#
7b00f4e9 |
| 07-Jun-2019 |
florian <florian@openbsd.org> |
Implement RFC 8555 "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)" to be able to talk to the v02 Let's Encrypt API.
With this acme-client(1) will no longer be able to talk to the v01 API. User
Implement RFC 8555 "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)" to be able to talk to the v02 Let's Encrypt API.
With this acme-client(1) will no longer be able to talk to the v01 API. Users must change the api url in /etc/acme-client.conf to https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory Existing accounts (and certs of course) stay valid and after the url change acme-client will be able to renew certs.
Tested by Renaud Allard and benno Input & OK benno
show more ...
|
#
aad8b57b |
| 06-Nov-2018 |
jsing <jsing@openbsd.org> |
Use TLS_CA_CERT_FILE instead of a separate define.
ok beck@ bluhm@ tb@
|
#
82b65d8a |
| 08-Aug-2018 |
deraadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> |
In netproc process, unveil to only expose the CA file. ok florian
|
#
b8795492 |
| 25-Jan-2017 |
inoguchi <inoguchi@openbsd.org> |
remove __BEGIN_DECLS and __END_DECLS from http.h sync with ocspcheck and acme-client ok benno@
|
#
b8ee2fe2 |
| 24-Jan-2017 |
deraadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> |
string terminator is called a NUL
|
#
25ca385b |
| 04-Oct-2016 |
jsing <jsing@openbsd.org> |
Avoid a potential MITM - calling tls_config_insecure_noverify() is a bad idea, so stop doing that. Instead, use a single tls_config, set it up and configure the CA file to use while we still have rpa
Avoid a potential MITM - calling tls_config_insecure_noverify() is a bad idea, so stop doing that. Instead, use a single tls_config, set it up and configure the CA file to use while we still have rpath, then drop rpath. This also avoids creating a new tls_config for each and every HTTPS connection, which is unnecessary.
ok benno@ florian@
show more ...
|
#
882a1b06 |
| 31-Aug-2016 |
benno <benno@openbsd.org> |
whitespace
|
#
de579d12 |
| 31-Aug-2016 |
florian <florian@openbsd.org> |
Import Kristaps' letskencrypt and call it acme-client in tree. OK to get it in deraadt@ (and probably beck@)
At least deraadt@, beck@ and otto@ are fine with the name and the disagreements stopped.
|