History log of /netbsd/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_binary.c (Results 1 – 8 of 8)
Revision Date Author Comments
# 5b5d646f 14-Jul-2023 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

lint: clean up comments, add a test for the '?:' operator


# ea649623 28-Mar-2023 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

lint: warn about extern declarations outside headers

https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2023/03/15/msg013727.html


# 53ed6e86 17-Jun-2022 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

tests/lint: make 'expect+-' comments stricter

Previously, the expectations from these comments were already satisfied
if the expectation occurred somewhere in the actual message from lint.
This mean

tests/lint: make 'expect+-' comments stricter

Previously, the expectations from these comments were already satisfied
if the expectation occurred somewhere in the actual message from lint.
This meant that the prefix 'error:' or 'warning:' could be omitted from
the 'expect' comment. These omissions were hard to see in a manual
review. Now any omissions must be visually marked with '...'.

The test msg_342 now reports its messages properly as being in the file
msg_342.c, rather than msg_341.c. This had been a copy-and-paste
mistake.

show more ...


# 6af07fc3 01-Aug-2021 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

tests/lint: re-add the test for __uint128_t


# 952c38f9 01-Aug-2021 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

tests/lint: fully cover the usual arithmetic conversions


# eddff605 01-Aug-2021 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

lint: fix usual arithmetic conversions for 128-bit integer types


# 9d5f3d15 01-Aug-2021 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

lint: demonstrate wrong integer conversion for __uint128_t


# 2b6f2595 01-Aug-2021 rillig <rillig@NetBSD.org>

tests/lint: test the usual arithmetic conversions

The function 'balance' does not mention __uint128_t and nevertheless
works as expected. Need to investigate further.