1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
2<!DOCTYPE html
3          PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
4          "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
5
6<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
7<head>
8   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
9   <meta name="KEYWORDS" content="libstdc++, libstdc++-v3, GCC, g++, libg++, STL" />
10   <meta name="DESCRIPTION" content="FAQ for the GNU libstdc++ effort." />
11   <title>libstdc++-v3 FAQ</title>
12<link rel="StyleSheet" href="../lib3styles.css" />
13<link rel="Start" rev="Help" href="../documentation.html" type="text/html"
14 title="GNU C++ Standard Library" />
15<link rel="Copyright" href="../17_intro/license.html" type="text/html" />
16</head>
17<body>
18
19<h1 class="centered">libstdc++ Frequently Asked Questions</h1>
20
21<p class="fineprint"><em>
22   The latest version of this document is always available at
23   <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/">
24   http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/</a>.  The main documentation
25   page is at
26   <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/documentation.html">
27   http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/documentation.html</a>.
28</em></p>
29
30<p><em>
31   To the <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/">libstdc++-v3 homepage</a>.
32</em></p>
33
34<!-- ####################################################### -->
35<hr />
36<h1>Questions</h1>
37<ol>
38   <li><a href="#1_0">General Information</a>
39   <!-- I suspect these will mostly be links to/into existing documents. -->
40   <ol>
41      <li><a href="#1_1">What is libstdc++-v3?</a> </li>
42      <li><a href="#1_2">Why should I use libstdc++?</a> </li>
43      <li><a href="#1_3">Who's in charge of it?</a> </li>
44      <li><a href="#1_4">How do I get libstdc++?</a> </li>
45      <li><a href="#1_5">When is libstdc++ going to be finished?</a> </li>
46      <li><a href="#1_6">How do I contribute to the effort?</a> </li>
47      <li><a href="#1_7">What happened to libg++?  I need that!</a> </li>
48      <li><a href="#1_8">What if I have more questions?</a> </li>
49      <li><a href="#1_9">What are the license terms for libstdc++-v3?</a> </li>
50   </ol>
51   </li>
52
53   <li><a href="#2_0">Installation</a>
54      <ol>
55         <li><a href="#2_1">How do I install libstdc++-v3?</a> </li>
56         <li><a href="#2_2">[removed]</a> </li>
57         <li><a href="#2_3">What is this SVN thing that you keep
58                            mentioning?</a> </li>
59         <li><a href="#2_4">How do I know if it works?</a> </li>
60         <li><a href="#2_5">This library is HUGE!  And what's libsupc++?</a> </li>
61         <li><a href="#2_6">Why do I get an error saying
62                            <code>libstdc++.so.X</code> is missing when I
63                            run my program?</a> </li>
64      </ol>
65   </li>
66
67   <li><a href="#3_0">Platform-Specific Issues</a>
68      <ol>
69         <li><a href="#3_1">Can libstdc++-v3 be used with &lt;my
70                            favorite compiler&gt;?</a> </li>
71         <li><a href="#3_2">[removed]</a> </li>
72         <li><a href="#3_3">[removed]</a> </li>
73         <li><a href="#3_4">I can't use 'long long' on Solaris</a> </li>
74         <li><a href="#3_5"><code>_XOPEN_SOURCE</code> /
75                            <code>_GNU_SOURCE</code> / etc is always defined</a>
76         </li>
77         <li><a href="#3_6">OS X ctype.h is broken!  How can I hack it?</a></li>
78         <li><a href="#3_7">Threading is broken on i386</a></li>
79         <li><a href="#3_8">Recent GNU/Linux glibc required?</a></li>
80         <li><a href="#3_9">Can't use wchar_t/wstring on FreeBSD</a></li>
81         <li><a href="#3_10">MIPS atomic operations</a></li>
82      </ol>
83   </li>
84
85   <li><a href="#4_0">Known Bugs and Non-Bugs</a>
86      <ol>
87         <li><a href="#4_1">What works already?</a> </li>
88         <li><a href="#4_2">Bugs in gcc/g++ (not libstdc++-v3)</a> </li>
89         <li><a href="#4_3">Bugs in the C++ language/lib specification</a> </li>
90         <li><a href="#4_4">Things in libstdc++ that only look like bugs</a><ul>
91           <li><a href="#4_4_iostreamclear">reopening a stream fails</a> </li>
92           <li><a href="#4_4_Weff">-Weffc++ complains too much</a> </li>
93           <li><a href="#4_4_rel_ops">&quot;ambiguous overloads&quot;
94                               after including an old-style header</a> </li>
95           <li><a href="#4_4_interface">The g++-3 headers are
96                               <strong>not ours</strong></a> </li>
97           <li><a href="#4_4_glibc">compilation errors from streambuf.h</a> </li>
98           <li><a href="#4_4_checks">errors about <em>*Concept</em> and
99                               <em>constraints</em> in the STL...</a> </li>
100           <li><a href="#4_4_dlsym">program crashes when using library code
101                               in a dynamically-loaded library</a> </li>
102           <li><a href="#4_4_leak">"memory leaks" in containers</a> </li>
103         </ul>
104         </li>
105         <li><a href="#4_5">Aw, that's easy to fix!</a> </li>
106      </ol>
107   </li>
108
109   <li><a href="#5_0">Miscellaneous</a>
110      <ol>
111         <li><a href="#5_1">string::iterator is not char*;
112                            vector&lt;T&gt;::iterator is not T*</a> </li>
113         <li><a href="#5_2">What's next after libstdc++-v3?</a> </li>
114         <li><a href="#5_3">What about the STL from SGI?</a> </li>
115         <li><a href="#5_4">Extensions and Backward Compatibility</a> </li>
116         <li><a href="#5_5">Does libstdc++ support TR1?</a> </li>
117         <li><a href="#5_6">Is libstdc++-v3 thread-safe?</a> </li>
118         <li><a href="#5_7">How do I get a copy of the ISO C++ Standard?</a> </li>
119         <li><a href="#5_8">What's an ABI and why is it so messy?</a> </li>
120         <li><a href="#5_9">How do I make std::vector&lt;T&gt;::capacity()
121                            == std::vector&lt;T&gt;::size?</a> </li>
122      </ol>
123   </li>
124
125</ol>
126
127<hr />
128
129<!-- ####################################################### -->
130
131<h1><a name="1_0">1.0 General Information</a></h1>
132<!-- I suspect these will mostly be links to/into existing documents. -->
133   <h2><a name="1_1">1.1 What is libstdc++-v3?</a></h2>
134      <p>The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 is an
135         ongoing project to implement the ISO 14882 Standard C++ library
136         as described in chapters 17 through 27 and annex D.
137         For those who want to see exactly how
138         far the project has come, or just want the latest
139         bleeding-edge code, the up-to-date source is available over
140         anonymous SVN, and can even be browsed over the Web (see
141         <a href="#1_4">1.4</a> below).
142      </p>
143      <p>The older libstdc++-v2 project is no longer maintained; the code
144         has been completely replaced and rewritten.
145         <a href="#4_4_interface">If you are using V2</a>, then you need to
146         report bugs to your system vendor, not to the V3 list.
147      </p>
148      <p>A more formal description of the V3 goals can be found in the
149         official <a href="../17_intro/DESIGN">design document</a>.
150      </p>
151
152<hr />
153   <h2><a name="1_2">1.2 Why should I use libstdc++?</a></h2>
154      <p>The completion of the ISO C++ standardization gave the
155         C++ community a powerful set of reuseable tools in the form
156         of the C++ Standard Library.  However, all existing C++
157         implementations are (as the Draft Standard used to say)
158         &quot;incomplet and incorrekt,&quot; and many suffer from
159         limitations of the compilers that use them.
160      </p>
161      <p>The GNU C/C++/FORTRAN/&lt;pick-a-language&gt; compiler
162         (<code>gcc</code>, <code>g++</code>, etc) is widely considered to be
163         one of the leading compilers in the world.  Its development
164         is overseen by the
165         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/">GCC team</a>.  All of
166         the rapid development and near-legendary
167         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/buildstat.html">portability</a>
168         that are the hallmarks of an open-source project are being
169         applied to libstdc++.
170      </p>
171      <p>That means that all of the Standard classes and functions
172         (such as <code>string</code>, <code>vector&lt;&gt;</code>, iostreams,
173         and algorithms) will be freely available and fully compliant.
174         Programmers will no longer need to &quot;roll their own&quot;
175         nor be worried about platform-specific incompatibilities.
176      </p>
177
178<hr />
179   <h2><a name="1_3">1.3 Who's in charge of it?</a></h2>
180      <p>The libstdc++ project is contributed to by several developers
181         all over the world, in the same way as GCC or Linux.
182         Benjamin Kosnik, Gabriel Dos Reis, Phil Edwards, Ulrich Drepper,
183         Loren James Rittle, and Paolo Carlini are the lead maintainers of
184         the SVN archive.
185      </p>
186      <p>Development and discussion is held on the libstdc++ mailing
187         list.  Subscribing to the list, or searching the list
188         archives, is open to everyone.  You can read instructions for
189         doing so on the <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/">homepage</a>.
190         If you have questions, ideas, code, or are just curious, sign up!
191      </p>
192
193<hr />
194   <h2><a name="1_4">1.4 How do I get libstdc++?</a></h2>
195      <p>The <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/">homepage</a>
196         has instructions for retrieving the latest SVN sources, and for
197         browsing the SVN sources over the web.
198      </p>
199      <p>Stable versions of libstdc++-v3 are included with releases of
200         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html">the GCC compilers</a>.
201      </p>
202      <p>The subset commonly known as the Standard Template Library
203         (chapters 23 through 25, mostly) is adapted from the final release
204         of the SGI STL, with extensive changes.
205      </p>
206
207<hr />
208   <h2><a name="1_5">1.5 When is libstdc++ going to be finished?</a></h2>
209<!--      <p>Nathan Myers gave the best of all possible answers in <a
210         href="http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=469581698&fmt=text">a
211         Usenet article</a>.</p>
212which is no longer available, thanks deja...-->
213      <p>Nathan Myers gave the best of all possible answers, responding to a
214         Usenet article asking this question:  <em>Sooner, if you help.</em>
215      </p>
216
217<hr />
218   <h2><a name="1_6">1.6 How do I contribute to the effort?</a></h2>
219      <p>Here is <a href="../17_intro/contribute.html">a
220         page devoted to this topic</a>.  Subscribing to the mailing
221         list (see above, or the homepage) is a very good idea if you
222         have something to contribute, or if you have spare time and
223         want to help.  Contributions don't have to be in the form of
224         source code; anybody who is willing to help write
225         documentation, for example, or has found a bug in code that
226         we all thought was working, is more than welcome!
227      </p>
228
229<hr />
230   <h2><a name="1_7">1.7 What happened to libg++?  I need that!</a></h2>
231      <p>The most recent libg++ README states that libg++ is no longer
232         being actively maintained.  It should not be used for new
233         projects, and is only being kicked along to support older code.
234      </p>
235      <p>The libg++ was designed and created when there was no Standard
236         to provide guidance.  Classes like linked lists are now provided
237         for by <code>list&lt;T&gt;</code> and do not need to be created by
238         <code>genclass</code>.  (For that matter, templates exist now and
239         are well-supported, whereas genclass (mostly) predates them.)
240      </p>
241      <p>There are other classes in libg++ that are not specified in the
242         ISO Standard (e.g., statistical analysis).  While there are a
243         lot of really useful things that are used by a lot of people
244         (e.g., statistics :-), the Standards Committee couldn't include
245         everything, and so a lot of those &quot;obvious&quot; classes
246         didn't get included.
247      </p>
248      <p>Since libstdc++ is an implementation of the Standard Library, we
249         have no plans at this time to include non-Standard utilities
250         in the implementation, however handy they are.  (The extensions
251         provided in the SGI STL aren't maintained by us and don't get
252         a lot of our attention, because they don't require a lot of our
253         time.)  It is entirely plausible that the &quot;useful stuff&quot;
254         from libg++ might be extracted into an updated utilities library,
255         but nobody has started such a project yet.
256      </p>
257      <p>(The <a href="http://www.boost.org/">Boost</a> site houses free
258         C++ libraries that do varying things, and happened to be started
259         by members of the Standards Committee.  Certain &quot;useful
260         stuff&quot; classes will probably migrate there.)
261      </p>
262      <p>For the bold and/or desperate, the
263         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html">GCC extensions page</a>
264         describes where to find the last libg++ source.
265      </p>
266
267<hr />
268   <h2><a name="1_8">1.8 What if I have more questions?</a></h2>
269      <p>If you have read the README and RELEASE-NOTES files, and your
270         question remains unanswered, then just ask the mailing list.
271         At present, you do not need to be subscribed to the list to
272         send a message to it.  More information is available on the
273         homepage (including how to browse the list archives); to send
274         to the list, use <a href="mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org">
275         <code>libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org</code></a>.
276      </p>
277      <p>If you have a question that you think should be included here,
278         or if you have a question <em>about</em> a question/answer here,
279         contact <a href="mailto:pme@gcc.gnu.org">Phil Edwards</a>
280         or <a href="mailto:gdr@gcc.gnu.org">Gabriel Dos Reis</a>.
281      </p>
282
283<hr />
284   <h2><a name="1_9">1.9 What are the license terms for libstdc++-v3?</a></h2>
285      <p>See <a href="../17_intro/license.html">our license description</a>
286         for these and related questions.
287      </p>
288
289<hr />
290<h1><a name="2_0">2.0 Installation</a></h1>
291   <h2><a name="2_1">2.1 How do I install libstdc++-v3?</a></h2>
292      <p>Complete instructions are not given here (this is a FAQ, not
293         an installation document), but the tools required are few:
294      </p>
295         <ul>
296            <li> A 3.x release of GCC.  Note that building GCC is much
297                 easier and more automated than building the GCC 2.[78]
298                 series was.  If you are using GCC 2.95, you can still
299                 build earlier snapshots of libstdc++.
300            </li>
301            <li> GNU Make is required for GCC 3.4 and later.
302            </li>
303            <li> The GNU Autotools are needed if you are messing with
304                 the configury or makefiles.
305            </li>
306         </ul>
307      <p>The file <a href="../documentation.html">documentation.html</a>
308         provides a good overview of the steps necessary to build, install,
309         and use the library.  Instructions for configuring the library
310         with new flags such as --enable-threads are there also, as well as
311         patches and instructions for working with GCC 2.95.
312      </p>
313      <p>The top-level install.html and
314         <a href="../17_intro/RELEASE-NOTES">RELEASE-NOTES</a> files contain
315         the exact build and installation instructions.  You may wish to
316         browse those files over ViewVC ahead of time to get a feel for
317         what's required.  RELEASE-NOTES is located in the
318         &quot;.../docs/17_intro/&quot; directory of the distribution.
319      </p>
320
321<hr />
322   <h2><a name="2_2">2.2 [removed]</a></h2>
323      <p>This question has become moot and has been removed.  The stub
324         is here to preserve numbering (and hence links/bookmarks).
325      </p>
326
327<hr />
328   <h2><a name="2_3">2.3 What is this SVN thing that you
329                         keep mentioning?</a></h2>
330      <p><em>Subversion</em> is one of several revision control packages.
331         It was selected for GNU projects because it's free (speech), free (beer),
332         and very high quality.  The <a href="http://subversion.tigris.org">
333         Subversion home page</a> has a better description.
334      </p>
335      <p>The &quot;anonymous client checkout&quot; feature of SVN is
336         similar to anonymous FTP in that it allows anyone to retrieve
337         the latest libstdc++ sources.
338      </p>
339      <p>After the first of April, American users will have a
340         &quot;/pharmacy&quot; command-line option...
341         <!-- wonder how long that'll live -->
342      </p>
343
344<hr />
345   <h2><a name="2_4">2.4 How do I know if it works?</a></h2>
346      <p>libstdc++-v3 comes with its own testsuite.  You do not need
347         to actually install the library (&quot;<code>make
348         install</code>&quot;) to run the testsuite, but you do need
349         DejaGNU, as described
350         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html">here</a>.
351      </p>
352      <p>To run the testsuite on the library after building it, use
353         &quot;make check&quot; while in your build directory.  To run
354         the testsuite on the library after building and installing it,
355         use &quot;make check-install&quot; instead.
356      </p>
357      <p>If you find bugs in the testsuite programs themselves, or if you
358         think of a new test program that should be added to the suite,
359         <strong>please</strong> write up your idea and send it to the list!
360      </p>
361
362<hr />
363   <h2><a name="2_5">2.5 This library is HUGE!  And what's libsupc++?</a></h2>
364      <p>Usually the size of libraries on disk isn't noticeable.  When a
365         link editor (or simply &quot;linker&quot;) pulls things from a
366         static archive library, only the necessary object files are copied
367         into your executable, not the entire library.  Unfortunately, even
368         if you only need a single function or variable from an object file,
369         the entire object file is extracted.  (There's nothing unique to C++
370         or libstdc++-v3 about this; it's just common behavior, given here
371         for background reasons.)
372      </p>
373      <p>Some of the object files which make up libstdc++.a are rather large.
374         If you create a statically-linked executable with
375         <code> -static</code>, those large object files are suddenly part
376         of your executable.  Historically the best way around this was to
377         only place a very few functions (often only a single one) in each
378         source/object file; then extracting a single function is the same
379         as extracting a single .o file.  For libstdc++-v3 this is only
380         possible to a certain extent; the object files in question contain
381         template classes and template functions, pre-instantiated, and
382         splitting those up causes severe maintenance headaches.
383      </p>
384      <p>It's not a bug, and it's not really a problem.  Nevertheless, some
385         people don't like it, so here are two pseudo-solutions:
386      </p>
387      <p>If the only functions from libstdc++.a which you need are
388         language support functions (those listed in <a
389         href="../18_support/howto.html">clause 18</a> of the
390         standard, e.g., <code>new</code> and <code>delete</code>),
391         then try linking against <code>libsupc++.a</code> (Using
392         <code>gcc</code> instead of <code>g++</code> and explicitly
393         linking in <code>-lsupc++</code> for the final link step will
394         do it).  This library contains only those support routines,
395         one per object file.  But if you are using anything from the
396         rest of the library, such as IOStreams or vectors, then
397         you'll still need pieces from <code>libstdc++.a</code>.
398      </p>
399      <p>The second method is one we hope to incorporate into the library
400         build process.  Some platforms can place each function and variable
401         into its own section in a .o file.  The GNU linker can then perform
402         garbage collection on unused sections; this reduces the situation
403         to only copying needed functions into the executable, as before,
404         but all happens automatically.
405      </p>
406      <p>Unfortunately the garbage collection in GNU ld is buggy; sections
407         (corresponding to functions and variables) which <em>are</em> used
408         are mistakenly removed, leading to horrible crashes when your
409         executable starts up.  For the time being, this feature is not used
410         when building the library.
411      </p>
412
413<hr />
414   <h2><a name="2_6">2.6 Why do I get an error saying
415                         <code>libstdc++.so.X</code> is missing when I run
416                         my program?</a></h2>
417      <p>Depending on your platform and library version, the message might
418         be similar to one of the following:
419      </p>
420      <pre>
421    ./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
422
423    /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libstdc++.so.6" not found </pre>
424
425      <p>This doesn't mean that the shared library isn't installed, only
426         that the dynamic linker can't find it. When a dynamically-linked
427         executable is run the linker finds and loads the required shared
428         libraries by searching a pre-configured list of directories. If
429         the directory where you've installed libstdc++ is not in this
430         list then the libraries won't be found. The simplest way to fix
431         this is to use the <code>LD_LIBRARY_PATH</code> environment
432         variable, which is a colon-separated list of directories in which
433         the linker will search for shared libraries:
434      </p>
435      <pre>
436    LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${prefix}/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
437    export LD_LIBRARY_PATH </pre>
438      <p>The exact environment variable to use will depend on your platform,
439         e.g. DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH for Darwin,
440         LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32/LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for Solaris 32-/64-bit,
441         LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH/LD_LIBRARY64_PATH for Irix N32/64-bit ABIs
442         and SHLIB_PATH for HP-UX.
443      </p>
444      <p>See the man pages for <code>ld(1)</code>, <code>ldd(1)</code> and
445         <code>ldconfig(8)</code> for more information. The dynamic linker
446         has different names on different platforms but the man page is
447         usually called something such as <code>ld.so / rtld / dld.so</code>.
448      </p>
449
450<hr />
451<h1><a name="3_0">3.0 Platform-Specific Issues</a></h1>
452   <h2><a name="3_1">3.1 Can libstdc++-v3 be used with &lt;my
453                         favorite compiler&gt;?</a></h2>
454      <p>Probably not.  Yet.</p>
455      <p>Because GCC advances so rapidly, development and testing of
456         libstdc++ is being done almost entirely under that compiler.
457         If you are curious about whether other, lesser compilers
458         (*grin*) support libstdc++, you are more than welcome to try.
459         Configuring and building the library (see above) will still
460         require certain tools, however.  Also keep in mind that
461         <em>building</em> libstdc++ does not imply that your compiler
462         will be able to <em>use</em> all of the features found in the
463         C++ Standard Library.
464      </p>
465      <p>Since the goal of ISO Standardization is for all C++
466         implementations to be able to share code, the final libstdc++
467         should, in theory, be usable under any ISO-compliant
468         compiler.  It will still be targeted and optimized for
469         GCC/g++, however.
470      </p>
471
472<hr />
473   <h2><a name="3_2">3.2 [removed]</a></h2>
474      <p>This question has become moot and has been removed.  The stub
475         is here to preserve numbering (and hence links/bookmarks).
476      </p>
477
478<hr />
479   <h2><a name="3_3">3.3 [removed]</a></h2>
480      <p>This question has become moot and has been removed.  The stub
481         is here to preserve numbering (and hence links/bookmarks).
482      </p>
483
484<hr />
485   <h2><a name="3_4">3.4 I can't use 'long long' on Solaris</a></h2>
486      <p>By default we try to support the C99 <code>long long</code> type.
487         This requires that certain functions from your C library be present.
488      </p>
489      <p>Up through release 3.0.2 the tests performed were too general, and
490         this feature was disabled when it did not need to be.  The most
491         commonly reported platform affected was Solaris.
492      </p>
493      <p>This has been fixed for 3.0.3 and onwards.
494      </p>
495
496<hr />
497   <h2><a name="3_5">3.5 <code>_XOPEN_SOURCE</code> / <code>_GNU_SOURCE</code>
498                         / etc is always defined</a></h2>
499      <p>On Solaris, g++ (but not gcc) always defines the preprocessor
500         macro <code>_XOPEN_SOURCE</code>.  On GNU/Linux, the same happens
501         with <code>_GNU_SOURCE</code>.  (This is not an exhaustive list;
502         other macros and other platforms are also affected.)
503      </p>
504      <p>These macros are typically used in C library headers, guarding new
505         versions of functions from their older versions.  The C++ standard
506         library includes the C standard library, but it requires the C90
507         version, which for backwards-compatibility reasons is often not the
508         default for many vendors.
509      </p>
510      <p>More to the point, the C++ standard requires behavior which is only
511         available on certain platforms after certain symbols are defined.
512         Usually the issue involves I/O-related typedefs.  In order to
513         ensure correctness, the compiler simply predefines those symbols.
514      </p>
515      <p>Note that it's not enough to #define them only when the library is
516         being built (during installation).  Since we don't have an 'export'
517         keyword, much of the library exists as headers, which means that
518         the symbols must also be defined as your programs are parsed and
519         compiled.
520      </p>
521      <p>To see which symbols are defined, look for CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC in
522         the gcc config headers for your target (and try changing them to
523         see what happens when building complicated code).  You can also run
524         <code>&quot;g++ -E -dM - &lt; /dev/null&quot;</code> to display
525         a list of predefined macros for any particular installation.
526      </p>
527      <p>This has been discussed on the mailing lists
528         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/htsearch?method=and&amp;format=builtin-long&amp;sort=score&amp;words=_XOPEN_SOURCE+Solaris">quite a bit</a>.
529      </p>
530      <p>This method is something of a wart.  We'd like to find a cleaner
531         solution, but nobody yet has contributed the time.
532      </p>
533
534<hr />
535   <h2><a name="3_6">3.6 OS X ctype.h is broken!  How can I hack it?</a></h2>
536      <p>This is a long-standing bug in the OS X support.  Fortunately,
537         the patch is quite simple, and well-known.
538         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-03/msg00817.html"> Here's a
539         link to the solution.</a>
540      </p>
541
542<hr />
543   <h2><a name="3_7">3.7 Threading is broken on i386</a></h2>
544      <p>Support for atomic integer operations is/was broken on i386
545         platforms.  The assembly code accidentally used opcodes that are
546         only available on the i486 and later.  So if you configured GCC
547         to target, for example, i386-linux, but actually used the programs
548         on an i686, then you would encounter no problems.  Only when
549         actually running the code on a i386 will the problem appear.
550      </p>
551      <p>This is fixed in 3.2.2.
552      </p>
553
554<hr />
555   <h2><a name="3_8">3.8 Recent GNU/Linux glibc required?</a></h2>
556      <p>When running on GNU/Linux, libstdc++ 3.2.1 (shared library version
557         5.0.1) and later uses localization and formatting code from the system
558         C library (glibc) version 2.2.5.  That version of glibc is over a
559         year old and contains necessary bugfixes.  Many GNU/Linux distros make
560         glibc version 2.3.x available now.
561      </p>
562      <p>The guideline is simple:  the more recent the C++ library, the
563         more recent the C library.  (This is also documented in the main
564         GCC installation instructions.)
565      </p>
566
567<hr />
568   <h2><a name="3_9">3.9 Can't use wchar_t/wstring on FreeBSD</a></h2>
569      <p>At the moment there are a few problems in FreeBSD's support for
570         wide character functions, and as a result the libstdc++ configury
571         decides that wchar_t support should be disabled.  Once the underlying
572         problems are fixed in FreeBSD (soon), the library support will
573         automatically enable itself.
574      </p>
575      <p>You can fix the problems yourself, and learn more about the situation,
576         by reading
577         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-02/subjects.html#00286">
578         this short thread</a> (&quot;_GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in
579         FreeBSD's c++config.h?&quot;).
580      </p>
581
582<hr />
583   <h2><a name="3_10">3.10 MIPS atomic operations</a></h2>
584      <p>The atomic locking routines for MIPS targets requires MIPS II
585         and later.  A patch went in just after the 3.3 release to
586         make mips* use the generic implementation instead.  You can also
587         configure for mipsel-elf as a workaround.
588      </p>
589      <p>mips*-*-linux* continues to use the MIPS II routines, and more
590         work in this area is expected.
591      </p>
592
593<hr />
594<h1><a name="4_0">4.0 Known Bugs and Non-Bugs</a></h1>
595   <em>Note that this section can get rapidly outdated -- such is the
596       nature of an open-source project.  For the latest information, join
597       the mailing list or look through recent archives.   The RELEASE-
598       NOTES and BUGS files are generally kept up-to-date.</em>
599
600   <p>For 3.0.1, the most common &quot;bug&quot; is an apparently missing
601      &quot;<code>../</code>&quot; in include/Makefile, resulting in files
602      like gthr.h and gthr-single.h not being found.  Please read
603      <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html">the configuration
604      instructions for GCC</a>,
605      specifically the part about configuring in a separate build directory,
606      and how strongly recommended it is.  Building in the source directory
607      is fragile, is rarely tested, and tends to break, as in this case.
608      This was fixed for 3.0.2.
609   </p>
610
611   <p>For 3.1, the most common &quot;bug&quot; is a parse error when using
612      <code>&lt;fstream&gt;</code>, ending with a message,
613      &quot;<code>bits/basic_file.h:52: parse error before `{'
614      token</code>.&quot;  Please read
615      <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/install/">the installation instructions for
616      GCC</a>, specifically the part about not installing newer versions on
617      top of older versions.  If you install 3.1 over a 3.0.x release, then
618      the wrong basic_file.h header will be found (its location changed
619      between releases).
620   </p>
621
622   <p><strong>Please do not report these as bugs.  We know about them.</strong>
623      Reporting this -- or any other problem that's already been fixed --
624      hinders the development of GCC, because we have to take time to
625      respond to your report.  Thank you.
626   </p>
627
628<hr />
629   <h2><a name="4_1">4.1 What works already?</a></h2>
630      <p>Short answer:  Pretty much everything <em>works</em> except for some
631         corner cases.  Also, localization is incomplete.  For whether it works
632         well, or as you expect it to work, see 5.2.
633      </p>
634      <p>Long answer:  See the docs/html/17_intro/CHECKLIST file, which is
635         badly outdated...  Also see the RELEASE-NOTES file, which is kept
636         more up to date.
637      </p>
638
639<hr />
640   <h2><a name="4_2">4.2 Bugs in gcc/g++ (not libstdc++-v3)</a></h2>
641      <p>This is by no means meant to be complete nor exhaustive, but
642         mentions some problems that users may encounter when building
643         or using libstdc++.  If you are experiencing one of these
644         problems, you can find more information on the libstdc++ and
645         the GCC mailing lists.
646      </p>
647      <p>Before reporting a bug, examine the
648         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html">bugs database</a> with the
649         category set to &quot;libstdc++&quot;.  The BUGS file in the source
650         tree also tracks known serious problems.
651      </p>
652      <ul>
653         <li>Debugging is problematic, due to bugs in line-number generation
654             (mostly fixed in the compiler) and gdb lagging behind the
655             compiler (lack of personnel).  We recommend configuring the
656             compiler using <code>--with-dwarf2</code> if the DWARF2
657             debugging format is not already the default on your platform.
658             Also,
659<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-02/msg00034.html">changing your
660             GDB settings</a> can have a profound effect on your C++ debugging
661             experiences.  :-)</li>
662      </ul>
663
664<hr />
665   <h2><a name="4_3">4.3 Bugs in the C++ language/lib specification</a></h2>
666      <p>Yes, unfortunately, there are some.  In a
667         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/1998/msg00006.html">message
668         to the list</a>, Nathan Myers announced that he has started a list of
669         problems in the ISO C++ Standard itself, especially with
670         regard to the chapters that concern the library.  The list
671         itself is
672         <a href="http://www.cantrip.org/draft-bugs.txt">posted on his
673         website</a>.  Developers who are having problems interpreting
674         the Standard may wish to consult his notes.
675      </p>
676      <p>For those people who are not part of the ISO Library Group
677         (i.e., nearly all of us needing to read this page in the first
678         place :-), a public list of the library defects is occasionally
679         published <a href="http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/">here</a>.
680         Some of these have resulted in <a href="#5_2">code changes</a>.
681      </p>
682
683<hr />
684   <h2><a name="4_4">4.4 Things in libstdc++ that only look like bugs</a></h2>
685      <p>There are things which are not bugs in the compiler (4.2) nor
686         the language specification (4.3), but aren't really bugs in
687         libstdc++, either.  Really!  Please do not report these as bugs.
688      </p>
689      <p><a name="4_4_Weff"><strong>-Weffc++</strong></a>
690         The biggest of these is the quadzillions of warnings about the
691         library headers emitted when <code>-Weffc++</code> is used.  Making
692         libstdc++ &quot;-Weffc++-clean&quot; is not a goal of the project,
693         for a few reasons.  Mainly, that option tries to enforce
694         object-oriented programming, while the Standard Library isn't
695         necessarily trying to be OO.
696      </p>
697      <p><a name="4_4_iostreamclear"><strong>reopening a stream fails</strong>
698         </a> Did I just say that -Weffc++ was our biggest false-bug report?
699         I lied.  (It used to be.)  Today it seems to be reports that after
700         executing a sequence like
701      </p>
702      <pre>
703    #include &lt;fstream&gt;
704    ...
705    std::fstream  fs(&quot;a_file&quot;);
706    // .
707    // . do things with fs...
708    // .
709    fs.close();
710    fs.open(&quot;a_new_file&quot;);</pre>
711      <p>all operations on the re-opened <code>fs</code> will fail, or at
712         least act very strangely.  Yes, they often will, especially if
713         <code>fs</code> reached the EOF state on the previous file.  The
714         reason is that the state flags are <strong>not</strong> cleared
715         on a successful call to open().  The standard unfortunately did
716         not specify behavior in this case, and to everybody's great sorrow,
717         the <a href="../ext/howto.html#5">proposed LWG resolution in
718         DR #22</a> is to leave the flags unchanged.  You must insert a call
719         to <code>fs.clear()</code> between the calls to close() and open(),
720         and then everything will work like we all expect it to work.
721	 <strong>Update:</strong> for GCC 4.0 we implemented the resolution
722	 of <a href="../ext/howto.html#5">DR #409</a> and open() now calls
723	 <code>clear()</code> on success!
724      </p>
725      <p><a name="4_4_rel_ops"><strong>rel_ops</strong></a>
726         Another is the <code>rel_ops</code> namespace and the template
727         comparison operator functions contained therein.  If they become
728         visible in the same namespace as other comparison functions
729         (e.g., '<code>using</code>' them and the &lt;iterator&gt; header),
730         then you will suddenly be faced with huge numbers of ambiguity
731         errors.  This was discussed on the -v3 list; Nathan Myers
732         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-01/msg00247.html">sums
733         things up here</a>.  The collisions with vector/string iterator
734         types have been fixed for 3.1.  <!-- more links to email here -->
735      </p>
736      <h3><a name="4_4_interface">The g++-3 headers are <em>not ours</em></a></h3>
737      <p>If you have found an extremely broken header file which is
738         causing problems for you, look carefully before submitting a
739         &quot;high&quot; priority bug report (which you probably shouldn't
740         do anyhow; see the last paragraph of the page describing
741         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html">the GCC bug database</a>).
742      </p>
743      <p>If the headers are in <code>${prefix}/include/g++-3</code>, or if
744         the installed library's name looks like <code>libstdc++-2.10.a</code>
745         or <code>libstdc++-libc6-2.10.so</code>, then you are using the old
746         libstdc++-v2 library, which is nonstandard and unmaintained.  Do not
747         report problems with -v2 to the -v3 mailing list.
748      </p>
749      <p>For GCC versions 3.0 and 3.1 the libstdc++-v3 header files are
750         installed in <code>${prefix}/include/g++-v3</code> (see the 'v'?).
751         Starting with version 3.2 the headers are installed in
752         <code>${prefix}/include/c++/${version}</code> as this prevents
753         headers from previous versions being found by mistake.
754      </p>
755      <p><a name="4_4_glibc"><strong>glibc</strong></a>
756         If you're on a GNU/Linux system and have just upgraded to
757         glibc 2.2, but are still using gcc 2.95.2, then you should have
758         read the glibc FAQ, specifically 2.34:
759      </p>
760      <pre>
7612.34.   When compiling C++ programs, I get a compilation error in streambuf.h.
762
763{BH} You are using g++ 2.95.2? After upgrading to glibc 2.2, you need to
764apply a patch to the include files in /usr/include/g++, because the fpos_t
765type has changed in glibc 2.2.  The patch is at
766http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/gccinclude-glibc-2.2-compat.diff
767   </pre>
768      <p>Note that 2.95.x shipped with the
769         <a href="#4_4_interface">old v2 library</a> which is no longer
770         maintained.  Also note that gcc 2.95.3 fixes this problem, but
771         requires a separate patch for libstdc++-v3.
772      </p>
773      <p><a name="4_4_checks"><strong>concept checks</strong></a>
774         If you see compilation errors containing messages about
775         <code> <em>foo</em>Concept </code>and a<code> constraints </code>
776         member function, then most likely you have violated one of the
777         requirements for types used during instantiation of template
778         containers and functions.  For example, EqualityComparableConcept
779         appears if your types must be comparable with == and you have not
780         provided this capability (a typo, or wrong visibility, or you
781         just plain forgot, etc).
782      </p>
783      <p>More information, including how to optionally enable/disable the
784         checks, is available
785         <a href="../19_diagnostics/howto.html#3">here</a>.
786      </p>
787      <p><a name="4_4_dlsym"><strong>dlopen/dlsym</strong></a>
788         If you are using the C++ library across dynamically-loaded
789         objects, make certain that you are passing the correct options
790         when compiling and linking:
791      </p>
792      <pre>
793    // compile your library components
794    g++ -fPIC -c a.cc
795    g++ -fPIC -c b.cc
796    ...
797    g++ -fPIC -c z.cc
798
799    // create your library
800    g++ -fPIC -shared -rdynamic -o libfoo.so a.o b.o ... z.o
801
802    // link the executable
803    g++ -fPIC -rdynamic -o foo ... -L. -lfoo -ldl</pre>
804      <p><a name="4_4_leak"><strong>"memory leaks" in containers</strong></a>
805         A few people have reported that the standard containers appear
806         to leak memory when tested with memory checkers such as
807         <a href="http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/">valgrind</a>.
808         The library's default allocators keep free memory in a pool
809         for later reuse, rather than returning it to the OS.  Although
810         this memory is always reachable by the library and is never
811         lost, memory debugging tools can report it as a leak.  If you
812         want to test the library for memory leaks please read
813         <a href="../debug.html#mem">Tips for memory leak hunting</a>
814         first.
815      </p>
816
817<hr />
818   <h2><a name="4_5">4.5 Aw, that's easy to fix!</a></h2>
819      <p>If you have found a bug in the library and you think you have
820         a working fix, then send it in!  The main GCC site has a page
821         on <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html">submitting
822         patches</a> that covers the procedure, but for libstdc++ you
823         should also send the patch to our mailing list in addition to
824         the GCC patches mailing list.  The libstdc++
825         <a href="../17_intro/contribute.html">contributors' page</a>
826         also talks about how to submit patches.
827      </p>
828      <p>In addition to the description, the patch, and the ChangeLog
829         entry, it is a Good Thing if you can additionally create a small
830         test program to test for the presence of the bug that your
831         patch fixes.  Bugs have a way of being reintroduced; if an old
832         bug creeps back in, it will be caught immediately by the
833         <a href="#2_4">testsuite</a> -- but only if such a test exists.
834      </p>
835
836<hr />
837<h1><a name="5_0">5.0 Miscellaneous</a></h1>
838   <h2><a name="5_1">5.1 string::iterator is not char*;
839                     vector&lt;T&gt;::iterator is not T*</a></h2>
840      <p>If you have code that depends on container&lt;T&gt; iterators
841         being implemented as pointer-to-T, your code is broken.
842      </p>
843      <p>While there are arguments for iterators to be implemented in
844         that manner, A) they aren't very good ones in the long term,
845         and B) they were never guaranteed by the Standard anyway.  The
846         type-safety achieved by making iterators a real class rather
847         than a typedef for <code>T*</code> outweighs nearly all opposing
848         arguments.
849      </p>
850      <p>Code which does assume that a vector iterator <code> i </code>
851         is a pointer can often be fixed by changing <code> i </code> in
852         certain expressions to <code> &amp;*i </code>.  Future revisions
853         of the Standard are expected to bless this usage for
854         vector&lt;&gt; (but not for basic_string&lt;&gt;).
855      </p>
856
857<hr />
858   <h2><a name="5_2">5.2 What's next after libstdc++-v3?</a></h2>
859      <p>Hopefully, not much.  The goal of libstdc++-v3 is to produce
860         a fully-compliant, fully-portable Standard Library.  After that,
861         we're mostly done:  there won't <em>be</em> any more compliance
862         work to do.  However:
863      </p>
864      <ol>
865      <li><p>The ISO Committee will meet periodically to review Defect Reports
866         in the C++ Standard.  Undoubtedly some of these will result in
867         changes to the Standard, which will be reflected in patches to
868         libstdc++.  Some of that is already happening, see <a href="#4_3">4.3</a>.  Some of
869         those changes are being predicted by the library maintainers, and
870         we add code to the library based on what the current proposed
871         resolution specifies.  Those additions are listed in
872         <a href="../ext/howto.html#5">the extensions page</a>.
873      </p></li>
874      <li><p>Performance tuning.  Lots of performance tuning.  This too is
875         already underway for post-3.0 releases, starting with memory
876         expansion in container classes and buffer usage in synchronized
877         stream objects.
878      </p></li>
879      <li><p>An ABI for libstdc++ is being developed, so that
880         multiple binary-incompatible copies of the library can be replaced
881         with a single backwards-compatible library, like libgcc_s.so is.
882      </p></li>
883      <li><p>The current libstdc++ contains extensions to the Library which
884         must be explicitly requested by client code (for example, the
885         hash tables from SGI).  Other extensions may be added to
886         libstdc++-v3 if they seem to be &quot;standard&quot; enough.
887         (For example, the &quot;long long&quot; type from C99.)
888         Bugfixes and rewrites (to improve or fix thread safety, for
889         instance) will of course be a continuing task.
890      </p></li>
891      <li><p>There is an effort underway to add significant extensions to
892         the standard library specification.  The latest version of this effort is
893         described in
894         <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1836.pdf">
895         The C++ Library Technical Report 1</a>.
896         See <a href="#5_5">5.5</a>.
897      </p></li>
898      </ol>
899      <p><a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/1999/msg00080.html">This
900         question</a> about the next libstdc++ prompted some brief but
901         interesting
902         <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/1999/msg00084.html">speculation</a>.
903      </p>
904
905<hr />
906   <h2><a name="5_3">5.3 What about the STL from SGI?</a></h2>
907      <p>The <a href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/">STL from SGI</a>,
908         version 3.3, was the final merge of the STL codebase.  The
909         code in libstdc++ contains many fixes and changes, and
910         the SGI code is no longer under active
911         development.  We expect that no future merges will take place.
912      </p>
913      <p>In particular, <code>string</code> is not from SGI and makes no
914         use of their &quot;rope&quot; class (which is included as an
915         optional extension), nor is <code>valarray</code> and some others.
916         Classes like <code>vector&lt;&gt;</code> are, however we have
917         made significant changes to them since then.
918      </p>
919      <p>The FAQ for SGI's STL (one jump off of their main page) is
920         recommended reading.
921      </p>
922
923<hr />
924   <h2><a name="5_4">5.4 Extensions and Backward Compatibility</a></h2>
925      <p>Headers in the <code>ext</code> and <code>backward</code>
926         subdirectories should be referred to by their relative paths:
927         <!-- Careful, the leading spaces in PRE show up directly. -->
928      </p>
929      <pre>
930      #include &lt;ext/hash_map&gt; </pre>
931      <p>rather than using <code>-I</code> or other options.  This is more
932         portable and forward-compatible.  (The situation is the same as
933         that of other headers whose directories are not searched directly,
934         e.g., <code>&lt;sys/stat.h&gt;</code>, <code>&lt;X11/Xlib.h&gt;</code>.
935      </p>
936
937      <p>At this time most of the features of the SGI STL extension have been
938         replaced by standardized libraries.
939         In particular, the unordered_map and unordered_set containers of TR1
940         are suitable replacement for the non-standard hash_map and hash_set
941         containers in the SGI STL.  See <a href="#5_5">5.5</a> for more details.
942      </p>
943
944      <p>The extensions are no longer in the global or <code>std</code>
945         namespaces, instead they are declared in the <code>__gnu_cxx</code>
946         namespace. For maximum portability, consider defining a namespace
947         alias to use to talk about extensions, e.g.:
948      </p>
949      <pre>
950      #ifdef __GNUC__
951      #if __GNUC__ &lt; 3
952        #include &lt;hash_map.h&gt;
953        namespace Sgi { using ::hash_map; }; // inherit globals
954      #else
955        #include &lt;ext/hash_map&gt;
956        #if __GNUC_MINOR__ == 0
957          namespace Sgi = std;               // GCC 3.0
958        #else
959          namespace Sgi = ::__gnu_cxx;       // GCC 3.1 and later
960        #endif
961      #endif
962      #else      // ...  there are other compilers, right?
963        namespace Sgi = std;
964      #endif
965
966      Sgi::hash_map&lt;int,int&gt; my_map; </pre>
967      <p>This is a bit cleaner than defining typedefs for all the
968         instantiations you might need.
969      </p>
970      <p><strong>Note:</strong> explicit template specializations must
971         be declared in the same namespace as the original template.
972         This means you cannot use a namespace alias when declaring
973         an explicit specialization.
974      </p>
975      <p>Extensions to the library have
976         <a href="../ext/howto.html">their own page</a>.
977      </p>
978
979<hr />
980   <h2><a name="5_5">5.5 Does libstdc++ support TR1?</a></h2>
981
982      <p>The C++ Standard Library Technical Report adds many new features to
983         the library.  The latest version of this effort is described in
984         <a href=
985	 "http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1836.pdf">
986         Technical Report 1</a>.
987      </p>
988
989      <p>libstdc++ strives to implement all of TR1.
990         An <a href="../ext/tr1.html">overview</a> of the implementation status
991	 is available.
992      </p>
993
994      <p>Briefly, the features of TR1 and the current status are:
995      </p>
996
997      <p><strong>Reference_wrapper - Complete -</strong>
998         Useful to pass references to functions that take their parameters
999         by value.
1000      </p>
1001
1002      <p><strong>Reference-counted smart pointers - Complete -</strong>
1003         The shared_ptr and weak_ptr allow several object to know about a
1004	 pointer and whether it is valid.  When the last reference to the
1005	 pointer is destroyed the pointer is freed.
1006      </p>
1007
1008      <p><strong>Function objects - Complete -</strong>
1009         Function return types (i.e., result_of), the functions template
1010	 mem_fn (a generalization of mem_fun and mem_fun_red), function
1011	 object binders (e.g., bind, a generalization of bind1st and bind2nd),
1012	 and polymorphic function wrappers (e.g, class template function).
1013      </p>
1014
1015      <p><strong>Type traits - Complete -</strong>
1016         The type_traits class gives templates the ability to probe
1017	 information about the input type and enable type-dependent logic
1018	 to be performed without the need of template specializations.
1019      </p>
1020
1021      <p><strong>A random number engine - Complete -</strong>
1022         This library contains random number generators with several different
1023	 choices of distribution.
1024      </p>
1025
1026      <p><strong>Tuples - Complete -</strong>
1027         The tuple class implements small heterogeneous arrays.  This is an
1028	 enhanced pair.  In fact, the standard pair is enhanced with a tuple
1029	 interface.
1030      </p>
1031
1032      <p><strong>Fixed-size arrays - Complete -</strong>
1033         The array class implements small fixed-sized arrays with container
1034	 semantics.
1035      </p>
1036
1037      <p><strong>Unordered containers - Complete -</strong>
1038         The unordered_set, unordered_map, unordered_multiset, and
1039	 unordered_multimap containers are hashed versions of the map, set,
1040	 multimap, and multiset containers respectively.  These classes are
1041	 suitable replacements for the SGI STL hash_map and hash_set
1042	 extensions.
1043      </p>
1044
1045      <p><strong>C99 compatibility - Under construction - </strong>
1046         There are many features designed to minimize the divergence of the C
1047	 and the C++ languages.
1048      </p>
1049
1050      <p><strong>Special functions - Under construction - </strong>
1051         Twenty-three mathematical functions familiar to physicists and
1052	 engineers are included:  cylindrical and spherical Bessel and Neumann
1053	 functions, hypergeometric functions, Laguerre polynomials, Legendre
1054	 functions, elliptic integrals, exponential integrals and the Riemann
1055	 zeta function all for your computing pleasure.
1056      </p>
1057
1058      <p><strong>A regular expression engine</strong>
1059         This library provides for regular expression objects with traversal
1060	 of text with return of subexpressions.
1061      </p>
1062
1063<hr />
1064   <h2><a name="5_6">5.6 Is libstdc++-v3 thread-safe?</a></h2>
1065      <p>libstdc++-v3 strives to be thread-safe when all of the following
1066         conditions are met:
1067      </p>
1068      <ul>
1069       <li>The system's libc is itself thread-safe,</li>
1070       <li><code>gcc -v</code> reports a thread model other than 'single',</li>
1071       <li>[pre-3.3 only] a non-generic implementation of atomicity.h
1072           exists for the architecture in question.</li>
1073      </ul>
1074      <p>The user-code must guard against concurrent method calls which may
1075         access any particular library object's state.  Typically, the
1076         application programmer may infer what object locks must be held
1077         based on the objects referenced in a method call.  Without getting
1078         into great detail, here is an example which requires user-level
1079         locks:
1080      </p>
1081      <pre>
1082     library_class_a shared_object_a;
1083
1084     thread_main () {
1085       library_class_b *object_b = new library_class_b;
1086       shared_object_a.add_b (object_b);   // must hold lock for shared_object_a
1087       shared_object_a.mutate ();          // must hold lock for shared_object_a
1088     }
1089
1090     // Multiple copies of thread_main() are started in independent threads.</pre>
1091      <p>Under the assumption that object_a and object_b are never exposed to
1092         another thread, here is an example that should not require any
1093         user-level locks:
1094      </p>
1095      <pre>
1096     thread_main () {
1097       library_class_a object_a;
1098       library_class_b *object_b = new library_class_b;
1099       object_a.add_b (object_b);
1100       object_a.mutate ();
1101     } </pre>
1102      <p>All library objects are safe to use in a multithreaded program as
1103         long as each thread carefully locks out access by any other
1104         thread while it uses any object visible to another thread, i.e.,
1105         treat library objects like any other shared resource.  In general,
1106         this requirement includes both read and write access to objects;
1107         unless otherwise documented as safe, do not assume that two threads
1108         may access a shared standard library object at the same time.
1109      </p>
1110      <p>See chapters <a href="../17_intro/howto.html#3">17</a> (library
1111         introduction), <a href="../23_containers/howto.html#3">23</a>
1112         (containers), and <a href="../27_io/howto.html#9">27</a> (I/O) for
1113         more information.
1114      </p>
1115
1116<hr />
1117   <h2><a name="5_7">5.7 How do I get a copy of the ISO C++ Standard?</a></h2>
1118      <p>Copies of the full ISO 14882 standard are available on line via the
1119         ISO mirror site for committee members.  Non-members, or those who
1120         have not paid for the privilege of sitting on the committee and
1121         sustained their two-meeting commitment for voting rights, may get a
1122         copy of the standard from their respective national standards
1123         organization.  In the USA, this national standards organization is
1124         ANSI and their website is right <a href="http://www.ansi.org">here</a>.
1125         (And if you've already registered with them, clicking this link will
1126         take you to directly to the place where you can
1127<a href="http://webstore.ansi.org/ansidocstore/product.asp?sku=ISO%2FIEC+14882%3A2003">buy
1128         the standard on-line</a>.
1129      </p>
1130      <p>Who is your country's member body?  Visit the
1131         <a href="http://www.iso.ch/">ISO homepage</a> and find out!
1132      </p>
1133
1134<hr />
1135   <h2><a name="5_8">5.8 What's an ABI and why is it so messy?</a></h2>
1136      <p>&quot;ABI&quot; stands for &quot;Application Binary Interface.&quot;
1137         Conventionally, it refers to a great mass of details about how
1138         arguments are arranged on the call stack and/or in registers, and
1139         how various types are arranged and padded in structs.  A single CPU
1140         design may suffer multiple ABIs designed by different development
1141         tool vendors who made different choices, or even by the same vendor
1142         for different target applications or compiler versions.  In ideal
1143         circumstances the CPU designer presents one ABI and all the OSes and
1144         compilers use it.  In practice every ABI omits details that compiler
1145         implementers (consciously or accidentally) must choose for themselves.
1146      </p>
1147      <p>That ABI definition suffices for compilers to generate code so a
1148         program can interact safely with an OS and its lowest-level libraries.
1149         Users usually want an ABI to encompass more detail, allowing libraries
1150         built with different compilers (or different releases of the same
1151         compiler!) to be linked together.  For C++, this includes many more
1152         details than for C, and CPU designers (for good reasons elaborated
1153         below) have not stepped up to publish C++ ABIs.  The details include
1154         virtual function implementation, struct inheritance layout, name
1155         mangling, and exception handling.  Such an ABI has been defined for
1156         GNU C++, and is immediately useful for embedded work relying only on
1157         a &quot;free-standing implementation&quot; that doesn't include (much
1158         of) the standard library.  It is a good basis for the work to come.
1159      </p>
1160      <p>A useful C++ ABI must also incorporate many details of the standard
1161         library implementation.  For a C ABI, the layouts of a few structs
1162         (such as FILE, stat, jmpbuf, and the like) and a few macros suffice.
1163         For C++, the details include the complete set of names of functions
1164         and types used, the offsets of class members and virtual functions,
1165         and the actual definitions of all inlines.  C++ exposes many more
1166         library details to the caller than C does.  It makes defining
1167         a complete ABI a much bigger undertaking, and requires not just
1168         documenting library implementation details, but carefully designing
1169         those details so that future bug fixes and optimizations don't
1170         force breaking the ABI.
1171      </p>
1172      <p>There are ways to help isolate library implementation details from the
1173         ABI, but they trade off against speed.  Library details used in
1174         inner loops (e.g., getchar) must be exposed and frozen for all
1175         time, but many others may reasonably be kept hidden from user code,
1176         so they may later be changed.  Deciding which, and implementing
1177         the decisions, must happen before you can reasonably document a
1178         candidate C++ ABI that encompasses the standard library.
1179      </p>
1180
1181<hr />
1182   <h2><a name="5_9">5.9 How do I make std::vector&lt;T&gt;::capacity()
1183                     == std::vector&lt;T&gt;::size()?</a> </h2>
1184   <!-- referenced by 21_strings/howto.html#6 -->
1185   <p>The standard idiom for deallocating a <code>std::vector&lt;T&gt;</code>'s
1186      unused memory is to create a temporary copy of the vector and swap their
1187      contents, e.g. for <code>std::vector&lt;T&gt; v</code>
1188   </p>
1189   <pre>
1190     std::vector&lt;T&gt;(v).swap(v);
1191   </pre>
1192   <p>The copy will take O(n) time and the swap is constant time.
1193   </p>
1194   <p>See <a href='../21_strings/howto.html#6'>Shrink-to-fit strings</a> for
1195      a similar solution for strings.
1196   </p>
1197
1198<!-- ####################################################### -->
1199
1200<hr />
1201<p class="fineprint"><em>
1202See <a href="../17_intro/license.html">license.html</a> for copying conditions.
1203Comments and suggestions are welcome, and may be sent to
1204<a href="mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org">the libstdc++ mailing list</a>.
1205</em></p>
1206
1207
1208</body>
1209</html>
1210
1211