from Chapter 27 -->
73      The old libg++ library had a function called form(), which did much
74      the same thing.  But for a Standard solution, you should use the
75      stringstream classes.  These are the bridge between the iostream
76      hierarchy and the string class, and they operate with regular
77      streams seamlessly because they inherit from the iostream
78      hierarchy.  An quick example:
79      </a>
80   </p>
81   <pre>
82   #include &lt;iostream&gt;
83   #include &lt;string&gt;
84   #include &lt;sstream&gt;
85
86   string f (string&amp; incoming)     // incoming is "foo  N"
87   {
88       istringstream   incoming_stream(incoming);
89       string          the_word;
90       int             the_number;
91
92       incoming_stream &gt;&gt; the_word        // extract "foo"
93                       &gt;&gt; the_number;     // extract N
94
95       ostringstream   output_stream;
96       output_stream &lt;&lt; "The word was " &lt;&lt; the_word
97                     &lt;&lt; " and 3*N was " &lt;&lt; (3*the_number);
98
99       return output_stream.str();
100   } </pre>
101   <p>A serious problem with CString is a design bug in its memory
102      allocation.  Specifically, quoting from that same message:
103   </p>
104   <pre>
105   CString suffers from a common programming error that results in
106   poor performance.  Consider the following code:
107
108   CString n_copies_of (const CString&amp; foo, unsigned n)
109   {
110           CString tmp;
111           for (unsigned i = 0; i &lt; n; i++)
112                   tmp += foo;
113           return tmp;
114   }
115
116   This function is O(n^2), not O(n).  The reason is that each +=
117   causes a reallocation and copy of the existing string.  Microsoft
118   applications are full of this kind of thing (quadratic performance
119   on tasks that can be done in linear time) -- on the other hand,
120   we should be thankful, as it's created such a big market for high-end
121   ix86 hardware. :-)
122
123   If you replace CString with string in the above function, the
124   performance is O(n).
125   </pre>
126   <p>Joe Buck also pointed out some other things to keep in mind when
127      comparing CString and the Standard string class:
128   </p>
129      <ul>
130         <li>CString permits access to its internal representation; coders
131             who exploited that may have problems moving to <code>string</code>.
132         </li>
133         <li>Microsoft ships the source to CString (in the files
134             MFC\SRC\Str{core,ex}.cpp), so you could fix the allocation
135             bug and rebuild your MFC libraries.
136             <em><strong>Note:</strong> It looks like the CString shipped
137             with VC++6.0 has fixed this, although it may in fact have been
138             one of the VC++ SPs that did it.</em>
139         </li>
140         <li><code>string</code> operations like this have O(n) complexity
141             <em>if the implementors do it correctly</em>.  The libstdc++
142             implementors did it correctly.  Other vendors might not.
143         </li>
144         <li>While parts of the SGI STL are used in libstdc++-v3, their
145             string class is not.  The SGI <code>string</code> is essentially
146             <code>vector&lt;char&gt;</code> and does not do any reference
147             counting like libstdc++-v3's does.  (It is O(n), though.)
148             So if you're thinking about SGI's string or rope classes,
149             you're now looking at four possibilities:  CString, the
150             libstdc++ string, the SGI string, and the SGI rope, and this
151             is all before any allocator or traits customizations!  (More
152             choices than you can shake a stick at -- want fries with that?)
153         </li>
154      </ul>
155   <p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
156      <a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
157   </p>
158
159<hr />
160<h2><a name="2">A case-insensitive string class</a></h2>
161   <p>The well-known-and-if-it-isn't-well-known-it-ought-to-be
162      <a href="http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/index.htm">Guru of the Week</a>
163      discussions held on Usenet covered this topic in January of 1998.
164      Briefly, the challenge was, &quot;write a 'ci_string' class which
165      is identical to the standard 'string' class, but is
166      case-insensitive in the same way as the (common but nonstandard)
167      C function stricmp():&quot;
168   </p>
169   <pre>
170   ci_string s( "AbCdE" );
171
172   // case insensitive
173   assert( s == "abcde" );
174   assert( s == "ABCDE" );
175
176   // still case-preserving, of course
177   assert( strcmp( s.c_str(), "AbCdE" ) == 0 );
178   assert( strcmp( s.c_str(), "abcde" ) != 0 ); </pre>
179
180   <p>The solution is surprisingly easy.  The original answer pages
181      on the GotW website were removed into cold storage, in
182      preparation for
183      <a href="http://cseng.aw.com/bookpage.taf?ISBN=0-201-61562-2">a
184      published book of GotW notes</a>.  Before being
185      put on the web, of course, it was posted on Usenet, and that
186      posting containing the answer is <a href="gotw29a.txt">available
187      here</a>.
188   </p>
189   <p>See?  Told you it was easy!</p>
190   <p><strong>Added June 2000:</strong>  The May issue of <u>C++ Report</u>
191      contains
192      a fascinating article by Matt Austern (yes, <em>the</em> Matt Austern)
193      on why case-insensitive comparisons are not as easy as they seem,
194      and why creating a class is the <em>wrong</em> way to go about it in
195      production code.  (The GotW answer mentions one of the principle
196      difficulties; his article mentions more.)
197   </p>
198   <p>Basically, this is &quot;easy&quot; only if you ignore some things,
199      things which may be too important to your program to ignore.  (I chose
200      to ignore them when originally writing this entry, and am surprised
201      that nobody ever called me on it...)  The GotW question and answer
202      remain useful instructional tools, however.
203   </p>
204   <p><strong>Added September 2000:</strong>  James Kanze provided a link to a
205      <a href="http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr21/">Unicode
206      Technical Report discussing case handling</a>, which provides some
207      very good information.
208   </p>
209   <p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
210      <a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
211   </p>
212
213<hr />
214<h2><a name="3">Breaking a C++ string into tokens</a></h2>
215   <p>The Standard C (and C++) function <code>strtok()</code> leaves a lot to
216      be desired in terms of user-friendliness.  It's unintuitive, it
217      destroys the character string on which it operates, and it requires
218      you to handle all the memory problems.  But it does let the client
219      code decide what to use to break the string into pieces; it allows
220      you to choose the &quot;whitespace,&quot; so to speak.
221   </p>
222   <p>A C++ implementation lets us keep the good things and fix those
223      annoyances.  The implementation here is more intuitive (you only
224      call it once, not in a loop with varying argument), it does not
225      affect the original string at all, and all the memory allocation
226      is handled for you.
227   </p>
228   <p>It's called stringtok, and it's a template function.  It's given
229      <a href="stringtok_h.txt">in this file</a> in a less-portable form than
230      it could be, to keep this example simple (for example, see the
231      comments on what kind of string it will accept).  The author uses
232      a more general (but less readable) form of it for parsing command
233      strings and the like.  If you compiled and ran this code using it:
234   </p>
235   <pre>
236   std::list&lt;string&gt;  ls;
237   stringtok (ls, " this  \t is\t\n  a test  ");
238   for (std::list&lt;string&gt;const_iterator i = ls.begin();
239        i != ls.end(); ++i)
240   {
241       std::cerr &lt;&lt; ':' &lt;&lt; (*i) &lt;&lt; ":\n";
242   } </pre>
243   <p>You would see this as output:
244   </p>
245   <pre>
246   :this:
247   :is:
248   :a:
249   :test: </pre>
250   <p>with all the whitespace removed.  The original <code>s</code> is still
251      available for use, <code>ls</code> will clean up after itself, and
252      <code>ls.size()</code> will return how many tokens there were.
253   </p>
254   <p>As always, there is a price paid here, in that stringtok is not
255      as fast as strtok.  The other benefits usually outweigh that, however.
256      <a href="stringtok_std_h.txt">Another version of stringtok is given
257      here</a>, suggested by Chris King and tweaked by Petr Prikryl,
258      and this one uses the
259      transformation functions mentioned below.  If you are comfortable
260      with reading the new function names, this version is recommended
261      as an example.
262   </p>
263   <p><strong>Added February 2001:</strong>  Mark Wilden pointed out that the
264      standard <code>std::getline()</code> function can be used with standard
265      <a href="../27_io/howto.html">istringstreams</a> to perform
266      tokenizing as well.  Build an istringstream from the input text,
267      and then use std::getline with varying delimiters (the three-argument
268      signature) to extract tokens into a string.
269   </p>
270   <p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
271      <a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
272   </p>
273
274<hr />
275<h2><a name="4">Simple transformations</a></h2>
276   <p>Here are Standard, simple, and portable ways to perform common
277      transformations on a <code>string</code> instance, such as &quot;convert
278      to all upper case.&quot;  The word transformations is especially
279      apt, because the standard template function
280      <code>transform&lt;&gt;</code> is used.
281   </p>
282   <p>This code will go through some iterations (no pun).  Here's the
283      simplistic version usually seen on Usenet:
284   </p>
285   <pre>
286   #include &lt;string&gt;
287   #include &lt;algorithm&gt;
288   #include &lt;cctype&gt;      // old &lt;ctype.h&gt;
289
290   struct ToLower
291   {
292     char operator() (char c) const  { return std::tolower(c); }
293   };
294
295   struct ToUpper
296   {
297     char operator() (char c) const  { return std::toupper(c); }
298   };
299
300   int main()
301   {
302     std::string  s ("Some Kind Of Initial Input Goes Here");
303
304     // Change everything into upper case
305     std::transform (s.begin(), s.end(), s.begin(), ToUpper());
306
307     // Change everything into lower case
308     std::transform (s.begin(), s.end(), s.begin(), ToLower());
309
310     // Change everything back into upper case, but store the
311     // result in a different string
312     std::string  capital_s;
313     capital_s.resize(s.size());
314     std::transform (s.begin(), s.end(), capital_s.begin(), ToUpper());
315   } </pre>
316   <p><span class="larger"><strong>Note</strong></span> that these calls all
317      involve the global C locale through the use of the C functions
318      <code>toupper/tolower</code>.  This is absolutely guaranteed to work --
319      but <em>only</em> if the string contains <em>only</em> characters
320      from the basic source character set, and there are <em>only</em>
321      96 of those.  Which means that not even all English text can be
322      represented (certain British spellings, proper names, and so forth).
323      So, if all your input forevermore consists of only those 96
324      characters (hahahahahaha), then you're done.
325   </p>
326   <p><span class="larger"><strong>Note</strong></span> that the
327      <code>ToUpper</code> and <code>ToLower</code> function objects
328      are needed because <code>toupper</code> and <code>tolower</code>
329      are overloaded names (declared in <code>&lt;cctype&gt;</code> and
330      <code>&lt;locale&gt;</code>) so the template-arguments for
331      <code>transform&lt;&gt;</code> cannot be deduced, as explained in
332      <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-11/msg00180.html">this
333      message</a>.  <!-- section 14.8.2.4 clause 16 in ISO 14882:1998
334      if you're into that sort of thing -->
335      At minimum, you can write short wrappers like
336   </p>
337   <pre>
338   char toLower (char c)
339   {
340      return std::tolower(c);
341   } </pre>
342   <p>The correct method is to use a facet for a particular locale
343      and call its conversion functions.  These are discussed more in
344      Chapter 22; the specific part is
345      <a href="../22_locale/howto.html#7">Correct Transformations</a>,
346      which shows the final version of this code.  (Thanks to James Kanze
347      for assistance and suggestions on all of this.)
348   </p>
349   <p>Another common operation is trimming off excess whitespace.  Much
350      like transformations, this task is trivial with the use of string's
351      <code>find</code> family.  These examples are broken into multiple
352      statements for readability:
353   </p>
354   <pre>
355   std::string  str (" \t blah blah blah    \n ");
356
357   // trim leading whitespace
358   string::size_type  notwhite = str.find_first_not_of(" \t\n");
359   str.erase(0,notwhite);
360
361   // trim trailing whitespace
362   notwhite = str.find_last_not_of(" \t\n");
363   str.erase(notwhite+1); </pre>
364   <p>Obviously, the calls to <code>find</code> could be inserted directly
365      into the calls to <code>erase</code>, in case your compiler does not
366      optimize named temporaries out of existence.
367   </p>
368   <p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
369      <a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
370   </p>
371
372<hr />
373<h2><a name="5">Making strings of arbitrary character types</a></h2>
374   <p>The <code>std::basic_string</code> is tantalizingly general, in that
375      it is parameterized on the type of the characters which it holds.
376      In theory, you could whip up a Unicode character class and instantiate
377      <code>std::basic_string&lt;my_unicode_char&gt;</code>, or assuming
378      that integers are wider than characters on your platform, maybe just
379      declare variables of type <code>std::basic_string&lt;int&gt;</code>.
380   </p>
381   <p>That's the theory.  Remember however that basic_string has additional
382      type parameters, which take default arguments based on the character
383      type (called CharT here):
384   </p>
385   <pre>
386      template &lt;typename CharT,
387                typename Traits = char_traits&lt;CharT&gt;,
388                typename Alloc = allocator&lt;CharT&gt; &gt;
389      class basic_string { .... };</pre>
390   <p>Now, <code>allocator&lt;CharT&gt;</code> will probably Do The Right
391      Thing by default, unless you need to implement your own allocator
392      for your characters.
393   </p>
394   <p>But <code>char_traits</code> takes more work.  The char_traits
395      template is <em>declared</em> but not <em>defined</em>.
396      That means there is only
397   </p>
398   <pre>
399      template &lt;typename CharT&gt;
400        struct char_traits
401        {
402            static void foo (type1 x, type2 y);
403            ...
404        };</pre>
405   <p>and functions such as char_traits&lt;CharT&gt;::foo() are not
406      actually defined anywhere for the general case.  The C++ standard
407      permits this, because writing such a definition to fit all possible
408      CharT's cannot be done.  (For a time, in earlier versions of GCC,
409      there was a mostly-correct implementation that let programmers be
410      lazy.  :-)  But it broke under many situations, so it was removed.
411      You are no longer allowed to be lazy and non-portable.)
412   </p>
413   <p>The C++ standard also requires that char_traits be specialized for
414      instantiations of <code>char</code> and <code>wchar_t</code>, and it
415      is these template specializations that permit entities like
416      <code>basic_string&lt;char,char_traits&lt;char&gt;&gt;</code> to work.
417   </p>
418   <p>If you want to use character types other than char and wchar_t,
419      such as <code>unsigned char</code> and <code>int</code>, you will
420      need to write specializations for them at the present time.  If you
421      want to use your own special character class, then you have
422      <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-08/msg00163.html">a lot
423      of work to do</a>, especially if you with to use i18n features
424      (facets require traits information but don't have a traits argument).
425   </p>
426   <p>One example of how to specialize char_traits is given <a
427      href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-08/msg00260.html">in
428      this message</a>, which was then put into the file <code>
429      include/ext/pod_char_traits.h</code> at a later date.  We agree
430      that the way it's used with basic_string (scroll down to main())
431      doesn't look nice, but that's because <a
432      href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-08/msg00236.html">the
433      nice-looking first attempt</a> turned out to <a
434      href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-08/msg00242.html">not
435      be conforming C++</a>, due to the rule that CharT must be a POD.
436      (See how tricky this is?)
437   </p>
438   <p>Other approaches were suggested in that same thread, such as providing
439      more specializations and/or some helper types in the library to assist
440      users writing such code.  So far nobody has had the time...
441      <a href="../17_intro/contribute.html">do you?</a>
442   </p>
443   <p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
444      <a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
445   </p>
446
447<hr />
448<h2><a name="6">Shrink-to-fit strings</a></h2>
449   <!-- referenced by faq/index.html#5_9, update link if numbering changes -->
450   <p>From GCC 3.4 calling <code>s.reserve(res)</code> on a
451      <code>string s</code> with <code>res &lt; s.capacity()</code> will
452      reduce the string's capacity to <code>std::max(s.size(), res)</code>.
453   </p>
454   <p>This behaviour is suggested, but not required by the standard. Prior
455      to GCC 3.4 the following alternative can be used instead
456   </p>
457   <pre>
458      std::string(str.data(), str.size()).swap(str);
459   </pre>
460   <p>This is similar to the idiom for reducing a <code>vector</code>'s
461      memory usage (see <a href='../faq/index.html#5_9'>FAQ 5.9</a>) but
462      the regular copy constructor cannot be used because libstdc++'s
463      <code>string</code> is Copy-On-Write.
464   </p>
465
466
467<!-- ####################################################### -->
468
469<hr />
470<p class="fineprint"><em>
471See <a href="../17_intro/license.html">license.html</a> for copying conditions.
472Comments and suggestions are welcome, and may be sent to
473<a href="mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org">the libstdc++ mailing list</a>.
474</em></p>
475
476
477</body>
478</html>
479