block: Mark bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-b

block: Mark bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-23-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-b

block: Mark bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-23-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-b

block: Mark bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_*_dirty_bitmap() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-23-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac8.

Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

include/block: Untangle inclusion loops

We have two inclusion loops:

block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h

I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac8.

Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: convert coroutine-only functions to co_wrapper

bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling

block/dirty-bitmap: convert coroutine-only functions to co_wrapper

bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling the
coroutine callback if it's the case.
Except that no coroutine calls such functions, therefore that check
can be removed, and function creation can be offloaded to
c_w.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-15-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: convert coroutine-only functions to co_wrapper

bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling

block/dirty-bitmap: convert coroutine-only functions to co_wrapper

bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling the
coroutine callback if it's the case.
Except that no coroutine calls such functions, therefore that check
can be removed, and function creation can be offloaded to
c_w.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-15-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: convert coroutine-only functions to co_wrapper

bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling

block/dirty-bitmap: convert coroutine-only functions to co_wrapper

bdrv_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap and bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap
check if they are running in a coroutine, directly calling the
coroutine callback if it's the case.
Except that no coroutine calls such functions, therefore that check
can be removed, and function creation can be offloaded to
c_w.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-15-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

qapi block: Elide redundant has_FOO in generated C

The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to
elide re

qapi block: Elide redundant has_FOO in generated C

The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to
elide redundant has_FOO in generated C" provided the means to elide
them step by step. This is the step for qapi/block*.json.

Said commit explains the transformation in more detail.

There is one instance of the invariant violation mentioned there:
qcow2_signal_corruption() passes false, "" when node_name is an empty
string. Take care to pass NULL then.

The previous two commits cleaned up two more.

Additionally, helper bdrv_latency_histogram_stats() loses its output
parameters and returns a value instead.

Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221104160712.3005652-11-armbru@redhat.com>
[Fixes for #ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION and MacOS squashed in]

show more ...

block: simplify handling of try to merge different sized bitmaps

We have too much logic to simply check that bitmaps are of the same
size. Let's just define that hbitmap_merge() and
bdrv_dirty_bitma

block: simplify handling of try to merge different sized bitmaps

We have too much logic to simply check that bitmaps are of the same
size. Let's just define that hbitmap_merge() and
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_merge_internal() require their argument bitmaps be of
same size, this simplifies things.

Let's look through the callers:

For backup_init_bcs_bitmap() we already assert that merge can't fail.

In bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap_locked() we gracefully handle the error
that can't happen: successor always has same size as its parent, drop
this logic.

In bdrv_merge_dirty_bitmap() we already has assertion and separate
check. Make the check explicit and improve error message.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <v.sementsov-og@mail.ru>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220517111206.23585-4-v.sementsov-og@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: simplify handling of try to merge different sized bitmaps

We have too much logic to simply check that bitmaps are of the same
size. Let's just define that hbitmap_merge() and
bdrv_dirty_bitma

block: simplify handling of try to merge different sized bitmaps

We have too much logic to simply check that bitmaps are of the same
size. Let's just define that hbitmap_merge() and
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_merge_internal() require their argument bitmaps be of
same size, this simplifies things.

Let's look through the callers:

For backup_init_bcs_bitmap() we already assert that merge can't fail.

In bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap_locked() we gracefully handle the error
that can't happen: successor always has same size as its parent, drop
this logic.

In bdrv_merge_dirty_bitmap() we already has assertion and separate
check. Make the check explicit and improve error message.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <v.sementsov-og@mail.ru>
Reviewed-by: Nikita Lapshin <nikita.lapshin@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220517111206.23585-4-v.sementsov-og@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: introduce bdrv_dirty_bitmap_status()

Add a convenient function similar with bdrv_block_status() to get
status of dirty bitmap.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vseme

block/dirty-bitmap: introduce bdrv_dirty_bitmap_status()

Add a convenient function similar with bdrv_block_status() to get
status of dirty bitmap.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303194349.2304213-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: bdrv_merge_dirty_bitmap(): add return value

That simplifies handling failure in existing code and in further new
usage of bdrv_merge_dirty_bitmap().

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Seme

block/dirty-bitmap: bdrv_merge_dirty_bitmap(): add return value

That simplifies handling failure in existing code and in further new
usage of bdrv_merge_dirty_bitmap().

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303194349.2304213-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>

show more ...

IO_CODE and IO_OR_GS_CODE for block_int I/O API

Mark all I/O functions with IO_CODE, and all "I/O OR GS" with
IO_OR_GS_CODE.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-

IO_CODE and IO_OR_GS_CODE for block_int I/O API

Mark all I/O functions with IO_CODE, and all "I/O OR GS" with
IO_OR_GS_CODE.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-14-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

assertions for block_int global state API

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-13-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@

assertions for block_int global state API

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-13-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

IO_CODE and IO_OR_GS_CODE for block I/O API

Mark all I/O functions with IO_CODE, and all "I/O OR GS" with
IO_OR_GS_CODE.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id:

IO_CODE and IO_OR_GS_CODE for block I/O API

Mark all I/O functions with IO_CODE, and all "I/O OR GS" with
IO_OR_GS_CODE.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220303151616.325444-6-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

iotests: Improve and rename test 291 to qemu-img-bitmap

Enhance the test to demonstrate existing less-than-stellar behavior of
qemu-img with a qcow2 image containing an inconsistent bitmap: we
don't

iotests: Improve and rename test 291 to qemu-img-bitmap

Enhance the test to demonstrate existing less-than-stellar behavior of
qemu-img with a qcow2 image containing an inconsistent bitmap: we
don't diagnose the problem until after copying the entire image (a
potentially long time), and when we do diagnose the failure, we still
end up leaving an empty bitmap in the destination. This mess will be
cleaned up in the next patch.

While at it, rename the test now that we support useful iotest names,
and fix a missing newline in the error message thus exposed.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210709153951.2801666-2-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: remove dirty bitmaps 'status' field

The same information is available via the 'recording' and 'busy' fields.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-b

block: remove dirty bitmaps 'status' field

The same information is available via the 'recording' and 'busy' fields.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>

show more ...

qcow2-bitmap: make bytes_covered_by_bitmap_cluster() public

Rename bytes_covered_by_bitmap_cluster() to
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_serialization_coverage() and make it public.
It is needed as we are going to

qcow2-bitmap: make bytes_covered_by_bitmap_cluster() public

Rename bytes_covered_by_bitmap_cluster() to
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_serialization_coverage() and make it public.
It is needed as we are going to share it with bitmap loading in
parallels format.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Message-Id: <20210224104707.88430-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

qapi: Use QAPI_LIST_APPEND in trivial cases

The easiest spots to use QAPI_LIST_APPEND are where we already have an
obvious pointer to the tail of a list. While at it, consistently use
the variable

qapi: Use QAPI_LIST_APPEND in trivial cases

The easiest spots to use QAPI_LIST_APPEND are where we already have an
obvious pointer to the tail of a list. While at it, consistently use
the variable name 'tail' for that purpose.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210113221013.390592-5-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_has_named_bitmaps helper

To be used for bitmap migration in further commit.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey S

block/dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_has_named_bitmaps helper

To be used for bitmap migration in further commit.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200521220648.3255-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Make it easier to learn which BDS support bitmaps

Upcoming patches will enhance bitmap support in qemu-img, but in doing
so, it turns out to be nice to suppress output when persistent bitmaps

block: Make it easier to learn which BDS support bitmaps

Upcoming patches will enhance bitmap support in qemu-img, but in doing
so, it turns out to be nice to suppress output when persistent bitmaps
make no sense (such as on a qcow2 v2 image). Add a hook to make this
easier to query.

This patch adds a new callback .bdrv_supports_persistent_dirty_bitmap,
rather than trying to shoehorn the answer in via existing callbacks.
In particular, while it might have been possible to overload
.bdrv_co_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap to special-case a NULL input to
answer whether any persistent bitmaps are supported, that is at odds
with whether a particular bitmap can be stored (for example, even on
an image that supports persistent bitmaps but has currently filled up
the maximum number of bitmaps, attempts to store another one should
fail); and the new functionality doesn't require coroutine safety.
Similarly, we could have added one more piece of information to
.bdrv_get_info, but then again, most callers to that function tend to
already discard extraneous information, and making it a catch-all
rather than a series of dedicated scalar queries hasn't really
simplified life.

In the future, when we improve the ability to look up bitmaps through
a filter, we will probably also want to teach the block layer to
automatically let filters pass this request on through.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200513011648.166876-4-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: improve _next_dirty_area API

Firstly, _next_dirty_area is for scenarios when we may contiguously
search for next dirty area inside some limited region, so it is more
comfortable

block/dirty-bitmap: improve _next_dirty_area API

Firstly, _next_dirty_area is for scenarios when we may contiguously
search for next dirty area inside some limited region, so it is more
comfortable to specify "end" which should not be recalculated on each
iteration.

Secondly, let's add a possibility to limit resulting area size, not
limiting searching area. This will be used in NBD code in further
commit. (Note that now bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area is unused)

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200205112041.6003-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: add _next_dirty API

We have bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero, let's add corresponding
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty, which is more comfortable to use than
bitmap iterators in some case

block/dirty-bitmap: add _next_dirty API

We have bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero, let's add corresponding
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty, which is more comfortable to use than
bitmap iterators in some cases.

For test modify test_hbitmap_next_zero_check_range to check both
next_zero and next_dirty and add some new checks.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200205112041.6003-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/dirty-bitmap: switch _next_dirty_area and _next_zero to int64_t

We are going to introduce bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty so that same
variable may be used to store its return value and to be its

block/dirty-bitmap: switch _next_dirty_area and _next_zero to int64_t

We are going to introduce bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty so that same
variable may be used to store its return value and to be its parameter,
so it would int64_t.

Similarly, we are going to refactor hbitmap_next_dirty_area to use
hbitmap_next_dirty together with hbitmap_next_zero, therefore we want
hbitmap_next_zero parameter type to be int64_t too.

So, for convenience update all parameters of *_next_zero and
*_next_dirty_area to be int64_t.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200205112041.6003-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

show more ...