block: Take graph lock for most of .bdrv_open

Most implementations of .bdrv_open first open their file child (which is
an operation that internally takes the write lock and therefore we
shouldn't ho

block: Take graph lock for most of .bdrv_open

Most implementations of .bdrv_open first open their file child (which is
an operation that internally takes the write lock and therefore we
shouldn't hold the graph lock while calling it), and afterwards many
operations that require holding the graph lock, e.g. for accessing
bs->file.

This changes block drivers that follow this pattern to take the graph
lock after opening the child node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access b

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.

This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Take graph lock for most of .bdrv_open

Most implementations of .bdrv_open first open their file child (which is
an operation that internally takes the write lock and therefore we
shouldn't ho

block: Take graph lock for most of .bdrv_open

Most implementations of .bdrv_open first open their file child (which is
an operation that internally takes the write lock and therefore we
shouldn't hold the graph lock while calling it), and afterwards many
operations that require holding the graph lock, e.g. for accessing
bs->file.

This changes block drivers that follow this pattern to take the graph
lock after opening the child node.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-24-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access b

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.

This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Make more BlockDriver definitions static

Most block driver implementations don't have any reason for their
BlockDriver to be public. The only exceptions are bdrv_file, bdrv_raw
and bdrv_qcow2

block: Make more BlockDriver definitions static

Most block driver implementations don't have any reason for their
BlockDriver to be public. The only exceptions are bdrv_file, bdrv_raw
and bdrv_qcow2, which are actually used in other source files.

Make all other BlockDriver definitions static if they aren't yet.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230905130607.35134-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Make more BlockDriver definitions static

Most block driver implementations don't have any reason for their
BlockDriver to be public. The only exceptions are bdrv_file, bdrv_raw
and bdrv_qcow2

block: Make more BlockDriver definitions static

Most block driver implementations don't have any reason for their
BlockDriver to be public. The only exceptions are bdrv_file, bdrv_raw
and bdrv_qcow2, which are actually used in other source files.

Make all other BlockDriver definitions static if they aren't yet.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230905130607.35134-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Make more BlockDriver definitions static

Most block driver implementations don't have any reason for their
BlockDriver to be public. The only exceptions are bdrv_file, bdrv_raw
and bdrv_qcow2

block: Make more BlockDriver definitions static

Most block driver implementations don't have any reason for their
BlockDriver to be public. The only exceptions are bdrv_file, bdrv_raw
and bdrv_qcow2, which are actually used in other source files.

Make all other BlockDriver definitions static if they aren't yet.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230905130607.35134-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark preadv_snapshot/snapshot_block_status GRAPH_RDLOCK

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Espo

block: Mark preadv_snapshot/snapshot_block_status GRAPH_RDLOCK

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_pdiscard() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, w

block: Mark bdrv_co_pdiscard() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark preadv_snapshot/snapshot_block_status GRAPH_RDLOCK

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Espo

block: Mark preadv_snapshot/snapshot_block_status GRAPH_RDLOCK

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_pdiscard() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, w

block: Mark bdrv_co_pdiscard() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark preadv_snapshot/snapshot_block_status GRAPH_RDLOCK

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Espo

block: Mark preadv_snapshot/snapshot_block_status GRAPH_RDLOCK

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_pdiscard() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, w

block: Mark bdrv_co_pdiscard() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Manipulate bs->file / bs->backing pointers in .attach/.detach

bs->file and bs->backing are a kind of duplication of part of
bs->children. But very useful diplication, so let's not drop them a

block: Manipulate bs->file / bs->backing pointers in .attach/.detach

bs->file and bs->backing are a kind of duplication of part of
bs->children. But very useful diplication, so let's not drop them at
all:)

We should manage bs->file and bs->backing in same place, where we
manage bs->children, to keep them in sync.

Moreover, generic io paths are unprepared to BdrvChild without a bs, so
it's double good to clear bs->file / bs->backing when we detach the
child.

Detach is simple: if we detach bs->file or bs->backing child, just
set corresponding field to NULL.

Attach is a bit more complicated. But we still can precisely detect
should we set one of bs->file / bs->backing or not:

- if role is BDRV_CHILD_COW, we definitely deal with bs->backing
- else, if role is BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED (it must be also
BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY), it's a filtered child. Use
bs->drv->filtered_child_is_backing to chose the pointer field to
modify.
- else, if role is BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY, we deal with bs->file
- in all other cases, it's neither bs->backing nor bs->file. It's some
other child and we shouldn't care

OK. This change brings one more good thing: we can (and should) get rid
of all indirect pointers in the block-graph-change transactions:

bdrv_attach_child_common() stores BdrvChild** into transaction to clear
it on abort.

bdrv_attach_child_common() has two callers: bdrv_attach_child_noperm()
just pass-through this feature, bdrv_root_attach_child() doesn't need
the feature.

Look at bdrv_attach_child_noperm() callers:
- bdrv_attach_child() doesn't need the feature
- bdrv_set_file_or_backing_noperm() uses the feature to manage
bs->file and bs->backing, we don't want it anymore
- bdrv_append() uses the feature to manage bs->backing, again we
don't want it anymore

So, we should drop this stuff! Great!

We could probably keep BdrvChild** argument to keep the int return
value, but it seems not worth the complexity.

Finally, we now set .file / .backing automatically in generic code and
want to restring setting them by hand outside of .attach/.detach.
So, this patch cleanups all remaining places where they were set.
To find such places I use:

git grep '\->file ='
git grep '\->backing ='
git grep '&.*\<backing\>'
git grep '&.*\<file\>'

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220726201134.924743-14-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Manipulate bs->file / bs->backing pointers in .attach/.detach

bs->file and bs->backing are a kind of duplication of part of
bs->children. But very useful diplication, so let's not drop them a

block: Manipulate bs->file / bs->backing pointers in .attach/.detach

bs->file and bs->backing are a kind of duplication of part of
bs->children. But very useful diplication, so let's not drop them at
all:)

We should manage bs->file and bs->backing in same place, where we
manage bs->children, to keep them in sync.

Moreover, generic io paths are unprepared to BdrvChild without a bs, so
it's double good to clear bs->file / bs->backing when we detach the
child.

Detach is simple: if we detach bs->file or bs->backing child, just
set corresponding field to NULL.

Attach is a bit more complicated. But we still can precisely detect
should we set one of bs->file / bs->backing or not:

- if role is BDRV_CHILD_COW, we definitely deal with bs->backing
- else, if role is BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED (it must be also
BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY), it's a filtered child. Use
bs->drv->filtered_child_is_backing to chose the pointer field to
modify.
- else, if role is BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY, we deal with bs->file
- in all other cases, it's neither bs->backing nor bs->file. It's some
other child and we shouldn't care

OK. This change brings one more good thing: we can (and should) get rid
of all indirect pointers in the block-graph-change transactions:

bdrv_attach_child_common() stores BdrvChild** into transaction to clear
it on abort.

bdrv_attach_child_common() has two callers: bdrv_attach_child_noperm()
just pass-through this feature, bdrv_root_attach_child() doesn't need
the feature.

Look at bdrv_attach_child_noperm() callers:
- bdrv_attach_child() doesn't need the feature
- bdrv_set_file_or_backing_noperm() uses the feature to manage
bs->file and bs->backing, we don't want it anymore
- bdrv_append() uses the feature to manage bs->backing, again we
don't want it anymore

So, we should drop this stuff! Great!

We could probably keep BdrvChild** argument to keep the int return
value, but it seems not worth the complexity.

Finally, we now set .file / .backing automatically in generic code and
want to restring setting them by hand outside of .attach/.detach.
So, this patch cleanups all remaining places where they were set.
To find such places I use:

git grep '\->file ='
git grep '\->backing ='
git grep '&.*\<backing\>'
git grep '&.*\<file\>'

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220726201134.924743-14-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: introduce snapshot-access block driver

The new block driver simply utilizes snapshot-access API of underlying
block node.

In further patches we want to use it like this:

[guest]

block: introduce snapshot-access block driver

The new block driver simply utilizes snapshot-access API of underlying
block node.

In further patches we want to use it like this:

[guest] [NBD export]
| |
| root | root
v file v
[copy-before-write]<------[snapshot-access]
| |
| file | target
v v
[active-disk] [temp.img]

This way, NBD client will be able to read snapshotted state of active
disk, when active disk is continued to be written by guest. This is
known as "fleecing", and currently uses another scheme based on qcow2
temporary image which backing file is active-disk. New scheme comes
with benefits - see next commit.

The other possible application is exporting internal snapshots of
qcow2, like this:

[guest] [NBD export]
| |
| root | root
v file v
[qcow2]<---------[snapshot-access]

For this, we'll need to implement snapshot-access API handlers in
qcow2 driver, and improve snapshot-access block driver (and API) to
make it possible to select snapshot by name. Another thing to improve
is size of snapshot. Now for simplicity we just use size of bs->file,
which is OK for backup, but for qcow2 snapshots export we'll need to
imporve snapshot-access API to get size of snapshot.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20220303194349.2304213-12-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[hreitz: Rebased on block GS/IO split]
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>

show more ...