|
Revision tags: v6.2.1, v6.2.0, v6.3.0, v6.0.1, v6.0.0, v6.0.0rc1, v6.1.0, v5.8.3, v5.8.2, v5.8.1, v5.8.0, v5.9.0, v5.8.0rc1, v5.6.3, v5.6.2, v5.6.1, v5.6.0, v5.6.0rc1, v5.7.0, v5.4.3, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.4.0, v5.5.0, v5.4.0rc1, v5.2.2, v5.2.1, v5.2.0, v5.3.0, v5.2.0rc, v5.0.2, v5.0.1, v5.0.0, v5.0.0rc2, v5.1.0, v5.0.0rc1, v4.8.1, v4.8.0, v4.6.2, v4.9.0, v4.8.0rc, v4.6.1, v4.6.0, v4.6.0rc2, v4.6.0rc, v4.7.0, v4.4.3, v4.4.2, v4.4.1, v4.4.0, v4.5.0, v4.4.0rc, v4.2.4, v4.3.1, v4.2.3, v4.2.1, v4.2.0, v4.0.6, v4.3.0, v4.2.0rc, v4.0.5, v4.0.4, v4.0.3, v4.0.2, v4.0.1, v4.0.0, v4.0.0rc3, v4.0.0rc2, v4.0.0rc, v4.1.0, v3.8.2, v3.8.1, v3.6.3, v3.8.0, v3.8.0rc2, v3.9.0, v3.8.0rc |
| #
76c21ea3 |
| 15-May-2014 |
Sascha Wildner <saw@online.de> |
kernel/ral: Bring in support for further chips (RT2700/2800/3090 series).
Unfortunately I don't have any hardware to test and no one volunteered
when I asked on the lists. Pushing anyway because it
kernel/ral: Bring in support for further chips (RT2700/2800/3090 series).
Unfortunately I don't have any hardware to test and no one volunteered
when I asked on the lists. Pushing anyway because it shouldn't break
RT2500/2501/2600 support. We'll see if someone reports issues with
it.
show more ...
|