|
Revision tags: v6.2.1, v6.2.0, v6.3.0, v6.0.1, v6.0.0, v6.0.0rc1, v6.1.0, v5.8.3, v5.8.2, v5.8.1, v5.8.0, v5.9.0, v5.8.0rc1, v5.6.3, v5.6.2, v5.6.1, v5.6.0, v5.6.0rc1, v5.7.0, v5.4.3, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.4.0, v5.5.0, v5.4.0rc1, v5.2.2, v5.2.1, v5.2.0, v5.3.0, v5.2.0rc, v5.0.2, v5.0.1, v5.0.0, v5.0.0rc2, v5.1.0, v5.0.0rc1, v4.8.1, v4.8.0, v4.6.2, v4.9.0, v4.8.0rc, v4.6.1, v4.6.0, v4.6.0rc2, v4.6.0rc, v4.7.0, v4.4.3, v4.4.2 |
|
| #
c66c7e2f |
| 25-Jan-2016 |
zrj <rimvydas.jasinskas@gmail.com> |
Correct BSD License clause numbering from 1-2-4 to 1-2-3.
|
|
Revision tags: v4.4.1, v4.4.0, v4.5.0, v4.4.0rc |
|
| #
8b927cb7 |
| 05-Sep-2015 |
John Marino <draco@marino.st> |
libc/x86-64: Add GNU-stack ELF notes to many assembly files
Most of the assembly files in libc/x86-64 were missing GNU-stack ELF
notes (they never had them) which means libc and every program that
l
libc/x86-64: Add GNU-stack ELF notes to many assembly files
Most of the assembly files in libc/x86-64 were missing GNU-stack ELF
notes (they never had them) which means libc and every program that
links with it has required an executable stack. I need to determine
a way to check which object files are missing this section and make
sure every single libc object file is covered.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v4.2.4, v4.3.1, v4.2.3, v4.2.1, v4.2.0, v4.0.6, v4.3.0, v4.2.0rc, v4.0.5, v4.0.4, v4.0.3, v4.0.2, v4.0.1, v4.0.0, v4.0.0rc3, v4.0.0rc2, v4.0.0rc, v4.1.0, v3.8.2, v3.8.1, v3.6.3, v3.8.0, v3.8.0rc2, v3.9.0, v3.8.0rc, v3.6.2, v3.6.1, v3.6.0, v3.7.1, v3.6.0rc, v3.7.0, v3.4.3, v3.4.2, v3.4.0, v3.4.1, v3.4.0rc, v3.5.0, v3.2.2, v3.2.1, v3.2.0, v3.3.0, v3.0.3, v3.0.2, v3.0.1, v3.1.0, v3.0.0 |
|
| #
86d7f5d3 |
| 26-Nov-2011 |
John Marino <draco@marino.st> |
Initial import of binutils 2.22 on the new vendor branch
Future versions of binutils will also reside on this branch rather
than continuing to create new binutils branches for each new version.
|
|
Revision tags: v2.12.0, v2.13.0, v2.10.1, v2.11.0, v2.10.0, v2.9.1, v2.8.2, v2.8.1, v2.8.0, v2.9.0, v2.6.3, v2.7.3, v2.6.2, v2.7.2, v2.7.1, v2.6.1, v2.7.0, v2.6.0 |
|
| #
b2b3ffcd |
| 04-Nov-2009 |
Simon Schubert <corecode@dragonflybsd.org> |
rename amd64 architecture to x86_64
The rest of the world seems to call amd64 x86_64. Bite the bullet and
rename all of the architecture files and references. This will
hopefully make pkgsrc build
rename amd64 architecture to x86_64
The rest of the world seems to call amd64 x86_64. Bite the bullet and
rename all of the architecture files and references. This will
hopefully make pkgsrc builds less painful.
Discussed-with: dillon@
show more ...
|
| #
c1543a89 |
| 04-Nov-2009 |
Simon Schubert <corecode@dragonflybsd.org> |
rename amd64 architecture to x86_64
The rest of the world seems to call amd64 x86_64. Bite the bullet and
rename all of the architecture files and references. This will
hopefully make pkgsrc build
rename amd64 architecture to x86_64
The rest of the world seems to call amd64 x86_64. Bite the bullet and
rename all of the architecture files and references. This will
hopefully make pkgsrc builds less painful.
Discussed-with: dillon@
show more ...
|