#
f0df613b |
| 26-Sep-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
make-release: do not ship dtc sources
A new enough libfdt is included in all of Debian 11, Ubuntu 20.04 and MSYS2. It has also been included for several minor releases in Fedora and openSUSE Leap,
make-release: do not ship dtc sources
A new enough libfdt is included in all of Debian 11, Ubuntu 20.04 and MSYS2. It has also been included for several minor releases in Fedora and openSUSE Leap, as well as in CentOS. Therefore there is no need anymore to ship the sources together with the QEMU tarballs.
Keep the wrap file so that it can be used with --enable-download, but do not ship the sources anymore with either archive-source.sh or make-release.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
f0df613b |
| 26-Sep-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
make-release: do not ship dtc sources
A new enough libfdt is included in all of Debian 11, Ubuntu 20.04 and MSYS2. It has also been included for several minor releases in Fedora and openSUSE Leap,
make-release: do not ship dtc sources
A new enough libfdt is included in all of Debian 11, Ubuntu 20.04 and MSYS2. It has also been included for several minor releases in Fedora and openSUSE Leap, as well as in CentOS. Therefore there is no need anymore to ship the sources together with the QEMU tarballs.
Keep the wrap file so that it can be used with --enable-download, but do not ship the sources anymore with either archive-source.sh or make-release.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
f0df613b |
| 26-Sep-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
make-release: do not ship dtc sources
A new enough libfdt is included in all of Debian 11, Ubuntu 20.04 and MSYS2. It has also been included for several minor releases in Fedora and openSUSE Leap,
make-release: do not ship dtc sources
A new enough libfdt is included in all of Debian 11, Ubuntu 20.04 and MSYS2. It has also been included for several minor releases in Fedora and openSUSE Leap, as well as in CentOS. Therefore there is no need anymore to ship the sources together with the QEMU tarballs.
Keep the wrap file so that it can be used with --enable-download, but do not ship the sources anymore with either archive-source.sh or make-release.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v8.1.1, v7.2.6, v8.0.5, v8.1.0, v8.1.0-rc4, v8.1.0-rc3, v7.2.5, v8.0.4, v8.1.0-rc2, v8.1.0-rc1, v8.1.0-rc0, v8.0.3, v7.2.4, v8.0.2, v8.0.1, v7.2.3 |
|
#
d2dfe0b5 |
| 19-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: subprojects: replace berkeley-{soft,test}float-3 with wraps
Unlike other subprojects, these require an overlay directory to include meson rules to build the libraries. The rules are basicall
meson: subprojects: replace berkeley-{soft,test}float-3 with wraps
Unlike other subprojects, these require an overlay directory to include meson rules to build the libraries. The rules are basically lifted from tests/fp/meson.build, with a few changes to create platform.h and publish a dependency.
The build defines are passed through a subproject option, and posted back to users of the library via the dependency's compile_args.
The only remaining user of GIT_SUBMODULES and GIT_SUBMODULES_ACTION is roms/SLOF, which is used to build pc-bios/s390-ccw. All other roms submodules are only present to satisfy the license on pre-built firmware blobs.
Best reviewed with --color-moved.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
2019cabf |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: subprojects: replace submodules with wrap files
Compared to submodules, .wrap files have several advantages:
* option parsing and downloading is delegated to meson
* the commit is stored in
meson: subprojects: replace submodules with wrap files
Compared to submodules, .wrap files have several advantages:
* option parsing and downloading is delegated to meson
* the commit is stored in a text file instead of a magic entry in the git tree object
* we could stop shipping external dependencies that are only used as a fallback, but not break compilation on platforms that lack them. For example it may make sense to download dtc at build time, controlled by --enable-download, even when building from a tarball. Right now, this patch does the opposite: make-release treats dtc like libvfio-user (which is not stable API and therefore hasn't found its way into any distros) and keycodemap (which is a copylib, for better or worse).
dependency() can fall back to a wrap automatically. However, this is only possible for libraries that come with a .pc file, and this is not very common for libfdt even though the upstream project in principle provides it; it also removes the control that we provide with --enable-fdt={system,internal}. Therefore, the logic to pick system vs. internal libfdt is left untouched.
--enable-fdt=git is removed; it was already a synonym for --enable-fdt=internal.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
c53648ab |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: use subproject for keycodemapdb
By using a subproject, our own meson.build can use variables from the subproject instead of hard-coded paths. This is also the first step towards managing dow
meson: use subproject for keycodemapdb
By using a subproject, our own meson.build can use variables from the subproject instead of hard-coded paths. This is also the first step towards managing downloads with .wrap files instead of submodule.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
58e48b2e |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: use subproject for internal libfdt
Recent dtc/libfdt can use either Make or meson as the build system. By using a subproject, our own meson.build can remove the hard coded list of source file
meson: use subproject for internal libfdt
Recent dtc/libfdt can use either Make or meson as the build system. By using a subproject, our own meson.build can remove the hard coded list of source files.
This is also the first step towards managing downloads with .wrap files instead of submodule.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
c53648ab |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: use subproject for keycodemapdb
By using a subproject, our own meson.build can use variables from the subproject instead of hard-coded paths. This is also the first step towards managing dow
meson: use subproject for keycodemapdb
By using a subproject, our own meson.build can use variables from the subproject instead of hard-coded paths. This is also the first step towards managing downloads with .wrap files instead of submodule.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
58e48b2e |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: use subproject for internal libfdt
Recent dtc/libfdt can use either Make or meson as the build system. By using a subproject, our own meson.build can remove the hard coded list of source file
meson: use subproject for internal libfdt
Recent dtc/libfdt can use either Make or meson as the build system. By using a subproject, our own meson.build can remove the hard coded list of source files.
This is also the first step towards managing downloads with .wrap files instead of submodule.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
c53648ab |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: use subproject for keycodemapdb
By using a subproject, our own meson.build can use variables from the subproject instead of hard-coded paths. This is also the first step towards managing dow
meson: use subproject for keycodemapdb
By using a subproject, our own meson.build can use variables from the subproject instead of hard-coded paths. This is also the first step towards managing downloads with .wrap files instead of submodule.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
58e48b2e |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: use subproject for internal libfdt
Recent dtc/libfdt can use either Make or meson as the build system. By using a subproject, our own meson.build can remove the hard coded list of source file
meson: use subproject for internal libfdt
Recent dtc/libfdt can use either Make or meson as the build system. By using a subproject, our own meson.build can remove the hard coded list of source files.
This is also the first step towards managing downloads with .wrap files instead of submodule.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
dde001ef |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
remove remaining traces of meson submodule
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
#
dde001ef |
| 18-May-2023 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
remove remaining traces of meson submodule
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
Revision tags: v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0, v7.2.0, v7.2.0-rc4, v7.2.0-rc3, v7.2.0-rc2, v7.2.0-rc1, v7.2.0-rc0, v7.1.0, v7.1.0-rc4, v7.1.0-rc3, v7.1.0-rc2, v7.1.0-rc1, v7.1.0-rc0, v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
5890258a |
| 08-Apr-2022 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged libslirp has been dismissed. All other major distros seem to have a libslirp package in their distribution already - according to repology.org:
Fedora 35: 4.6.1 CentOS 8 (RHEL-8): 4.4.0 Debian 11: 4.4.0 OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 4.3.1 Ubuntu LTS 20.04: 4.1.0 FreeBSD Ports: 4.7.0 NetBSD pkgsrc: 4.7.0 Homebrew: 4.7.0 MSYS2 mingw: 4.7.0
The only one that was still missing a libslirp package is OpenBSD - but the next version (OpenBSD 7.2 which will be shipped in October) is going to include a libslirp package. Since QEMU 7.2 will be published after OpenBSD 7.2, we should be fine there, too.
So there is no real urgent need for keeping the slirp submodule in the QEMU tree anymore. Thus let's drop the slirp submodule now and rely on the libslirp packages from the distributions instead.
Message-Id: <20220824151122.704946-7-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0, v7.2.0, v7.2.0-rc4, v7.2.0-rc3, v7.2.0-rc2, v7.2.0-rc1, v7.2.0-rc0, v7.1.0, v7.1.0-rc4, v7.1.0-rc3, v7.1.0-rc2, v7.1.0-rc1, v7.1.0-rc0, v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
5890258a |
| 08-Apr-2022 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged libslirp has been dismissed. All other major distros seem to have a libslirp package in their distribution already - according to repology.org:
Fedora 35: 4.6.1 CentOS 8 (RHEL-8): 4.4.0 Debian 11: 4.4.0 OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 4.3.1 Ubuntu LTS 20.04: 4.1.0 FreeBSD Ports: 4.7.0 NetBSD pkgsrc: 4.7.0 Homebrew: 4.7.0 MSYS2 mingw: 4.7.0
The only one that was still missing a libslirp package is OpenBSD - but the next version (OpenBSD 7.2 which will be shipped in October) is going to include a libslirp package. Since QEMU 7.2 will be published after OpenBSD 7.2, we should be fine there, too.
So there is no real urgent need for keeping the slirp submodule in the QEMU tree anymore. Thus let's drop the slirp submodule now and rely on the libslirp packages from the distributions instead.
Message-Id: <20220824151122.704946-7-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0, v7.2.0, v7.2.0-rc4, v7.2.0-rc3, v7.2.0-rc2, v7.2.0-rc1, v7.2.0-rc0, v7.1.0, v7.1.0-rc4, v7.1.0-rc3, v7.1.0-rc2, v7.1.0-rc1, v7.1.0-rc0, v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
5890258a |
| 08-Apr-2022 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged libslirp has been dismissed. All other major distros seem to have a libslirp package in their distribution already - according to repology.org:
Fedora 35: 4.6.1 CentOS 8 (RHEL-8): 4.4.0 Debian 11: 4.4.0 OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 4.3.1 Ubuntu LTS 20.04: 4.1.0 FreeBSD Ports: 4.7.0 NetBSD pkgsrc: 4.7.0 Homebrew: 4.7.0 MSYS2 mingw: 4.7.0
The only one that was still missing a libslirp package is OpenBSD - but the next version (OpenBSD 7.2 which will be shipped in October) is going to include a libslirp package. Since QEMU 7.2 will be published after OpenBSD 7.2, we should be fine there, too.
So there is no real urgent need for keeping the slirp submodule in the QEMU tree anymore. Thus let's drop the slirp submodule now and rely on the libslirp packages from the distributions instead.
Message-Id: <20220824151122.704946-7-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0, v7.2.0, v7.2.0-rc4, v7.2.0-rc3, v7.2.0-rc2, v7.2.0-rc1, v7.2.0-rc0, v7.1.0, v7.1.0-rc4, v7.1.0-rc3, v7.1.0-rc2, v7.1.0-rc1, v7.1.0-rc0, v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
5890258a |
| 08-Apr-2022 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged libslirp has been dismissed. All other major distros seem to have a libslirp package in their distribution already - according to repology.org:
Fedora 35: 4.6.1 CentOS 8 (RHEL-8): 4.4.0 Debian 11: 4.4.0 OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 4.3.1 Ubuntu LTS 20.04: 4.1.0 FreeBSD Ports: 4.7.0 NetBSD pkgsrc: 4.7.0 Homebrew: 4.7.0 MSYS2 mingw: 4.7.0
The only one that was still missing a libslirp package is OpenBSD - but the next version (OpenBSD 7.2 which will be shipped in October) is going to include a libslirp package. Since QEMU 7.2 will be published after OpenBSD 7.2, we should be fine there, too.
So there is no real urgent need for keeping the slirp submodule in the QEMU tree anymore. Thus let's drop the slirp submodule now and rely on the libslirp packages from the distributions instead.
Message-Id: <20220824151122.704946-7-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0, v7.2.0, v7.2.0-rc4, v7.2.0-rc3, v7.2.0-rc2, v7.2.0-rc1, v7.2.0-rc0, v7.1.0, v7.1.0-rc4, v7.1.0-rc3, v7.1.0-rc2, v7.1.0-rc1, v7.1.0-rc0, v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
5890258a |
| 08-Apr-2022 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged libslirp has been dismissed. All other major distros seem to have a libslirp package in their distribution already - according to repology.org:
Fedora 35: 4.6.1 CentOS 8 (RHEL-8): 4.4.0 Debian 11: 4.4.0 OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 4.3.1 Ubuntu LTS 20.04: 4.1.0 FreeBSD Ports: 4.7.0 NetBSD pkgsrc: 4.7.0 Homebrew: 4.7.0 MSYS2 mingw: 4.7.0
The only one that was still missing a libslirp package is OpenBSD - but the next version (OpenBSD 7.2 which will be shipped in October) is going to include a libslirp package. Since QEMU 7.2 will be published after OpenBSD 7.2, we should be fine there, too.
So there is no real urgent need for keeping the slirp submodule in the QEMU tree anymore. Thus let's drop the slirp submodule now and rely on the libslirp packages from the distributions instead.
Message-Id: <20220824151122.704946-7-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0, v7.2.0, v7.2.0-rc4, v7.2.0-rc3, v7.2.0-rc2, v7.2.0-rc1, v7.2.0-rc0, v7.1.0, v7.1.0-rc4, v7.1.0-rc3, v7.1.0-rc2, v7.1.0-rc1, v7.1.0-rc0, v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
5890258a |
| 08-Apr-2022 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> |
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged
Remove the slirp submodule (i.e. compile only with an external libslirp)
Since QEMU 7.1 we don't support Ubuntu 18.04 anymore, so the last big important Linux distro that did not have a pre-packaged libslirp has been dismissed. All other major distros seem to have a libslirp package in their distribution already - according to repology.org:
Fedora 35: 4.6.1 CentOS 8 (RHEL-8): 4.4.0 Debian 11: 4.4.0 OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 4.3.1 Ubuntu LTS 20.04: 4.1.0 FreeBSD Ports: 4.7.0 NetBSD pkgsrc: 4.7.0 Homebrew: 4.7.0 MSYS2 mingw: 4.7.0
The only one that was still missing a libslirp package is OpenBSD - but the next version (OpenBSD 7.2 which will be shipped in October) is going to include a libslirp package. Since QEMU 7.2 will be published after OpenBSD 7.2, we should be fine there, too.
So there is no real urgent need for keeping the slirp submodule in the QEMU tree anymore. Thus let's drop the slirp submodule now and rely on the libslirp packages from the distributions instead.
Message-Id: <20220824151122.704946-7-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v7.0.0-rc3, v7.0.0-rc2, v7.0.0-rc1, v7.0.0-rc0, v6.1.1, v6.2.0, v6.2.0-rc4, v6.2.0-rc3, v6.2.0-rc2, v6.2.0-rc1, v6.2.0-rc0, v6.0.1, v6.1.0, v6.1.0-rc4, v6.1.0-rc3, v6.1.0-rc2, v6.1.0-rc1, v6.1.0-rc0, v6.0.0, v6.0.0-rc5, v6.0.0-rc4, v6.0.0-rc3, v6.0.0-rc2, v6.0.0-rc1, v6.0.0-rc0, v5.2.0, v5.2.0-rc4, v5.2.0-rc3, v5.2.0-rc2, v5.2.0-rc1, v5.2.0-rc0, v5.0.1, v5.1.0, v5.1.0-rc3, v5.1.0-rc2, v5.1.0-rc1, v5.1.0-rc0, v4.2.1, v5.0.0, v5.0.0-rc4, v5.0.0-rc3, v5.0.0-rc2, v5.0.0-rc1, v5.0.0-rc0, v4.2.0, v4.2.0-rc5, v4.2.0-rc4, v4.2.0-rc3, v4.2.0-rc2, v4.1.1, v4.2.0-rc1, v4.2.0-rc0, v4.0.1, v3.1.1.1 |
|
#
0a01d76f |
| 21-Aug-2019 |
Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> |
build-sys: add meson submodule
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
Revision tags: v4.1.0, v4.1.0-rc5, v4.1.0-rc4, v3.1.1, v4.1.0-rc3, v4.1.0-rc2, v4.1.0-rc1, v4.1.0-rc0 |
|
#
84963b5b |
| 08-Jul-2019 |
Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> |
archive-source: also create a stash for submodules
"git archive" fails when a submodule has a modification, because "git stash create" doesn't handle submodules. Let's teach our archive-source.sh to
archive-source: also create a stash for submodules
"git archive" fails when a submodule has a modification, because "git stash create" doesn't handle submodules. Let's teach our archive-source.sh to handle modifications in submodules the same way as qemu tree, by creating a stash.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190708200250.12017-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
#
8fc76176 |
| 20-May-2019 |
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> |
scripts: use git archive in archive-source
Use git archive to create tarballs of qemu and submodules instead of cloning the repository and the submodules. This is a order of magnitude faster becaus
scripts: use git archive in archive-source
Use git archive to create tarballs of qemu and submodules instead of cloning the repository and the submodules. This is a order of magnitude faster because it doesn't fetch the submodules from the internet each time the script runs.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190520124716.30472-2-kraxel@redhat.com> [AJB: fixed up tabs] Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
#
7c57bdd8 |
| 24-Apr-2019 |
Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> |
build-sys: move slirp as git submodule project
The slirp project is now hosted on freedesktop at: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp.
The libslirp source was extracted from qemu/slirp filtered th
build-sys: move slirp as git submodule project
The slirp project is now hosted on freedesktop at: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/slirp.
The libslirp source was extracted from qemu/slirp filtered through clang-format (available in project tree). The qemu slirp directory can be swapped by a git submodule.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190424110041.8175-3-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v4.0.0, v4.0.0-rc4, v3.0.1, v4.0.0-rc3, v4.0.0-rc2, v4.0.0-rc1, v4.0.0-rc0 |
|
#
d3b44265 |
| 24-Jan-2019 |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> |
archive-source.sh: Clone the submodules locally
We cloned the QEMU repository from the local storage. Since the submodules are also available there, clone them too. This is quicker and reduce networ
archive-source.sh: Clone the submodules locally
We cloned the QEMU repository from the local storage. Since the submodules are also available there, clone them too. This is quicker and reduce network use.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> [AJB: incorporated review suggestions from danpb] Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
#
1627a36e |
| 08-Jan-2019 |
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> |
scripts/archive-source: include softfloat tests
We need these if we want to run unit/softfloat tests in our docker containers.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richa
scripts/archive-source: include softfloat tests
We need these if we want to run unit/softfloat tests in our docker containers.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
show more ...
|