|
Revision tags: v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4, v7.0.0-rc3, v7.0.0-rc2, v7.0.0-rc1, v7.0.0-rc0, v6.1.1, v6.2.0, v6.2.0-rc4, v6.2.0-rc3, v6.2.0-rc2, v6.2.0-rc1, v6.2.0-rc0, v6.0.1, v6.1.0, v6.1.0-rc4, v6.1.0-rc3, v6.1.0-rc2, v6.1.0-rc1, v6.1.0-rc0, v6.0.0, v6.0.0-rc5, v6.0.0-rc4, v6.0.0-rc3, v6.0.0-rc2, v6.0.0-rc1, v6.0.0-rc0, v5.2.0, v5.2.0-rc4, v5.2.0-rc3, v5.2.0-rc2 |
|
| #
b430b513 |
| 16-Nov-2020 |
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> |
util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
-drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
-d
util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
-drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
-device virtio-blk,drive=drive0 \
VFIO may pin all guest memory, and discarding of RAM no longer works as
expected. I was able to reproduce this easily with my
01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
Similar to common VFIO, we have to disable it, making sure that:
a) virtio-balloon won't discard any memory ("silently disabled")
b) virtio-mem and nvme:// run mutually exclusive
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201116105947.9194-1-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.2.0-rc1, v5.2.0-rc0, v5.0.1, v5.1.0, v5.1.0-rc3, v5.1.0-rc2, v5.1.0-rc1, v5.1.0-rc0, v4.2.1, v5.0.0, v5.0.0-rc4, v5.0.0-rc3, v5.0.0-rc2, v5.0.0-rc1, v5.0.0-rc0, v4.2.0, v4.2.0-rc5, v4.2.0-rc4, v4.2.0-rc3, v4.2.0-rc2, v4.1.1, v4.2.0-rc1, v4.2.0-rc0, v4.0.1, v3.1.1.1, v4.1.0, v4.1.0-rc5, v4.1.0-rc4, v3.1.1, v4.1.0-rc3, v4.1.0-rc2, v4.1.0-rc1, v4.1.0-rc0, v4.0.0, v4.0.0-rc4, v3.0.1, v4.0.0-rc3, v4.0.0-rc2, v4.0.0-rc1, v4.0.0-rc0 |
|
| #
754cb9c0 |
| 15-Feb-2019 |
Yury Kotov <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru> |
exec: Change RAMBlockIterFunc definition
Currently, qemu_ram_foreach_* calls RAMBlockIterFunc with many
block-specific arguments. But often iter func needs RAMBlock*.
This refactoring is needed for
exec: Change RAMBlockIterFunc definition
Currently, qemu_ram_foreach_* calls RAMBlockIterFunc with many
block-specific arguments. But often iter func needs RAMBlock*.
This refactoring is needed for fast access to RAMBlock flags from
qemu_ram_foreach_block's callback. The only way to achieve this now
is to call qemu_ram_block_from_host (which also enumerates blocks).
So, this patch reduces complexity of
qemu_ram_foreach_block() -> cb() -> qemu_ram_block_from_host()
from O(n^2) to O(n).
Fix RAMBlockIterFunc definition and add some functions to read
RAMBlock* fields witch were passed.
Signed-off-by: Yury Kotov <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20190215174548.2630-2-yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v3.1.0, v3.1.0-rc5, v3.1.0-rc4, v3.1.0-rc3, v3.1.0-rc2, v3.1.0-rc1, v3.1.0-rc0, v3.0.0, v3.0.0-rc4, v2.12.1, v3.0.0-rc3, v3.0.0-rc2, v3.0.0-rc1, v3.0.0-rc0, v2.11.2, v2.12.0, v2.12.0-rc4, v2.12.0-rc3, v2.12.0-rc2, v2.12.0-rc1, v2.12.0-rc0, v2.11.1 |
|
| #
a37eaa53 |
| 10-Jan-2018 |
Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> |
stubs: Add stubs for ram block API
These functions will be wanted by block-obj-y but the actual definition
is in obj-y, so stub them to keep the linker happy.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.
stubs: Add stubs for ram block API
These functions will be wanted by block-obj-y but the actual definition
is in obj-y, so stub them to keep the linker happy.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180110091846.10699-2-famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
show more ...
|