History log of /xv6-public/trap.c (Results 1 – 25 of 83)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: xv6-rev11
# 4638cabf 29-Aug-2017 Robert Morris <rtm@csail.mit.edu>

fix runoff complaints about pagination and long lines


# abf847a0 31-Jan-2017 Frans Kaashoek <kaashoek@mit.edu>

Start of an experiment to remove the use of gs for cpu local variables.


Revision tags: xv6-rev9
# ae15515d 02-Sep-2016 Frans Kaashoek <kaashoek@mit.edu>

APIC IDs may not be consecutive and start from zero, so we cannot really use it
as a direct index into cpus. Record apicid in struct cpu and have cpunum() look
for it. Replace cpu->id with cpunum()

APIC IDs may not be consecutive and start from zero, so we cannot really use it
as a direct index into cpus. Record apicid in struct cpu and have cpunum() look
for it. Replace cpu->id with cpunum() everywhere, and replace cpu->id with cpu->apicid.
Thanks to Xi Wang.

show more ...


# 7894fcd2 25-Aug-2016 Frans Kaashoek <kaashoek@mit.edu>

Remove trailing white space with:
for f in *.{h,c}; do sed -i .sed 's/[[:blank:]]*$//' $f; done
(Thanks to Nicolás Wolovick)


Revision tags: xv6-rev8, xv6-rev7, osdi12-submit, xv6-rev6
# 9aa0337d 29-Jul-2011 Frans Kaashoek <kaashoek@Frans-Kaashoeks-MacBook-Pro.local>

Map kernel high
Very important to give qemu memory through PHYSTOP :(


Revision tags: xv6-rev5
# cf4b1ad9 20-Feb-2011 Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>

xv6: formatting, cleanup, rev5 (take 2)


Revision tags: xv6-2010, xv6-rev4
# 5efca905 01-Sep-2010 Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>

Tab police


# 7472b2b4 31-Aug-2010 Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>

Fix too-long lines


# 789b508d 11-Aug-2010 Robert Morris <rtm@nephron.lcs.mit.edu>

uptime() sys call for benchmarking
increase PHYSTOP


# b738a4f1 28-Jul-2010 Frans Kaashoek <kaashoek@26-4-190.dynamic.csail.mit.edu>

kill TLB shoot down code


# 4714c205 23-Jul-2010 Frans Kaashoek <kaashoek@Frans-Kaashoeks-MacBook-Pro.local>

Checkpoint page-table version for SMP
Includes code for TLB shootdown (which actually seems unnecessary for xv6)


# 40889627 02-Jul-2010 Frans Kaashoek <kaashoek@fransk-6.local>

Initial version of single-cpu xv6 with page tables


Revision tags: xv6-rev3
# c9ee77b8 03-Sep-2009 Russ Cox <rsc@x40.(none)>

formatting tweaks


# 48755214 31-Aug-2009 Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>

assorted fixes:
* rename c/cp to cpu/proc
* rename cpu.context to cpu.scheduler
* fix some comments
* formatting for printout


# 0aef8914 08-Aug-2009 Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>

shuffle and tweak for formatting.
pdf has very good page breaks now.
would be a good copy for fall 2009.


# 8b75366c 12-Jul-2009 Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>

s/IRQ_OFFSET/T_IRQ0/: it's a trap number, not an irq number.
move the SYSCALL number up, so does not overlap the IRQ traps.


# 74afa70d 31-May-2009 rsc <rsc>

Add serial port input/output.
Delete parallel port output.
Works well with qemu -nographic mode.


# 21575761 08-Mar-2009 rsc <rsc>

be consistent: no underscores in function names


# 15ce79de 15-Oct-2008 kolya <kolya>

check cp->killed before returning to user from a timer interrupt


Revision tags: xv6-2008
# af7366c9 27-Sep-2007 rsc <rsc>

interrupts during system calls

"It just works."


# ab08960f 27-Sep-2007 rsc <rsc>

Final word on the locking fiasco?

Change pushcli / popcli so that they can never turn on
interrupts unexpectedly. That is, if interrupts are on,
then pushcli(); popcli(); turns them off and back on

Final word on the locking fiasco?

Change pushcli / popcli so that they can never turn on
interrupts unexpectedly. That is, if interrupts are on,
then pushcli(); popcli(); turns them off and back on, but
if they are off to begin with, then pushcli(); popcli(); is
a no-op.

I think our fundamental mistake was having a primitive
(release and then popcli nee spllo) that could turn
interrupts on at unexpected moments instead of being
explicit about when we want to start allowing interrupts.

With the new semantics, all the manual fiddling of ncli
to force interrupts off in certain sections goes away.
In return, we must explicitly mark the places where
we want to enable interrupts unconditionally, by calling sti().
There is only one: inside the scheduler loop.

show more ...


# 3807c1f2 27-Sep-2007 rsc <rsc>

rename splhi/spllo to pushcli/popcli


# 8c8b748a 27-Sep-2007 rsc <rsc>

now spllo is okay


# c8919e65 27-Sep-2007 rsc <rsc>

kernel SMP interruptibility fixes.

Last year, right before I sent xv6 to the printer, I changed the
SETGATE calls so that interrupts would be disabled on entry to
interrupt handlers, and I added the

kernel SMP interruptibility fixes.

Last year, right before I sent xv6 to the printer, I changed the
SETGATE calls so that interrupts would be disabled on entry to
interrupt handlers, and I added the nlock++ / nlock-- in trap()
so that interrupts would stay disabled while the hw handlers
(but not the syscall handler) did their work. I did this because
the kernel was otherwise causing Bochs to triple-fault in SMP
mode, and time was short.

Robert observed yesterday that something was keeping the SMP
preemption user test from working. It turned out that when I
simplified the lapic code I swapped the order of two register
writes that I didn't realize were order dependent. I fixed that
and then since I had everything paged in kept going and tried
to figure out why you can't leave interrupts on during interrupt
handlers. There are a few issues.

First, there must be some way to keep interrupts from "stacking
up" and overflowing the stack. Keeping interrupts off the whole
time solves this problem -- even if the clock tick handler runs
long enough that the next clock tick is waiting when it finishes,
keeping interrupts off means that the handler runs all the way
through the "iret" before the next handler begins. This is not
really a problem unless you are putting too many prints in trap
-- if the OS is doing its job right, the handlers should run
quickly and not stack up.

Second, if xv6 had page faults, then it would be important to
keep interrupts disabled between the start of the interrupt and
the time that cr2 was read, to avoid a scenario like:

p1 page faults [cr2 set to faulting address]
p1 starts executing trapasm.S
clock interrupt, p1 preempted, p2 starts executing
p2 page faults [cr2 set to another faulting address]
p2 starts, finishes fault handler
p1 rescheduled, reads cr2, sees wrong fault address

Alternately p1 could be rescheduled on the other cpu, in which
case it would still see the wrong cr2. That said, I think cr2
is the only interrupt state that isn't pushed onto the interrupt
stack atomically at fault time, and xv6 doesn't care. (This isn't
entirely hypothetical -- I debugged this problem on Plan 9.)

Third, and this is the big one, it is not safe to call cpu()
unless interrupts are disabled. If interrupts are enabled then
there is no guarantee that, between the time cpu() looks up the
cpu id and the time that it the result gets used, the process
has not been rescheduled to the other cpu. For example, the
very commonly-used expression curproc[cpu()] (aka the macro cp)
can end up referring to the wrong proc: the code stores the
result of cpu() in %eax, gets rescheduled to the other cpu at
just the wrong instant, and then reads curproc[%eax].

We use curproc[cpu()] to get the current process a LOT. In that
particular case, if we arranged for the current curproc entry
to be addressed by %fs:0 and just use a different %fs on each
CPU, then we could safely get at curproc even with interrupts
disabled, since the read of %fs would be atomic with the read
of %fs:0. Alternately, we could have a curproc() function that
disables interrupts while computing curproc[cpu()]. I've done
that last one.

Even in the current kernel, with interrupts off on entry to trap,
interrupts are enabled inside release if there are no locks held.
Also, the scheduler's idle loop must be interruptible at times
so that the clock and disk interrupts (which might make processes
runnable) can be handled.

In addition to the rampant use of curproc[cpu()], this little
snippet from acquire is wrong on smp:

if(cpus[cpu()].nlock == 0)
cli();
cpus[cpu()].nlock++;

because if interrupts are off then we might call cpu(), get
rescheduled to a different cpu, look at cpus[oldcpu].nlock, and
wrongly decide not to disable interrupts on the new cpu. The
fix is to always call cli(). But this is wrong too:

if(holding(lock))
panic("acquire");
cli();
cpus[cpu()].nlock++;

because holding looks at cpu(). The fix is:

cli();
if(holding(lock))
panic("acquire");
cpus[cpu()].nlock++;

I've done that, and I changed cpu() to complain the first time
it gets called with interrupts disabled. (It gets called too
much to complain every time.)

I added new functions splhi and spllo that are like acquire and
release but without the locking:

void
splhi(void)
{
cli();
cpus[cpu()].nsplhi++;
}

void
spllo(void)
{
if(--cpus[cpu()].nsplhi == 0)
sti();
}

and I've used those to protect other sections of code that refer
to cpu() when interrupts would otherwise be disabled (basically
just curproc and setupsegs). I also use them in acquire/release
and got rid of nlock.

I'm not thrilled with the names, but I think the concept -- a
counted cli/sti -- is sound. Having them also replaces the
nlock++/nlock-- in trap.c and main.c, which is nice.


Final note: it's still not safe to enable interrupts in
the middle of trap() between lapic_eoi and returning
to user space. I don't understand why, but we get a
fault on pop %es because 0x10 is a bad segment
descriptor (!) and then the fault faults trying to go into
a new interrupt because 0x8 is a bad segment descriptor too!
Triple fault. I haven't debugged this yet.

show more ...


# fbaa7b42 26-Sep-2007 rsc <rsc>

various comment and print tweaks


1234