Revision tags: v8.2.4 |
|
#
6e55b32d |
| 29-Apr-2024 |
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> |
target/s390x: flag te and cte as deprecated
Add the CONSTRAINT_TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (cte) and TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (te) to the list of deprecated features.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ib
target/s390x: flag te and cte as deprecated
Add the CONSTRAINT_TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (cte) and TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (te) to the list of deprecated features.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240429191059.11806-3-walling@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
8aa2211e |
| 29-Apr-2024 |
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> |
target/s390x: report deprecated-props in cpu-model-expansion reply
Retain a list of deprecated features disjoint from any particular CPU model. A query-cpu-model-expansion reply will now provide a l
target/s390x: report deprecated-props in cpu-model-expansion reply
Retain a list of deprecated features disjoint from any particular CPU model. A query-cpu-model-expansion reply will now provide a list of properties (i.e. features) that are flagged as deprecated. Example:
{ "return": { "model": { "name": "z14.2-base", "deprecated-props": [ "bpb", "csske" ], "props": { "pfmfi": false, "exrl": true, ...a lot more props... "skey": false, "vxpdeh2": false } } } }
It is recommended that s390 guests operate with these features explicitly disabled to ensure compatibility with future hardware.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240429191059.11806-2-walling@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v8.2.4 |
|
#
6e55b32d |
| 29-Apr-2024 |
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> |
target/s390x: flag te and cte as deprecated
Add the CONSTRAINT_TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (cte) and TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (te) to the list of deprecated features.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ib
target/s390x: flag te and cte as deprecated
Add the CONSTRAINT_TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (cte) and TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (te) to the list of deprecated features.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240429191059.11806-3-walling@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
8aa2211e |
| 29-Apr-2024 |
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> |
target/s390x: report deprecated-props in cpu-model-expansion reply
Retain a list of deprecated features disjoint from any particular CPU model. A query-cpu-model-expansion reply will now provide a l
target/s390x: report deprecated-props in cpu-model-expansion reply
Retain a list of deprecated features disjoint from any particular CPU model. A query-cpu-model-expansion reply will now provide a list of properties (i.e. features) that are flagged as deprecated. Example:
{ "return": { "model": { "name": "z14.2-base", "deprecated-props": [ "bpb", "csske" ], "props": { "pfmfi": false, "exrl": true, ...a lot more props... "skey": false, "vxpdeh2": false } } } }
It is recommended that s390 guests operate with these features explicitly disabled to ensure compatibility with future hardware.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240429191059.11806-2-walling@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v8.2.4 |
|
#
6e55b32d |
| 29-Apr-2024 |
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> |
target/s390x: flag te and cte as deprecated
Add the CONSTRAINT_TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (cte) and TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (te) to the list of deprecated features.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ib
target/s390x: flag te and cte as deprecated
Add the CONSTRAINT_TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (cte) and TRANSACTIONAL_EXE (te) to the list of deprecated features.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240429191059.11806-3-walling@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
8aa2211e |
| 29-Apr-2024 |
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> |
target/s390x: report deprecated-props in cpu-model-expansion reply
Retain a list of deprecated features disjoint from any particular CPU model. A query-cpu-model-expansion reply will now provide a l
target/s390x: report deprecated-props in cpu-model-expansion reply
Retain a list of deprecated features disjoint from any particular CPU model. A query-cpu-model-expansion reply will now provide a list of properties (i.e. features) that are flagged as deprecated. Example:
{ "return": { "model": { "name": "z14.2-base", "deprecated-props": [ "bpb", "csske" ], "props": { "pfmfi": false, "exrl": true, ...a lot more props... "skey": false, "vxpdeh2": false } } } }
It is recommended that s390 guests operate with these features explicitly disabled to ensure compatibility with future hardware.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240429191059.11806-2-walling@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v8.2.3, v7.2.11, v9.0.0, v9.0.0-rc4, v9.0.0-rc3, v9.0.0-rc2, v9.0.0-rc1, v9.0.0-rc0, v8.2.2, v7.2.10, v8.2.1, v8.1.5, v7.2.9, v8.1.4, v7.2.8, v8.2.0, v8.2.0-rc4, v8.2.0-rc3, v8.2.0-rc2, v8.2.0-rc1, v7.2.7, v8.1.3, v8.2.0-rc0, v8.1.2, v8.1.1, v7.2.6, v8.0.5, v8.1.0, v8.1.0-rc4, v8.1.0-rc3, v7.2.5, v8.0.4, v8.1.0-rc2, v8.1.0-rc1, v8.1.0-rc0 |
|
#
cced0d65 |
| 14-Jul-2023 |
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> |
s390x: spelling fixes
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
Revision tags: v8.2.3, v7.2.11, v9.0.0, v9.0.0-rc4, v9.0.0-rc3, v9.0.0-rc2, v9.0.0-rc1, v9.0.0-rc0, v8.2.2, v7.2.10, v8.2.1, v8.1.5, v7.2.9, v8.1.4, v7.2.8, v8.2.0, v8.2.0-rc4, v8.2.0-rc3, v8.2.0-rc2, v8.2.0-rc1, v7.2.7, v8.1.3, v8.2.0-rc0, v8.1.2, v8.1.1, v7.2.6, v8.0.5, v8.1.0, v8.1.0-rc4, v8.1.0-rc3, v7.2.5, v8.0.4, v8.1.0-rc2, v8.1.0-rc1, v8.1.0-rc0 |
|
#
cced0d65 |
| 14-Jul-2023 |
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> |
s390x: spelling fixes
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
Revision tags: v8.2.3, v7.2.11, v9.0.0, v9.0.0-rc4, v9.0.0-rc3, v9.0.0-rc2, v9.0.0-rc1, v9.0.0-rc0, v8.2.2, v7.2.10, v8.2.1, v8.1.5, v7.2.9, v8.1.4, v7.2.8, v8.2.0, v8.2.0-rc4, v8.2.0-rc3, v8.2.0-rc2, v8.2.0-rc1, v7.2.7, v8.1.3, v8.2.0-rc0, v8.1.2, v8.1.1, v7.2.6, v8.0.5, v8.1.0, v8.1.0-rc4, v8.1.0-rc3, v7.2.5, v8.0.4, v8.1.0-rc2, v8.1.0-rc1, v8.1.0-rc0 |
|
#
cced0d65 |
| 14-Jul-2023 |
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> |
s390x: spelling fixes
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
|
Revision tags: v8.0.3, v7.2.4 |
|
#
f5f9c6ea |
| 24-Jun-2023 |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> |
hw/s390x: Move KVM specific PV from hw/ to target/s390x/kvm/
Protected Virtualization (PV) is not a real hardware device: it is a feature of the firmware on s390x that is exposed to userspace via th
hw/s390x: Move KVM specific PV from hw/ to target/s390x/kvm/
Protected Virtualization (PV) is not a real hardware device: it is a feature of the firmware on s390x that is exposed to userspace via the KVM interface.
Move the pv.c/pv.h files to target/s390x/kvm/ to make this clearer.
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230624200644.23931-1-philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v8.0.3, v7.2.4 |
|
#
f5f9c6ea |
| 24-Jun-2023 |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> |
hw/s390x: Move KVM specific PV from hw/ to target/s390x/kvm/
Protected Virtualization (PV) is not a real hardware device: it is a feature of the firmware on s390x that is exposed to userspace via th
hw/s390x: Move KVM specific PV from hw/ to target/s390x/kvm/
Protected Virtualization (PV) is not a real hardware device: it is a feature of the firmware on s390x that is exposed to userspace via the KVM interface.
Move the pv.c/pv.h files to target/s390x/kvm/ to make this clearer.
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20230624200644.23931-1-philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v8.0.2, v8.0.1, v7.2.3, v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0 |
|
#
3ea7e312 |
| 17-Dec-2022 |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> |
hw/s390x/pv: Restrict Protected Virtualization to sysemu
Protected Virtualization is irrelevant in user emulation.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20221217152
hw/s390x/pv: Restrict Protected Virtualization to sysemu
Protected Virtualization is irrelevant in user emulation.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20221217152454.96388-4-philmd@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v8.0.2, v8.0.1, v7.2.3, v7.2.2, v8.0.0, v8.0.0-rc4, v8.0.0-rc3, v7.2.1, v8.0.0-rc2, v8.0.0-rc1, v8.0.0-rc0 |
|
#
3ea7e312 |
| 17-Dec-2022 |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> |
hw/s390x/pv: Restrict Protected Virtualization to sysemu
Protected Virtualization is irrelevant in user emulation.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20221217152
hw/s390x/pv: Restrict Protected Virtualization to sysemu
Protected Virtualization is irrelevant in user emulation.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20221217152454.96388-4-philmd@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v7.2.0, v7.2.0-rc4, v7.2.0-rc3, v7.2.0-rc2, v7.2.0-rc1, v7.2.0-rc0, v7.1.0, v7.1.0-rc4, v7.1.0-rc3, v7.1.0-rc2, v7.1.0-rc1, v7.1.0-rc0, v7.0.0, v7.0.0-rc4, v7.0.0-rc3, v7.0.0-rc2, v7.0.0-rc1, v7.0.0-rc0, v6.1.1, v6.2.0, v6.2.0-rc4, v6.2.0-rc3, v6.2.0-rc2, v6.2.0-rc1, v6.2.0-rc0, v6.0.1, v6.1.0, v6.1.0-rc4, v6.1.0-rc3, v6.1.0-rc2, v6.1.0-rc1, v6.1.0-rc0, v6.0.0, v6.0.0-rc5, v6.0.0-rc4, v6.0.0-rc3, v6.0.0-rc2, v6.0.0-rc1, v6.0.0-rc0 |
|
#
10248418 |
| 11-Dec-2020 |
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> |
s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests
There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not advertise it and its support facilities.
Fixes: c3347ed0d2ee
s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests
There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not advertise it and its support facilities.
Fixes: c3347ed0d2ee ("s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility") Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201211105109.2913-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.2.0, v5.2.0-rc4, v5.2.0-rc3, v5.2.0-rc2, v5.2.0-rc1, v5.2.0-rc0 |
|
#
3ded270a |
| 22-Oct-2020 |
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> |
s390x: pv: Fix diag318 PV fencing
Diag318 fencing needs to be determined on the current VM PV state and not on the state that the VM has when we create the CPU model.
Fixes: fabdada935 ("s390: gues
s390x: pv: Fix diag318 PV fencing
Diag318 fencing needs to be determined on the current VM PV state and not on the state that the VM has when we create the CPU model.
Fixes: fabdada935 ("s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318") Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201022103135.126033-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.0.1, v5.1.0, v5.1.0-rc3, v5.1.0-rc2, v5.1.0-rc1, v5.1.0-rc0, v4.2.1, v5.0.0, v5.0.0-rc4, v5.0.0-rc3, v5.0.0-rc2, v5.0.0-rc1, v5.0.0-rc0 |
|
#
0979ed01 |
| 04-Feb-2020 |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
meson: rename .inc.h files to .h.inc
Make it consistent with '.c.inc' and '.rst.inc'.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
Revision tags: v4.2.0, v4.2.0-rc5, v4.2.0-rc4, v4.2.0-rc3, v4.2.0-rc2, v4.1.1, v4.2.0-rc1, v4.2.0-rc0, v4.0.1, v3.1.1.1, v4.1.0, v4.1.0-rc5, v4.1.0-rc4, v3.1.1, v4.1.0-rc3, v4.1.0-rc2, v4.1.0-rc1, v4.1.0-rc0 |
|
#
220ae900 |
| 12-Jun-2019 |
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: Rework CPU feature definition
Let's define features at a single spot and make it less error prone to define new features.
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: C
s390x/cpumodel: Rework CPU feature definition
Let's define features at a single spot and make it less error prone to define new features.
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
afc7b866 |
| 29-Apr-2019 |
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: add Deflate-conversion facility
add the deflate conversion facility.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20190429090250.7648-8-borntraeger@de.
s390x/cpumodel: add Deflate-conversion facility
add the deflate conversion facility.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20190429090250.7648-8-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
d220fabf |
| 29-Apr-2019 |
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: enhanced sort facility
add the enhanced sort facility.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <2
s390x/cpumodel: enhanced sort facility
add the enhanced sort facility.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190429090250.7648-7-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
54d65de0 |
| 29-Apr-2019 |
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: vector enhancements
Add vector enhancements to the cpu model.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message
s390x/cpumodel: vector enhancements
Add vector enhancements to the cpu model.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190429090250.7648-6-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
5dacbe23 |
| 29-Apr-2019 |
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: msa9 facility
Provide the MSA9 facility (stfle.155). This also contains pckmo subfunctions for key wrapping. Keep them in a separate group to disable those as a block if necessary. T
s390x/cpumodel: msa9 facility
Provide the MSA9 facility (stfle.155). This also contains pckmo subfunctions for key wrapping. Keep them in a separate group to disable those as a block if necessary. This is for example needed when disabling key wrapping via the HMC.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20190429090250.7648-5-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
#
2ec03883 |
| 29-Apr-2019 |
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: Miscellaneous-Instruction-Extensions Facility 3
Provide the "Miscellaneous-Instruction-Extensions Facility 3" via stfle.61.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.
s390x/cpumodel: Miscellaneous-Instruction-Extensions Facility 3
Provide the "Miscellaneous-Instruction-Extensions Facility 3" via stfle.61.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190429090250.7648-4-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v4.0.0, v4.0.0-rc4, v3.0.1, v4.0.0-rc3, v4.0.0-rc2, v4.0.0-rc1, v4.0.0-rc0 |
|
#
ddf5d18a |
| 12-Feb-2019 |
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: mepochptff: warn when no mepoch and re-align group init
The extended PTFF features (qsie, qtoue, stoe, stoue) are dependent on the multiple-epoch facility (mepoch). Let's print a war
s390x/cpumodel: mepochptff: warn when no mepoch and re-align group init
The extended PTFF features (qsie, qtoue, stoe, stoue) are dependent on the multiple-epoch facility (mepoch). Let's print a warning if these features are enabled without mepoch.
While we're at it, let's move the FEAT_GROUP_INIT for mepochptff down the s390_feature_groups list so it can be properly indexed with its generated S390FeatGroup enum.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20190212011657.18324-1-walling@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v3.1.0, v3.1.0-rc5, v3.1.0-rc4, v3.1.0-rc3, v3.1.0-rc2, v3.1.0-rc1, v3.1.0-rc0 |
|
#
c5cd17af |
| 10-Oct-2018 |
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> |
s390x/cpumodel: Set up CPU model for AP device support
A new CPU model feature and two new CPU model facilities are introduced to support AP devices for a KVM guest.
CPU model features:
1. The S39
s390x/cpumodel: Set up CPU model for AP device support
A new CPU model feature and two new CPU model facilities are introduced to support AP devices for a KVM guest.
CPU model features:
1. The S390_FEAT_AP CPU model feature indicates whether AP instructions are available to the guest. This feature will be enabled only if the AP instructions are available on the linux host as determined by the availability of the KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_APIE VM attribute which is exposed by KVM only if the AP instructions are available on the host.
This feature must be turned on from userspace to execute AP instructions on the KVM guest. The QEMU command line to turn this feature on looks something like this:
qemu-system-s390x ... -cpu xxx,ap=on ...
This feature will be supported for zEC12 and newer CPU models. The feature will not be supported for older models because there are few older systems on which to test and the older crypto cards will be going out of service in the relatively near future.
CPU model facilities:
1. The S390_FEAT_AP_QUERY_CONFIG_INFO feature indicates whether the AP Query Configuration Information (QCI) facility is available to the guest as determined by whether the facility is available on the host. This feature will be exposed by KVM only if the QCI facility is installed on the host.
2. The S390_FEAT_AP_FACILITY_TEST feature indicates whether the AP Facility Test (APFT) facility is available to the guest as determined by whether the facility is available on the host. This feature will be exposed by KVM only if APFT is installed on the host.
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20181010170309.12045-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v3.0.0, v3.0.0-rc4, v2.12.1, v3.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
27e84d4e |
| 31-Jul-2018 |
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> |
s390x/kvm: add etoken facility
Provide the etoken facility. We need to handle cpu model, migration and clear reset.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Janosch F
s390x/kvm: add etoken facility
Provide the etoken facility. We need to handle cpu model, migration and clear reset.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20180731090448.36662-3-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
show more ...
|