History log of /linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c (Results 1 – 25 of 136)
Revision Date Author Comments
# b7ffab29 06-May-2024 Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

net: bridge: switchdev: Improve error message for port_obj_add/del functions

Enhance the error reporting mechanism in the switchdev framework to
provide more informative and user-friendly error mess

net: bridge: switchdev: Improve error message for port_obj_add/del functions

Enhance the error reporting mechanism in the switchdev framework to
provide more informative and user-friendly error messages.

Following feedback from users struggling to understand the implications
of error messages like "failed (err=-28) to add object (id=2)", this
update aims to clarify what operation failed and how this might impact
the system or network.

With this change, error messages now include a description of the failed
operation, the specific object involved, and a brief explanation of the
potential impact on the system. This approach helps administrators and
developers better understand the context and severity of errors,
facilitating quicker and more effective troubleshooting.

Example of the improved logging:

[ 70.516446] ksz-switch spi0.0 uplink: Failed to add Port Multicast
Database entry (object id=2) with error: -ENOSPC (-28).
[ 70.516446] Failure in updating the port's Multicast Database could
lead to multicast forwarding issues.
[ 70.516446] Current HW/SW setup lacks sufficient resources.

This comprehensive update includes handling for a range of switchdev
object IDs, ensuring that most operations within the switchdev framework
benefit from clearer error reporting.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# dc489f86 14-Feb-2024 Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>

net: bridge: switchdev: Skip MDB replays of deferred events on offload

Before this change, generation of the list of MDB events to replay
would race against the creation of new group memberships, ei

net: bridge: switchdev: Skip MDB replays of deferred events on offload

Before this change, generation of the list of MDB events to replay
would race against the creation of new group memberships, either from
the IGMP/MLD snooping logic or from user configuration.

While new memberships are immediately visible to walkers of
br->mdb_list, the notification of their existence to switchdev event
subscribers is deferred until a later point in time. So if a replay
list was generated during a time that overlapped with such a window,
it would also contain a replay of the not-yet-delivered event.

The driver would thus receive two copies of what the bridge internally
considered to be one single event. On destruction of the bridge, only
a single membership deletion event was therefore sent. As a
consequence of this, drivers which reference count memberships (at
least DSA), would be left with orphan groups in their hardware
database when the bridge was destroyed.

This is only an issue when replaying additions. While deletion events
may still be pending on the deferred queue, they will already have
been removed from br->mdb_list, so no duplicates can be generated in
that scenario.

To a user this meant that old group memberships, from a bridge in
which a port was previously attached, could be reanimated (in
hardware) when the port joined a new bridge, without the new bridge's
knowledge.

For example, on an mv88e6xxx system, create a snooping bridge and
immediately add a port to it:

root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ ip link add dev br0 up type bridge mcast_snooping 1 && \
> ip link set dev x3 up master br0

And then destroy the bridge:

root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ ip link del dev br0
root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ mvls atu
ADDRESS FID STATE Q F 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a
DEV:0 Marvell 88E6393X
33:33:00:00:00:6a 1 static - - 0 . . . . . . . . . .
33:33:ff:87:e4:3f 1 static - - 0 . . . . . . . . . .
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 1 static - - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a
root@infix-06-0b-00:~$

The two IPv6 groups remain in the hardware database because the
port (x3) is notified of the host's membership twice: once via the
original event and once via a replay. Since only a single delete
notification is sent, the count remains at 1 when the bridge is
destroyed.

Then add the same port (or another port belonging to the same hardware
domain) to a new bridge, this time with snooping disabled:

root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ ip link add dev br1 up type bridge mcast_snooping 0 && \
> ip link set dev x3 up master br1

All multicast, including the two IPv6 groups from br0, should now be
flooded, according to the policy of br1. But instead the old
memberships are still active in the hardware database, causing the
switch to only forward traffic to those groups towards the CPU (port
0).

Eliminate the race in two steps:

1. Grab the write-side lock of the MDB while generating the replay
list.

This prevents new memberships from showing up while we are generating
the replay list. But it leaves the scenario in which a deferred event
was already generated, but not delivered, before we grabbed the
lock. Therefore:

2. Make sure that no deferred version of a replay event is already
enqueued to the switchdev deferred queue, before adding it to the
replay list, when replaying additions.

Fixes: 4f2673b3a2b6 ("net: bridge: add helper to replay port and host-joined mdb entries")
Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# f2e2857b 19-Jul-2023 Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>

net: switchdev: Add a helper to replay objects on a bridge port

When a front panel joins a bridge via another netdevice (typically a LAG),
the driver needs to learn about the objects configured on t

net: switchdev: Add a helper to replay objects on a bridge port

When a front panel joins a bridge via another netdevice (typically a LAG),
the driver needs to learn about the objects configured on the bridge port.
When the bridge port is offloaded by the driver for the first time, this
can be achieved by passing a notifier to switchdev_bridge_port_offload().
The notifier is then invoked for the individual objects (such as VLANs)
configured on the bridge, and can look for the interesting ones.

Calling switchdev_bridge_port_offload() when the second port joins the
bridge lower is unnecessary, but the replay is still needed. To that end,
add a new function, switchdev_bridge_port_replay(), which does only the
replay part of the _offload() function in exactly the same way as that
function.

Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# d62607c3 08-Jun-2022 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

net: rename reference+tracking helpers

Netdev reference helpers have a dev_ prefix for historic
reasons. Renaming the old helpers would be too much churn
but we can rename the tracking ones which ar

net: rename reference+tracking helpers

Netdev reference helpers have a dev_ prefix for historic
reasons. Renaming the old helpers would be too much churn
but we can rename the tracking ones which are relatively
recent and should be the default for new code.

Rename:
dev_hold_track() -> netdev_hold()
dev_put_track() -> netdev_put()
dev_replace_track() -> netdev_ref_replace()

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220608043955.919359-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...


# ec638740 23-Feb-2022 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: remove lag_mod_cb from switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device

When the switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device() event replication helper
was created, my original thought was that FDB eve

net: switchdev: remove lag_mod_cb from switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device

When the switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device() event replication helper
was created, my original thought was that FDB events on LAG interfaces
should most likely be special-cased, not just replicated towards all
switchdev ports beneath that LAG. So this replication helper currently
does not recurse through switchdev lower interfaces of LAG bridge ports,
but rather calls the lag_mod_cb() if that was provided.

No switchdev driver uses this helper for FDB events on LAG interfaces
yet, so that was an assumption which was yet to be tested. It is
certainly usable for that purpose, as my RFC series shows:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220210125201.2859463-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/

however this approach is slightly convoluted because:

- the switchdev driver gets a "dev" that isn't its own net device, but
rather the LAG net device. It must call switchdev_lower_dev_find(dev)
in order to get a handle of any of its own net devices (the ones that
pass check_cb).

- in order for FDB entries on LAG ports to be correctly refcounted per
the number of switchdev ports beneath that LAG, we haven't escaped the
need to iterate through the LAG's lower interfaces. Except that is now
the responsibility of the switchdev driver, because the replication
helper just stopped half-way.

So, even though yes, FDB events on LAG bridge ports must be
special-cased, in the end it's simpler to let switchdev_handle_fdb_*
just iterate through the LAG port's switchdev lowers, and let the
switchdev driver figure out that those physical ports are under a LAG.

The switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device() helper takes a
"foreign_dev_check" callback so it can figure out whether @dev can
autonomously forward to @foreign_dev. DSA fills this method properly:
if the LAG is offloaded by another port in the same tree as @dev, then
it isn't foreign. If it is a software LAG, it is foreign - forwarding
happens in software.

Whether an interface is foreign or not decides whether the replication
helper will go through the LAG's switchdev lowers or not. Since the
lan966x doesn't properly fill this out, FDB events on software LAG
uppers will get called. By changing lan966x_foreign_dev_check(), we can
suppress them.

Whereas DSA will now start receiving FDB events for its offloaded LAG
uppers, so we need to return -EOPNOTSUPP, since we currently don't do
the right thing for them.

Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...


# acd8df58 21-Feb-2022 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: avoid infinite recursion from LAG to bridge with port object handler

The logic from switchdev_handle_port_obj_add_foreign() is directly
adapted from switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_dev

net: switchdev: avoid infinite recursion from LAG to bridge with port object handler

The logic from switchdev_handle_port_obj_add_foreign() is directly
adapted from switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device(), which already
detects events on foreign interfaces and reoffloads them towards the
switchdev neighbors.

However, when we have a simple br0 <-> bond0 <-> swp0 topology and the
switchdev_handle_port_obj_add_foreign() gets called on bond0, we get
stuck into an infinite recursion:

1. bond0 does not pass check_cb(), so we attempt to find switchdev
neighbor interfaces. For that, we recursively call
__switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() for bond0's bridge, br0.

2. __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() recurses through br0's lowers,
essentially calling __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() for bond0

3. Go to step 1.

This happens because switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device() and
switchdev_handle_port_obj_add_foreign() are not exactly the same.
The FDB event helper special-cases LAG interfaces with its lag_mod_cb(),
so this is why we don't end up in an infinite loop - because it doesn't
attempt to treat LAG interfaces as potentially foreign bridge ports.

The problem is solved by looking ahead through the bridge's lowers to
see whether there is any switchdev interface that is foreign to the @dev
we are currently processing. This stops the recursion described above at
step 1: __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(bond0) will not create another
call to __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(br0). Going one step upper
should only happen when we're starting from a bridge port that has been
determined to be "foreign" to the switchdev driver that passes the
foreign_dev_check_cb().

Fixes: c4076cdd21f8 ("net: switchdev: introduce switchdev_handle_port_obj_{add,del} for foreign interfaces")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# c4076cdd 15-Feb-2022 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: introduce switchdev_handle_port_obj_{add,del} for foreign interfaces

The switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() helper is good for replicating a
port object on the lower interfaces of @dev,

net: switchdev: introduce switchdev_handle_port_obj_{add,del} for foreign interfaces

The switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() helper is good for replicating a
port object on the lower interfaces of @dev, if that object was emitted
on a bridge, or on a bridge port that is a LAG.

However, drivers that use this helper limit themselves to a box from
which they can no longer intercept port objects notified on neighbor
ports ("foreign interfaces").

One such driver is DSA, where software bridging with foreign interfaces
such as standalone NICs or Wi-Fi APs is an important use case. There, a
VLAN installed on a neighbor bridge port roughly corresponds to a
forwarding VLAN installed on the DSA switch's CPU port.

To support this use case while also making use of the benefits of the
switchdev_handle_* replication helper for port objects, introduce a new
variant of these functions that crawls through the neighbor ports of
@dev, in search of potentially compatible switchdev ports that are
interested in the event.

The strategy is identical to switchdev_handle_fdb_event_to_device():
if @dev wasn't a switchdev interface, then go one step upper, and
recursively call this function on the bridge that this port belongs to.
At the next recursion step, __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() will
iterate through the bridge's lower interfaces. Among those, some will be
switchdev interfaces, and one will be the original @dev that we came
from. To prevent infinite recursion, we must suppress reentry into the
original @dev, and just call the @add_cb for the switchdev_interfaces.

It looks like this:

br0
/ | \
/ | \
/ | \
swp0 swp1 eth0

1. __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(eth0)
-> check_cb(eth0) returns false
-> eth0 has no lower interfaces
-> eth0's bridge is br0
-> switchdev_lower_dev_find(br0, check_cb, foreign_dev_check_cb))
finds br0

2. __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(br0)
-> check_cb(br0) returns false
-> netdev_for_each_lower_dev
-> check_cb(swp0) returns true, so we don't skip this interface

3. __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(swp0)
-> check_cb(swp0) returns true, so we call add_cb(swp0)

(back to netdev_for_each_lower_dev from 2)
-> check_cb(swp1) returns true, so we don't skip this interface

4. __switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(swp1)
-> check_cb(swp1) returns true, so we call add_cb(swp1)

(back to netdev_for_each_lower_dev from 2)
-> check_cb(eth0) returns false, so we skip this interface to
avoid infinite recursion

Note: eth0 could have been a LAG, and we don't want to suppress the
recursion through its lowers if those exist, so when check_cb() returns
false, we still call switchdev_lower_dev_find() to estimate whether
there's anything worth a recursion beneath that LAG. Using check_cb()
and foreign_dev_check_cb(), switchdev_lower_dev_find() not only figures
out whether the lowers of the LAG are switchdev, but also whether they
actively offload the LAG or not (whether the LAG is "foreign" to the
switchdev interface or not).

The port_obj_info->orig_dev is preserved across recursive calls, so
switchdev drivers still know on which device was this notification
originally emitted.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 7b465f4c 15-Feb-2022 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: rename switchdev_lower_dev_find to switchdev_lower_dev_find_rcu

switchdev_lower_dev_find() assumes RCU read-side critical section
calling context, since it uses netdev_walk_all_lower

net: switchdev: rename switchdev_lower_dev_find to switchdev_lower_dev_find_rcu

switchdev_lower_dev_find() assumes RCU read-side critical section
calling context, since it uses netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu().

Rename it appropriately, in preparation of adding a similar iterator
that assumes writer-side rtnl_mutex protection.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# d8c28581 10-Feb-2022 Minghao Chi (CGEL ZTE) <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

net/switchdev: use struct_size over open coded arithmetic

Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member and make use
of the struct_size() helper in kmalloc(). For example:

struct switchdev_d

net/switchdev: use struct_size over open coded arithmetic

Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member and make use
of the struct_size() helper in kmalloc(). For example:

struct switchdev_deferred_item {
...
unsigned long data[];
};

Make use of the struct_size() helper instead of an open-coded version
in order to avoid any potential type mistakes.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi (CGEL ZTE) <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 4fc003fe 07-Dec-2021 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

net: switchdev: add net device refcount tracker

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>


# 716a30a9 26-Oct-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: merge switchdev_handle_fdb_{add,del}_to_device

To reduce code churn, the same patch makes multiple changes, since they
all touch the same lines:

1. The implementations for these two

net: switchdev: merge switchdev_handle_fdb_{add,del}_to_device

To reduce code churn, the same patch makes multiple changes, since they
all touch the same lines:

1. The implementations for these two are identical, just with different
function pointers. Reduce duplications and name the function pointers
"mod_cb" instead of "add_cb" and "del_cb". Pass the event as argument.

2. Drop the "const" attribute from "orig_dev". If the driver needs to
check whether orig_dev belongs to itself and then
call_switchdev_notifiers(orig_dev, SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED), it
can't, because call_switchdev_notifiers takes a non-const struct
net_device *.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 957e2235 03-Aug-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: make switchdev_bridge_port_{,unoffload} loosely coupled with the bridge

With the introduction of explicit offloading API in switchdev in commit
2f5dc00f7a3e ("net: bridge: switchdev: let driver

net: make switchdev_bridge_port_{,unoffload} loosely coupled with the bridge

With the introduction of explicit offloading API in switchdev in commit
2f5dc00f7a3e ("net: bridge: switchdev: let drivers inform which bridge
ports are offloaded"), we started having Ethernet switch drivers calling
directly into a function exported by net/bridge/br_switchdev.c, which is
a function exported by the bridge driver.

This means that drivers that did not have an explicit dependency on the
bridge before, like cpsw and am65-cpsw, now do - otherwise it is not
possible to call a symbol exported by a driver that can be built as
module unless you are a module too.

There was an attempt to solve the dependency issue in the form of commit
b0e81817629a ("net: build all switchdev drivers as modules when the
bridge is a module"). Grygorii Strashko, however, says about it:

| In my opinion, the problem is a bit bigger here than just fixing the
| build :(
|
| In case, of ^cpsw the switchdev mode is kinda optional and in many
| cases (especially for testing purposes, NFS) the multi-mac mode is
| still preferable mode.
|
| There were no such tight dependency between switchdev drivers and
| bridge core before and switchdev serviced as independent, notification
| based layer between them, so ^cpsw still can be "Y" and bridge can be
| "M". Now for mostly every kernel build configuration the CONFIG_BRIDGE
| will need to be set as "Y", or we will have to update drivers to
| support build with BRIDGE=n and maintain separate builds for
| networking vs non-networking testing. But is this enough? Wouldn't
| it cause 'chain reaction' required to add more and more "Y" options
| (like CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q)?
|
| PS. Just to be sure we on the same page - ARM builds will be forced
| (with this patch) to have CONFIG_TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV=m and so all our
| automation testing will just fail with omap2plus_defconfig.

In the light of this, it would be desirable for some configurations to
avoid dependencies between switchdev drivers and the bridge, and have
the switchdev mode as completely optional within the driver.

Arnd Bergmann also tried to write a patch which better expressed the
build time dependency for Ethernet switch drivers where the switchdev
support is optional, like cpsw/am65-cpsw, and this made the drivers
follow the bridge (compile as module if the bridge is a module) only if
the optional switchdev support in the driver was enabled in the first
place:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210802144813.1152762-1-arnd@kernel.org/

but this still did not solve the fact that cpsw and am65-cpsw now must
be built as modules when the bridge is a module - it just expressed
correctly that optional dependency. But the new behavior is an apparent
regression from Grygorii's perspective.

So to support the use case where the Ethernet driver is built-in,
NET_SWITCHDEV (a bool option) is enabled, and the bridge is a module, we
need a framework that can handle the possible absence of the bridge from
the running system, i.e. runtime bloatware as opposed to build-time
bloatware.

Luckily we already have this framework, since switchdev has been using
it extensively. Events from the bridge side are transmitted to the
driver side using notifier chains - this was originally done so that
unrelated drivers could snoop for events emitted by the bridge towards
ports that are implemented by other drivers (think of a switch driver
with LAG offload that listens for switchdev events on a bonding/team
interface that it offloads).

There are also events which are transmitted from the driver side to the
bridge side, which again are modeled using notifiers.
SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE is an example of this, and deals with
notifying the bridge that a MAC address has been dynamically learned.
So there is a precedent we can use for modeling the new framework.

The difference compared to SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE is that the work
that the bridge needs to do when a port becomes offloaded is blocking in
its nature: replay VLANs, MDBs etc. The calling context is indeed
blocking (we are under rtnl_mutex), but the existing switchdev
notification chain that the bridge is subscribed to is only the atomic
one. So we need to subscribe the bridge to the blocking switchdev
notification chain too.

This patch:
- keeps the driver-side perception of the switchdev_bridge_port_{,un}offload
unchanged
- moves the implementation of switchdev_bridge_port_{,un}offload from
the bridge module into the switchdev module.
- makes everybody that is subscribed to the switchdev blocking notifier
chain "hear" offload & unoffload events
- makes the bridge driver subscribe and handle those events
- moves the bridge driver's handling of those events into 2 new
functions called br_switchdev_port_{,un}offload. These functions
contain in fact the core of the logic that was previously in
switchdev_bridge_port_{,un}offload, just that now we go through an
extra indirection layer to reach them.

Unlike all the other switchdev notification structures, the structure
used to carry the bridge port information, struct
switchdev_notifier_brport_info, does not contain a "bool handled".
This is because in the current usage pattern, we always know that a
switchdev bridge port offloading event will be handled by the bridge,
because the switchdev_bridge_port_offload() call was initiated by a
NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event in the first place, where info->upper_dev is a
bridge. So if the bridge wasn't loaded, then the CHANGEUPPER event
couldn't have happened.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 2b0a5688 21-Jul-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: fix FDB entries towards foreign ports not getting propagated to us

The newly introduced switchdev_handle_fdb_{add,del}_to_device helpers
solved a problem but introduced another one.

net: switchdev: fix FDB entries towards foreign ports not getting propagated to us

The newly introduced switchdev_handle_fdb_{add,del}_to_device helpers
solved a problem but introduced another one. They have a severe design
bug: they do not propagate FDB events on foreign interfaces to us, i.e.
this use case:

br0
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
swp0 eno0
(switchdev) (foreign)

when an address is learned on eno0, what is supposed to happen is that
this event should also be propagated towards swp0. Somehow I managed to
convince myself that this did work correctly, but obviously it does not.

The trouble with foreign interfaces is that we must reach a switchdev
net_device pointer through a foreign net_device that has no direct
upper/lower relationship with it. So we need to do exploratory searching
through the lower interfaces of the foreign net_device's bridge upper
(to reach swp0 from eno0, we must check its upper, br0, for lower
interfaces that pass the check_cb and foreign_dev_check_cb). This is
something that the previous code did not do, it just assumed that "dev"
will become a switchdev interface at some point, somehow, probably by
magic.

With this patch, assisted address learning on the CPU port works again
in DSA:

ip link add br0 type bridge
ip link set swp0 master br0
ip link set eno0 master br0
ip link set br0 up

[ 46.708929] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0: Adding FDB entry towards eno0, addr 00:04:9f:05:f4:ab vid 0 as host address

Fixes: 8ca07176ab00 ("net: switchdev: introduce a fanout helper for SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE")
Reported-by: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 71f4f89a 20-Jul-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: recurse into __switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device

The difference between __switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device and
switchdev_handle_del_to_device is that the former takes an extra
ori

net: switchdev: recurse into __switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device

The difference between __switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device and
switchdev_handle_del_to_device is that the former takes an extra
orig_dev argument, while the latter starts with dev == orig_dev.

We should recurse into the variant that does not lose the orig_dev along
the way. This is relevant when deleting FDB entries pointing towards a
bridge (dev changes to the lower interfaces, but orig_dev shouldn't).

The addition helper already recurses properly, just the deletion one
doesn't.

Fixes: 8ca07176ab00 ("net: switchdev: introduce a fanout helper for SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 8ca07176 19-Jul-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: introduce a fanout helper for SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE

Currently DSA has an issue with FDB entries pointing towards the bridge
in the presence of br_fdb_replay() being calle

net: switchdev: introduce a fanout helper for SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE

Currently DSA has an issue with FDB entries pointing towards the bridge
in the presence of br_fdb_replay() being called at port join and leave
time.

In particular, each bridge port will ask for a replay for the FDB
entries pointing towards the bridge when it joins, and for another
replay when it leaves.

This means that for example, a bridge with 4 switch ports will notify
DSA 4 times of the bridge MAC address.

But if the MAC address of the bridge changes during the normal runtime
of the system, the bridge notifies switchdev [ once ] of the deletion of
the old MAC address as a local FDB towards the bridge, and of the
insertion [ again once ] of the new MAC address as a local FDB.

This is a problem, because DSA keeps the old MAC address as a host FDB
entry with refcount 4 (4 ports asked for it using br_fdb_replay). So the
old MAC address will not be deleted. Additionally, the new MAC address
will only be installed with refcount 1, and when the first switch port
leaves the bridge (leaving 3 others as still members), it will delete
with it the new MAC address of the bridge from the local FDB entries
kept by DSA (because the br_fdb_replay call on deletion will bring the
entry's refcount from 1 to 0).

So the problem, really, is that the number of br_fdb_replay() calls is
not matched with the refcount that a host FDB is offloaded to DSA during
normal runtime.

An elegant way to solve the problem would be to make the switchdev
notification emitted by br_fdb_change_mac_address() result in a host FDB
kept by DSA which has a refcount exactly equal to the number of ports
under that bridge. Then, no matter how many DSA ports join or leave that
bridge, the host FDB entry will always be deleted when there are exactly
zero remaining DSA switch ports members of the bridge.

To implement the proposed solution, we remember that the switchdev
objects and port attributes have some helpers provided by switchdev,
which can be optionally called by drivers:
switchdev_handle_port_obj_{add,del} and switchdev_handle_port_attr_set.
These helpers:
- fan out a switchdev object/attribute emitted for the bridge towards
all the lower interfaces that pass the check_cb().
- fan out a switchdev object/attribute emitted for a bridge port that is
a LAG towards all the lower interfaces that pass the check_cb().

In other words, this is the model we need for the FDB events too:
something that will keep an FDB entry emitted towards a physical port as
it is, but translate an FDB entry emitted towards the bridge into N FDB
entries, one per physical port.

Of course, there are many differences between fanning out a switchdev
object (VLAN) on 3 lower interfaces of a LAG and fanning out an FDB
entry on 3 lower interfaces of a LAG. Intuitively, an FDB entry towards
a LAG should be treated specially, because FDB entries are unicast, we
can't just install the same address towards 3 destinations. It is
imaginable that drivers might want to treat this case specifically, so
create some methods for this case and do not recurse into the LAG lower
ports, just the bridge ports.

DSA also listens for FDB entries on "foreign" interfaces, aka interfaces
bridged with us which are not part of our hardware domain: think an
Ethernet switch bridged with a Wi-Fi AP. For those addresses, DSA
installs host FDB entries. However, there we have the same problem
(those host FDB entries are installed with a refcount of only 1) and an
even bigger one which we did not have with FDB entries towards the
bridge:

br_fdb_replay() is currently not called for FDB entries on foreign
interfaces, just for the physical port and for the bridge itself.

So when DSA sniffs an address learned by the software bridge towards a
foreign interface like an e1000 port, and then that e1000 leaves the
bridge, DSA remains with the dangling host FDB address. That will be
fixed separately by replaying all FDB entries and not just the ones
towards the port and the bridge.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 69bfac96 27-Jun-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: add a context void pointer to struct switchdev_notifier_info

In the case where the driver asks for a replay of a certain type of
event (port object or attribute) for a bridge port th

net: switchdev: add a context void pointer to struct switchdev_notifier_info

In the case where the driver asks for a replay of a certain type of
event (port object or attribute) for a bridge port that is a LAG, it may
do so because this port has just joined the LAG.

But there might already be other switchdev ports in that LAG, and it is
preferable that those preexisting switchdev ports do not act upon the
replayed event.

The solution is to add a context to switchdev events, which is NULL most
of the time (when the bridge layer initiates the call) but which can be
set to a value controlled by the switchdev driver when a replay is
requested. The driver can then check the context to figure out if all
ports within the LAG should act upon the switchdev event, or just the
ones that match the context.

We have to modify all switchdev_handle_* helper functions as well as the
prototypes in the drivers that use these helpers too, because these
helpers hide the underlying struct switchdev_notifier_info from us and
there is no way to retrieve the context otherwise.

The context structure will be populated and used in later patches.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# dcbdf135 13-Feb-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set

The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers
for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and
SWITCHDEV_ATTR

net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set

The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers
for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 4c08c586 12-Feb-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes

When a struct switchdev_attr is notified through switchdev, there is no
way to report informational messages, unlike for struct switchdev_obj.

Si

net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes

When a struct switchdev_attr is notified through switchdev, there is no
way to report informational messages, unlike for struct switchdev_obj.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 20776b46 25-Jan-2021 Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>

net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP

It's not true that switchdev_port_obj_notify() only inspects the
->handled field of "struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info" i

net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP

It's not true that switchdev_port_obj_notify() only inspects the
->handled field of "struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info" if
call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers() returns 0 - there's a WARN_ON()
triggering for a non-zero return combined with ->handled not being
true. But the real problem here is that -EOPNOTSUPP is not being
properly handled.

The wrapper functions switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() et al change a
return value of -EOPNOTSUPP to 0, and the treatment of ->handled in
switchdev_port_obj_notify() seems to be designed to change that back
to -EOPNOTSUPP in case nobody actually acted on the notifier (i.e.,
everybody returned -EOPNOTSUPP).

Currently, as soon as some device down the stack passes the check_cb()
check, ->handled gets set to true, which means that
switchdev_port_obj_notify() cannot actually ever return -EOPNOTSUPP.

This, for example, means that the detection of hardware offload
support in the MRP code is broken: switchdev_port_obj_add() used by
br_mrp_switchdev_send_ring_test() always returns 0, so since the MRP
code thinks the generation of MRP test frames has been offloaded, no
such frames are actually put on the wire. Similarly,
br_mrp_switchdev_set_ring_role() also always returns 0, causing
mrp->ring_role_offloaded to be set to 1.

To fix this, continue to set ->handled true if any callback returns
success or any error distinct from -EOPNOTSUPP. But if all the
callbacks return -EOPNOTSUPP, make sure that ->handled stays false, so
the logic in switchdev_port_obj_notify() can propagate that
information.

Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7ea ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API")
Fixes: f30f0601eb93 ("switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices")
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125124116.102928-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...


# bae33f2b 09-Jan-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port attributes

Since the introduction of the switchdev API, port attributes were
transmitted to drivers for offloading using a two-step transac

net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port attributes

Since the introduction of the switchdev API, port attributes were
transmitted to drivers for offloading using a two-step transactional
model, with a prepare phase that was supposed to catch all errors, and a
commit phase that was supposed to never fail.

Some classes of failures can never be avoided, like hardware access, or
memory allocation. In the latter case, merely attempting to move the
memory allocation to the preparation phase makes it impossible to avoid
memory leaks, since commit 91cf8eceffc1 ("switchdev: Remove unused
transaction item queue") which has removed the unused mechanism of
passing on the allocated memory between one phase and another.

It is time we admit that separating the preparation from the commit
phase is something that is best left for the driver to decide, and not
something that should be baked into the API, especially since there are
no switchdev callers that depend on this.

This patch removes the struct switchdev_trans member from switchdev port
attribute notifier structures, and converts drivers to not look at this
member.

In part, this patch contains a revert of my previous commit 2e554a7a5d8a
("net: dsa: propagate switchdev vlan_filtering prepare phase to
drivers").

For the most part, the conversion was trivial except for:
- Rocker's world implementation based on Broadcom OF-DPA had an odd
implementation of ofdpa_port_attr_bridge_flags_set. The conversion was
done mechanically, by pasting the implementation twice, then only
keeping the code that would get executed during prepare phase on top,
then only keeping the code that gets executed during the commit phase
on bottom, then simplifying the resulting code until this was obtained.
- DSA's offloading of STP state, bridge flags, VLAN filtering and
multicast router could be converted right away. But the ageing time
could not, so a shim was introduced and this was left for a further
commit.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> # hellcreek
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> # RTL8366RB
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...


# cf6def51 09-Jan-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now

After the removal of the transactional model inside
switchdev_port_obj_add_now, it has no added value and we can just call
switchdev_port_obj_notify

net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now

After the removal of the transactional model inside
switchdev_port_obj_add_now, it has no added value and we can just call
switchdev_port_obj_notify directly, bypassing this function. Let's
delete it.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...


# ffb68fc5 09-Jan-2021 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers

Since the introduction of the switchdev API, port objects were
transmitted to drivers for offloading using a two-step tran

net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers

Since the introduction of the switchdev API, port objects were
transmitted to drivers for offloading using a two-step transactional
model, with a prepare phase that was supposed to catch all errors, and a
commit phase that was supposed to never fail.

Some classes of failures can never be avoided, like hardware access, or
memory allocation. In the latter case, merely attempting to move the
memory allocation to the preparation phase makes it impossible to avoid
memory leaks, since commit 91cf8eceffc1 ("switchdev: Remove unused
transaction item queue") which has removed the unused mechanism of
passing on the allocated memory between one phase and another.

It is time we admit that separating the preparation from the commit
phase is something that is best left for the driver to decide, and not
something that should be baked into the API, especially since there are
no switchdev callers that depend on this.

This patch removes the struct switchdev_trans member from switchdev port
object notifier structures, and converts drivers to not look at this
member.

Where driver conversion is trivial (like in the case of the Marvell
Prestera driver, NXP DPAA2 switch, TI CPSW, and Rocker drivers), it is
done in this patch.

Where driver conversion needs more attention (DSA, Mellanox Spectrum),
the conversion is left for subsequent patches and here we only fake the
prepare/commit phases at a lower level, just not in the switchdev
notifier itself.

Where the code has a natural structure that is best left alone as a
preparation and a commit phase (as in the case of the Ocelot switch),
that structure is left in place, just made to not depend upon the
switchdev transactional model.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...


# ea6754ae 22-Sep-2020 Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>

net: switchdev: Fixed kerneldoc warning

Update kernel-doc line comments to fix warnings reported by make W=1.
net/switchdev/switchdev.c:413: warning: Function parameter or
member 'extack' not descri

net: switchdev: Fixed kerneldoc warning

Update kernel-doc line comments to fix warnings reported by make W=1.
net/switchdev/switchdev.c:413: warning: Function parameter or
member 'extack' not described in 'call_switchdev_notifiers'

Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# c8af73f0 12-Jul-2020 Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

net: switchdev: kerneldoc fixes

Simple fixes which require no deep knowledge of the code.

Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Mille

net: switchdev: kerneldoc fixes

Simple fixes which require no deep knowledge of the code.

Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 07c6f980 26-Feb-2020 Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

net: switchdev: do not propagate bridge updates across bridges

When configuring a tree of independent bridges, propagating changes
from the upper bridge across a bridge master to the lower bridge
po

net: switchdev: do not propagate bridge updates across bridges

When configuring a tree of independent bridges, propagating changes
from the upper bridge across a bridge master to the lower bridge
ports brings surprises.

For example, a lower bridge may have vlan filtering enabled. It
may have a vlan interface attached to the bridge master, which may
then be incorporated into another bridge. As soon as the lower
bridge vlan interface is attached to the upper bridge, the lower
bridge has vlan filtering disabled.

This occurs because switchdev recursively applies its changes to
all lower devices no matter what.

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


123456