bpf: Teach verifier that certain helpers accept NULL pointer.

bpf_[sk|inode|task|cgrp]_storage_[get|delete]() and bpf_get_socket_cookie() helpers
perform run-time check that sk|inode|task|cgrp point

bpf: Teach verifier that certain helpers accept NULL pointer.

bpf_[sk|inode|task|cgrp]_storage_[get|delete]() and bpf_get_socket_cookie() helpers
perform run-time check that sk|inode|task|cgrp pointer != NULL.
Teach verifier about this fact and allow bpf programs to pass
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL into such helpers.
It will be used in the subsequent patch that will do
bpf_sk_storage_get(.., skb->sk, ...);
Even when 'skb' pointer is trusted the 'sk' pointer may be NULL.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230404045029.82870-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage_elem

This patch uses bpf_mem_alloc for the task and cgroup local storage that
the bpf prog can easily get a hold of the storage owner's PTR_TO_

bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage_elem

This patch uses bpf_mem_alloc for the task and cgroup local storage that
the bpf prog can easily get a hold of the storage owner's PTR_TO_BTF_ID.
eg. bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be used in some of the kmalloc code
path which will cause deadlock/recursion. bpf_mem_cache_alloc is
deadlock free and will solve a legit use case in [1].

For sk storage, its batch creation benchmark shows a few percent
regression when the sk create/destroy batch size is larger than 32.
The sk creation/destruction happens much more often and
depends on external traffic. Considering it is hypothetical
to be able to cause deadlock with sk storage, it can cross
the bridge to use bpf_mem_alloc till a legit (ie. useful)
use case comes up.

For inode storage, bpf_local_storage_destroy() is called before
waiting for a rcu gp and its memory cannot be reused immediately.
inode stays with kmalloc/kfree after the rcu [or tasks_trace] gp.

A 'bool bpf_ma' argument is added to bpf_local_storage_map_alloc().
Only task and cgroup storage have 'bpf_ma == true' which
means to use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free(). This patch only changes
selem to use bpf_mem_alloc for task and cgroup. The next patch
will change the local_storage to use bpf_mem_alloc also for
task and cgroup.

Here is some more details on the changes:

* memory allocation:
After bpf_mem_cache_alloc(), the SDATA(selem)->data is zero-ed because
bpf_mem_cache_alloc() could return a reused selem. It is to keep
the existing bpf_map_kzalloc() behavior. Only SDATA(selem)->data
is zero-ed. SDATA(selem)->data is the visible part to the bpf prog.
No need to use zero_map_value() to do the zeroing because
bpf_selem_free(..., reuse_now = true) ensures no bpf prog is using
the selem before returning the selem through bpf_mem_cache_free().
For the internal fields of selem, they will be initialized when
linking to the new smap and the new local_storage.

When 'bpf_ma == false', nothing changes in this patch. It will
stay with the bpf_map_kzalloc().

* memory free:
The bpf_selem_free() and bpf_selem_free_rcu() are modified to handle
the bpf_ma == true case.

For the common selem free path where its owner is also being destroyed,
the mem is freed in bpf_local_storage_destroy(), the owner (task
and cgroup) has gone through a rcu gp. The memory can be reused
immediately, so bpf_local_storage_destroy() will call
bpf_selem_free(..., reuse_now = true) which will do
bpf_mem_cache_free() for immediate reuse consideration.

An exception is the delete elem code path. The delete elem code path
is called from the helper bpf_*_storage_delete() and the syscall
bpf_map_delete_elem(). This path is an unusual case for local
storage because the common use case is to have the local storage
staying with its owner life time so that the bpf prog and the user
space does not have to monitor the owner's destruction. For the delete
elem path, the selem cannot be reused immediately because there could
be bpf prog using it. It will call bpf_selem_free(..., reuse_now = false)
and it will wait for a rcu tasks trace gp before freeing the elem. The
rcu callback is changed to do bpf_mem_cache_raw_free() instead of kfree().

When 'bpf_ma == false', it should be the same as before.
__bpf_selem_free() is added to do the kfree_rcu and call_tasks_trace_rcu().
A few words on the 'reuse_now == true'. When 'reuse_now == true',
it is still racing with bpf_local_storage_map_free which is under rcu
protection, so it still needs to wait for a rcu gp instead of kfree().
Otherwise, the selem may be reused by slab for a totally different struct
while the bpf_local_storage_map_free() is still using it (as a
rcu reader). For the inode case, there may be other rcu readers also.
In short, when bpf_ma == false and reuse_now == true => vanilla rcu.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221118190109.1512674-1-namhyung@kernel.org/

Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322215246.1675516-3-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: return long from bpf_map_ops funcs

This patch changes the return types of bpf_map_ops functions to long, where
previously int was returned. Using long allows for bpf programs to maintain
the si

bpf: return long from bpf_map_ops funcs

This patch changes the return types of bpf_map_ops functions to long, where
previously int was returned. Using long allows for bpf programs to maintain
the sign bit in the absence of sign extension during situations where
inlined bpf helper funcs make calls to the bpf_map_ops funcs and a negative
error is returned.

The definitions of the helper funcs are generated from comments in the bpf
uapi header at `include/uapi/linux/bpf.h`. The return type of these
helpers was previously changed from int to long in commit bdb7b79b4ce8. For
any case where one of the map helpers call the bpf_map_ops funcs that are
still returning 32-bit int, a compiler might not include sign extension
instructions to properly convert the 32-bit negative value a 64-bit
negative value.

For example:
bpf assembly excerpt of an inlined helper calling a kernel function and
checking for a specific error:

; err = bpf_map_update_elem(&mymap, &key, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
...
46: call 0xffffffffe103291c ; htab_map_update_elem
; if (err && err != -EEXIST) {
4b: cmp $0xffffffffffffffef,%rax ; cmp -EEXIST,%rax

kernel function assembly excerpt of return value from
`htab_map_update_elem` returning 32-bit int:

movl $0xffffffef, %r9d
...
movl %r9d, %eax

...results in the comparison:
cmp $0xffffffffffffffef, $0x00000000ffffffef

Fixes: bdb7b79b4ce8 ("bpf: Switch most helper return values from 32-bit int to 64-bit long")
Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322194754.185781-3-inwardvessel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Repurpose use_trace_rcu to reuse_now in bpf_local_storage

This patch re-purpose the use_trace_rcu to mean
if the freed memory can be reused immediately or not.
The use_trace_rcu is renamed to r

bpf: Repurpose use_trace_rcu to reuse_now in bpf_local_storage

This patch re-purpose the use_trace_rcu to mean
if the freed memory can be reused immediately or not.
The use_trace_rcu is renamed to reuse_now. Other than
the boolean test is reversed, it should be a no-op.

The following explains the reason for the rename and how it will
be used in a later patch.

In a later patch, bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free will be used
in the bpf_local_storage. The bpf mem allocator will reuse
the freed memory immediately. Some of the free paths in
bpf_local_storage does not support memory to be reused immediately.
These paths are the "delete" elem cases from the bpf_*_storage_delete()
helper and the map_delete_elem() syscall. Note that "delete" elem
before the owner's (sk/task/cgrp/inode) lifetime ended is not
the common usage for the local storage.

The common free path, bpf_local_storage_destroy(), can reuse the
memory immediately. This common path means the storage stays with
its owner until the owner is destroyed.

The above mentioned "delete" elem paths that cannot
reuse immediately always has the 'use_trace_rcu == true'.
The cases that is safe for immediate reuse always have
'use_trace_rcu == false'. Instead of adding another arg
in a later patch, this patch re-purpose this arg
to reuse_now and have the test logic reversed.

In a later patch, 'reuse_now == true' will free to the
bpf_mem_cache_free() where the memory can be reused
immediately. 'reuse_now == false' will go through the
call_rcu_tasks_trace().

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308065936.1550103-7-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Refactor codes into bpf_local_storage_destroy

This patch first renames bpf_local_storage_unlink_nolock to
bpf_local_storage_destroy(). It better reflects that it is only
used when the storage's

bpf: Refactor codes into bpf_local_storage_destroy

This patch first renames bpf_local_storage_unlink_nolock to
bpf_local_storage_destroy(). It better reflects that it is only
used when the storage's owner (sk/task/cgrp/inode) is being kfree().

All bpf_local_storage_destroy's caller is taking the spin lock and
then free the storage. This patch also moves these two steps into
the bpf_local_storage_destroy.

This is a preparation work for a later patch that uses
bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in the bpf_local_storage.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308065936.1550103-3-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf, net: bpf_local_storage memory usage

A new helper is introduced into bpf_local_storage map to calculate the
memory usage. This helper is also used by other maps like
bpf_cgrp_storage, bpf_inode_

bpf, net: bpf_local_storage memory usage

A new helper is introduced into bpf_local_storage map to calculate the
memory usage. This helper is also used by other maps like
bpf_cgrp_storage, bpf_inode_storage, bpf_task_storage and etc.

Note that currently the dynamically allocated storage elements are not
counted in the usage, since it will take extra runtime overhead in the
elements update or delete path. So let's put it aside now, and implement
it in the future when someone really need it.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230305124615.12358-15-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Fix a compilation failure with clang lto build

When building the kernel with clang lto (CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_FULL=y), the
following compilation error will appear:

$ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 -j
.

bpf: Fix a compilation failure with clang lto build

When building the kernel with clang lto (CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_FULL=y), the
following compilation error will appear:

$ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 -j
...
ld.lld: error: ld-temp.o <inline asm>:26889:1: symbol 'cgroup_storage_map_btf_ids' is already defined
cgroup_storage_map_btf_ids:;
^
make[1]: *** [/.../bpf-next/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux_o:61: vmlinux.o] Error 1

In local_storage.c, we have
BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(cgroup_storage_map_btf_ids, struct, bpf_local_storage_map)
Commit c4bcfb38a95e ("bpf: Implement cgroup storage available to
non-cgroup-attached bpf progs") added the above identical BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE
definition in bpf_cgrp_storage.c. With duplicated definitions, llvm linker
complains with lto build.

Also, extracting btf_id of 'struct bpf_local_storage_map' is defined four times
for sk, inode, task and cgrp local storages. Let us define a single global one
with a different name than cgroup_storage_map_btf_ids, which also fixed
the lto compilation error.

Fixes: c4bcfb38a95e ("bpf: Implement cgroup storage available to non-cgroup-attached bpf progs")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221130052147.1591625-1-yhs@fb.com

show more ...

bpf: Refactor some inode/task/sk storage functions for reuse

Refactor codes so that inode/task/sk storage implementation
can maximally share the same code. I also added some comments
in new function

bpf: Refactor some inode/task/sk storage functions for reuse

Refactor codes so that inode/task/sk storage implementation
can maximally share the same code. I also added some comments
in new function bpf_local_storage_unlink_nolock() to make
codes easy to understand. There is no functionality change.

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221026042845.672944-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_delete proto with no deadlock detection

The bpf_lsm and bpf_iter do not recur that will cause a deadlock.
The situation is similar to the bpf_pid_task_storage_delete_el

bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_delete proto with no deadlock detection

The bpf_lsm and bpf_iter do not recur that will cause a deadlock.
The situation is similar to the bpf_pid_task_storage_delete_elem()
which is called from the syscall map_delete_elem. It does not need
deadlock detection. Otherwise, it will cause unnecessary failure
when calling the bpf_task_storage_delete() helper.

This patch adds bpf_task_storage_delete proto that does not do deadlock
detection. It will be used by bpf_lsm and bpf_iter program.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-8-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: bpf_task_storage_delete_recur does lookup first before the deadlock check

Similar to the earlier change in bpf_task_storage_get_recur.
This patch changes bpf_task_storage_delete_recur such that

bpf: bpf_task_storage_delete_recur does lookup first before the deadlock check

Similar to the earlier change in bpf_task_storage_get_recur.
This patch changes bpf_task_storage_delete_recur such that it
does the lookup first. It only returns -EBUSY if it needs to
take the spinlock to do the deletion when potential deadlock
is detected.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-7-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_get proto with no deadlock detection

The bpf_lsm and bpf_iter do not recur that will cause a deadlock.
The situation is similar to the bpf_pid_task_storage_lookup_elem(

bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_get proto with no deadlock detection

The bpf_lsm and bpf_iter do not recur that will cause a deadlock.
The situation is similar to the bpf_pid_task_storage_lookup_elem()
which is called from the syscall map_lookup_elem. It does not need
deadlock detection. Otherwise, it will cause unnecessary failure
when calling the bpf_task_storage_get() helper.

This patch adds bpf_task_storage_get proto that does not do deadlock
detection. It will be used by bpf_lsm and bpf_iter programs.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-6-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Avoid taking spinlock in bpf_task_storage_get if potential deadlock is detected

bpf_task_storage_get() does a lookup and optionally inserts
new data if BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE is present

bpf: Avoid taking spinlock in bpf_task_storage_get if potential deadlock is detected

bpf_task_storage_get() does a lookup and optionally inserts
new data if BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE is present.

During lookup, it will cache the lookup result and caching requires to
acquire a spinlock. When potential deadlock is detected (by the
bpf_task_storage_busy pcpu-counter added in
commit bc235cdb423a ("bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]")),
the current behavior is returning NULL immediately to avoid deadlock. It is
too pessimistic. This patch will go ahead to do a lookup (which is a
lockless operation) but it will avoid caching it in order to avoid
acquiring the spinlock.

When lookup fails to find the data and BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE
is set, an insertion is needed and this requires acquiring a spinlock.
This patch will still return NULL when a potential deadlock is detected.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-5-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Refactor the core bpf_task_storage_get logic into a new function

This patch creates a new function __bpf_task_storage_get() and
moves the core logic of the existing bpf_task_storage_get()
into

bpf: Refactor the core bpf_task_storage_get logic into a new function

This patch creates a new function __bpf_task_storage_get() and
moves the core logic of the existing bpf_task_storage_get()
into this new function. This new function will be shared
by another new helper proto in the latter patch.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-4-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Append _recur naming to the bpf_task_storage helper proto

This patch adds the "_recur" naming to the bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}
proto. In a latter patch, they will only be used by the traci

bpf: Append _recur naming to the bpf_task_storage helper proto

This patch adds the "_recur" naming to the bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}
proto. In a latter patch, they will only be used by the tracing
programs that requires a deadlock detection because a tracing
prog may use bpf_task_storage_{get,delete} recursively and cause a
deadlock.

Another following patch will add a different helper proto for the non
tracing programs because they do not need the deadlock prevention.
This patch does this rename to prepare for this future proto
additions.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-3-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Use this_cpu_{inc|dec|inc_return} for bpf_task_storage_busy

Now migrate_disable() does not disable preemption and under some
architectures (e.g. arm64) __this_cpu_{inc|dec|inc_return} are neith

bpf: Use this_cpu_{inc|dec|inc_return} for bpf_task_storage_busy

Now migrate_disable() does not disable preemption and under some
architectures (e.g. arm64) __this_cpu_{inc|dec|inc_return} are neither
preemption-safe nor IRQ-safe, so for fully preemptible kernel concurrent
lookups or updates on the same task local storage and on the same CPU
may make bpf_task_storage_busy be imbalanced, and
bpf_task_storage_trylock() on the specific cpu will always fail.

Fixing it by using this_cpu_{inc|dec|inc_return} when manipulating
bpf_task_storage_busy.

Fixes: bc235cdb423a ("bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901061938.3789460-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Compute map_btf_id during build time

For now, the field 'map_btf_id' in 'struct bpf_map_ops' for all map
types are computed during vmlinux-btf init:

btf_parse_vmlinux() -> btf_vmlinux_map_id

bpf: Compute map_btf_id during build time

For now, the field 'map_btf_id' in 'struct bpf_map_ops' for all map
types are computed during vmlinux-btf init:

btf_parse_vmlinux() -> btf_vmlinux_map_ids_init()

It will lookup the btf_type according to the 'map_btf_name' field in
'struct bpf_map_ops'. This process can be done during build time,
thanks to Jiri's resolve_btfids.

selftest of map_ptr has passed:

$96 map_ptr:OK
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Fix usage of trace RCU in local storage.

bpf_{sk,task,inode}_storage_free() do not need to use
call_rcu_tasks_trace as no BPF program should be accessing the owner
as it's being destroyed. The

bpf: Fix usage of trace RCU in local storage.

bpf_{sk,task,inode}_storage_free() do not need to use
call_rcu_tasks_trace as no BPF program should be accessing the owner
as it's being destroyed. The only other reader at this point is
bpf_local_storage_map_free() which uses normal RCU.

The only path that needs trace RCU are:

* bpf_local_storage_{delete,update} helpers
* map_{delete,update}_elem() syscalls

Fixes: 0fe4b381a59e ("bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programs")
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220418155158.2865678-1-kpsingh@kernel.org

show more ...

bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage

Currently, local storage memory can only be allocated atomically
(GFP_ATOMIC). This restriction is too strict for sleepable bpf
programs.

In this

bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage

Currently, local storage memory can only be allocated atomically
(GFP_ATOMIC). This restriction is too strict for sleepable bpf
programs.

In this patch, the verifier detects whether the program is sleepable,
and passes the corresponding GFP_KERNEL or GFP_ATOMIC flag as a
5th argument to bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_get. This flag will propagate
down to the local storage functions that allocate memory.

Please note that bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem functions are
invoked by userspace applications through syscalls. Preemption is
disabled before bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem is called, which
means they will always have to allocate memory atomically.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220318045553.3091807-2-joannekoong@fb.com

show more ...

bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programs

Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs.
Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and ino

bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programs

Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs.
Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and inode
storage to be used from sleepable programs. This allows sleepable and
non-sleepable programs to provide shareable annotations on kernel
objects.

Sleepable programs run in trace RCU where as non-sleepable programs run
in a normal RCU critical section i.e. __bpf_prog_enter{_sleepable}
and __bpf_prog_exit{_sleepable}) (rcu_read_lock or rcu_read_lock_trace).

In order to make the local storage maps accessible to both sleepable
and non-sleepable programs, one needs to call both
call_rcu_tasks_trace and call_rcu to wait for both trace and classical
RCU grace periods to expire before freeing memory.

Paul's work on call_rcu_tasks_trace allows us to have per CPU queueing
for call_rcu_tasks_trace. This behaviour can be achieved by setting
rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim=<num_cpus> boot parameter.

In light of these new performance changes and to keep the local storage
code simple, avoid adding a new flag for sleepable maps / local storage
to select the RCU synchronization (trace / classical).

Also, update the dereferencing of the pointers to use
rcu_derference_check (with either the trace or normal RCU locks held)
with a common bpf_rcu_lock_held helper method.

Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211224152916.1550677-2-kpsingh@kernel.org

show more ...

bpf: Introduce btf_tracing_ids

Similar to btf_sock_ids, btf_tracing_ids provides btf ID for task_struct,
file, and vm_area_struct via easy to understand format like
btf_tracing_ids[BTF_TRACING_TYPE_

bpf: Introduce btf_tracing_ids

Similar to btf_sock_ids, btf_tracing_ids provides btf ID for task_struct,
file, and vm_area_struct via easy to understand format like
btf_tracing_ids[BTF_TRACING_TYPE_[TASK|file|VMA]].

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211112150243.1270987-3-songliubraving@fb.com

show more ...

bpf: Consolidate task_struct BTF_ID declarations

No need to have it defined 5 times. Once is enough.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link

bpf: Consolidate task_struct BTF_ID declarations

No need to have it defined 5 times. Once is enough.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6dcefa5bed26fe1226f26683f36819bb53ec19a2.1629772842.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz

show more ...

bpf: Make symbol 'bpf_task_storage_busy' static

The sparse tool complains as follows:

kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c:23:1: warning:
symbol '__pcpu_scope_bpf_task_storage_busy' was not declared. Sho

bpf: Make symbol 'bpf_task_storage_busy' static

The sparse tool complains as follows:

kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c:23:1: warning:
symbol '__pcpu_scope_bpf_task_storage_busy' was not declared. Should it be static?

This symbol is not used outside of bpf_task_storage.c, so this
commit marks it static.

Fixes: bc235cdb423a ("bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210311131505.1901509-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com

show more ...

bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]

BPF helpers bpf_task_storage_[get|delete] could hold two locks:
bpf_local_storage_map_bucket->lock and bpf_local_storage->lock. Cal

bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]

BPF helpers bpf_task_storage_[get|delete] could hold two locks:
bpf_local_storage_map_bucket->lock and bpf_local_storage->lock. Calling
these helpers from fentry/fexit programs on functions in bpf_*_storage.c
may cause deadlock on either locks.

Prevent such deadlock with a per cpu counter, bpf_task_storage_busy. We
need this counter to be global, because the two locks here belong to two
different objects: bpf_local_storage_map and bpf_local_storage. If we
pick one of them as the owner of the counter, it is still possible to
trigger deadlock on the other lock. For example, if bpf_local_storage_map
owns the counters, it cannot prevent deadlock on bpf_local_storage->lock
when two maps are used.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210225234319.336131-3-songliubraving@fb.com

show more ...

bpf: Enable task local storage for tracing programs

To access per-task data, BPF programs usually creates a hash table with
pid as the key. This is not ideal because:
1. The user need to estimate t

bpf: Enable task local storage for tracing programs

To access per-task data, BPF programs usually creates a hash table with
pid as the key. This is not ideal because:
1. The user need to estimate the proper size of the hash table, which may
be inaccurate;
2. Big hash tables are slow;
3. To clean up the data properly during task terminations, the user need
to write extra logic.

Task local storage overcomes these issues and offers a better option for
these per-task data. Task local storage is only available to BPF_LSM. Now
enable it for tracing programs.

Unlike LSM programs, tracing programs can be called in IRQ contexts.
Helpers that access task local storage are updated to use
raw_spin_lock_irqsave() instead of raw_spin_lock_bh().

Tracing programs can attach to functions on the task free path, e.g.
exit_creds(). To avoid allocating task local storage after
bpf_task_storage_free(). bpf_task_storage_get() is updated to not allocate
new storage when the task is not refcounted (task->usage == 0).

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210225234319.336131-2-songliubraving@fb.com

show more ...

bpf: Local storage helpers should check nullness of owner ptr passed

The verifier allows ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID helper arguments to be NULL, so
helper implementations need to check this before dereferenc

bpf: Local storage helpers should check nullness of owner ptr passed

The verifier allows ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID helper arguments to be NULL, so
helper implementations need to check this before dereferencing them.
This was already fixed for the socket storage helpers but not for task
and inode.

The issue can be reproduced by attaching an LSM program to
inode_rename hook (called when moving files) which tries to get the
inode of the new file without checking for its nullness and then trying
to move an existing file to a new path:

mv existing_file new_file_does_not_exist

The report including the sample program and the steps for reproducing
the bug:

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CANaYP3HWkH91SN=wTNO9FL_2ztHfqcXKX38SSE-JJ2voh+vssw@mail.gmail.com

Fixes: 4cf1bc1f1045 ("bpf: Implement task local storage")
Fixes: 8ea636848aca ("bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes")
Reported-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075525.256820-3-kpsingh@kernel.org

show more ...