graph-lock: remove AioContext locking

Stop acquiring/releasing the AioContext lock in
bdrv_graph_wrlock()/bdrv_graph_unlock() since the lock no longer has any
effect.

The distinction between bdrv_g

graph-lock: remove AioContext locking

Stop acquiring/releasing the AioContext lock in
bdrv_graph_wrlock()/bdrv_graph_unlock() since the lock no longer has any
effect.

The distinction between bdrv_graph_wrunlock() and
bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() becomes meaningless and they can be collapsed
into one function.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-6-stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Fix deadlocks in bdrv_graph_wrunlock()

bdrv_graph_wrunlock() calls aio_poll(), which may run callbacks that
have a nested event loop. Nested event loops can depend on other
iothreads making p

block: Fix deadlocks in bdrv_graph_wrunlock()

bdrv_graph_wrunlock() calls aio_poll(), which may run callbacks that
have a nested event loop. Nested event loops can depend on other
iothreads making progress, so in order to allow them to make progress it
must not hold the AioContext lock of another thread while calling
aio_poll().

This introduces a @bs parameter to bdrv_graph_wrunlock() whose
AioContext is temporarily dropped (which matches bdrv_graph_wrlock()),
and a bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() that can be used if the BlockDriverState
doesn't necessarily exist any more when unlocking.

This also requires a change to bdrv_schedule_unref(), which was relying
on the incorrectly taken lock. It needs to take the lock itself now.
While this is a separate bug, it can't be fixed a separate patch because
otherwise the intermediate state would either deadlock or try to release
a lock that we don't even hold.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231115172012.112727-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[kwolf: Fixed up bdrv_schedule_unref()]
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_get_parent_name() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_get_parent_name() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it a

block: Mark bdrv_get_parent_name() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_get_parent_name() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the parents list of a node.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_get_parent_name() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_get_parent_name() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it a

block: Mark bdrv_get_parent_name() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_get_parent_name() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the parents list of a node.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementati

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementations actually modify the graph, so it has to be a writer
lock.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically al

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is
completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it
internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementati

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementations actually modify the graph, so it has to be a writer
lock.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically al

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is
completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it
internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementati

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementations actually modify the graph, so it has to be a writer
lock.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically al

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is
completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it
internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementati

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementations actually modify the graph, so it has to be a writer
lock.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically al

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is
completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it
internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementati

block: Mark bdrv_add/del_child() and caller GRAPH_WRLOCK

The functions read the parents list in the generic block layer, so we
need to hold the graph lock already there. The BlockDriver
implementations actually modify the graph, so it has to be a writer
lock.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-22-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hol

block: Mark bdrv_unref_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_unref_child(). These callers will typically
already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which
means that they can't call functions that take it internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically al

block: Mark bdrv_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCK

Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already
hold it when calling bdrv_attach_child_common(). These callers will
typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is
completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it
internally.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230911094620.45040-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
beca

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
beca

block: Mark bdrv_recurse_can_replace() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_recurse_can_replace() need to hold a reader lock for the graph
because it accesses the children list of a node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the

block: Mark bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors() need to hold a reader lock for the
graph.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark public read/write functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pread*/pwrite*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places

block: Mark public read/write functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pread*/pwrite*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark read/write in block/io.c GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_driver_*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. It doesn't add
the annotatio

block: Mark read/write in block/io.c GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_driver_*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. It doesn't add
the annotation to public functions yet.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some

block: Mark bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...