libvhost-user: Bump up VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS to 509

Let's support up to 509 mem slots, just like vhost in the kernel usually
does and the rust vhost-user implementation recently [1] started doing

libvhost-user: Bump up VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS to 509

Let's support up to 509 mem slots, just like vhost in the kernel usually
does and the rust vhost-user implementation recently [1] started doing.
This is required to properly support memory hotplug, either using
multiple DIMMs (ACPI supports up to 256) or using virtio-mem.

The 509 used to be the KVM limit, it supported 512, but 3 were
used for internal purposes. Currently, KVM supports more than 512, but
it usually doesn't make use of more than ~260 (i.e., 256 DIMMs + boot
memory), except when other memory devices like PCI devices with BARs are
used. So, 509 seems to work well for vhost in the kernel.

Details can be found in the QEMU change that made virtio-mem consume
up to 256 mem slots across all virtio-mem devices. [2]

509 mem slots implies 509 VMAs/mappings in the worst case (even though,
in practice with virtio-mem we won't be seeing more than ~260 in most
setups).

With max_map_count under Linux defaulting to 64k, 509 mem slots
still correspond to less than 1% of the maximum number of mappings.
There are plenty left for the application to consume.

[1] https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost/pull/224
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230926185738.277351-1-david@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-3-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Dynamically allocate memory for memory slots

Let's prepare for increasing VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS by dynamically
allocating dev->regions. We don't have any ABI guarantees (not
dynami

libvhost-user: Dynamically allocate memory for memory slots

Let's prepare for increasing VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS by dynamically
allocating dev->regions. We don't have any ABI guarantees (not
dynamically linked), so we can simply change the layout of VuDev.

Let's zero out the memory, just as we used to do.

Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-2-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Bump up VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS to 509

Let's support up to 509 mem slots, just like vhost in the kernel usually
does and the rust vhost-user implementation recently [1] started doing

libvhost-user: Bump up VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS to 509

Let's support up to 509 mem slots, just like vhost in the kernel usually
does and the rust vhost-user implementation recently [1] started doing.
This is required to properly support memory hotplug, either using
multiple DIMMs (ACPI supports up to 256) or using virtio-mem.

The 509 used to be the KVM limit, it supported 512, but 3 were
used for internal purposes. Currently, KVM supports more than 512, but
it usually doesn't make use of more than ~260 (i.e., 256 DIMMs + boot
memory), except when other memory devices like PCI devices with BARs are
used. So, 509 seems to work well for vhost in the kernel.

Details can be found in the QEMU change that made virtio-mem consume
up to 256 mem slots across all virtio-mem devices. [2]

509 mem slots implies 509 VMAs/mappings in the worst case (even though,
in practice with virtio-mem we won't be seeing more than ~260 in most
setups).

With max_map_count under Linux defaulting to 64k, 509 mem slots
still correspond to less than 1% of the maximum number of mappings.
There are plenty left for the application to consume.

[1] https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost/pull/224
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230926185738.277351-1-david@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-3-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Dynamically allocate memory for memory slots

Let's prepare for increasing VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS by dynamically
allocating dev->regions. We don't have any ABI guarantees (not
dynami

libvhost-user: Dynamically allocate memory for memory slots

Let's prepare for increasing VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS by dynamically
allocating dev->regions. We don't have any ABI guarantees (not
dynamically linked), so we can simply change the layout of VuDev.

Let's zero out the memory, just as we used to do.

Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-2-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Bump up VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS to 509

Let's support up to 509 mem slots, just like vhost in the kernel usually
does and the rust vhost-user implementation recently [1] started doing

libvhost-user: Bump up VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS to 509

Let's support up to 509 mem slots, just like vhost in the kernel usually
does and the rust vhost-user implementation recently [1] started doing.
This is required to properly support memory hotplug, either using
multiple DIMMs (ACPI supports up to 256) or using virtio-mem.

The 509 used to be the KVM limit, it supported 512, but 3 were
used for internal purposes. Currently, KVM supports more than 512, but
it usually doesn't make use of more than ~260 (i.e., 256 DIMMs + boot
memory), except when other memory devices like PCI devices with BARs are
used. So, 509 seems to work well for vhost in the kernel.

Details can be found in the QEMU change that made virtio-mem consume
up to 256 mem slots across all virtio-mem devices. [2]

509 mem slots implies 509 VMAs/mappings in the worst case (even though,
in practice with virtio-mem we won't be seeing more than ~260 in most
setups).

With max_map_count under Linux defaulting to 64k, 509 mem slots
still correspond to less than 1% of the maximum number of mappings.
There are plenty left for the application to consume.

[1] https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost/pull/224
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230926185738.277351-1-david@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-3-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Dynamically allocate memory for memory slots

Let's prepare for increasing VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS by dynamically
allocating dev->regions. We don't have any ABI guarantees (not
dynami

libvhost-user: Dynamically allocate memory for memory slots

Let's prepare for increasing VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS by dynamically
allocating dev->regions. We don't have any ABI guarantees (not
dynamically linked), so we can simply change the layout of VuDev.

Let's zero out the memory, just as we used to do.

Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael@enfabrica.net>
Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240214151701.29906-2-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

The VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP feature bit was defined in
f21e95ee97d, which has been part of qemu's 8.1.0 release. However, it
seems it was never

vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

The VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP feature bit was defined in
f21e95ee97d, which has been part of qemu's 8.1.0 release. However, it
seems it was never added to qemu's code, but it is well possible that it
is already used by different front-ends outside of qemu (i.e., Xen).

VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SHARED_OBJECT in contrast was added to qemu's code
in 16094766627, but never defined in the vhost-user specification. As a
consequence, both bits were defined to be 17, which cannot work.

Regardless of whether actual code or the specification should take
precedence, F_XEN_MMAP is already part of a qemu release, while
F_SHARED_OBJECT is not. Therefore, bump the latter to take number 18
instead of 17, and add this to the specification.

Take the opportunity to add at least a little note on the
VhostUserShared structure to the specification. This structure is
referenced by the new commands introduced in 16094766627, but was not
defined.

Fixes: 160947666276c5b7f6bca4d746bcac2966635d79
("vhost-user: add shared_object msg")
Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231016083201.23736-1-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

The VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP feature bit was defined in
f21e95ee97d, which has been part of qemu's 8.1.0 release. However, it
seems it was never

vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

The VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP feature bit was defined in
f21e95ee97d, which has been part of qemu's 8.1.0 release. However, it
seems it was never added to qemu's code, but it is well possible that it
is already used by different front-ends outside of qemu (i.e., Xen).

VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SHARED_OBJECT in contrast was added to qemu's code
in 16094766627, but never defined in the vhost-user specification. As a
consequence, both bits were defined to be 17, which cannot work.

Regardless of whether actual code or the specification should take
precedence, F_XEN_MMAP is already part of a qemu release, while
F_SHARED_OBJECT is not. Therefore, bump the latter to take number 18
instead of 17, and add this to the specification.

Take the opportunity to add at least a little note on the
VhostUserShared structure to the specification. This structure is
referenced by the new commands introduced in 16094766627, but was not
defined.

Fixes: 160947666276c5b7f6bca4d746bcac2966635d79
("vhost-user: add shared_object msg")
Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231016083201.23736-1-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

The VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP feature bit was defined in
f21e95ee97d, which has been part of qemu's 8.1.0 release. However, it
seems it was never

vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

The VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP feature bit was defined in
f21e95ee97d, which has been part of qemu's 8.1.0 release. However, it
seems it was never added to qemu's code, but it is well possible that it
is already used by different front-ends outside of qemu (i.e., Xen).

VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SHARED_OBJECT in contrast was added to qemu's code
in 16094766627, but never defined in the vhost-user specification. As a
consequence, both bits were defined to be 17, which cannot work.

Regardless of whether actual code or the specification should take
precedence, F_XEN_MMAP is already part of a qemu release, while
F_SHARED_OBJECT is not. Therefore, bump the latter to take number 18
instead of 17, and add this to the specification.

Take the opportunity to add at least a little note on the
VhostUserShared structure to the specification. This structure is
referenced by the new commands introduced in 16094766627, but was not
defined.

Fixes: 160947666276c5b7f6bca4d746bcac2966635d79
("vhost-user: add shared_object msg")
Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231016083201.23736-1-hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: handle shared_object msg

In the libvhost-user library we need to
handle VHOST_USER_GET_SHARED_OBJECT requests,
and add helper functions to allow sending messages
to interact with the

libvhost-user: handle shared_object msg

In the libvhost-user library we need to
handle VHOST_USER_GET_SHARED_OBJECT requests,
and add helper functions to allow sending messages
to interact with the virtio shared objects
hash table.

Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231002065706.94707-5-aesteve@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: handle shared_object msg

In the libvhost-user library we need to
handle VHOST_USER_GET_SHARED_OBJECT requests,
and add helper functions to allow sending messages
to interact with the

libvhost-user: handle shared_object msg

In the libvhost-user library we need to
handle VHOST_USER_GET_SHARED_OBJECT requests,
and add helper functions to allow sending messages
to interact with the virtio shared objects
hash table.

Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231002065706.94707-5-aesteve@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: handle shared_object msg

In the libvhost-user library we need to
handle VHOST_USER_GET_SHARED_OBJECT requests,
and add helper functions to allow sending messages
to interact with the

libvhost-user: handle shared_object msg

In the libvhost-user library we need to
handle VHOST_USER_GET_SHARED_OBJECT requests,
and add helper functions to allow sending messages
to interact with the virtio shared objects
hash table.

Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20231002065706.94707-5-aesteve@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

vhost-user: fully use new backend/frontend naming

Slave/master nomenclature was replaced with backend/frontend in commit
1fc19b65279a ("vhost-user: Adopt new backend naming")

This patch replaces al

vhost-user: fully use new backend/frontend naming

Slave/master nomenclature was replaced with backend/frontend in commit
1fc19b65279a ("vhost-user: Adopt new backend naming")

This patch replaces all remaining uses of master and slave in the
codebase.

Signed-off-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230613080849.2115347-1-manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

show more ...

vhost-user-blk-server: notify client about disk resize

Currently block_resize qmp command is simply ignored by vhost-user-blk
export. So, the block-node is successfully resized, but virtio config
is

vhost-user-blk-server: notify client about disk resize

Currently block_resize qmp command is simply ignored by vhost-user-blk
export. So, the block-node is successfully resized, but virtio config
is unchanged and guest doesn't see that disk is resized.

Let's handle the resize by modifying the config and notifying the guest
appropriately.

After this comment, lsblk in linux guest with attached
vhost-user-blk-pci device shows new size immediately after block_resize
QMP command on vhost-user exported block node.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20230321201323.3695923-1-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

vhost-user-blk-server: notify client about disk resize

Currently block_resize qmp command is simply ignored by vhost-user-blk
export. So, the block-node is successfully resized, but virtio config
is

vhost-user-blk-server: notify client about disk resize

Currently block_resize qmp command is simply ignored by vhost-user-blk
export. So, the block-node is successfully resized, but virtio config
is unchanged and guest doesn't see that disk is resized.

Let's handle the resize by modifying the config and notifying the guest
appropriately.

After this comment, lsblk in linux guest with attached
vhost-user-blk-pci device shows new size immediately after block_resize
QMP command on vhost-user exported block node.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20230321201323.3695923-1-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

vhost-user-blk-server: notify client about disk resize

Currently block_resize qmp command is simply ignored by vhost-user-blk
export. So, the block-node is successfully resized, but virtio config
is

vhost-user-blk-server: notify client about disk resize

Currently block_resize qmp command is simply ignored by vhost-user-blk
export. So, the block-node is successfully resized, but virtio config
is unchanged and guest doesn't see that disk is resized.

Let's handle the resize by modifying the config and notifying the guest
appropriately.

After this comment, lsblk in linux guest with attached
vhost-user-blk-pci device shows new size immediately after block_resize
QMP command on vhost-user exported block node.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20230321201323.3695923-1-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Adopt new backend naming

The Vhost-user specification changed feature and request
naming from _SLAVE_ to _BACKEND_.

This patch adopts the new naming convention.

Signed-off-by: Maxim

libvhost-user: Adopt new backend naming

The Vhost-user specification changed feature and request
naming from _SLAVE_ to _BACKEND_.

This patch adopts the new naming convention.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230208203259.381326-3-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Adopt new backend naming

The Vhost-user specification changed feature and request
naming from _SLAVE_ to _BACKEND_.

This patch adopts the new naming convention.

Signed-off-by: Maxim

libvhost-user: Adopt new backend naming

The Vhost-user specification changed feature and request
naming from _SLAVE_ to _BACKEND_.

This patch adopts the new naming convention.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230208203259.381326-3-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvh

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^

Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvh

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^

Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvh

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^

Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvh

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^

Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvh

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^

Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvh

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^

Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvh

libvhost-user: Switch to unsigned int for inuse field in struct VuVirtq

It seems there is no need to keep the inuse field signed and end up with
compiler warnings for sign-compare.

CC libvhost-user.o
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_pop’:
libvhost-user.c:2763:19: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘unsigned int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2763 | if (vq->inuse >= vq->vring.num) {
| ^~
libvhost-user.c: In function ‘vu_queue_rewind’:
libvhost-user.c:2808:13: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare]
2808 | if (num > vq->inuse) {
| ^

Instead of casting the comparision to unsigned int, just make the inuse
field unsigned int in the fist place.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Message-Id: <20221219175337.377435-8-marcel@holtmann.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

show more ...