block: Remove unnecessary NULL check in bdrv_pad_request()

Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests
that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the

block: Remove unnecessary NULL check in bdrv_pad_request()

Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests
that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the check.
In fact, all of the callers pass a non-NULL pointer, so just remove the
misleading check.

Resolves: Coverity CID 1542668
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20240327192750.204197-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

show more ...

block/io: accept NULL qiov in bdrv_pad_request

Some operations, e.g. block-stream, perform reads while discarding the
results (only copy-on-read matters). In this case, they will pass NULL
as the ta

block/io: accept NULL qiov in bdrv_pad_request

Some operations, e.g. block-stream, perform reads while discarding the
results (only copy-on-read matters). In this case, they will pass NULL
as the target QEMUIOVector, which will however trip bdrv_pad_request,
since it wants to extend its passed vector. In particular, this is the
case for the blk_co_preadv() call in stream_populate().

If there is no qiov, no operation can be done with it, but the bytes
and offset still need to be updated, so the subsequent aligned read
will actually be aligned and not run into an assertion failure.

In particular, this can happen when the request alignment of the top
node is larger than the allocated part of the bottom node, in which
case padding becomes necessary. For example:

> ./qemu-img create /tmp/backing.qcow2 -f qcow2 64M -o cluster_size=32768
> ./qemu-io -c "write -P42 0x0 0x1" /tmp/backing.qcow2
> ./qemu-img create /tmp/top.qcow2 -f qcow2 64M -b /tmp/backing.qcow2 -F qcow2
> ./qemu-system-x86_64 --qmp stdio \
> --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node0,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/top.qcow2 \
> <<EOF
> {"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
> {"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "compress", "file": "node0", "node-name": "node1" } }
> {"execute": "block-stream", "arguments": { "job-id": "stream0", "device": "node1" } }
> EOF

Originally-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
[FE: do update bytes and offset in any case
add reproducer to commit message]
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20240322095009.346989-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/io: clear BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE flag after recursing in bdrv_co_block_status

Using fleecing backup like in [0] on a qcow2 image (with metadata
preallocation) can lead to the following assertion f

block/io: clear BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE flag after recursing in bdrv_co_block_status

Using fleecing backup like in [0] on a qcow2 image (with metadata
preallocation) can lead to the following assertion failure:

> bdrv_co_do_block_status: Assertion `!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO)' failed.

In the reproducer [0], it happens because the BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE flag
will be set by the qcow2 driver, so the caller will recursively check
the file child. Then the BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO set too. Later up the call
chain, in bdrv_co_do_block_status() for the snapshot-access driver,
the assertion failure will happen, because both flags are set.

To fix it, clear the recurse flag after the recursive check was done.

In detail:

> #0 qcow2_co_block_status

Returns 0x45 = BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID.

> #1 bdrv_co_do_block_status

Because of the data flag, bdrv_co_do_block_status() will now also set
BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED. Because of the recurse flag,
bdrv_co_do_block_status() for the bdrv_file child will be called,
which returns 0x16 = BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID |
BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO. Now the return value inherits the zero flag.

Returns 0x57 = BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED | BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO.

> #2 bdrv_co_common_block_status_above
> #3 bdrv_co_block_status_above
> #4 bdrv_co_block_status
> #5 cbw_co_snapshot_block_status
> #6 bdrv_co_snapshot_block_status
> #7 snapshot_access_co_block_status
> #8 bdrv_co_do_block_status

Return value is propagated all the way up to here, where the assertion
failure happens, because BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE and BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO are
both set.

> #9 bdrv_co_common_block_status_above
> #10 bdrv_co_block_status_above
> #11 block_copy_block_status
> #12 block_copy_dirty_clusters
> #13 block_copy_common
> #14 block_copy_async_co_entry
> #15 coroutine_trampoline

[0]:

> #!/bin/bash
> rm /tmp/disk.qcow2
> ./qemu-img create /tmp/disk.qcow2 -o preallocation=metadata -f qcow2 1G
> ./qemu-img create /tmp/fleecing.qcow2 -f qcow2 1G
> ./qemu-img create /tmp/backup.qcow2 -f qcow2 1G
> ./qemu-system-x86_64 --qmp stdio \
> --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node0,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/disk.qcow2 \
> --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node1,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/fleecing.qcow2 \
> --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node2,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/backup.qcow2 \
> <<EOF
> {"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
> {"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "copy-before-write", "file": "node0", "target": "node1", "node-name": "node3" } }
> {"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "snapshot-access", "file": "node3", "node-name": "snap0" } }
> {"execute": "blockdev-backup", "arguments": { "device": "snap0", "target": "node1", "sync": "full", "job-id": "backup0" } }
> EOF

Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-id: 20240116154839.401030-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: remove AioContext locking

This is the big patch that removes
aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() from the block layer and
affected block layer users.

There isn't a clean way to split

block: remove AioContext locking

This is the big patch that removes
aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() from the block layer and
affected block layer users.

There isn't a clean way to split this patch and the reviewers are likely
the same group of people, so I decided to do it in one patch.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-7-stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access b

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.

This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access b

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.

This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_parent_cb_resize() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_parent_cb_resize() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-o

block: Mark bdrv_parent_cb_resize() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_parent_cb_resize() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark drain related functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

Draining recursively traverses the graph, therefore we need to make sure
that also such accesses to the graph are protected by the graph rdlock.

The

block: Mark drain related functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

Draining recursively traverses the graph, therefore we need to make sure
that also such accesses to the graph are protected by the graph rdlock.

There are 3 different drain callers to consider:
1. drain in the main loop: no issue at all, rdlock is nop.
2. drain in an iothread: rdlock only works in main loop or coroutines,
so disallow it.
3. drain in a coroutine (regardless of AioContext): the drain mechanism
takes care of scheduling a BH in the bs->aio_context that will
then take care of perform the actual draining. This is wrong,
because as pointed in (2) if bs->aio_context is an iothread then
rdlock won't work. Therefore change bdrv_co_yield_to_drain to
schedule the BH in the main loop.

Caller (2) also implies that we need to modify test-bdrv-drain.c to
disallow draining in the iothreads.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() need to hold a reader lock
fo

block: Mark bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() need to hold a reader lock
for the graph. These functions are the only functions in block-backend.c
that access the parent list of a node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: convert more bdrv_is_allocated* and bdrv_block_status* calls to coroutine versions

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <

block: convert more bdrv_is_allocated* and bdrv_block_status* calls to coroutine versions

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: switch to co_wrapper for bdrv_is_allocated_*

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-4-pbonzini@redha

block: switch to co_wrapper for bdrv_is_allocated_*

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-4-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: complete public block status API

Include both coroutine and non-coroutine versions, the latter being
co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock of the former.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
S

block: complete public block status API

Include both coroutine and non-coroutine versions, the latter being
co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock of the former.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: rename the bdrv_co_block_status static function

bdrv_block_status exists as a wrapper for bdrv_block_status_above, but
the name of the (hypothetical) coroutine version, bdrv_co_block_status,

block: rename the bdrv_co_block_status static function

bdrv_block_status exists as a wrapper for bdrv_block_status_above, but
the name of the (hypothetical) coroutine version, bdrv_co_block_status,
is squatted by a random static function. Rename it to
bdrv_co_do_block_status.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_parent_cb_resize() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_parent_cb_resize() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-o

block: Mark bdrv_parent_cb_resize() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_parent_cb_resize() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark drain related functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

Draining recursively traverses the graph, therefore we need to make sure
that also such accesses to the graph are protected by the graph rdlock.

The

block: Mark drain related functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

Draining recursively traverses the graph, therefore we need to make sure
that also such accesses to the graph are protected by the graph rdlock.

There are 3 different drain callers to consider:
1. drain in the main loop: no issue at all, rdlock is nop.
2. drain in an iothread: rdlock only works in main loop or coroutines,
so disallow it.
3. drain in a coroutine (regardless of AioContext): the drain mechanism
takes care of scheduling a BH in the bs->aio_context that will
then take care of perform the actual draining. This is wrong,
because as pointed in (2) if bs->aio_context is an iothread then
rdlock won't work. Therefore change bdrv_co_yield_to_drain to
schedule the BH in the main loop.

Caller (2) also implies that we need to modify test-bdrv-drain.c to
disallow draining in the iothreads.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() need to hold a reader lock
fo

block: Mark bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() need to hold a reader lock
for the graph. These functions are the only functions in block-backend.c
that access the parent list of a node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: convert more bdrv_is_allocated* and bdrv_block_status* calls to coroutine versions

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <

block: convert more bdrv_is_allocated* and bdrv_block_status* calls to coroutine versions

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: switch to co_wrapper for bdrv_is_allocated_*

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-4-pbonzini@redha

block: switch to co_wrapper for bdrv_is_allocated_*

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-4-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: complete public block status API

Include both coroutine and non-coroutine versions, the latter being
co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock of the former.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
S

block: complete public block status API

Include both coroutine and non-coroutine versions, the latter being
co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock of the former.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: rename the bdrv_co_block_status static function

bdrv_block_status exists as a wrapper for bdrv_block_status_above, but
the name of the (hypothetical) coroutine version, bdrv_co_block_status,

block: rename the bdrv_co_block_status static function

bdrv_block_status exists as a wrapper for bdrv_block_status_above, but
the name of the (hypothetical) coroutine version, bdrv_co_block_status,
is squatted by a random static function. Rename it to
bdrv_co_do_block_status.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, th

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, this is a start and makes it possible to use vrc's path-based
searches to find potential bugs where coroutine_fns call blocking functions.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, th

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, this is a start and makes it possible to use vrc's path-based
searches to find potential bugs where coroutine_fns call blocking functions.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, th

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, this is a start and makes it possible to use vrc's path-based
searches to find potential bugs where coroutine_fns call blocking functions.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: remove AIOCBInfo->get_aio_context()

The synchronous bdrv_aio_cancel() function needs the acb's AioContext so
it can call aio_poll() to wait for cancellation.

It turns out that all users run

block: remove AIOCBInfo->get_aio_context()

The synchronous bdrv_aio_cancel() function needs the acb's AioContext so
it can call aio_poll() to wait for cancellation.

It turns out that all users run under the BQL in the main AioContext, so
this callback is not needed.

Remove the callback, mark bdrv_aio_cancel() GLOBAL_STATE_CODE just like
its blk_aio_cancel() caller, and poll the main loop AioContext.

The purpose of this cleanup is to identify bdrv_aio_cancel() as an API
that does not work with the multi-queue block layer.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230912231037.826804-2-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: remove AIOCBInfo->get_aio_context()

The synchronous bdrv_aio_cancel() function needs the acb's AioContext so
it can call aio_poll() to wait for cancellation.

It turns out that all users run

block: remove AIOCBInfo->get_aio_context()

The synchronous bdrv_aio_cancel() function needs the acb's AioContext so
it can call aio_poll() to wait for cancellation.

It turns out that all users run under the BQL in the main AioContext, so
this callback is not needed.

Remove the callback, mark bdrv_aio_cancel() GLOBAL_STATE_CODE just like
its blk_aio_cancel() caller, and poll the main loop AioContext.

The purpose of this cleanup is to identify bdrv_aio_cancel() as an API
that does not work with the multi-queue block layer.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230912231037.826804-2-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...