History log of /netbsd/sys/secmodel/keylock/secmodel_keylock.c (Results 1 – 12 of 12)
Revision Date Author Comments
# 12d258fa 07-Dec-2021 andvar <andvar@NetBSD.org>

s/dissallow/disallow/


# 6f055a6d 05-Dec-2020 thorpej <thorpej@NetBSD.org>

Remove unnecessary inclusion of <sys/timevar.h>.


# 7cd8f2ab 21-Feb-2020 joerg <joerg@NetBSD.org>

Explicitly cast pointers to uintptr_t before casting to enums. They are
not necessarily the same size. Don't cast pointers to bool, check for
NULL instead.


# 361e68bb 15-Jul-2018 maxv <maxv@NetBSD.org>

Retire ipkdb entirely. The option was removed from the config files
yesterday.

ok kamil christos


# 05fd0bf3 25-Feb-2014 pooka <pooka@NetBSD.org>

Ensure that the top level sysctl nodes (kern, vfs, net, ...) exist before
the sysctl link sets are processed, and remove redundancy.

Shaves >13kB off of an amd64 GENERIC, not to mention >1k duplicat

Ensure that the top level sysctl nodes (kern, vfs, net, ...) exist before
the sysctl link sets are processed, and remove redundancy.

Shaves >13kB off of an amd64 GENERIC, not to mention >1k duplicate
lines of code.

show more ...


# 909597c3 08-Dec-2011 jym <jym@NetBSD.org>

build fix for keylock secmodel(9).


# 6519e39d 04-Dec-2011 jym <jym@NetBSD.org>

Implement the register/deregister/evaluation API for secmodel(9). It
allows registration of callbacks that can be used later for
cross-secmodel "safe" communication.

When a secmodel wishes to know a

Implement the register/deregister/evaluation API for secmodel(9). It
allows registration of callbacks that can be used later for
cross-secmodel "safe" communication.

When a secmodel wishes to know a property maintained by another
secmodel, it has to submit a request to it so the other secmodel can
proceed to evaluating the request. This is done through the
secmodel_eval(9) call; example:

bool isroot;
error = secmodel_eval("org.netbsd.secmodel.suser", "is-root",
cred, &isroot);
if (error == 0 && !isroot)
result = KAUTH_RESULT_DENY;

This one asks the suser module if the credentials are assumed to be root
when evaluated by suser module. If the module is present, it will
respond. If absent, the call will return an error.

Args and command are arbitrarily defined; it's up to the secmodel(9) to
document what it expects.

Typical example is securelevel testing: when someone wants to know
whether securelevel is raised above a certain level or not, the caller
has to request this property to the secmodel_securelevel(9) module.
Given that securelevel module may be absent from system's context (thus
making access to the global "securelevel" variable impossible or
unsafe), this API can cope with this absence and return an error.

We are using secmodel_eval(9) to implement a secmodel_extensions(9)
module, which plugs with the bsd44, suser and securelevel secmodels
to provide the logic behind curtain, usermount and user_set_cpu_affinity
modes, without adding hooks to traditional secmodels. This solves a
real issue with the current secmodel(9) code, as usermount or
user_set_cpu_affinity are not really tied to secmodel_suser(9).

The secmodel_eval(9) is also used to restrict security.models settings
when securelevel is above 0, through the "is-securelevel-above"
evaluation:
- curtain can be enabled any time, but cannot be disabled if
securelevel is above 0.
- usermount/user_set_cpu_affinity can be disabled any time, but cannot
be enabled if securelevel is above 0.

Regarding sysctl(7) entries:
curtain and usermount are now found under security.models.extensions
tree. The security.curtain and vfs.generic.usermount are still
accessible for backwards compat.

Documentation is incoming, I am proof-reading my writings.

Written by elad@, reviewed and tested (anita test + interact for rights
tests) by me. ok elad@.

See also
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-security/2011/11/29/msg000422.html

XXX might consider va0 mapping too.

XXX Having a secmodel(9) specific printf (like aprint_*) for reporting
secmodel(9) errors might be a good idea, but I am not sure on how
to design such a function right now.

show more ...


# 570ca15b 19-Oct-2009 cegger <cegger@NetBSD.org>

buildfix: define integer before use. i386 ALL kernel builds again


# 756638cf 06-Oct-2009 elad <elad@NetBSD.org>

Factor out a block of code that appears in three places (Veriexec, keylock,
and securelevel) so that others can use it as well.


# a39251ec 03-Oct-2009 elad <elad@NetBSD.org>

Introduce time_wraps() to check if setting the time will wrap it (or
close to it). Useful for secmodels.

Replace open-coded form with it in secmodel code (securelevel, keylock).

Note: I need to fin

Introduce time_wraps() to check if setting the time will wrap it (or
close to it). Useful for secmodels.

Replace open-coded form with it in secmodel code (securelevel, keylock).

Note: I need to find a way to make secmodel_keylock.c ~<100 lines.

show more ...


# 385b2e36 15-Aug-2009 mbalmer <mbalmer@NetBSD.org>

Move the keylock.h header from sys/sys to sys/dev where it really belongs.
Add keylock options to the ALL kernel configuration.


# 3ab4ce47 14-Aug-2009 mbalmer <mbalmer@NetBSD.org>

Add support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks. An example
driver, gpiolock(4), is provided as an example how to interface real hardware.
A new securemodel, securemodel_keylock, is provi

Add support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks. An example
driver, gpiolock(4), is provided as an example how to interface real hardware.
A new securemodel, securemodel_keylock, is provided to show how this can
be used to tie keylocks to overall system security. This is experimental
code. The diff has been on tech-kern for several weeks.

Reviewed by many, kauth(9) integration reviewed by Elad Efrat; approved by
tonnerre@ and tron@. Thanks to everyone who provided feedback.

show more ...