smp: Change function signatures to use call_single_data_t

call_single_data_t is a size-aligned typedef of struct __call_single_data.

This alignment is desirable in order to have smp_call_function*(

smp: Change function signatures to use call_single_data_t

call_single_data_t is a size-aligned typedef of struct __call_single_data.

This alignment is desirable in order to have smp_call_function*() avoid
bouncing an extra cacheline in case of an unaligned csd, given this
would hurt performance.

Since the removal of struct request->csd in commit 660e802c76c8
("blk-mq: use percpu csd to remote complete instead of per-rq csd") there
are no current users of smp_call_function*() with unaligned csd.

Change every 'struct __call_single_data' function parameter to
'call_single_data_t', so we have warnings if any new code tries to
introduce an smp_call_function*() call with unaligned csd.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230831063129.335425-1-leobras@redhat.com

show more ...

kernel/up.c: fix typo

s/condtions/conditions/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210317032732.3260835-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by:

kernel/up.c: fix typo

s/condtions/conditions/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210317032732.3260835-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async prototype

As of commit 966a967116e6 ("smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct
call_single_data"), the smp code prefers 32-byte aligned call_single_data
ob

smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async prototype

As of commit 966a967116e6 ("smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct
call_single_data"), the smp code prefers 32-byte aligned call_single_data
objects for performance reasons, but the block layer includes an instance
of this structure in the main 'struct request' that is more senstive
to size than to performance here, see 4ccafe032005 ("block: unalign
call_single_data in struct request").

The result is a violation of the calling conventions that clang correctly
points out:

block/blk-mq.c:630:39: warning: passing 8-byte aligned argument to 32-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'smp_call_function_single_async' may result in an unaligned pointer access [-Walign-mismatch]
smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);

It does seem that the usage of the call_single_data without cache line
alignment should still be allowed by the smp code, so just change the
function prototype so it accepts both, but leave the default alignment
unchanged for the other users. This seems better to me than adding
a local hack to shut up an otherwise correct warning in the caller.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210505211300.3174456-1-arnd@kernel.org

show more ...

smp: Inline on_each_cpu_cond() and on_each_cpu()

Simplify the code and avoid having an additional function on the stack
by inlining on_each_cpu_cond() and on_each_cpu().

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstr

smp: Inline on_each_cpu_cond() and on_each_cpu()

Simplify the code and avoid having an additional function on the stack
by inlining on_each_cpu_cond() and on_each_cpu().

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
[ Minor edits. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210220231712.2475218-10-namit@vmware.com

show more ...

smp/up: Make smp_call_function_single() match SMP semantics

In CONFIG_SMP=y kernels, smp_call_function_single() returns -ENXIO when
invoked for a non-existent CPU. In contrast, in CONFIG_SMP=n kern

smp/up: Make smp_call_function_single() match SMP semantics

In CONFIG_SMP=y kernels, smp_call_function_single() returns -ENXIO when
invoked for a non-existent CPU. In contrast, in CONFIG_SMP=n kernels,
a splat is emitted and smp_call_function_single() otherwise silently
ignores its "cpu" argument, instead pretending that the caller intended
to have something happen on CPU 0. Given that there is now code that
expects smp_call_function_single() to return an error if a bad CPU was
specified, this difference in semantics needs to be addressed.

Bring the semantics of the CONFIG_SMP=n version of
smp_call_function_single() into alignment with its CONFIG_SMP=y
counterpart.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200205143409.GA7021@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72

show more ...

smp: Remove allocation mask from on_each_cpu_cond.*()

The allocation mask is no longer used by on_each_cpu_cond() and
on_each_cpu_cond_mask() and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Si

smp: Remove allocation mask from on_each_cpu_cond.*()

The allocation mask is no longer used by on_each_cpu_cond() and
on_each_cpu_cond_mask() and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200117090137.1205765-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de

show more ...

smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function

Use a typdef for the conditional function instead defining it each time in
the function prototype.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Sie

smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function

Use a typdef for the conditional function instead defining it each time in
the function prototype.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200117090137.1205765-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de

show more ...

smp: Remove smp_call_function() and on_each_cpu() return values

The return value is fixed. Remove it and amend the callers.

[ tglx: Fixup arm/bL_switcher and powerpc/rtas ]

Signed-off-by: Nadav Am

smp: Remove smp_call_function() and on_each_cpu() return values

The return value is fixed. Remove it and amend the callers.

[ tglx: Fixup arm/bL_switcher and powerpc/rtas ]

Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190613064813.8102-2-namit@vmware.com

show more ...

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files

Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:

- Have no license information of any form

- Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was use

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files

Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:

- Have no license information of any form

- Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the
initial scan/conversion to ignore the file

These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:

GPL-2.0-only

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask

Introduce a variant of on_each_cpu_cond that iterates only over the
CPUs in a cpumask, in order to avoid making callbacks for every single
CPU in the sys

smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask

Introduce a variant of on_each_cpu_cond that iterates only over the
CPUs in a cpumask, in order to avoid making callbacks for every single
CPU in the system when we only need to test a subset.

Cc: npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: songliubraving@fb.com
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180926035844.1420-5-riel@surriel.com

show more ...

smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct call_single_data

struct call_single_data is used in IPIs to transfer information between
CPUs. Its size is bigger than sizeof(unsigned long) and less tha

smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct call_single_data

struct call_single_data is used in IPIs to transfer information between
CPUs. Its size is bigger than sizeof(unsigned long) and less than
cache line size. Currently it is not allocated with any explicit alignment
requirements. This makes it possible for allocated call_single_data to
cross two cache lines, which results in double the number of the cache lines
that need to be transferred among CPUs.

This can be fixed by requiring call_single_data to be aligned with the
size of call_single_data. Currently the size of call_single_data is the
power of 2. If we add new fields to call_single_data, we may need to
add padding to make sure the size of new definition is the power of 2
as well.

Fortunately, this is enforced by GCC, which will report bad sizes.

To set alignment requirements of call_single_data to the size of
call_single_data, a struct definition and a typedef is used.

To test the effect of the patch, I used the vm-scalability multiple
thread swap test case (swap-w-seq-mt). The test will create multiple
threads and each thread will eat memory until all RAM and part of swap
is used, so that huge number of IPIs are triggered when unmapping
memory. In the test, the throughput of memory writing improves ~5%
compared with misaligned call_single_data, because of faster IPIs.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
[ Add call_single_data_t and align with size of call_single_data. ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87bmnqd6lz.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

smp: Add function to execute a function synchronously on a CPU

On some hardware models (e.g. Dell Studio 1555 laptop) some hardware
related functions (e.g. SMIs) are to be executed on physical CPU 0

smp: Add function to execute a function synchronously on a CPU

On some hardware models (e.g. Dell Studio 1555 laptop) some hardware
related functions (e.g. SMIs) are to be executed on physical CPU 0
only. Instead of open coding such a functionality multiple times in
the kernel add a service function for this purpose. This will enable
the possibility to take special measures in virtualized environments
like Xen, too.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Douglas_Warzecha@dell.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akataria@vmware.com
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org
Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: jdelvare@suse.com
Cc: jeremy@goop.org
Cc: linux@roeck-us.net
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472453327-19050-4-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

virt, sched: Add generic vCPU pinning support

Add generic virtualization support for pinning the current vCPU to a
specified physical CPU. As this operation isn't performance critical
(a very limite

virt, sched: Add generic vCPU pinning support

Add generic virtualization support for pinning the current vCPU to a
specified physical CPU. As this operation isn't performance critical
(a very limited set of operations like BIOS calls and SMIs is expected
to need this) just add a hypervisor specific indirection.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Douglas_Warzecha@dell.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akataria@vmware.com
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org
Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: jdelvare@suse.com
Cc: jeremy@goop.org
Cc: linux@roeck-us.net
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472453327-19050-3-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

smp: Rename __smp_call_function_single() to smp_call_function_single_async()

The name __smp_call_function_single() doesn't tell much about the
properties of this function, especially when compared t

smp: Rename __smp_call_function_single() to smp_call_function_single_async()

The name __smp_call_function_single() doesn't tell much about the
properties of this function, especially when compared to
smp_call_function_single().

The comments above the implementation are also misleading. The main
point of this function is actually not to be able to embed the csd
in an object. This is actually a requirement that result from the
purpose of this function which is to raise an IPI asynchronously.

As such it can be called with interrupts disabled. And this feature
comes at the cost of the caller who then needs to serialize the
IPIs on this csd.

Lets rename the function and enhance the comments so that they reflect
these properties.

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

show more ...

smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single()

The main point of calling __smp_call_function_single() is to send
an IPI in a pure asynchronous way. By embedding a csd in an object,
a ca

smp: Remove wait argument from __smp_call_function_single()

The main point of calling __smp_call_function_single() is to send
an IPI in a pure asynchronous way. By embedding a csd in an object,
a caller can send the IPI without waiting for a previous one to complete
as is required by smp_call_function_single() for example. As such,
sending this kind of IPI can be safe even when irqs are disabled.

This flexibility comes at the expense of the caller who then needs to
synchronize the csd lifecycle by himself and make sure that IPIs on a
single csd are serialized.

This is how __smp_call_function_single() works when wait = 0 and this
usecase is relevant.

Now there don't seem to be any usecase with wait = 1 that can't be
covered by smp_call_function_single() instead, which is safer. Lets look
at the two possible scenario:

1) The user calls __smp_call_function_single(wait = 1) on a csd embedded
in an object. It looks like a nice and convenient pattern at the first
sight because we can then retrieve the object from the IPI handler easily.

But actually it is a waste of memory space in the object since the csd
can be allocated from the stack by smp_call_function_single(wait = 1)
and the object can be passed an the IPI argument.

Besides that, embedding the csd in an object is more error prone
because the caller must take care of the serialization of the IPIs
for this csd.

2) The user calls __smp_call_function_single(wait = 1) on a csd that
is allocated on the stack. It's ok but smp_call_function_single()
can do it as well and it already takes care of the allocation on the
stack. Again it's more simple and less error prone.

Therefore, using the underscore prepend API version with wait = 1
is a bad pattern and a sign that the caller can do safer and more
simple.

There was a single user of that which has just been converted.
So lets remove this option to discourage further users.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

show more ...

smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus

Align __smp_call_function_single() with smp_call_function_single() so
that it also checks whether requested cpu is still online.

Si

smp: Teach __smp_call_function_single() to check for offline cpus

Align __smp_call_function_single() with smp_call_function_single() so
that it also checks whether requested cpu is still online.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

show more ...

kernel: provide a __smp_call_function_single stub for !CONFIG_SMP

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Mor

kernel: provide a __smp_call_function_single stub for !CONFIG_SMP

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

smp.h: move !SMP version of on_each_cpu() out-of-line

All of the other non-trivial !SMP versions of functions in smp.h are
out-of-line in up.c. Move on_each_cpu() there as well.

This allows us to

smp.h: move !SMP version of on_each_cpu() out-of-line

All of the other non-trivial !SMP versions of functions in smp.h are
out-of-line in up.c. Move on_each_cpu() there as well.

This allows us to get rid of the #include <linux/irqflags.h>. The
drawback is that this makes both the x86_64 and i386 defconfig !SMP
kernels about 200 bytes larger each.

Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

up.c: use local_irq_{save,restore}() in smp_call_function_single.

The SMP version of this function doesn't unconditionally enable irqs, so
neither should this !SMP version. There are no know proble

up.c: use local_irq_{save,restore}() in smp_call_function_single.

The SMP version of this function doesn't unconditionally enable irqs, so
neither should this !SMP version. There are no know problems caused by
this, but we make the change for consistency's sake.

Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

smp: quit unconditionally enabling irq in on_each_cpu_mask and on_each_cpu_cond

As in commit f21afc25f9ed ("smp.h: Use local_irq_{save,restore}() in
!SMP version of on_each_cpu()"), we don't want to

smp: quit unconditionally enabling irq in on_each_cpu_mask and on_each_cpu_cond

As in commit f21afc25f9ed ("smp.h: Use local_irq_{save,restore}() in
!SMP version of on_each_cpu()"), we don't want to enable irqs if they
are not already enabled. There are currently no known problematical
callers of these functions, but since it is a known failure pattern, we
preemptively fix them.

Since they are not trivial functions, make them non-inline by moving
them to up.c. This also makes it so we don't have to fix #include
dependancies for preempt_{disable,enable}.

Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

kernel: Map most files to use export.h instead of module.h

The changed files were only including linux/module.h for the
EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure, and nothing else. Revector them
onto the isolat

kernel: Map most files to use export.h instead of module.h

The changed files were only including linux/module.h for the
EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure, and nothing else. Revector them
onto the isolated export header for faster compile times.

Nothing to see here but a whole lot of instances of:

-#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>

This commit is only changing the kernel dir; next targets
will probably be mm, fs, the arch dirs, etc.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

show more ...

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix #2

fix m68k build failure:

tip/kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single':
tip/kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to in

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix #2

fix m68k build failure:

tip/kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single':
tip/kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
make[2]: *** [kernel/up.o] Error 1

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix

Impact: build fix on Alpha

kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single':
kernel/up.c:12: error: 'cpuid' undeclared (first use in th

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix

Impact: build fix on Alpha

kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single':
kernel/up.c:12: error: 'cpuid' undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/up.c:12: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/up.c:12: error: for each function it appears in.)

The typo didnt show up on x86 because 'cpuid' happens to be a
function address as well ...

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid

If you do

smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...)

then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds.

As

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid

If you do

smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...)

then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds.

As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do.

While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency
reasons.

And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put
uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

show more ...