block: Mark BlockDriver callbacks for amend job GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of amend
callbacks in BlockDriver need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

S

block: Mark BlockDriver callbacks for amend job GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of amend
callbacks in BlockDriver need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark BlockDriver callbacks for amend job GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of amend
callbacks in BlockDriver need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

S

block: Mark BlockDriver callbacks for amend job GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of amend
callbacks in BlockDriver need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac8.

Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac8.

Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/amend: Keep strong reference to BDS

Otherwise, the BDS might be freed while the job is running, which would
cause a use-after-free.

Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id:

block/amend: Keep strong reference to BDS

Otherwise, the BDS might be freed while the job is running, which would
cause a use-after-free.

Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220304153729.711387-5-hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/amend: Always call .bdrv_amend_clean()

.bdrv_amend_clean() says block drivers can use it to clean up what was
done in .bdrv_amend_pre_run(). Therefore, it should always be called
after .bdrv_

block/amend: Always call .bdrv_amend_clean()

.bdrv_amend_clean() says block drivers can use it to clean up what was
done in .bdrv_amend_pre_run(). Therefore, it should always be called
after .bdrv_amend_pre_run(), which means we need it to call it in the
JobDriver.free() callback, not in JobDriver.clean().

Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220304153729.711387-3-hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

crypto: perform permission checks under BQL

Move the permission API calls into driver-specific callbacks
that always run under BQL. In this case, bdrv_crypto_luks
needs to perform permission checks

crypto: perform permission checks under BQL

Move the permission API calls into driver-specific callbacks
that always run under BQL. In this case, bdrv_crypto_luks
needs to perform permission checks before and after
qcrypto_block_amend_options(). The problem is that the caller,
block_crypto_amend_options_generic_luks(), can also run in I/O
from .bdrv_co_amend(). This does not comply with Global State-I/O API split,
as permissions API must always run under BQL.

Firstly, introduce .bdrv_amend_pre_run() and .bdrv_amend_clean()
callbacks. These two callbacks are guaranteed to be invoked under
BQL, respectively before and after .bdrv_co_amend().
They take care of performing the permission checks
in the same way as they are currently done before and after
qcrypto_block_amend_options().
These callbacks are in preparation for next patch, where we
delete the original permission check. Right now they just add redundant
control.

Then, call .bdrv_amend_pre_run() before job_start in
qmp_x_blockdev_amend(), so that it will be run before the job coroutine
is created and stay in the main loop.
As a cleanup, use JobDriver's .clean() callback to call
.bdrv_amend_clean(), and run amend-specific cleanup callbacks under BQL.

After this patch, permission failures occur early in the blockdev-amend
job to update a LUKS volume's keys. iotest 296 must now expect them in
x-blockdev-amend's QMP reply instead of waiting for the actual job to
fail later.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220209105452.1694545-2-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220304153729.711387-6-hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/amend: Check whether the node exists

We should check whether the user-specified node-name actually refers to
a node. The simplest way to do that is to use bdrv_lookup_bs() instead
of bdrv_fin

block/amend: Check whether the node exists

We should check whether the user-specified node-name actually refers to
a node. The simplest way to do that is to use bdrv_lookup_bs() instead
of bdrv_find_node() (the former wraps the latter, and produces an error
message if necessary).

Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1430268)
Fixes: ced914d0ab9fb2c900f873f6349a0b8eecd1fdbe
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200710095037.10885-1-mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/core: add generic infrastructure for x-blockdev-amend qmp command

blockdev-amend will be used similiar to blockdev-create
to allow on the fly changes of the structure of the format based block

block/core: add generic infrastructure for x-blockdev-amend qmp command

blockdev-amend will be used similiar to blockdev-create
to allow on the fly changes of the structure of the format based block devices.

Current plan is to first support encryption keyslot management for luks
based formats (raw and embedded in qcow2)

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200608094030.670121-12-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

show more ...