graph-lock: remove AioContext locking

Stop acquiring/releasing the AioContext lock in
bdrv_graph_wrlock()/bdrv_graph_unlock() since the lock no longer has any
effect.

The distinction between bdrv_g

graph-lock: remove AioContext locking

Stop acquiring/releasing the AioContext lock in
bdrv_graph_wrlock()/bdrv_graph_unlock() since the lock no longer has any
effect.

The distinction between bdrv_graph_wrunlock() and
bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() becomes meaningless and they can be collapsed
into one function.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-6-stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Fix deadlocks in bdrv_graph_wrunlock()

bdrv_graph_wrunlock() calls aio_poll(), which may run callbacks that
have a nested event loop. Nested event loops can depend on other
iothreads making p

block: Fix deadlocks in bdrv_graph_wrunlock()

bdrv_graph_wrunlock() calls aio_poll(), which may run callbacks that
have a nested event loop. Nested event loops can depend on other
iothreads making progress, so in order to allow them to make progress it
must not hold the AioContext lock of another thread while calling
aio_poll().

This introduces a @bs parameter to bdrv_graph_wrunlock() whose
AioContext is temporarily dropped (which matches bdrv_graph_wrlock()),
and a bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() that can be used if the BlockDriverState
doesn't necessarily exist any more when unlocking.

This also requires a change to bdrv_schedule_unref(), which was relying
on the incorrectly taken lock. It needs to take the lock itself now.
While this is a separate bug, it can't be fixed a separate patch because
otherwise the intermediate state would either deadlock or try to release
a lock that we don't even hold.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231115172012.112727-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[kwolf: Fixed up bdrv_schedule_unref()]
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access b

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.

This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

blkverify: Add locking for request_fn

This is either bdrv_co_preadv() or bdrv_co_pwritev() which both need to
have the graph locked. Annotate the function pointer accordingly and add
locking to its

blkverify: Add locking for request_fn

This is either bdrv_co_preadv() or bdrv_co_pwritev() which both need to
have the graph locked. Annotate the function pointer accordingly and add
locking to its callers.

This shouldn't actually have resulted in a bug because the graph lock is
already held by blkverify_co_prwv(), which waits for the coroutines to
terminate. Annotate with GRAPH_RDLOCK as well to make this clearer.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access b

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.

This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

blkverify: Add locking for request_fn

This is either bdrv_co_preadv() or bdrv_co_pwritev() which both need to
have the graph locked. Annotate the function pointer accordingly and add
locking to its

blkverify: Add locking for request_fn

This is either bdrv_co_preadv() or bdrv_co_pwritev() which both need to
have the graph locked. Annotate the function pointer accordingly and add
locking to its callers.

This shouldn't actually have resulted in a bug because the graph lock is
already held by blkverify_co_prwv(), which waits for the coroutines to
terminate. Annotate with GRAPH_RDLOCK as well to make this clearer.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
beca

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
beca

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.

Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.

Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.

This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.

Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.

Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.

Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.

This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.

Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.

Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.

Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.

This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.

Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac8.

Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac8.

Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: introduce bdrv_open_file_child() helper

Almost all drivers call bdrv_open_child() similarly. Let's create a
helper for this.

The only not updated drivers that call bdrv_open_child() to set
b

block: introduce bdrv_open_file_child() helper

Almost all drivers call bdrv_open_child() similarly. Let's create a
helper for this.

The only not updated drivers that call bdrv_open_child() to set
bs->file are raw-format and snapshot-access:
raw-format sometimes want to have filtered child but
don't set drv->is_filter to true.
snapshot-access wants only DATA | PRIMARY

Possibly we should implement drv->is_filter_func() handler, to consider
raw-format as filter when it works as filter.. But it's another story.

Note also, that we decrease assignments to bs->file in code: it helps
us restrict modifying this field in further commit.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220726201134.924743-3-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...